Search

OBJECTIVE To obtain a legal understanding of the “key” or “critical” portions of an operation, pertaining to attending supervision, resident autonomy, and patient safety. DESIGN Snowball sampling, a subset of purposive sampling, was used to develop a population of 47 risk managers and legal counsel, who were given an online, qualitative questionnaire. Interpretive description was used to analyze qualitative data. Individual responses were coded with simultaneous categorization and assessment of underlying relationships. SETTING Online, qualitative questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS Hospital risk managers and legal counsel from across the United States. RESULTS Overall, 25 of 47 (53%) risk managers completed the survey. Qualitative responses could be organized into 3 major themes (1) variation in the definition of “key” or “critical” portions of an operation, (2) differing expectations of attending supervision and resident autonomy, and (3) the need for clear communication and trust among attendings, residents, and patients. CONCLUSIONS Among risk managers, the primary liaisons between surgeons and patients in malpractice litigation, there is widespread variation in understanding the “key” and “critical” portions of an operation and the dynamic between appropriate attending supervision and resident autonomy. Better collaboration and transparency between surgeons and legal experts are required to facilitate a shared mental model regarding attending supervision and resident autonomy.

Background Lack of transparency and meaningful assessment in surgical residency has led to inconsistent intraoperative entrustment and highly variable trainee competence at graduation. The relationship between faculty entrustment and resident entrustability on clinical competency remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the dynamic between entrustment/entrustability and clinical competency in general surgery residency. Methods Intraoperative observations were conducted across a 22-month period at an academic tertiary center. Entrustment/entrustability were measured using OpTrust. Clinical competencies were appraised via ACGME Milestones and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scores. Mixed effects linear regression was used to investigate the relationship among overall ACGME Milestone scores, OSATS domain scores, and overall OpTrust scores. Results Overall OpTrust scores significantly correlated with overall Milestone scores and multiple OSATS score domains. Conclusions OpTrust demonstrated a positive association between ACGME general surgery Milestones and OSATS scores. Overall, OpTrust may help optimize intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, facilitating surgical trainee success during residency.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of a novel faculty and resident educational bundle focused on development of faculty-resident behaviors and entrustment in the operating room. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA As surgical training environments are orienting to entrustable professional activities (EPAs), successful transitions to this model will require significant faculty and resident development. Identifying an effective educational initiative which prepares faculty and residents for optimizing assessment, teaching, learning, and interacting in this model is critical. METHODS From September 2015 to June 2017, an experimental study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS). Case observations took place across general, plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgical specialties. A total of 117 operating room observations were conducted during Phase I of the study and 108 operating room observations were conducted during Phase II following the educational intervention. Entrustment behaviors were rated for 56 faculty and 73 resident participants using OpTrust, a validated intraoperative entrustment instrument. RESULTS Multiple regression analysis showed a significant increase in faculty entrustment (Phase I = 2.32 vs Phase II = 2.56, P < 0.027) and resident entrustability (Phase I = 2.16 vs Phase II = 2.40, P < 0.029) scores following exposure to the educational intervention. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows improved intraoperative entrustment following implementation of faculty and resident development, indicating the efficacy of this innovative educational bundle. This represents a crucial component in the implementation of a competency-based assessment framework like EPAs.

Background Operative experience with an appropriate degree of supervised autonomy is critical to resident training. Progressively greater intraoperative entrustment has been associated with gradually higher levels of resident autonomy. This study attempts to identify consistently observed intraoperative behaviors that are linked with higher resident entrustment. Methods This qualitative study analyzed observational notes recorded by trained raters who provided entrustment scores for 204 surgical cases at Michigan Medicine from 2015 to 2017. Notes were coded in NVivo12. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and patterns within the data. Results The analysis generated 144 codes. Codes were clustered into 10 themes. These themes manifested differently in intraoperative behaviors strongly associated with high entrustment versus low entrustment. Conclusion This study demonstrates key differences in intraoperative behaviors exhibited by residents and faculty in high and low entrustment interactions. Awareness of behaviors that enhance entrustment can help faculty augment resident learning and enable higher resident operative autonomy.

BACKGROUND Intraoperative resident autonomy has been compromised secondary to expectations for increased supervision without defined parameters for safe progressive independence, diffusion of training experience, and more to learn with less time. Surgical residents who are insufficiently entrusted during training attain less autonomy, confidence, and even clinical competency, potentially affecting future patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine if OpTrust, an educational intervention for increasing intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, negatively impacts patient outcomes after general surgery procedures. METHODS Surgical faculty and residents received OpTrust training and instruction to promote intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability. A post-intervention OpTrust cohort was compared to historical and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the impact of the OpTrust intervention and time on patient outcomes. SETTING Single tertiary academic center. PARTICIPANTS General surgery faculty and residents. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S) Thirty-day postoperative outcomes, including mortality, any complication, reoperation, readmission, and length of stay. RESULTS A total of 8890 surgical procedures were included. After risk adjustment, overall patient outcomes were similar. Multivariable regression estimating the effect of the OpTrust intervention and time revealed similar patient outcomes with no increased risk (P > 0.05) of mortality {odds ratio (OR), 2.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-5.6]}, any complication [OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.76-1.3)], reoperation [OR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-1.0)], readmission [OR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.2)], and length of stay [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.86-1.1)] compared to the historic and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. CONCLUSIONS OpTrust, an educational intervention to increase faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, does not compromise postoperative patient outcomes. Integrating faculty and resident development to further enhance entrustment and entrustability through OpTrust may help facilitate increased resident autonomy within the safety net of surgical training without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.

Background Optimizing intraoperative education is critical for development of autonomous residents. Faculty decisions concerning intraoperative entrustment determine the degree to which a resident gains intraoperative responsibility. Accordingly, residents exhibit entrustable behaviors that further faculty entrustment in the operating room. Little empiric evidence exists evaluating how the sex of a resident influences faculty-resident decisions of entrustment. Studies involving perception-based measurements of autonomy report inequities for women residents. We sought to assess faculty behaviors in entrustment in relation to resident sex using OpTrust, a third-party objective measurement tool. Methods From September 2015 to June 2017 at the University of Michigan, surgical cases were observed and entrustment behaviors were rated using OpTrust. Critical case sampling was used to generate variation in operation type, case difficulty, faculty-resident pairings, faculty experience, and the level of the resident's training. Independent sample t-tests were conducted to compare faculty entrustment scores, as well as resident entrustability scores. Results A total of 56 faculty and 73 residents were observed across 223 surgical cases from 4 surgical specialties: general, plastic, thoracic, and vascular. There was no difference in faculty entrustment or entrustability scores between women and men (2.54 vs 2.35, P = .117 and 2.32 vs 2.22, P = .393, respectively). Conclusion Using OpTrust scores, we found that a resident's sex does not appear to influence faculty entrustment in the OR. Faculty entrustment scores for women and men residents are similar across cases. This observation suggests that during the intraoperative interaction, faculty are not extending entrustment or opportunities for autonomy differently to women or men. Future research is needed to identify and measure perioperative elements that inform resident autonomy, which may contribute to inequities for women residents.

Background Changes in the surgical training landscape have sparked an interest in developing new educational models anchored on entrustment assessment. We sought to optimize the validated OpTrust entrustment assessment tool by comparing ratings from short-course video reviews to previously validated intraoperative assessments. Methods Entrustment assessment scores for video-based and 1-h (short-course) observations were compared to previously validated intraoperative assessment scores. Faculty and residents were surveyed for their perceptions related to operative observation. Results There was a strong association between entrustment scores when comparing in-person to video-based observations (R2 = 0.76–0.84, p 97%) felt observation did not negatively impact operative experience. Conclusions Assessment of entrustment behaviors using short-course video review provides a feasible approach to intraoperative assessment. This latest application of OpTrust allows for the tool to be incorporated into surgical training programs across a variety of environments.

Faculty entrustment decisions affect resident entrustability behaviors and surgical autonomy. The relationship between entrustability and autonomy is not well understood. This pilot study explores that relationship.108 case observations were completed. Entrustment behaviors were rated using OpTrust. Residents completed a Zwisch self-assessment to measure surgical autonomy. Resident perceived autonomy was collected for 67 cases used for this pilot study.Full entrustability was observed in 5 of the 108 observed cases. Residents in our study did not report full autonomy. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient identified that resident entrustability was positively correlated with perceived resident autonomy (ρ = 0.66, p 0.05). Ordinal logistic regression assessed the relationship between resident entrustability and autonomy. The relationship persisted while controlling for PGY level, gender, and case complexity (OR = 8.42, SEM = 4.54, p 0.000).Resident entrustability is positively associated with perceived autonomy, yet full entrustability is not translating to the perception of full autonomy for residents.

Importance Sex equity is elusive in academic surgery departments across the United States. Persistent inequities remain a considerable problem and inhibit professional advancement for female surgeons. Identifying the factors that promulgate sex discrepancies may provide a framework for institutional growth and personal progress for women. Objective To identify barriers and facilitators to success at the individual and organizational level to develop evidence-based interventions designed to close the sex gap in surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study included 26 female participants who were current and former surgical faculty employed by Michigan Medicine, the health system of the University of Michigan, between 2000 and 2017. Semistructured personal interviews were conducted from June 28 to September 29, 2017, via telephone. Each interview lasted 45 minutes to 1 hour. Interviews were recorded and then transcribed for analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures The interview included 7 questions referring to the surgeon’s experience with the Michigan Medicine Department of Surgery and 7 questions referring to nonspecific areas of interest. Results The 26 participants in this study ranged in age from 32 to 64 years, with faculty experience ranging from 3 to 22 years. Thematic analysis was used to locate, analyze, and report patterns within the data related to barriers and facilitators for women in academic medicine. Three major themes were identified by researchers. Participants reported that (1) organizational culture and institutional policies affect opportunities for advancement; (2) relational interactions with leadership, mentors, colleagues, and staff affect promotion and attrition; and (3) individual characteristics mediate the perception of professional and personal success. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study of 26 female academic surgeons, a complex matrix of organizational and individual factors were found to contribute to sex inequities in academic surgery. This research may provide insight into the sex biases that inhibit advancement, may inform strategies that facilitate progress, and may inspire interventions that could help eliminate institutional and individual barriers to the academic success of women.

A critical balance is sought between faculty supervision, appropriate resident autonomy, and patient safety in the operating room. Variability in the release of supervision during surgery represents a potential safety hazard to patients. A better understanding of intraoperative faculty-resident interactions is needed to determine what factors influence entrustment.To assess faculty and resident intraoperative entrustment behaviors and to determine whether faculty behaviors drive resident entrustability in the operating room.This observational study was conducted from September 1, 2015, to August 31, 2016, at Michigan Medicine, the University of Michigan's health care system. Two surgical residents, 1 medical student, 2 behavioral research scientists, and 1 surgical faculty member observed surgical intraoperative interactions between faculty and residents in 117 cases involving 28 faculty and 35 residents and rated entrustment behaviors. Without intervening in the interaction, 1 or 2 researchers observed each case and noted behaviors, verbal and nonverbal communication, and interaction processes. Immediately after the case, observers completed an assessment using OpTrust, a validated tool designed to assess progressive entrustment in the operating room. Purposeful sampling was used to generate variation in type of operation, case difficulty, faculty-resident pairings, faculty experience, and resident training level.Observer results in the form of entrustability scores (range, 1-4, with 4 indicating full entrustability) were compared with resident- and faculty-reported measures. Difficulty of operation was rated on a scale of 1 to 3 (higher scores indicate greater difficulty). Path analysis was used to explore direct and indirect effects of the predictors. Associations between resident entrustability and observation duration, observation month, and faculty entrustment scores were assessed by pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients.Twenty-eight faculty and 35 residents were observed across 117 surgical cases from 4 surgical specialties. Cases observed by postgraduate year (PGY) of residents were distributed as follows: PGY-1, 21 (18%); 2, 15 (13%); 3, 17 (15%); 4, 27 (23%); 5, 28 (24%); and 6, 9 (8%). Case difficulty was evenly distributed: 36 (33%) were rated easy/straightforward; 43 (40%), moderately difficult; and 29 (27%), very difficult by attending physicians. Path analysis showed that the association of PGY with resident entrustability was mediated by faculty entrustment (0.23 [.03]; P .001). At the univariate level, case difficulty (mean [SD] resident entrustability score range, 1.97 [0.75] for easy/straightforward cases to 2.59 [0.82] for very difficult cases; F = 6.69; P = .01), PGY (range, 1.31 [0.28] for PGY-1 to 3.16 [0.54] for PGY-6; F = 22.85; P .001), and faculty entrustment (2.27 [0.79]; R2 = 0.91; P .001) were significantly associated with resident entrustability. Mean (SD) resident entrustability scores were highest for very difficult cases (2.59 [0.82]) and PGY-6 (3.16 [0.54]).Faculty entrustment behaviors may be the primary drivers of resident entrustability. Faculty entrustment is a feature of faculty surgeons' teaching style and could be amenable to faculty development efforts.