Search

ObjectivesTo systematically identify, synthesise and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, posttraumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash associated disorders (WAD).Study design and settingPsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (9 November, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines.ResultsMeasurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia – 11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate/high quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS and PFActS-C. Whereas, the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash.ConclusionUntil further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, post-traumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Study Design and Setting: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (November 9, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines. Results: Measurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate- or high-quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS, and PFActS-C, whereas the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash. Conclusion: Until further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS, or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims.

The Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) was developed to identify potential physiological system impairment (PSI) underlying persistent symptoms post-mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This study evaluates PSI in individuals 4 weeks to 6 months post-mTBI using the BCTT "failure" criteria, and additional exploratory measures of test duration and heart rate (HR) response.Tertiary hospital and university.Participants included 73 individuals 4 weeks to 6 months post-mTBI and a comparison group of 39 healthy controls (HCs). The mTBI group was further subgrouped at screening into those considering themselves asymptomatic (Asymp mTBI) (n = 35) or symptomatic (Symp mTBI) (n = 36).Observational cohort study.BCTT; failure rate (%), test duration (minutes), HR responses.Thirty percent of the mTBI group (including 50% of the Symp and 9% of the Asymp subgroups) failed the BCTT. BCTT duration and associated overall HR change was significantly lower in the mTBI group and Symp subgroup compared with HCs. Compared with HCs maximal HR percentage was higher for the first 4 minutes of the test in the mTBI group, and for the first 2 minutes of the test for the Symp subgroup.Individuals post-mTBI demonstrated PSI impairment subacutely. In some individuals this was despite an initially reported absence of symptoms. The study also showed some preliminary evidence that BCTT duration and HR responses may be additionally informative post-mTBI.

Background Little is known about the management experiences, needs and preferences of individuals seeking care for persistent intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Investigating these experiences may improve understanding of the impact management has on individuals, and factors that shape these experiences. This information may advance current practice and guide future management of individuals with intra-articular TMD. Objectives To investigate the management experiences, needs and preferences of individuals with persistent intra-articular TMD. Methods A qualitative study was performed. Thirteen eligible participants (mean age 32.7 years, 12 female) were recruited via purposive sampling, and interviewed using a semi-structured framework. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results Four themes were established from interview data: (i) searching for help; (ii) wanting answers; (iii) wanting to regain control; and (iv) meeting needs, preferences and expectations, and the implications on care. Numerous factors influenced the experiences of those seeking care, including the ability to navigate care and management expectations. Specific to intra-articular TMD, the absence of pain made seeking care harder, and often, patients perceived neglect of mechanical symptoms by healthcare practitioners, which negatively impacted care. Often, those wanting management expressed the need for answers and to regain control over their jaw symptoms. Conclusions Strategies to improve healthcare navigation are needed for those wanting help for intra-articular TMD. Within management, a person-centred approach is encouraged. Practitioners should respect individuals' specific needs and preferences, and address underlying management expectations, to facilitate positive care experiences. Consideration of symptoms other than pain in intra-articular TMD populations is paramount.

To determine reference values, including the appropriate number of repetitions, and test-retest reliability of the torsion and conventional cervical joint position sense (JPS) tests.Phase 1) Cross-sectional design to determine reference values and the appropriate number of repetitions; Phase 2) repeated-measures concordance design (test-retest reliability). Sixty-eight healthy participants performed 10 repetitions of randomized rotation left and right for both cervical JPS tests using a laser projected onto a target. Thirty participants returned for the same evaluation process one week later.The age-stratified reference values for the torsion JPS test showed greater absolute error as age increased. Stable levels of performance were obtained with 6-7 repetitions for both tests. Moderate to good reliability was found with 7 or more repetitions for left rotation [Torsion JPS test, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC; 95% CI) = 0.85 (0.68-0.93); Conventional JPS test, ICC = 0.78 (0.53-0.89)], and 6-7 or more repetitions for right rotation [Torsion JPS test, 6 repetitions, ICC = 0.79 (0.56-0.90); Conventional JPS test, 7 repetitions, ICC = 0.82 (0.61-0.91)]. Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) stabilized at 7 repetitions in both tests [Torsion JPS test (SEM ≤ 1.0°; MDCThe reference values generated for the torsion JPS test may help identify the presence of impairments cervical proprioception. At least 7 repetitions optimize stability, reliability and responsiveness in the torsion and conventional cervical JPS tests.

Objective To identify how frequently the neck pain associated with migraine presents with a pattern of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction akin to cervical musculoskeletal disorders, and to determine if pain hypersensitivity impacts on cervical musculoskeletal function in persons with migraine. Background Many persons with migraine experience neck pain and often seek local treatment. Yet neck pain may be part of migraine symptomology and not from a local cervical source. If neck pain is of cervical origin, a pattern of musculoskeletal impairments with characteristics similar to idiopathic neck pain should be present. Some individuals with migraine may have neck pain of cervical origin, whereas others may not. However, previous studies have neglected the disparity in potential origins of neck pain and treated persons with migraine as a homogenous group, which does not assist in identifying the origin of neck pain in individuals with migraine. Methods This cross-sectional, single-blinded study was conducted in a research laboratory at the University of Queensland, Australia. Persons with migraine (total n = 124: episodic migraine n = 106, chronic migraine = 18), healthy controls (n = 32), and persons with idiopathic neck pain (n = 21) were assessed using a set of measures typically used in the assessment of a cervical musculoskeletal disorder, including cervical movement range and accuracy, segmental joint dysfunction, neuromuscular and sensorimotor measures. Pain hypersensitivity was assessed using pressure pain thresholds and the Allodynia Symptom Checklist. People with migraine with diagnoses of comorbid neck disorders were excluded. Cluster analysis was performed to identify how participants grouped on the basis of their performance across cervical musculoskeletal assessments. Post hoc analyses examined the effects of pain hypersensitivity on musculoskeletal function, and if any symptoms experienced during testing were related to musculoskeletal function. Results Two distinct clusters of cervical musculoskeletal function were found: (i) neck function similar to healthy controls (n = 108) and (ii) neck dysfunction similar to persons with neck pain disorders (n = 69). Seventy-six of the individuals with migraine (62 with neck pain and 14 without neck pain) were clustered as having normal cervical musculoskeletal function, whereas the remaining 48 with neck pain had cervical dysfunction comparable with a neck disorder. Musculoskeletal dysfunction was not related to pain hypersensitivity or symptoms experienced during testing. Conclusions Neck pain when present with migraine does not necessarily indicate the existence of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction. Skilled assessment without reliance only on the person reporting symptoms is needed to identify actual cervical dysfunction. Treatments suitable for neck musculoskeletal disorders would seem inappropriate for the individuals without cervical dysfunction. Future studies evaluating any potential effects of such treatments should only select participants with neck pain of cervical origin.

Understanding jaw muscle activity changes in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is crucial to guide clinical management. The nature of these changes is currently unclear. Explore changes in jaw muscle activity in TMD. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) and bibliographies were searched from inception to 9 July 2020 for eligible studies, including grey literature. Case-control and interventional studies reporting time-domain and frequency-domain electromyographic measures of jaw muscle activity in TMD and control groups were included. SIGN checklist for case-control studies was used to evaluate risk of bias. Results were pooled for meta-analysis using random-effects model. Confidence in cumulative evidence was established using American Academy of Neurology guidelines. Forty-five studies were included. Most were rated moderate risk of bias. Activity of four muscles (masseter, temporalis, lateral pterygoid, suprahyoids) was assessed across six domains (resting, clenching, chewing, swallowing, concentrating, resisted mandibular movements), with partial meta-analysis scope. Masseter and temporalis activity were significantly higher at rest (P = .05, P

Local neck treatments and sensorimotor training can improve cervical proprioception and balance, but it remains unclear what treatments and treatment combination achieve the best outcomes.To investigate the most effective interventions to improve disturbances in joint position sense (JPS) and balance and their effects on neck pain, dizziness and related features in the short- and long-terms.2x2 factorial, randomized controlled trial.Participants with neck pain (n = 152) were randomly allocated to one of four intervention groups: i) local neck treatment (NT), ii) NT + JPS/oculomotor exercises (JPS/OC), iii) NT + balance exercises, and iv) all treatments. Participants received 12 treatments over 6 weeks. Primary outcomes were postural sway and joint position error. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, dizziness, pain intensity and disability, cervical range of motion, functional ability, and quality of life. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, posttreatment and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups.All four interventions resulted in short- and long-term improvements in primary and secondary outcomes with medium to large effect sizes, but JPS and balance in neck torsion improved most with the addition of a combined program of JPS/OC + balance exercises to NT while balance in neck neutral improved most with the addition of balance exercises. Adding sensorimotor training was also more effective in maintaining levels of improvement in neck pain and disability at 6- and 12-months. Effect sizes of additional treatment benefits were medium to large.Adding specific training of JPS/OC and balance to NT best addresses deficits in cervical proprioception and balance.xxxxx.

Scapular dyskinesis is often observed in patients with neck pain. However, it is unknown whether clavicular, scapular and spinal kinematics vary with different types of scapular dyskinesis during arm movement.Are there differences in clavicular, scapular and spinal kinematics during unilateral arm elevation and lowering among neck pain patients presenting with (i) scapular winging, (ii) with dysrhythmia, (iii) with no scapular abnormality and (iv) healthy controls?Sixty participants with neck pain (20 in each group) and 20 asymptomatic controls were recruited. The 3D kinematic data were measured during unilateral arm elevation and lowering at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° in the scapular plane. A three-way mixed-effects ANOVA was used to determine the main effects (group, phase and angle) and the interactions between three independent variables on the kinematic data.The neck pain group with scapular winging had decreased clavicular retraction and increased scapular internal rotation and anterior tilt compared to the other neck pain and control groups at all angles during both phases of arm movement (p 0.01). The neck pain group with scapular dysrhythmia had decreased scapular upward rotation compared to all other groups (p 0.01). Some alterations in the kinematics existed during the lowering phase compared to the raising phase for all groups (p 0.05). Spinal kinematics were similar across all groups (p 0.05).Specific patterns of clavicular and scapular kinematics were identified during arm movement relevant to the type of observed scapular dyskinesis in patients with neck pain. Such findings stand to inform more precise and relevant motor training in rehabilitation and improve understanding of the association between altered scapular kinematics and neck pain.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is not without impact on surgeons’ neck/shoulder/head and eyes. However, the mechanisms for concurrent symptoms are not clear. This study aims to examine the effect of visual impairments on physical symptoms and surgical performance among surgeons performing simulated surgical tasks using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) viewing modes. Gynaecologists with experience in laparoscopy performed four simulated surgical tasks in the 2D and 3D viewing modes. Visual parameters (accommodation, convergence and stereoacuity) were measured prior to commencement. Objective performance measures were derived from the laparoscopic tasks, and surgeons also self-reported their mental and physical workload using the NASA-TLX. In addition, perceived symptoms were measured using Visual Analogue Scales, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire. Seventeen healthy gynaecologists participated in this study. There were significant relationships between visual impairments and both the perceived symptoms and surgical performance scores of MIS surgeons. Surgeons with a higher number of accommodation/convergence dysfunctions and/or poorer stereoacuity tended to have poorer objective performance scores on simulated surgical tasks in both viewing modes. NASA-TLX scores indicated that surgeons with poorer stereoacuity also perceived themselves to have been less successful at accomplishing tasks. However, these surgeons also reported less intense physical symptoms and simulator sickness. Surgeons’ performance for the simulated surgical tasks correlated with visual functions, and it also impacted on the symptoms experienced. Regular screening of surgeons’ vision and vision therapy may be required to decrease physical symptoms and improve surgical performance.

Cervical arterial dissection (CeAD) is a serious condition that can mimic a musculoskeletal condition. A diagnostic tool using five key criteria could help prompt early medical referral, but these criteria may occur in healthy people or benign neck pain/headache. To determine the frequency of CeAD criteria in healthy individuals and those with neck pain/headache, and identify refinements needed to improve specificity. An interview and neurological screen to identify the presence of the five criteria was conducted. Definitions were refined and the frequency of the modified criteria in each individual was determined. The criteria were re-administered using data from 37 CeAD cases of the derivation cohort, to examine how the modifications impact sensitivity of the tool. One hundred healthy and 20 participants with neck pain/headache were interviewed. Most participants had ≤ 2 criteria, mainly age or trauma, 3% had 3 criteria, but had migraine or resolving symptoms. None had >3. Modifications to definitions were needed to improve potential specificity of the tool (96.7%). Changes did not impact sensitivity of the tool (81%). Further refinements may be required. Strictly defined CeAD criteria may assist in identifying when to refer, when to wait and monitor, or when management can proceed. Trialing the tool in those with migraine and in emergency departments to calculate risk scores is recommended.

Bite is an important function of the human stomatognathic system. Despite this, it is commonly impaired in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) populations. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative interventions on self-reported and physical measures of bite function in individuals with TMD.This review was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was performed on databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central. Inclusion criteria were journal articles evaluating the effect of any non-pharmacological conservative interventions on bite function in participants diagnosed with TMD. Risk of bias for individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias v2 tool, and the NIH NHLBI pre-post tool. Data was synthesised based on outcome measures of bite function, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Eleven studies were eligible for this review. Interventions included splinting, photobiomodulation, needling, exercise, manual therapy, and patient education, which were evaluated using mastication-related pain, self-reported chewing difficulty, and bite force/endurance outcome measures. Findings suggested manual therapy, needling, oral splinting, exercise, and PBM interventions may improve bite function in TMD, although confidence in cumulative evidence ranged from moderate to very low. There was no evidence that patient education improved bite function.Conservative interventions may be helpful to address bite-related impairments associated with TMD, although further research is needed to improve the quality of evidence and direct clinical guidelines.

Clavicular and scapular orientations vary between neck pain patients as do clinical features and responses (changes in pain and rotation range) to scapular repositioning. Associations between these factors are unknown.To identify subgroups of neck pain patients based on three-dimensional (3D) measures of clavicular and scapular orientations and differences between subgroups in clinical characteristics and responses to scapular repositioning.Cross-sectional study.Eligible participants were recruited as part of a larger study. The 3D clavicular and scapular orientations were analyzed on the more painful side of the neck using a hierarchical cluster analysis. Clinical characteristics were neck pain location, intensity, duration, disability and presence of headache. Responses to scapular repositioning were classified as "yes and no".Fifty-eight participants (29 responsive; 29 non-responsive to scapular repositioning) participated in the study. Analysis identified two distinct subgroups: subgroup1 had greater clavicular retraction and scapular downward rotation (n = 26) and subgroup2 had greater clavicular elevation and scapular internal rotation and anterior tilt (n = 32). Headache and dominant pain in the upper neck were more frequent in subgroup 1 while dominant pain in the lower neck was frequent in subgroup 2 (p 0.01). Most participants who responded positively to scapular repositioning (88.5%) were in subgroup1 and most non-responsive participants (81.2%) in subgroup2.The 3D clavicular and scapular orientations identified two subgroups of neck pain patients. Participants with predominantly downward scapular rotation were distinguished by pain in the upper neck, presence of headache and a positive response to scapular repositioning.

ObjectiveTo investigate the frequency and clinical aspects of patients with neck pain who responded and did not respond to scapular repositioning and to determine the clinical features associated with a positive response.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingResearch unit, Department of Physical Therapy, Chiang Mai University.ParticipantsVolunteers with non-specific neck pain aged 18–59 years were recruited between May 2020 and February 2021 from hospitals, clinics, university and community.Outcome measuresClinical data documented were neck pain (intensity, duration and disability), the presence of headache, type of scapular dysfunction, cervical musculoskeletal impairment (range of motion (ROM), flexion rotation test (FRT) and location of any symptomatic cervical joint dysfunction), upper limb functional limitation and self-reported disability. Manual scapular repositioning was performed on the side of neck pain. Participants were categorised as responsive or non-responsive based on a change in pain and/or cervical rotation range.ResultsA total of 219 people with neck pain responded to advertisements, of which 144 were eligible. Of the eligible participants, 107 (74.3%) demonstrated a clinically relevant improvement in either neck pain or rotation range or both following the scapular repositioning and 37 (25.7%) had no relevant improvement. The responsive group had a high incidence of scapular downward rotation, greater neck pain intensity, headache and cervical musculoskeletal impairment (reduced ROM, positive FRT and symptomatic C1-3 dysfunction) compared with the non-responsive group (pConclusionAlmost 75% of neck pain patients with altered scapular alignment responded to scapular repositioning. The predominance of upper cervical dysfunction with a downwardly rotated scapular in this group suggests a role of poor axioscapular muscle function which might benefit from rehabilitation.

IntroductionMusculoskeletal (MSK) conditions constitute the highest burden of disease globally, with healthcare services often utilised inappropriately and overburdened. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel clinical PAthway of CarE programme (PACE programme), where care is provided based on people’s risk of poor outcome.Methods and analysisMulticentre randomised controlled trial. 716 people with MSK conditions (low back pain, neck pain or knee osteoarthritis) will be recruited in primary care. They will be stratified for risk of a poor outcome (low risk/high risk) using the Short Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (SF-ÖMSPQ) then randomised to usual care (n=358) or the PACE programme (n=358). Participants at low risk in the PACE programme will receive up to 3 sessions of guideline based care from their primary healthcare professional (HCP) supported by a custom designed website (mypainhub.com). Those at high risk will be referred to an allied health MSK specialist who will conduct a comprehensive patient-centred assessment then liaise with the primary HCP to determine further care. Primary outcome (SF 12-item PCS) and secondary outcomes (eg, pain self-efficacy, psychological health) will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Cost-effectiveness will be measured as cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Health economic analysis will include direct and indirect costs. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed independently, using generalised linear models. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies embedded within the trial will evaluate patient experience, health professional practice and interprofessional collaboration.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been received from the following Human Research Ethics Committees: The University of Sydney (2018/926), The University of Queensland (2019000700/2018/926), University of Melbourne (1954239), Curtin University (HRE2019-0263) and Northern Sydney Local Health District (2019/ETH03632). Dissemination of findings will occur via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media.Trial registration numberACTRN12619000871145.

Objective The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a self-rated disability tool originally developed for whiplash-associated disorders and validated in cervical musculoskeletal conditions. It is now commonly used to assess neck disability in migraine, but it is unknown whether NDI scores relate to migraine and hypersensitivity, cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction, or both. This single-blinded observational study aimed to determine whether the presence of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction, migraine features, and hypersensitivity predict NDI scores and whether alternate versions of the NDI (NDI-physical, NDI-8, NDI-5) relate more to cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction. Methods Migraine and neck pain features, the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), NDI, Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC12), and pressure pain thresholds were assessed in 104 participants with migraine and neck pain, 45 previously identified with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction and 59 without. The NDI score was regressed on the presence or absence of cervical dysfunction, migraine features, HIT-6, total pressure pain threshold, and ASC12 while accounting for neck pain features. The presence of cervical dysfunction was regressed on the scores of NDI versions. Results The ASC12 (standardized ß = 0.20) and HIT-6 (standardized ß = 0.18) were significantly predictive of total NDI score, as were neck pain intensity (standardized ß = 0.32) and frequency (standardized ß = 0.44). No scores from alternate NDI versions related to cervical dysfunction. Conclusion The NDI score is a complex measure of neck disability influenced by migraine disability and hypersensitivity beyond the presence of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction. This has implications for the clinical interpretation of NDI scores in patients with migraine. Impact Many patients with migraine and neck pain report neck disability; therefore, it is important to understand if migraine impacts neck disability. The results of this study indicate that clinicians need to consider migraine-related disability and hypersensitivity when managing neck disability in this population.

The three-metre tandem gait test (TG) is used to assess postural control during locomotion following sports concussion. However, values used to determine a pass/fail result are currently based on young athletic populations. Times for test completion may be influenced by several intrinsic or extrinsic factors. The aim of this study was to collate healthy individual single, dual task as well as dual task cost - motor TG times for a non-elite athlete population, across several age groups, and to investigate several potential influencing factors.Healthy individuals aged 18-55+, who had never experienced a concussion completed single and dual task TG following the SCAT5 protocol. A separate group (n = 20, age, foot length and body mass index matched) performed the tests with alternate instructions.Mean best TG time for all participants were: single task 21.03 (±5.26s), dual task 29.59 (±9.84s) and DTC-motor 8.57 (±7.5s:41.7%). Age and foot length but not specificity of verbal instructions were related to TG times. Significantly slower single and dual task times were identified for the 55 + age group when compared to the three youngest groups (p 0.01). No difference was seen for DTC-motor time or % between age groups (p 0.05).Healthy individual data collected exceeded previously reported average times. Faster times were evident in younger participants and those with longer foot length. Results from this study can be used as a reliable guideline to inform clinical decisions around the pass/fail result of TGT across age ranges in non-elite athlete populations post-concussion.

A reduced capacity to generate and sustain cervical muscle force over a range of contraction intensities is a feature of some participants with neck pain. To date there have been no studies comparing the accuracy of force perception in participants with and without neck pain.Cross-sectional observational study.Participants with (n = 25) and without (n = 25) neck pain performed isometric muscle contractions at three progressive self-perceived (no feedback provided) intensities (10, 25, 50) % of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in cervical: flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion. Absolute error (AE), constant error (CE), and variable error (VE) between actual and targeted force values were calculated.The neck pain group had: (1) AE-combined direction -significantly higher at 10% and lower at 50% (p 0.05); (2) significantly lower CE in most measures (p 0.05); (3) higher mean VE in all measures, with 10, 25, and 50% combined direction and overall combined % extension significantly higher (p 0.05).Findings indicate higher variability in force generation perception across all directions and intensities in participants with neck pain compared to healthy controls. Potentially this greater variability might suggest impaired force sense, a construct of proprioception in participants with neck pain. Reduced force sense may have implications for participants with neck pain during functional activities requiring precision and may need to be trained. Further research is required.

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of 2 treatments for patients with dizziness after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who demonstrate abnormal cervical spine proprioception (CSP).A retrospective records review was conducted on the medical charts of patients treated for dizziness after mTBI who received either standard care (vestibular rehabilitation therapy [VRT]) or cervical spine proprioceptive retraining (CSPR) from 2009 to 2013. All patients included in the analysis were active-duty military with recurring dizziness after mTBI who had at least 1 abnormal CSP test. Patients were excluded for dizziness with a clear peripheral vestibular or central symptom origin, incomplete data, or no CSP assessment, or if both treatments were administered. Forty-eight total patients were included in the final dataset (22 VRT; 26 CSPR). Traditional VRT was compared with CSPR when abnormal CSP tests were present, regardless of the presence or absence of neck pain. A clinician review of records was used to determine improvement of dizziness based on patient reports of symptoms at discharge evaluation (ie, no symptoms for at least 2 weeks).Patients who received CSPR were 30 times more likely to report improvement in dizziness symptoms compared with those who received VRT (adjusted odds ratio: 30.12; 95% confidence interval 4.44-204.26, P.001) when abnormal CSP tests were present. Patients with dizziness over 1 year were significantly less likely to improve.These results suggest that patients with dizziness after mTBI and who had abnormal CSP assessments responded better to CSPR compared with those who received VRT.

Aims Neck pain is common in migraine and tension type headache (TTH). This review aimed to examine the evidence for cervical musculoskeletal impairments in these headaches. Methods Databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2018. Observational studies using a comparator group were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Level of evidence for each outcome was assigned based on risk of bias, consistency of results and magnitude of difference between participants with headache and controls. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018083683). Results Of 48 studies included, the majority were rated moderate risk of bias due to possible confounding influences. In total, 17 cervical outcomes were assessed, with confidence in findings ranging from very low to moderate levels. Compared to controls, participants with TTH had greater forward head posture (FHP) (MD = −6.18°, 95% CI [-8.18°, −4.18°]) and less cervical range of motion (ROM) (greatest difference transverse plane MD = −15.0°, 95% CI [-27.7°, −2.3°]. Participants with migraine demonstrated minimally reduced cervical ROM (greatest difference sagittal plane MD = −5.4°, 95% CI [-9.9°, −0.9°]. No differences presented in head posture, strength, craniocervical flexion test performance or joint position error between migraineurs and controls. Conclusions TTH presented with more findings of cervical musculoskeletal impairments than migraine however levels of confidence in findings were low. Future studies should differentiate episodic from chronic headache, identify coexisting musculoskeletal cervical disorders, and describe neck pain behaviour in headache.

To further explore symptoms in patients beyond the expected recovery period post mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) that are potentially indicative of impairment.Ninety-four individuals (62 diagnosed with mTBI within the previous 4-24 weeks and 32 healthy controls) participated in the study. Participants in the mTBI group were further grouped as symptomatic (n = 33) or asymptomatic (n = 29) based on their spontaneous report of symptoms at the time of screening. Measures included a demographic questionnaire, 8 impairment specific self-report clinical tools, and a standard post-mTBI self-report symptom scale (Head Injury Scale (HIS)).Compared to the control group, scores for all instruments (including the HIS) were higher in the symptomatic mTBI group (P 0.05), and higher for the neck disability and hyperarousal measures in the asymptomatic mTBI group (p 0.035), but not the HIS (p 0.093). Overall 94% of the symptomatic and 62% of the asymptomatic participants post-mTBI, recorded scores considered to be clinically relevant on at least one impairment screening tool. In contrast, only 28% of the asymptomatic mTBI group recorded a clinically relevant score for the HIS.Symptoms indicative of persisting impairments beyond the expected recovery period were apparent in a substantial proportion of individuals post mTBI. Furthermore, a high percentage of individuals initially reporting as symptom free demonstrated clinically relevant scores on at least one impairment screening tool. Findings also suggest that a standard post-mTBI self-report symptom scale may often not detect the presence of persisting symptoms.

Background Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are associated with increased self-reported disability and psychosocial issues, although little is known about those who specifically experience mechanical signs and symptoms such as clicking and locking. Understanding the lived experiences of individuals with persistent intra-articular TMD is an important first step to gaining insight into specific domains of self-reported disability associated with these conditions. This information can be helpful to improve clinical management of this subgroup. Objectives To explore the lived experiences of adults with persistent intra-articular TMD, including its impact on activity, participation and psychological wellbeing, and the influence of contextual factors on disability. Design Qualitative study. Methods Semi-structured interviews explored the lived experiences of adults with persistent intra-articular TMD, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from private physiotherapy and dental practices, and the community. Results Sixteen participants were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the data: i) The challenge of living with intra-articular TMD, ii) Living with uncertainty, iii) Seeking control, and iv) Learning to live with it. Novel findings included the impact of persistent intra-articular TMD on dreams, work, intimacy and socialising; and the role of non-pain symptoms (e.g. locking) in disability. Conclusions Persistent intra-articular TMD are associated with numerous activity limitations, participation restrictions and psychological issues. Disability is complex and multi-directional, and influenced by various contextual factors including individuals’ thoughts, beliefs and support networks. These findings emphasise the need for biopsychosocial and person-centred care in clinical practice.

Objective To synthesise and analyse the current evidence regarding changes in joint position sense (JPS) and standing balance in people with whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) taking the presence or absence of dizziness into account. Data sources PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE and APA PsycINFO were searched by two independent reviewers from inception until August 2020 and reference lists of all included studies were also reviewed. Study selection Only cross-sectional studies that measured JPS and/or standing balance between people with WAD vs. healthy controls (HC) or people with WAD complaining of dizziness (WADD) vs. those not complaining of dizziness (WADND) were selected. Data extraction Relevant data were extracted using specific checklists and quality assessment was performed using Downs and Black Scale (modified version). Data synthesis Twenty-six studies were included. For JPS, data were synthesized for absolute error in the primary plane of movement for separate movement directions. For standing balance, data were synthesized for traditional time- and frequency domain sway parameters considering the conditions of eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) separately. For meta-analysis, reduced JPS was observed in people with WAD compared to HC when the head was repositioned to a neutral head position (NHP) from rotation (standardised mean difference [SMD] = 0.43 [95%: 0.24–0.62]) and extension (0.33 [95%CI: 0.08–0.58]) or when the head was moved toward 50° rotation from a NHP (0.50 [0.05–0.96]). Similarly, people with WADD had reduced JPS compared to people with WADND when the head was repositioned to a NHP from rotation (0.52 [0.22–0.82]). Larger sway velocity and amplitude was found in people with WAD compared to HC for both EO (0.62 [0.37–0.88] and 0.78 [0.56–0.99], respectively) and EC (0.69 [0.46–0.91] and 0.80 [0.58–1.02]) conditions. Conclusion The observed changes of JPS and standing balance confirms deficits in sensorimotor control in people with WAD and especially in those with dizziness.

Clinicians seek to identify associations between pain behaviours to understand if symptoms are related or separate conditions. This study determined whether the temporal behaviour of migraine related neck pain related to i) the presence of cervical musculoskeletal function or ii) migraine hypersensitivity.Cross-sectional study of migraineurs with neck pain (n = 110). Participants reported daily for one month via an online survey, on migraine and other headaches, neck symptoms, location of onset and self-identified triggers. Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC12), Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), and presence or absence of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction were also assessed.The temporal behaviours of neck pain in 92 participants (46 migraine only, 46 migraine plus another headache) were categorised as: i) ictal only (n = 42), ii) ictal and infrequent interictal (n = 26), iii) ictal and frequent interictal (n = 17), and iv) undecipherable (n = 7). Cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction was present in 43%. Temporal behaviours of neck pain were not associated with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction (p = 1.00 and 0.21), nor related to ASC12, PPTs, headache triggers, neck pain, nor region of symptom onset, whether migraine only or migraine and another headache was reported (p = 0.29 to 0.97).Individuals with migraine present with varied behaviours of neck pain in relation to the headache. As temporal behaviour is not informative, a physical examination is needed to negate or confirm a cervical source of neck pain in migraine.

The nature of certain musculoskeletal impairments associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is unclear. Understanding impairments within TMD subgroups is important to guide management.Characterise local musculoskeletal impairments in adults with persistent TMD.PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 12 January 2020. Bibliographies were searched for additional articles, including grey literature. Case-control and interventional studies reporting temporomandibular range of motion (ROM), muscle function (MF) or proprioception in TMD and control groups were included. Risk of bias was assessed using SIGN checklist for case-control studies. Results were pooled using random-effects model. Confidence in cumulative evidence was determined using American Academy of Neurology guidelines.Sixty-six studies were included, most rated moderate risk of bias. Twelve primary outcomes were assessed, with partial scope for meta-analysis. Significant reductions were found for active maximal mouth opening (P .00001, MD=-4.65 mm), protrusion (P .0001, MD=-0.76 mm) and maximum bite force (P .00001) in TMD versus controls. Subgroup analysis scope was limited. Reduced AMMO was found in myogenic TMD subgroups versus controls (P = .001, MD= -3.28 mm). Few studies measured proprioception, with high methodological variability. Confidence in cumulative evidence ranged from high to very low.ROM and bite force impairments accompany TMD. Insufficient data were available to investigate impairments within TMD subgroups.Several musculoskeletal impairments have been identified, which may guide clinical management of TMD. Lack of subgroup data, and data for proprioception and MF, highlights future direction for research.CRD42020150734.

Background: Training targeted towards improving cervical movement accuracy is an effective strategy in the management of neck pain. Relatively complex measures have been validated to measure this in research although a simple clinical measure using a head mounted laser tracing a standardised pattern has been shown to be reliable. It is not known if this method demonstrate clinically meaningful change to training. Objective: To assess change responsiveness of the clinical cervical movement sense (CCMS) test following home kinematic training (KT). Study design: Pre-post treatment observational study. Methods: The CCMS measure was assessed in 56 patients with chronic neck pain (41 intervention, 15 control) at baseline and 4 weeks post intervention by blinded assessors. Task completion time and error number were assessed reviewing video of the performances. Change pre-post intervention was compared between groups. Results: There was a significantly greater mean improvement in the intervention (−9.2 ± 9.3) seconds) for completion time and combined time and error (−13.3 ± 16) compared to the control group for time (−2.0 ± 9.8) and combined time and error (−1.8 ± 14) with moderate to high effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.76). There was a non-significant trend for decreased number of errors in the intervention (−4.1 ± 9.0) compared to control group (0.2 ± 8.3). Conclusion: Completion time of the CCMS test appears to be able to demonstrate meaningful change following four weeks of KT. This further supports its clinical utility as a measure of cervical movement accuracy and provides direction for future clinical use.

The pathophysiology of concussion is complex. Altered sensorimotor function post-concussion may contribute to the wide range of symptoms and impairments reported. There is currently limited evidence documenting changes in sensorimotor function during the recovery period. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concussion on the sensorimotor system in adolescents post-concussion using a multifaceted approach.Prospective nested case-control study.A total of 285 male adolescent rugby players underwent assessment of sensorimotor function during preseason. Players who sustained a concussion during the season and control players, matched for age and playing position, were assessed in the subacute period (3-5 days) and after return-to-sport (3 weeks). Tests of sensorimotor function included balance, cervical spine and vestibulo-ocular function, and measurement of the size and contraction of lumbopelvic muscles (ultrasound imaging).Twenty-three players (8%) sustained a concussion. Of these, 20 players were assessed during the subacute period and 17 players following return-to-sport. The prevalence of vestibulo-ocular dysfunction increased from 38.9% to 72.2% during the subacute period and dysfunction was present in 83.3% of players after return-to-sport (p = 0.01). Changes in lumbar multifidus muscle size (p = 0.002) and thickness (p = 0.05) at the L5 vertebral level were observed. No statistically significant changes in balance, cervical spine proprioception, or contraction of lumbopelvic muscles were found (p 0.05).Changes in sensorimotor function were observed in the subacute period post-concussion, with some persisting after return-to-sport. Using symptom-based criteria for return-to-sport may not adequately reflect the sequelae of concussion on the sensorimotor system.

BACKGROUND Clinically relevant scores of neck disability have been observed in adults post mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), even in those who initially report to be recovered. Potentially cervical musculoskeletal and/or cervical sensorimotor impairments may underlie these persistent symptoms post mTBI. OBJECTIVE To determine whether cervical impairments exist beyond expected recovery times following concussion compared to healthy controls (HC). STUDY DESIGN Observational cohort study. METHODS Participants aged 18-60 years consisting of 39 HC, and 72 individuals, 4 weeks to 6 months post mTBI of which 35 considered themselves asymptomatic (Asymp), and 37 symptomatic (Symp). Cervical outcome measures included range and velocity of motion, flexor muscle endurance, presence of at least one dysfunctional cervical joint, joint position error -neutral and torsion, movement accuracy, smooth pursuit neck torsion test (SPNT) and balance. RESULTS Individuals in the Symp mTBI group demonstrated significantly reduced: flexion and rotation range, rotation velocity, flexor endurance and movement accuracy as well as increased postural sway and a higher percentage had positive cervical joint dysfunction (p

Electrooculography is useful in detecting smooth pursuit neck torsion (SPNT) abnormalities in patients with neck pain, however, a validated, clinically relevant measure is lacking.To explore the validity of visual assessment of formal and clinical videotaped SPNT tests in comparison to electrooculography.Cross-sectional observational study.Twenty patients with idiopathic neck pain (INP) and twenty healthy controls performed the electrooculography SPNT test: first in neutral, then 45° trunk-under-head torsion to the left then right. The formal video test involved the participant following a horizontal laser stimulus simultaneous to electrooculography. The clinical video test was then performed where the participant followed the clinician's finger in the horizontal direction. One blinded investigator interpreted and analysed the electrooculography trace and two others interpreted the videos.Patients with INP had a significantly (p 0.05) greater SPNT difference than healthy controls. Visual observation of the formal test had 82.5% agreement with electrooculography and showed fair sensitivity (63.5%) and good specificity (89.6) whilst the clinical test had 65% agreement with electrooculography and showed poor sensitivity (27.3%) and good specificity (79.3%). There was an 82.5% agreement between investigators for the formal video taped measure.Visual analysis of assessment of SPNT is sufficient for detecting SPNT abnormalities in patients with INP. Accuracy of the clinical method could be improved by, altering how the visual stimulus is presented and including subjective reporting of symptoms to aid diagnosis resulting in implications for future research.

There is limited understanding of potential mechanisms underpinning postural control deficits in people with neck pain. This study examined several characteristics that might explain impaired postural stability in a group of older adults with neck pain, and compared the results in this cohort with that of asymptomatic controls. In this cross-sectional study we compared physical activity, lower limb motor and sensory function, vestibular and visual function, falls efficacy and dizziness handicap in 84 older adults with (n=35, age 69.6±6.3) and without (n=49, age 69.4±4.7) idiopathic neck-pain. Additionally, dynamic balance was assessed using the dynamic gait index (DGI) and standard and wavelet analysis of static balance was computed after data capture. Physical activity levels, lower limb motor and sensory function, vestibular function and visual contrast sensitivity were not different between groups (p>0.05). The neck-pain group demonstrated higher falls efficacy (p=0.01), greater levels of dizziness handicap (p