Search

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and chronic mental disorder that elicits widespread functional impairment. Given the high degree of non-response/partial response among patients with GAD to available pharmacological treatments, there is a strong need for novel approaches that can optimize outcomes, and lead to medications that are safer and more effective. Although investigations have identified interesting targets predicting treatment response through pharmacogenetics (PGx), pharmaco-epigenetics, and neuroimaging methods, these studies are often solitary, not replicated, and carry several limitations. This review provides an overview of the current status of GAD genetics and PGx and presents potential strategies to improve treatment response by combining better phenotyping with PGx and improved analytical methods. These strategies carry the dual benefit of delivering data on biomarkers of treatment response as well as pointing to disease mechanisms through the biology of the markers associated with response. Overall, these efforts can serve to identify clinical, genetic, and epigenetic factors that can be incorporated into a pharmaco(epi)genetic test that may ultimately improve treatment response and reduce the socioeconomic burden of GAD.

Anxiety disorders and substance use disorders (SUDs) frequently co-occur, and individuals with this comorbidity demonstrate exacerbated impairment and poorer treatment outcomes compared to individuals with only one of the disorders. This paper reviews the potential mechanisms underlying this comorbidity, with a particular focus on the influence of impulsivity. There is an atypical subset of individuals with anxiety disorders that display elevated impulsivity, and it is suggested that these individuals account for the clinically relevant group of anxiety disorder patients that have a concurrent SUD. Patients with anxiety disorders that show increased impulsivity, particularly within the negative urgency (NU) sub-domain, appear to have a predisposition to engage in risky behaviours to cope with their anxiety symptoms, which includes substance use. Given the promise of impulsivity and NU as endophenotypes of this anxiety-SUD comorbidity, it is recommended that future research investigate gene variants that modulate impulsivity and NU to establish biomarkers predicting an increased risk of a concurrent SUD among anxiety disorder patients. This subtype and endophenotypic investigation may ultimately establish treatment targets that can lead to greater personalization of treatments for the subgroup of anxiety disorder patients that have comorbid SUDs.

Startle response is an objective physiological measure integral to the human defense system and a promising target for endophenotype investigations of anxiety. Given the alterations in startle reactivity observed among anxiety and related disorders, we searched for genetic variants associated with startle reactivity as they may be further involved in pathological anxiety risk.A systematic literature review was performed to identify genetic variants associated with startle reactivity in humans, specifically baseline and fear- or anxiety-potentiated startle.The polymorphisms Val66Met (rs6265) from brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Similar to psychiatric genetic studies, the studies on startle reactivity primarily focus on candidate genes and are plagued by non-replication. Startle reactivity is a promising endophenotype that requires concerted efforts to collect uniformly assessed, large, well-powered samples and hypothesis-free genome-wide strategies. To further support startle as an endophenotype for anxiety, this review suggests advanced genetic strategies for startle research.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmission by modulating dopaminergic neuron differentiation and establishment. Multiple studies have analyzed the functional BDNF Val66Met variant in relation to antipsychotic response in schizophrenia (SCZ) patients, yielding mixed results. A meta-analysis was thus performed to examine the relationship between this variant and symptom improvement during antipsychotic treatment. Searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo until October 2017 yielded 11 studies that met inclusion criteria (total n = 3774). These studies investigated the BDNF Val66Met variant and antipsychotic response in patients with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder. Responders to antipsychotics were defined using the original criteria applied in each study. Effect sizes were computed using odds ratios, which were pooled according to the Mantel–Haenszel method. The BDNF Val66Met variant was not associated with the total number of responders and non-responders (p > 0.05) under dominant, recessive, or allelic models. Secondary analyses stratifying for individuals of each ethnicity and drug type also revealed no significant associations. Our findings suggest that the BDNF Val66Met variant is not associated with response to antipsychotics in individuals with SCZ. However, considering the current sample size, small effects cannot be ruled out. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that Val66Met forms haplotypes with other BDNF variants. Future studies should examine the Val66Met variant in conjunction with these other variants in relation to antipsychotic response. Moreover, since illness duration appears to influence BDNF levels in SCZ patients, future studies should aim to control for this potential confounding factor in response analyses.

Given the limited effectiveness of treatments for pathological anxiety, there is a pressing need to identify genetic markers that can aid the precise selection of treatments and optimize treatment response. Anxiety and startle response levels demonstrate a direct relationship, and previous literature suggests that exaggerated startle reactivity may serve as an endophenotype of pathological anxiety. In addition, genetic variants related to startle reactivity may play a role in the etiology of pathological anxiety. In the current study, we selected 22 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to startle reactivity in the literature, and examined their association with anxiety symptom severity across psychiatric disorders (n = 508), and in a subset of patients with an anxiety disorder (n = 298). Overall, none of the SNPs pass correction for multiple independent tests. However, across psychiatric patients, rs6323 from the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene and rs324981 from the neuropeptide S receptor 1 (NPSR1) gene were nominally associated with baseline anxiety symptom severity (p = 0.017, 0.023). These preliminary findings provide support for investigating startle-related genetic variants to identify biomarkers of anxiety symptom severity.

Sirtuins are NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases that play essential roles in cell survival, energy metabolism, inflammation, and aging; therefore, sirtuins are potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, cancer, inflammatory and metabolic disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. Available evidence provides the basis for hypothesizing that sirtuins 1, 2, and 3 (SIRT1, SIRT2, and SIRT3) may have a mechanistic role subserving mood disorders (i.e. downregulation) and associated co-morbidity (e.g. metabolic disorders). Specifically, the domains of general cognitive processes, as well as cognitive emotional processing may be particularly relevant to sirtuin physiology. Given the role of sirtuins in the perpetuation of circadian rhythmicity, and evidence of dysfunctional circadian cycling in mood disorders, sirtuins may be an underlying etiological factor that links circadian rhythm functionality with mood disorders. Caloric restriction, and caloric restriction mimetics (e.g. resveratrol) are all capable of upregulating sirtuin isoforms implicated in stress response syndromes. Repurposing existing treatments and/or discovery of novel agents capable of modulating sirtuin physiology may represent genuinely novel approaches for trans-diagnostic domains affected in mood disorders and other brain-based illnesses.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmission by modulating dopaminergic neuron differentiation and establishment. Multiple studies have analyzed the functional BDNF Val66Met variant in relation to antipsychotic response in schizophrenia (SCZ) patients, yielding mixed results. A meta-analysis was thus performed to examine the relationship between this variant and symptom improvement during antipsychotic treatment. Searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo until October 2017 yielded 11 studies that met inclusion criteria (total n = 3774). These studies investigated the BDNF Val66Met variant and antipsychotic response in patients with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder. Responders to antipsychotics were defined using the original criteria applied in each study. Effect sizes were computed using odds ratios, which were pooled according to the Mantel-Haenszel method. The BDNF Val66Met variant was not associated with the total number of responders and non-responders (p 0.05) under dominant, recessive, or allelic models. Secondary analyses stratifying for individuals of each ethnicity and drug type also revealed no significant associations. Our findings suggest that the BDNF Val66Met variant is not associated with response to antipsychotics in individuals with SCZ. However, considering the current sample size, small effects cannot be ruled out. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that Val66Met forms haplotypes with other BDNF variants. Future studies should examine the Val66Met variant in conjunction with these other variants in relation to antipsychotic response. Moreover, since illness duration appears to influence BDNF levels in SCZ patients, future studies should aim to control for this potential confounding factor in response analyses.