Search

Skin cancer is the most common secondary malignancy among young adult childhood cancer survivors (YA-CCS). Skin examination to detect skin cancer early (including melanoma as well as basal or squamous cell skin cancers), both physician-based (PSE) and self-skin exam (SSE), is recommended, particularly for radiotherapy-exposed YA-CCS who are at high risk of developing skin cancer.Awareness and prevalence of skin examination and demographic, clinical, and healthcare correlates were examined in a population-based sample of YA-CCS with diverse cancer types excluding melanoma. Descriptive frequencies and logistic regression models were conducted using sample weights to correct for non-response bias with PSE, SSE and adherence to both as outcomes.The sample comprised 1064 participants with 53% Latino. Eight percent of participants were aware of the need for skin examination; 9% reported receipt of PSE within past 2 years; 35% reported regular SSE; and 6% were adherent to both. Among the radiotherapy-treated, 10% were aware of the need for skin examination, 10% reported recent PSE; 38% reported regular SSE; and 8% were adherent to both. Healthcare and clinical factors including healthcare self-efficacy, engagement in cancer-related follow-up care, greater treatment intensity and greater number of treatment-related late effects were positively associated with PSE and SSE. Latino YA-CCS were less likely to engage in PSE and SSE.Adherence to recommended screening for skin cancer was low in this at-risk population, notably for YA-CCS exposed to radiotherapy. The development of effective strategies to expand skin cancer screening is needed in this at-risk population.

Over 3.1 million women living in the U.S. have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether stage of cancer, psychological distress, cognitive fusion (fusion of one’s thoughts and emotions), mindfulness, and resilience were related to quality of life among breast cancer patients. Participants were 24 women, aged 41-71, diagnosed with stage 0-3 breast cancer, recruited to participate in a pilot intervention study. All data for this study were collected at the baseline assessment. A multiple linear regression analysis explained 79.1% of the total variance in quality of life, F(5, 14) = 15.400, p < .001, Adjusted R2 = .791. Higher resilience significantly predicted higher quality of life (b = 2.392, p = .002), whereas higher stage of cancer (b = -8.068, p = .030) and higher levels of psychological distress (b = -1.737, p < .001) significantly predicted lower quality of life. Contrary to the hypotheses, higher levels of mindfulness significantly predicted lower quality of life (b = -0.612, p = .022). Cognitive fusion did not significantly predict quality of life (p > .05). More research is needed to determine how various factors predict quality of life among breast cancer patients.

ObjectivePalliative care (PC) is patient and family-centered supportive care intended to improve symptom management, reduce caregiver burden, coordinate care, and improve quality of life for patients diagnosed with serious illness. Optimally, PC is begun close to initial diagnosis and delivered in synchrony with disease-specific treatment until symptom relief or patient death. The purpose of this study was to examine cancer survivors’ knowledge and perceptions of PC using a nationally representative sample of US adults from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).MethodA total of 593 HINTS respondents reported a personal history of cancer and were included in the sample (55.56% female; mean age of 65.88 years, SD = 18.21; mean time from diagnosis 13.83 years, SD = 18.21). Weighted logistic regression models were conducted to identify correlates of PC knowledge.ResultsOf the 593 cancer survivors in the sample, 66% (N = 378) reported that they had never heard of PC, 18% (N = 112) reported knowing a little bit about PC, and 17% (N = 95) reported knowing what PC is and could explain it to someone else. In multivariable analysis, survivors of color (Hispanic/Latino, Black, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Islander), males, and those less educated were significantly less likely to report knowledge of PC. Among survivors who did report knowledge of PC, a lack of distinction between differing modes of supportive care exists.Significance of resultsThese findings suggest a need to increase PC knowledge among cancer survivors with the ultimate goal of addressing disparities in PC acceptance and utilization.

Posttraumatic growth (PTG) represents positive changes following a trauma, crisis, and/or psychologically distressing event. Experiencing cancer can serve as a traumatic event for patients, resulting in life changes among survivors. Various PTG measures have been used to assess post-cancer change among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), but few have been evaluated for use in this population. This study examined the factor structure of an adapted, 11-item version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) among CCS. A randomly selected subgroup of participants ( N = 332) was selected from the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program (mean age of 26.5 years at time of survey, mean age at diagnosis of 12 years, primarily male [53.6%], and Hispanic [51.5%]). Participants indicated the degree to which they experienced positive, negative, or no change in their life because of their cancer experience. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified two factors: Appreciation of New Possibilities and Spiritual Change. The adapted, 11-item PTGI was deemed appropriate for use among CCS. Additional research is needed to confirm the use of the two-factor model with confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. Future research on PTG among CCS can consider spiritual change as a potential independent factor.

This letter to the editor continues the discussion on fertility counseling for young adult patients with rectal cancer.

88 Background: From 1995-2016, rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased among young adults (YA) under 50 years by 2% annually, despite overall rates of CRC among adults over age 65 decreasing. Unfortunately, this population is disproportionately affected by diagnosis at later stage of disease due to systematic and healthcare factors. Such late diagnoses are associated with higher symptom burden among survivors; however, symptom burden among YA early-onset CRC (EOCRC) survivors is poorly understood. The present study aims to characterize symptom burden among YA EOCRC survivors. Methods: A cross sectional survey was administered online in collaboration with a national organization for YA CRC survivors. Respondents (18-49 years) were EOCRC survivors who were 6-36 months from diagnosis/relapse. Survivors endorsed symptoms they experienced among 23 common CRC late effects. Responses were stratified by symptom duration (6-18 versus 19-36 months) to examine differences in endorsement rates among respondents. Results: Respondents (n=235) were colon (n=86) and rectal (n=149) cancer survivors, primarily male 63%, diagnosed at 32.4 years (SD=6.65), with an average of 5.1 (SD=2.57) symptoms. Overall, the most highly reported symptoms were fatigue, perceived change in appearance after treatment, and nail color changes. Comparisons of 6-18 and 19-36 months-from-diagnosis groups revealed similar symptom endorsement rates, with those 19-36 months from diagnosis endorsing constipation/diarrhea, anal bleeding, and incisional discomfort at higher rates than those 6-18 months from diagnosis. The 6-18 and 19-36 months-from-diagnosis groups carried similar symptom burdens of 4.9 (SD=2.57) and 5.1 (SD=2.58), respectively. Conclusions: YA EOCRC survivors endorse numerous symptoms that may interfere with their daily living and quality of life. Similarities in endorsement between 6-18 month and 19-36-month groups suggest symptoms may become chronic and persist beyond cancer treatment. Fortunately, many symptoms can be mitigated or prevented with proper medical and/or psychosocial intervention, patient education, and resource availability. Providers can leverage these findings in their evaluation of YA EOCRC patients during treatment and follow-up care to ensure the delivery of optimal symptom management. [Table: see text]

Context: Latino cancer patients experience disparities in access to and quality of palliative care. Objectives: This literature review addressed three aims: 1) to summarize existing palliative care interventions that aim to improve the quality of life for Latino cancer patients; 2) to evaluate the health care decision-making between providers and Latino cancer patients/family members who received palliative care, and 3) to describe culturally sensitive palliative care interventions for Latino cancer patients in the United States. Methods: We conducted a literature review using multiple electronic databases (PubMed and the University of Texas Medical Branch database) to identify potentially relevant empirical research published from (month) 2017 through March 2022. Peer-reviewed, empirical studies that implemented a palliative care intervention with a focus on the quality of life, health care decision-making, cultural sensitivity, and patient experiences with the palliative care intervention were reviewed. Studies included participants from pediatric to adult populations and other minority populations (with the inclusion of Latino and Hispanic participants) in their sample. Articles and palliative care interventions had to have taken place in the United States and had to be written in English. Any other language or different location were not included. Results: Of the twenty-two articles that satisfied eligibility criteria, only eleven articles focused on Latino cancer patients. Approximately half of the included? studies involved the quality of life, health care decision-making, and cultural sensitivity in their interventions. Sixteen articles incorporated cultural sensitivity throughout palliative care intervention development. Interventions that aimed to provide culturally sensitive palliative care made generalizations (culture differences within different countries' representation, language, education level, and gender) that were not applicable to all Latino and Hispanic groups. Discussion: Few empirical studies focused on palliative care interventions for Latino cancer patients. Many interventions for Latino and Hispanic cancer patients lack cultural sensitivity. Results suggest that interventions currently used are moderately acceptable; Future interventions should consider cultural sensitivity, avoid generalizations among Latino cancer patients, and improve the engagement of health care decisions between the clinical team and patient/family members. As palliative care intervention is personalized for each patient, the medical team should keep an account in understanding the patient background to construct a culturally competent treatment and engagement with patients and their caregivers/community in order to provide a better quality of life. Citation Format: Carlos J. Orellana Garcia, Julia Stal, Cara Pennel. Palliative care interventions for Latino cancer patients: A review of the literature between 2017-2022 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A029.

Background Young adults (YA) diagnosed with rectal cancer are disproportionately impacted by the gonadotoxic effects of treatment and potential subsequent infertility. Objective The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of fertility preservation measures used, reasons why such measures were not used, and correlates of discussion between providers and YA rectal cancer survivors. Design An online, cross-sectional survey was administered on the Facebook page of a national colorectal cancer (CRC) advocacy organization. Eligible participants were rectal cancer survivors diagnosed before age 50, between 6 and 36 months from diagnosis or relapse, and based in the US. Results Participants were 148 rectal cancer survivors. Over half of the survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about potential therapy-related fertility complications. Only one-fifth of survivors banked sperm (males) or eggs/embryos (females) prior to their cancer therapy. Older age at diagnosis and greater quality of life were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussions among males. Greater quality of life was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussion among females. Conclusions These findings indicate that the majority of YA rectal cancer survivors do not receive, or cannot recall, comprehensive cancer care, and help to identify patients with rectal cancer who may be at risk for inadequate fertility counseling. Clinicians should provide proper counseling to mitigate this late effect and to ensure optimal quality of life for YA rectal cancer survivors.

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether students’ views of mentors have changed as a function of the increased number of faculty members conducting research and the inclusion of undergraduate students in faculty mentors’ research teams, using reports from current students. The participants were 227 undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral students at two large, Western public universities located in the United States. One institution was a research-intensive university and the other was not. Students were asked to complete a questionnaire about whether they had a mentor, the characteristics of their mentors, and their perceptions of their mentors. The findings indicated that 28.5% of undergraduates and 95% of graduate students had mentors. Undergraduate students were significantly more likely to choose mentors for being inspiring instructors, and graduate students were significantly more likely to choose mentors because of interest in their research. The most important characteristic of both good and bad mentors was personality. Students at all levels perceived their mentors as very interested in their futures. Mentor satisfaction was high among students at all levels. The findings are encouraging, and they provide evidence that psychology has adapted well to the increased number of faculty conducting research and to the inclusion of undergraduate students in research.

Objectives. Survival rates for pediatric cancer have dramatically increased since the 1970s, and the population of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) exceeds 500,000 in the United States. Cancer during childhood and related treatments lead to long-term health problems, many of which are poorly understood. These problems can be amplified by suboptimal survivorship care. This report provides an overview of the existing evidence and forthcoming research relevant to disparities and barriers for pediatric cancer survivorship care, outlines pending questions, and offers guidance for future research. Data sources. This Technical Brief reviews published peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and Key Informant interviews to answer five Guiding Questions regarding disparities in the care of pediatric survivors, barriers to cancer survivorship care, proposed strategies, evaluated interventions, and future directions. Review methods. We searched research databases, research registries, and published reviews for ongoing and published studies in CCS to October 2020. We used the authors’ definition of CCS; where not specified, CCS included those diagnosed with any cancer prior to age 21. The grey literature search included relevant professional and nonprofit organizational websites and guideline clearinghouses. Key Informants provided content expertise regarding published and ongoing research, and recommended approaches to fill identified gaps. Results. In total, 110 studies met inclusion criteria. We identified 26 studies that assessed disparities in survivorship care for CCS. Key Informants discussed subgroups of CCS by race or ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage that may experience disparities in survivorship care, and these were supported in the published literature. Key Informants indicated that major barriers to care are providers (e.g., insufficient knowledge), the health system (e.g., availability of services), and payers (e.g., network adequacy); we identified 47 studies that assessed a large range of barriers to survivorship care. Sixteen organizations have outlined strategies to address pediatric survivorship care. Our searches identified only 27 published studies that evaluated interventions to alleviate disparities and reduce barriers to care. These predominantly assessed approaches that targeted patients. We found only eight ongoing studies that evaluated strategies to address disparities and barriers. Conclusions. While research has addressed disparities and barriers to survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors, evidence-based interventions to address these disparities and barriers to care are sparse. Additional research is also needed to examine less frequently studied disparities and barriers and to evaluate ameliorative strategies in order to improve the survivorship care for CCS.

71 Background: The information needs of young adult (YA) cancer survivors have been described, however, the specific needs of YA colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors are not well-documented. Characterizing the distinct unmet needs of YA CRC survivors is important given their unique cancer experience which may include an ostomy, chronic bowel symptoms, and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to examine CRC survivors’ unmet needs across general, clinical, and psychosocial domains. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered via Facebook in collaboration with a national YA CRC patient advocacy organization. Respondents (diagnosed 18-39) endorsed areas in which they required more information on aspects of their lives that may have been affected by their cancer experience. Needs were stratified by life stage (emerging [18-29 years] and young [30-39] adulthood). Results: Respondents (n=189) were colon (40.2%) and rectal (59.8%) cancer survivors with a mean current age of 32.2 years (SD=4.6) and a mean age of 30.2 years (SD=4.3) at diagnosis. Most endorsed items per domain included: nutrition and diet (52.1%), complementary and alternative treatments (45.4%), and talking about your cancer experience with family, friends, and co-workers (36.1%). Survivors in emerging adulthood (n=80), compared with those in young adulthood (n=109), endorsed notably greater needs in: staying physically fit (57.5% versus 38.5%), complementary and alternative treatments (57.5% versus 36.7%), and advice/help about dating and intimate relationships (18.8% versus 6.4%). Conclusions: Overall, half of respondents endorsed a desire for information on nutrition and diet, staying physically fit, and complementary and alternative treatments. Differing endorsement rates by age group indicate the importance of tailored approaches. Optimal counseling, resources, and referrals specific to life stage can mitigate the unmet needs of YA CRC survivors to improve health outcomes and quality of life.[Table: see text]

Simple Summary Young adult survivors of colorectal cancer often undergo intensive and multimodal cancer therapy and may experience impairments in health-related quality of life. However, knowledge regarding the impacts of colorectal cancer on the quality of life of young adults is limited. This study aimed to characterize overall health-related quality of life among young adult colorectal cancer survivors within 36 months of their diagnosis or relapse, to compare those who are shorter versus longer time from initial diagnosis or relapse, and to examine correlates across the distinct domains of quality of life. Such information can inform the development of life stage-appropriate counseling and interventions to maintain and improve health-related quality of life following a colorectal cancer diagnosis for this at-risk patient population. Abstract The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising among young adults. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in survivorship is not well-described in this population. We assessed HRQoL among young adult CRC survivors diagnosed from age 18–39 (AYAs) to examine differences by time from diagnosis, and to identify key correlates. A cross-sectional online survey was administered in collaboration with a national patient advocacy organization. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-C) was used to measure HRQoL, which assesses HRQoL globally and across 4 domains: emotional, physical, social, and functional. T-tests were conducted to compare HRQoL between survivors who were 6–18 months versus 19–36 months from diagnosis or relapse and multiple linear regression was conducted to identify correlates. The sample (n = 196) had a mean age of 32.2(SD ± 4.5); 116 (59.9%) were male; and the self-reported tumor location was colon (39.3%) or rectal (60.7%). The majority (56.4%) were diagnosed with stage 2 disease; 96.9% were non-metastatic. The mean global HRQoL score was 67.7 out of a possible score of 136. Across domains, mean scores were low. Emotional and physical well-being were significantly higher among survivors who were 19–36 months from diagnosis/relapse compared to those 6–18 months from diagnosis/relapse. Longer time from diagnosis and older current age were associated with higher HRQoL, while more intensive treatment and higher clinical disease stage were negatively associated, particularly in the emotional and physical domains. Overall, HRQoL was low in this population, and further research is needed to inform age-appropriate interventions to improve HRQoL for AYA CRC survivors.

3518 Background: Clinical guidelines indicate that oncologists should discuss potential treatment-induced infertility with patients with reproductive potential. Due to tumor location and use of multimodal therapies, young adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at heightened risk for treatment-related infertility. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered in collaboration with a national patient advocacy organization for young adult CRC survivors (currently under age 50). Survivors were asked to indicate if a doctor had ever talked to them about potential problems with their ability to have children after treatment and if they banked eggs/embryos (females) or sperm (males) prior to their cancer therapy. Those who reported that they did not preserve fertility were asked to indicate why ( not sure; I chose not to; I did not know this was an option; I wanted to, but could not afford it; and I wanted to, but my treatment would not allow it). Results: A total of 234 colon (N=86) or rectal (N=148) cancer survivors were included in the study (male [61.9%] and White [77.9%; table]). Most respondents were diagnosed with stage 2 cancer (55.8% colon, 61.6% rectal). Over half of male and female survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about problems with their ability to have children after treatment, and 75% did not bank eggs/embryos or sperm prior to their cancer therapy. Of those, over 20% endorsed ‘I wanted to, but could not afford it’ and over 20% endorsed ‘I did not know this was an option’. Conclusions: Most CRC survivors in this study reported never having a fertility discussion with their provider, suggesting that survivors are not receiving, or cannot recall, comprehensive and guideline-concordant cancer care. In addition, one-fifth were not aware of preservation options, suggesting potential healthcare and/or provider-level barriers to appropriate fertility counseling. Fertility preservation cost is another barrier to the appropriate delivery of care. Providers must ensure that patients receive timely fertility discussions covering options to preserve fertility to mitigate this late effect of cancer treatment to ensure optimal quality of life for CRC patients with reproductive potential.[Table: see text]

34 Background: Incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients under 50 years of age is rising. Quality of life in survivorship is not well-described in this population. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in CRC survivors ≤ 50 years old who were 6-18 months or 19-36 months from initial diagnosis or relapse. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered in collaboration with a national organization for young CRC survivors. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-C) was used to measure HRQoL, which assesses HRQoL globally, including a CRC specific scale, and emotional, physical, social, and functional well-being domains. T-tests were conducted to compare HRQoL between survivors who were 6-18 months versus 19-36 months from diagnosis/relapse. Results: This sample (n=308) had a mean age of 33.76 SD±6.68; 201 (65.3%) were male; tumor location was colon or rectal in 41.7% and 58.3%, respectively. The majority (55.23%) were diagnosed with stage 2 disease; 98.0% were non-metastatic. 42.2% experienced relapse; 25% had an ostomy. Most survivors were 6-18 months (N=189; 61.4%) from diagnosis/relapse, and key demographics and disease characteristics did not significantly differ between those who were shorter versus longer time from diagnosis/relapse. The mean global HRQoL score was 67.3 out of a possible score of 136. Across domains, scores were low, with social well-being the highest (15.15/28) and emotional well-being the lowest (11.44/24). Social well-being was significantly higher among survivors who were 6-18 months from diagnosis/relapse compared to those 19-36 months (15.98 for 6-18 months vs. 13.83 for 19-36; p