Search

Aims The incidence of in-hospital post-interventional complications and mortality after ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) vary among the type of procedure and most likely the experience of the centre. As ablation therapy of SVT is progressively being established as first-line therapy, further assessment of post-procedural complication rates is crucial for health care quality. Methods and results We aimed at determining the incidence of in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications from SVT ablations in German high-volume electrophysiological centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were registered by the German Diagnosis Related Groups—and the German Operation and Procedure Classification (OPS) system. A uniform search for SVT ablations from 2005 to 2020 with the same OPS codes defining the type of ablation/arrhythmia as well as the presence of a vascular complication, cardiac tamponade, and/or in-hospital death was performed. An overall of 47 610 ablations with 10 037 SVT ablations were registered from 2005 to 2020 among three high-volume centres. An overall complication rate of 0.5% (n = 38) was found [median age, 64; ±15 years; female n = 26 (68%)]. All-cause mortality was 0.02% (n = 2) and both patients had major prior co-morbidities precipitating a lethal outcome irrespective of the ablation procedure. Vascular complications occurred in 10 patients (0.1%), and cardiac tamponade was detected in 26 cases (0.3%). Conclusion The present case-based analysis shows an overall low incidence of in-hospital complications after SVT ablation highlighting the overall very good safety profile of SVT ablations in high-volume centres. Further prospective analysis is still warranted to guarantee continuous quality control and optimal patient care.

Aims The present study aims at analyzing the role of a preimplantation 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) on the prediction of inappropriate S-ICD® episodes. Methods N=116 screened patients (pts) with an S-ICD® and a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. A preimplantation 12-lead ECG (50 mm/s, 10 mm/mV) was analyzed with regard to QRS and T-wave amplitude, T wave concordance or discordance and QRS/T wave ratio in all 12 leads. To ensure an exact determination of parameters Datinf® Measure software was used. Results were correlated to the occurrence of oversensing of cardiac signals during follow-up. Results N = 116 pts. (63,8% male, mean age 40,9 ± 15,5 years) were included (primary prevention in 47.4% of pts). The most frequent cardiac diseases were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in n = 25 (21,6%), electrical heart disease in n = 20 (17,2%), and dilated cardiomyopathy in n = 17 (14,7%). Mean follow-up was 740 ± 549 days. During follow- up n = 17 (14.7%) pts. experienced n = 27 inappropriate episodes due to T-wave oversensing. Besides HCM (OR 6.16, CI 1.79–21.15, p = 0.004) a discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I (OR 6.5, CI 1.86–22.67, p = 0.003) was found to be a strong predictor for inappropriate shocks. In multivariate analysis the pts. with a combination of both had an 8.4-fold higher risk of misclassification of intracardiac signals (p = 0.003) with consecutive inappropriate therapy. Conclusion A discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I turned out to be a strong predictor for future inappropriate shocks in a typical S-ICD® cohort with special impact on HCM pts.

Background: Decision-making in primary prevention is not always trivial and many clinical scenarios are not reflected in current guidelines. To help evaluate a patient’s individual risk, a new score to predict the benefit of an implantable defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, the MADIT-ICD benefit score, has recently been proposed. The score tries to predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic death based on data from four previous MADIT trials. We aimed at examining its usefulness in a large single-center register of S-ICD patients with various underlying cardiomyopathies. Methods and results: All S-ICD patients with a primary preventive indication for ICD implantation from our large single-center database were included in the analysis (n = 173). During a follow-up of 1227 ± 978 days, 27 patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias, while 6 patients died for non-arrhythmic reasons. There was a significant correlation for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 29, p = 0.04) to the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. However, the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias could not sufficiently be predicted by the MADIT-ICD VT/VF score (p = 0.3) in patients with (n = 142, p = 0.19) as well as patients without structural heart disease (n = 31, p = 0.88) and patients with LV-EF < 35%. Of the risk factors included in the risk score calculation, only non-sustained ventricular tachycardias were significantly associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.02). Of note, non-arrhythmic death could effectively be predicted by the proposed non-arrhythmic mortality score as part of the benefit score (p = 0.001, r = 0.3) also mainly driven by ICM patients. Age, diabetes mellitus, and a BMI < 23 kg/m2 were key predictors of non-arrhythmic death implemented in the score. Conclusion: The MADIT-ICD benefit score adds a new option to evaluate expected benefit of ICD implantation for primary prevention. In a large S-ICD cohort of primary prevention, the value of the score was limited to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Future research should evaluate the performance of the score in different subgroups and compare it to other risk scores to assess its value for daily clinical practice.

Syncopes are a very common phenomenon and have a high recurrence rate. The differentiation between the psychogenic and physical, especially of arrhythmic origin, remains difficult. In many cases, an implantable loop recorder is used for the detection of possible arrhythmias, leading to syncopes. Yet, the existing literature suggests that psychological factors may play a significant role in recurrent syncopes. We aimed at analyzing the potential role of several psychological factors on the recurrence of arrhythmic or non-arrhythmic syncopes. Methods and results: A total of 119 patients, who had received an implantable loop recorder for recurrent syncopes at our center between 01/2018 and 12/2021, participated in this retrospective cohort study. Anxiety, depression and quality of life were assessed using extensively validated questionnaires (GAD-7, PHQ-9 and SF-12). The mean follow-up after loop recorder implantation was 710 ± 430 days and 50% of patients were female. The mean patient age was 54.8 ± 18.6 years. Most patients had no evidence of structural heart disease (84%), and normal LV function (92%). A statistical analysis revealed that the presence of structural heart disease was the strongest predictor for arrhythmic syncope during follow-up. In patients with non-arrhythmic syncopes, we found significantly higher levels of anxiety (GAD-7 score: 2.5 ± 2.6 vs. 4.8 ± 4.3) and depression (PHQ-9 score: 3.9 ± 3.6 vs. 6.8 ± 5.1), and a lower quality of life (SF-12 score: 33.7 ± 6.4 vs. 29.6 ± 7.8). Discussion: We identified factors as contributors to a better identification of patients at risk for arrhythmic as well as non-arrhythmic syncopes. Especially anxious or depressive symptoms may hinted at non-arrhythmic causes of syncope. However, the study was limited by its retrospective design and low patient number. Further trials should likewise combine the diagnostic yield of loop recorders with psychometric evaluations before implantation and combine it with additional diagnostic measures, such as video monitoring, to further examine the role of psychological factors in the pathomechanism and treatment of syncope.

Catheter-based ablation is nowadays a safe and widespread procedure for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. This requires exact anatomical knowledge both before and during the examination and is an important prerequisite for targeted treatment. At the beginning of the era of interventional catheter-based treatment, fluoroscopy was the only and usual means of visualization, whereas in the middle of the 1990s continuous 3D-mapping systems were developed for the non-fluoroscopic examination of patients. The correct use of these 3‑D systems, which non-fluoroscopically visualize the catheter and mostly identify mechanisms of arrhythmia in great detail, nowadays makes an important contribution to successful interventional catheter treatment of arrhythmia; however, it is not uncommon for patients with ventricular arrhythmia to also carry implanted electronic devices, such as pacemakers, defibrillators or less frequently left ventricular hemodynamic support systems. All implantable devices lead to electromagnetic interferences, which can complicate the diagnostics and treatment during electrophysiological examinations and ablation. This article addresses the adversities and experiences associated with magnet-based 3D systems and implantable electromagnetically active cardiac devices.Katheterablationen sind heute ein weit verbreitetes Verfahren zur Behandlung von Herzrhythmusstörungen. Hierfür sind genaue anatomische Kenntnisse sowohl im Vorfeld als auch während der Untersuchung erforderlich und eine wichtige Voraussetzung zur zielgerichteten Behandlung. Während zu Beginn der Ära von katheterinterventionellen Behandlungen die Fluoroskopie das einzige und gängige Visualisierungsmittel war, sind seit Mitte der 1990er Jahre kontinuierlich 3‑D-Mappingssysteme zur nichtfluoroskopischen Untersuchung von Patienten (weiter)entwickelt worden. Die sachgemäße Anwendung dieser 3‑D-Systeme, die Katheter nichtfluoroskopisch visualisieren und Arrhythmiemechanismen meist sehr detailliert identifizieren, leistet heute einen bedeutsamen Beitrag zur erfolgreichen katheterinterventionellen Behandlung von Rhythmusstörungen. Vor allem Patienten mit ventrikulären Arrhythmien sind jedoch nicht selten Träger elektronischer Devices wie Defibrillatoren oder teilweise hämodynamischen Unterstützungssystemen. Implantierbare Devices führen zu elektromagnetischen Interferenzen, die die Diagnostik und Behandlung im Rahmen elektrophysiologischen Untersuchungen und Ablationen erschweren können. Dieser Artikel diskutiert die Widrigkeiten und Erfahrungen in Zusammenhang mit magnetbasierten 3‑D-Systemen sowie implantierbaren elektromagnetisch aktiven „cardiac devices“.

Decision-making in primary prevention is not always trivial and many clinical scenarios are not reflected in current guidelines. To help evaluate a patient's individual risk, a new score to predict the benefit of an implantable defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, the MADIT-ICD benefit score, has recently been proposed. The score tries to predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic death based on data from four previous MADIT trials. We aimed at examining its usefulness in a large single-center register of S-ICD patients with various underlying cardiomyopathies.All S-ICD patients with a primary preventive indication for ICD implantation from our large single-center database were included in the analysis (The MADIT-ICD benefit score adds a new option to evaluate expected benefit of ICD implantation for primary prevention. In a large S-ICD cohort of primary prevention, the value of the score was limited to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Future research should evaluate the performance of the score in different subgroups and compare it to other risk scores to assess its value for daily clinical practice.

Introduction Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) are often difficult to document due to their intermittent, short-lasting nature. Smartphone-based one-lead ECG monitors (sECG) were initially developed for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. No data have been published regarding their potential role in differentiating inappropiate sinus tachycardia (IST) from regular SVT. If cardiologists could distinguish IST from SVT in sECG, economic health care burden might be significantly reduced. Methods We prospectively recruited 75 consecutive patients with known SVT undergoing an EP study. In all patients, four ECG were recorded: a sECG during SVT and during sinus tachycardia and respective 12-lead ECG. Two experienced electrophysiologists were blinded to the diagnoses and separately evaluated all ECG. Results Three hundred individual ECG were recorded in 75 patients (47 female, age 50 ± 18 years, BMI 26 ± 5 kg/m2, 60 AVNRT, 15 AVRT). The electrophysiologists’ blinded interpretation of sECG recordings showed a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 91% for the detection of SVT (interobserver agreement κ = 0.76). In high-quality sECG recordings (68%), sensitivity rose to 95% with a specificity of 92% (interobserver agreement of κ = 0.91). Specificity increased to 96% when both electrophysiologists agreed on the diagnosis. Respective 12-lead ECG had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% for the detection of SVT. Conclusion A smartphone-based one-lead ECG monitor allows for differentiation of SVT from IST in about 90% of cases. These results should encourage cardiologists to integrate wearables into clinical practice, possibly reducing time to definitive diagnosis of an arrhythmia and unnecessary EP procedures. Graphical abstract A smartphone-based one lead ECG device (panel A) can be used reliably to differentiate supraventricular tachycardia (panel B) from inappropriate sinus tachycardia when compared to a simultaneously conducted gold-standard electrophysiology study (panels C, D).

Arrhythmias are among the most common late complications in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and a frequent reason for hospital admission. Both, supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, not only cause debilitating symptoms, but may be life-threatening by increasing risk of stroke, causing or worsening heart failure and being associated with sudden death. Substrate and risk for arrhythmia differs widely between congenital defects with specific arrhythmias being much more common in some patients than others. Atrial macroreentrant arrhythmias are particularly frequent in patients with atrial septal defects and repair that involves atrial incisions including patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and atrial switch. Accessory pathways and related arrhythmias are often associated with Ebstein's anomaly and congenitally corrected TGA. Monomorphic ventricular arrhythmias occur in patients with ventricular incisions, namely patients with Tetralogy of Fallot. Changes in surgical repair techniques influence arrhythmia prevalence and substrate as well as anatomical access for catheter ablation procedures. In addition, epidemiologic changes associated with improved long-term survival will further increase the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in ACHD. This article summarizes current understanding of prevalence of specific arrhythmias, underlying mechanisms, medical and interventional treatment options and their outcome in ACHD.

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Slow pathway modification (SPM) is the accepted first line treatment with reported success rates around 95%. Information regarding possible predictors of AVNRT recurrence is scarce.Out of 4170 consecutive patients with SPM in our department from 1993-2018, we identified 78 patients (1.9%) receiving > 1 SPM (69% female, median age 50 years) with a recurrence of AVNRT after a successful SPM. We matched these patients for age, gender and number of radiofrequency applications during first SPM with 78 patients who received one successful SPM in our center without AVNRT recurrence. Both groups were analyzed for possible predictors of a recurrence of AVNRT during long-term follow-up. The recurrence group contained a significantly lower proportion of patients with an occurrence of junctional beats during SPM (69% versus 89%, P = 0.006). Moreover, significantly more cases of previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT; 21% versus 5%, P = 0.007) and inducible AF/AT during electrophysiology study (23% versus 6%, P = 0.006) were present in the recurrence group. While more than half of patients had a recurrence within the first year, in 20% symptoms reappeared ≥ 4 years after ablation.In a small percentage of patients, AVNRT recurs after an initially successful ablation. Interestingly, these patients had significantly fewer junctional beats during ablation and a higher rate of other (inducible) arrhythmias. AVNRT recurrence spanned a considerable timeframe and should remain a differential diagnosis, even years after ablation.

Die kardiale Resynchronisationstherapie (CRT) ist ein fester Bestandteil in der Behandlung der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz, wobei ein moglichst hoher biventrikularer Stimulationsanteil fur die Effektivitat dieser Therapie von groser Bedeutung ist. Eine vermehrte ventrikulare Extrasystolie (VES) stellt neben atrialen Arrhythmien wie Vorhofflimmern die haufigste Ursache einer ineffektiven Resynchronisationstherapie dar. Neben der prognostisch ungunstigen Reduktion des Stimulationsanteils ist eine ventrikulare Extrasystolie beim Vorliegen einer strukturellen Herzerkrankung generell mit einem reduzierten Outcome assoziiert, was die Bedeutung einer adaquaten Therapie der VES in diesem Kollektiv unterstreicht. Die Optionen, durch Anpassung der Gerateprogrammierung den Stimulationsanteil zu erhohen, sind insgesamt limitiert. Aufgrund des wechselseitigen Zusammenhangs zwischen Kardiomyopathie bzw. Herzinsuffizienz und ventrikularer Arrhythmielast ist eine adaquate Herzinsuffizienztherapie essenziell zur Reduktion der Extrasystolie. Neben einer Betablockertherapie sind die spezifischen medikamentos-antiarrhythmischen Therapieoptionen aufgrund der in der Regel bei CRT-Patienten zugrundeliegenden strukturellen Herzerkrankung auf die Klasse-III-Antiarrhythmika Amiodaron und mit Einschrankungen Sotalol beschrankt. Insbesondere bei idiopathischer Extrasystolie ist die Katheterablation der medikamentosen Therapie uberlegen, aber auch zur Ablationsbehandlung von VES bei struktureller Herzerkrankung und bei CRT-Nonrespondern liegen vielversprechende Daten vor.

Background The benefits of de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with QRS-prolongation and impaired left-ventricular function (LVEF) are well established. Current guidelines also recommend CRT-upgrade in patients requiring permanent or frequent right ventricular pacing (RVP) with symptomatic heart failure and reduced LVEF. Whereas several predictors of response to de novo CRT-implantation such as female gender, QRS-duration, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are known due to large prospective trials, similar factors regarding CRT-upgrade are currently lacking. Methods and results We examine 114 patients 3–6 months after CRT-upgrade due to frequent RVP (> 50%) and symptomatic heart failure. Response to CRT was evaluated by improvement in NYHA class referring to the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. Only cardiomyopathy type and use of Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor had an impact on response to CRT-upgrade in a linear regression model. Patients with NICM presented a greater responder rate than patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (80.4 vs. 60.3%, p Conclusion Only underlying heart disease (NICM vs. ICM) and the use of ACE inhibitor were significant predictors of response to CRT-upgrade. In contrast to de novo CRT-recipients, where pre-implant QRS-duration is a key predictor, QRS-duration during RV-pacing has no significant impact on CRT-response in this cohort. Graphic abstract

Background: Amiodarone has a profound adverse toxicity profile. Large population-based analyses quantifying the risk of thyroid dysfunction (TD) in adults with and without congenital heart disease (ACHD) are lacking. Methods: All adults registered with a major German health insurer (≈9.2 million members) with amiodarone prescriptions were analyzed. Occurrence of amiodarone-associated TD was assessed. Results: Overall, 48,891 non-ACHD (37% female; median 73 years) and 886 ACHD (34% female; median 66 years) received amiodarone. Over 184,787 patient-years, 10,875 cases of TD occurred. The 10-year risk for TD was 38% in non-ACHD (35% ACHD). Within ACHD, compared to amiodarone-naïve patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for TD was 3.9 at 4 years after any amiodarone exposure. TD was associated with female gender (HR 1.42, p < 0.001) and younger age (HR 0.97 per 10 years, p = 0.009). Patients with congenital heart disease were not at increased risk (HR 0.98, p = 0.80). Diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease, however, was a predictor for TD (HR 1.56, p = 0.02). Amiodarone was continued in 47% of non-ACHD (38% ACHD), and 2.3% of non-ACHD (3.5% ACHD) underwent thyroid surgery/radiotherapy. Conclusions: Amiodarone-associated TD is common and comparable in non-ACHD and ACHD. While female gender and younger age are predictors for TD, congenital heart disease is not necessarily associated with an elevated risk.

Aim The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) has evolved to a potential first option for many patients who have to be protected from sudden cardiac death. Many trials have underlined a similar performance regarding its effectiveness in relation to transvenous ICDs and have shown the expected benefits concerning infective endocarditis and lead failure. However, there have also been problems due to the peculiarities of the device, such as oversensing and myopotentials. In this study, we present patients from a large tertiary centre suffering from complications with an S-ICD and propose possible solutions. Methods and results All S-ICD patients who experienced complications related to the device (n = 40) of our large-scale single-centre S-ICD registry (n = 351 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, complications occurring and solutions to these problems were documented over a mean follow-up of 50 months. In most cases (n = 23), patients suffered from oversensing (18 cases with T wave or P wave oversensing, 5 due to myopotentials). Re-programming successfully prevented further oversensing episode in 13/23 patients. In 9 patients, generator or lead-related complications, mostly due to infectious reasons (5/9), occurred. Further problems consisted of ineffective shocks in one patient and need for antibradycardia stimulation in 2 patients and indication for CRT in 2 other patients. In total, the S-ICD had to be extracted in 10 patients. 7 of them received a tv-ICD subsequently, 3 patients refused re-implantation of any ICD. One other patient kept the ICD but had antitachycardic therapy deactivated due to inappropriate shocks for myopotential oversensing. Conclusion The S-ICD is a valuable option for many patients for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Nonetheless, certain problems are immanent to the S-ICD (limited re-programming options, size of the generator) and should be addressed in future generations of the S-ICD. Graphic abstract

Background The subcutaneous implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD™, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICD™ use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common reason for the implantation of an ICD. However, there are no sufficient data on the performance of the S-ICD™ in this patient cohort. Materials and methods All S-ICD™ patients with DCM as the main indication for ICD implantation (n = 47 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry (n = 294 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 22.9 ± 18.5 months. Results A total of 47 patients with DCM as the underlying structural heart disease received an S-ICD™ in our institution. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 12% and a 28% had a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. During follow-up eight ventricular tachyarrhythmias were adequately terminated in three patients. In four patients, oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector. There was no need for a change to a cardiac resynchronization (CRT) system while one system was changed to a VVI-ICD due to S-ICD™ wound infection. Conclusion The S-ICD™ seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in patients with DCM and no indication for CRT. As clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmias consisted of ventricular fibrillation or fast ventricular tachycardia in all patients in our cohort, no change to transvenous ICDs for anti-tachycardia pacing delivery was necessary.

As with all cardiac interventions, performing left ventricular ablation requires profound knowledge of cardiac anatomy. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of left ventricular anatomy and to characterize complex and clinically relevant structures from an electrophysiologist-centered perspective. In addition to the different access routes, the trabecular network, the left ventricular outflow tract, and the left ventricular conduction system, complex anatomical structures such as the aortomitral continuity and the left ventricular summit are also explained. In addition, this article offers multiple clinical examples that combine ECG, anatomy, and electrophysiologic study.Die Durchführung einer linksventrikulären Ablation setzt, wie bei grundsätzlich allen kardialen Interventionen, eine gute Kenntnis der kardialen Anatomie voraus. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, eine Übersicht über die Anatomie des linken Ventrikels zu geben und komplexe klinisch relevante Strukturen aus einer untersucherzentrierten Perspektive zu charakterisieren. Neben den unterschiedlichen Zugangswegen, dem Trabekelwerk, dem linksventrikulären Ausflusstrakt und dem spezifischen Reizleitungssystem, sollen im Folgenden auch komplexe anatomische Strukturen wie die aortomitrale Kontinuität und der linksventrikuläre Summit erläutert und kartiert werden. Darüber hinaus bietet dieser Artikel mehrere klinische Fälle, die eine Verbindung zwischen EKG, Anatomie und Ablation ermöglichen sollen.

Registry data add important information to randomized controlled trials (RCT) on real-life aspects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). This analysis of the prospectively conducted German Device Registry aims at comparing mortality rates, comorbidities, complication rates to results from RCT.The German Device registry (DEVICE) prospectively collected data on ICD and CRT-D first implantations from 50 German centres. Demographic data, details on cardiac disease, electrocardiogram (ECG), medication, and data about procedure, complications, and hospital stay were stored in electronic case report forms. One year after device implantation patients were contacted for follow-up.DEVICE included n = 4384 first ICD/CRT-D implantations (29.3% CRT-D devices). We found a strong adherence to guidelines with over 90% of patients being on ß-blocker and ACE-inhibitor medication and adequate QRS width in the majority of CRT-D patients. Patients receiving a CRT-D were older (67.6 ± 11.0 years vs. 63.9 ± 13.4 years, p .001) and had lower ejection fractions (mean 25% vs. 30%, p .001) compared to ICD patients. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant underlying heart disease in CRT-D (53.3%), coronary artery disease in ICD patients (64.7%). Compared to RCT our DEVICE patients had more comorbidities (17.9% chronic kidney disease [CKD]) and higher 1-year mortality rates (10.7% ICD group, 12.3% CRT group). In multivariate analysis, CKD patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of 1-year mortality.Despite relevant limitations of registry data, DEVICE highlights important differences between RCT and real-world registry data and the impact of comorbidities on mortality of ICD and CRT-D recipients.

Background: Different electrocardiogram (ECG) findings are known to be independent predictors of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). It remains unknown how these findings influence very long-term prognosis. Methods and Results: A total of 102 consecutive patients (75 males, mean age 65 ± 10 years) referred to our center for CRT implantation had previously been included in this prospective observational study. The same patient group was now re-evaluated for death from all causes over a prolonged median follow-up of 10.3 years (interquartile range 9.4–12.5 years). During follow-up, 55 patients died, and 82% of the clinical non-responders (n = 23) and 44% of the responders (n = 79) were deceased. We screened for univariate associations and found QRS width during biventricular (BIV) pacing (p = 0.02), left ventricular (LV) pacing (p &lt, 0.01), Δ LV paced–right ventricular (RV) paced (p = 0.03), age (p = 0.03), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (p &lt, 0.01), CHA2DS2-Vasc score (p &lt, 0.01), glomerular filtration rate (p &lt, 0.01), coronary artery disease (p &lt, 0.01), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (p = 0.01), arterial hypertension (p &lt, 0.01), NT-proBNP (p &lt, 0.01), and clinical response to CRT (p &lt, 0.01) to be significantly associated with mortality. In the multivariate analysis, NICM, the lower NYHA class, and smaller QRS width during BIV pacing were independent predictors of better outcomes. Conclusion: Our data show that QRS width duration during biventricular pacing, an ECG parameter easily obtainable during LV lead placement, is an independent predictor of mortality in a long-term follow-up. Our data add further evidence that NICM and lower NYHA class are independent predictors for better outcome after CRT implantation.

Introduction: Multiple studies have shown that left atrial (LA) enlargement is a strong predictor of poor outcome after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). LA size is commonly approximated as the diameter in the parasternal long axis. It remains unknown whether more precise echocardiographic measurements of LA size allow for better correlation with outcome after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods and results: We performed a retrospective study of 131 consecutive patients (43 females, 60% paroxysmal AF, mean CHA2DS2-Vasc score 1.6, mean age 61 ± 12 years) referred for PVI. Measurements of the LA were carried out by a single observer in transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) performed prior to ablation. We calculated diameter of the LA in the parasternal long axis (PLAX), LA area in the 2- as well as 4-Chamber (CH) view. LA volume was computed using the disc summation technique (LAV) and indexed to body surface area (LAVI). Procedural and follow-up data were gathered from a prospective AF database. Ablation was performed exclusively using the second generation cryoballoon by the same operators. Follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months showed freedom from AF in 76%, 73% and 73% respectively. Mean values of LA calculations were LAPLAX: 37.9 mm ± 6.3 mm, 2CH area: 22.5 cm2 ± 6.7 cm2, 4CH area: 21.4 cm2 ± 5.5 cm2, LAV: 73.7 mL ± 26.1 mL and LAVI: 36.2 mL/m2 ± 12.7 mL/m2, respectively. C statistic revealed the best concordance of LAVI with outcome after 12 months (C = 0.67), LAV also exhibited a satisfactory value (C = 0.61) in comparison to surfaces in 2CH (C = 0.59) and 4CH (C = 0.57). PLAX showed the worst correlation (C = 0.51). Additionally, different binary logistic regression models identified three independent predictors of AF outcome after cryoballoon PVI: gender (OR = 0.95 per year, p = 0.01), LAV (OR = 1.3/10mL, p = 0.02) and LAVI (OR = 1.58/10 mL/m2, p = 0.02). In all models, PLAX and area measurements were not predictive. Conclusions: Our data add further to evidence that LA size lends itself well as a predictor of PVI outcome. LAVI and LAV were independently predictive of rhythm outcome after PVI. This did not hold true for more commonly used measurements, such as PLAX diameter and surfaces of the LA, irrespective of the view chosen.

Background: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is used in an increasing number of patients for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Decision-making in primary prevention is not always trivial and many clinical scenarios are not reflected in current ICD guidelines. To help evaluating the patient’s individual risk, a new score trying to predict the benefit of an ICD implantation for primary prevention, the MADIT-ICD benefit score, which tries to predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic death, has been proposed. We therefore aimed at examining its usefulness in a large single centre register of S-ICD patients Methods and results: All S-ICD patients with a primary preventive indication for ICD implantation from our large single centre database were included in the analysis (n=173). During a follow-up of 1227±978 days 27 patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias, while 6 patients died for non-arrhythmic reasons. Occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias could not sufficiently be predicted by the MADIT-ICD VT/VF score (p=0.3) in patients with (n=142, p=0.19) as well as patients without structural heart disease (n=31, p=0.88). However, there was a significant correlation for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n=29, p=0.04). Only one parameter (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia) was significantly associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.02). Of note, non-arrhythmic death could effectively be predicted by the proposed non-arrhythmic mortality score as part of the benefit score (p=0.001, r=0.3) also mainly driven by ICM patients. Age, diabetes mellitus, and a BMI 2 were key predictors of non-arrhythmic death implemented in the score.Conclusion: The MADIT-ICD benefit score adds a new option to evaluate expected benefit of ICD implantation for primary prevention. However, in our S-ICD cohort, the only group in which the score worked properly for prediction of sudden and non-sudden death were ICM patients, so that a larger validation in more heterogeneous cohorts in mandatory to claim general validity for this score in risk stratification for primary preventive ICD implantation.

Atrial fibrillation and other atrial tachyarrhythmias are increasing with age and concomitant morbidity. First options in symptomatic patients are drug treatment and catheter ablation. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias despite treatment. Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) may be helpful in many of these patients. Therefore, we investigated AVNA patients with a long-term follow-up. We enrolled 82 patients with a follow-up longer than 1 year receiving AVNA for drug- and ablation-resistant atrial tachyarrhythmias (AA) in a retrospective manner. Mean follow-up duration was 48 ± 24 months. 50% of the patients initially received AVNA to optimize biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy, the other 50% because of refractory symptomatic tachyarrhythmias. Persistent AV block was achieved in every patient. Symptom relief and patient satisfaction were high during follow-up. Due to system upgrades there were 63% of patients with a biventricular system during follow-up. In these patients, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) increased by 7% (42-49%) after ablation. AVNA is effective in increasing biventricular pacing as well as for symptom relief in patients with refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias. AVNA should be considered as a valuable option in patients with refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias lacking other treatment options.

The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICD™ use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups. Among several cardiac diseases that prone to SCD, coronary artery disease (CAD) carries several peculiarities that may hamper S-ICD™ therapy in this cohort. CAD can lead to an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with a reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and bundle branch blocks, which can be difficult for ICD sensing and discrimination of arrhythmia. CAD is mainly driven by risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, which put these patients at an elevated risk for infectious complications of cardiac devices. Furthermore, in ICM myocardial scars are frequent and are a potential substrate for ventricular tachycardia, which may be accessible for antitachycardia pacing. At the moment, it remains unclear if there is a value of S-ICD™ therapy in this subgroup. Therefore, this study analysed patients with CAD. All S-ICD™ patients with CAD as the main indication for ICD implantation (n = 45 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 22.5 ± 8.3 months. Primary prevention of SCD was the indication for implantation of an S-ICD™ in 28 patients (62%). Of all 45 patients with an overall mean age of 58.1 ± 11.4 years, 40 were male (88%). The mean LVEF was 37.7 ± 12.6%. Three episodes of ventricular arrhythmia (one monomorphic, one polymorphic, one ventricular fibrillation) were adequately terminated in three patients (7%). In only one patient, oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector. 15 of the examined 45 patients previously had a transvenous ICD, which was explanted due to system-related infections. In only two patients, S-ICD™ was changed to transvenous ICD because of the need of antibradycardia stimulation. There were no S-ICD™ system-related infections. The S-ICD™ seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in CAD patients. Patients with systemic infections of a transvenous ICD and, therefore, a need for an alternative might benefit from the absence of intracardiac leads as the S-ICD™ is safe and works flawlessly in these patients. Inadequate shock delivery was very rare, while every episode of ventricular arrhythmia was terminated by the first shock.

Fortunately, the population of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is growing due to improved operation techniques. Life expectancy is continuously rising, nevertheless, sudden cardiac death is one of the leading causes of mortality in ACHD late after initial diagnosis. Risk stratification in ACHD remains challenging as large study results are missing, congenital defects and operation methods differ considerably between individual patients and results from acquired heart diseases are often not conferrable. The purpose of this narrative review is to objectively summarize the current knowledge on arrhythmogenic risk of ACHD and to give an overview on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in this collective. Remarkable progress has been made in electrophysiological understanding of critical areas of slow conduction especially in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). In patients with transposition of the great arteries after atrial baffling (Mustard/Senning procedure) atrial arrhythmias play a crucial role in sudden cardiac death. ICD therapy in ACHD may pose special technical challenges due to limited access for intracardiac leads. The introduction of the totally subcutaneous ICD improved therapeutic options for ACHD especially when contraindications for transvenous leads are present. Risk stratification in ACHD has to be seen as a team approach, requires thorough understanding of congenital heart defects and the operation techniques and needs unconventional technical approaches in some cases.

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Slow pathway modification (SPM) is the accepted first line treatment with reported success rates around 95%. Information regarding possible predictors of AVNRT recurrence is scarce.Out of 4170 consecutive patients with SPM in our department from 1993-2018, we identified 78 patients (1.9%) receiving1 SPM (69% female, median age 50 years) with a recurrence of AVNRT after a successful SPM. We matched these patients for age, gender and number of radiofrequency applications during first SPM with 78 patients who received one successful SPM in our center without AVNRT recurrence. Both groups were analyzed for possible predictors of a recurrence of AVNRT during long-term follow-up. The recurrence group contained a significantly lower proportion of patients with an occurrence of junctional beats during SPM (69% versus 89%, P = 0.006). Moreover, significantly more cases of previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT; 21% versus 5%, P = 0.007) and inducible AF/AT during electrophysiology study (23% versus 6%, P = 0.006) were present in the recurrence group. While more than half of patients had a recurrence within the first year, in 20% symptoms reappeared ≥ 4 years after ablation.In a small percentage of patients, AVNRT recurs after an initially successful ablation. Interestingly, these patients had significantly fewer junctional beats during ablation and a higher rate of other (inducible) arrhythmias. AVNRT recurrence spanned a considerable timeframe and should remain a differential diagnosis, even years after ablation.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an integral part in the treatment of chronic heart failure. However, a high degree of biventricular pacing is essential for the effectiveness of this therapy. In addition to atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions (PVC) are a common cause of reduced biventricular stimulation in CRT. In addition to the prognostically unfavorable reduction of biventricular pacing, PVC are generally associated with reduced outcome in the presence of structural heart disease. Options to increase biventricular stimulation percentage by reprogramming the CRT devices are limited in the majority of cases. Due to the mutual relationship between cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias, adequate heart failure therapy is essential for the reduction of ventricular ectopy. In addition to beta-blocker therapy, specific antiarrhythmic medication is mostly limited to class III antiarrhythmic drugs due to the structural heart disease usually present in CRT patients. Catheter ablation is superior to pharmacological therapy especially in the field of idiopathic PVC, but promising data are also available for catheter ablation of PVC in structural heart disease and CRT nonresponders.Die kardiale Resynchronisationstherapie (CRT) ist ein fester Bestandteil in der Behandlung der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz, wobei ein möglichst hoher biventrikulärer Stimulationsanteil für die Effektivität dieser Therapie von großer Bedeutung ist. Eine vermehrte ventrikuläre Extrasystolie (VES) stellt neben atrialen Arrhythmien wie Vorhofflimmern die häufigste Ursache einer ineffektiven Resynchronisationstherapie dar. Neben der prognostisch ungünstigen Reduktion des Stimulationsanteils ist eine ventrikuläre Extrasystolie beim Vorliegen einer strukturellen Herzerkrankung generell mit einem reduzierten Outcome assoziiert, was die Bedeutung einer adäquaten Therapie der VES in diesem Kollektiv unterstreicht. Die Optionen, durch Anpassung der Geräteprogrammierung den Stimulationsanteil zu erhöhen, sind insgesamt limitiert. Aufgrund des wechselseitigen Zusammenhangs zwischen Kardiomyopathie bzw. Herzinsuffizienz und ventrikulärer Arrhythmielast ist eine adäquate Herzinsuffizienztherapie essenziell zur Reduktion der Extrasystolie. Neben einer Betablockertherapie sind die spezifischen medikamentös-antiarrhythmischen Therapieoptionen aufgrund der in der Regel bei CRT-Patienten zugrundeliegenden strukturellen Herzerkrankung auf die Klasse-III-Antiarrhythmika Amiodaron und mit Einschränkungen Sotalol beschränkt. Insbesondere bei idiopathischer Extrasystolie ist die Katheterablation der medikamentösen Therapie überlegen, aber auch zur Ablationsbehandlung von VES bei struktureller Herzerkrankung und bei CRT-Nonrespondern liegen vielversprechende Daten vor.

Background The role and technique of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly is unclear. While in young patients pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has evolved as first option, in older patients decision is often made in favor of drugs as higher complication rates and less benefit are suspected. Therefore, data on PVI of paroxysmal and persistent AF in these patients is still sparse but of eminent importance. Hypothesis PVI is comparably safe in the very elderly with similar recurrence and complication rates. Methods We enrolled all patients (n = 146) aged >75 years who underwent a first PVI over a period of 10 years (2009‐2019) from our prospective single‐center ablation registry. Mean follow‐up time was 231 ± 399 days. Results Acute ablation success defined as complete PVI and sinus rhythm at the end of the ablation procedure was high (99%). Severe periprocedural complications occurred in 3.3% (stroke/TIA n = 2; 1.3%; pericardial effusion n = 3; 2%). In 4.6% of patients symptomatic sick‐sinus‐syndrome was unmasked after PVI resulting in pacemaker implantation. There were no deaths related to PVI. Recurrence rate of symptomatic AF was 37.3% resulting in a Re‐PVI and/or substrate ablation in 32 pts (20.9%). During follow‐up pacemaker implantation plus atrioventricular node ablation was performed in 10 pts (6.8%). There was a trend toward lower recurrence rates with single‐shot devices (cryoballoon, multielectrode phased‐radiofrequency ablation catheter) than with point‐by‐point radiofrequency while complication rates did not differ. Conclusion PVI for AF is a feasible treatment option also in patients >75 years with a reasonable success and safety profile. Higher success rates occurred in patients treated with a single‐shot device as compared to point‐by‐point ablation.

Background Ablation emerged as first line therapy in the treatment of various arrhythmias. Nevertheless, in older patients (pts), decision is often made pro drug treatment as more complications and less benefit are suspected. Hypothesis We hypothesized that different kind of ablations can be performed safely regardless of the pts age. Methods We enrolled all pts aged >80 years (yrs) who underwent ablation for three different arrhythmias (atrial flutter [AFL], atrioventricular nodal re‐entry tachycardia [AVNRT], ventricular tachycardia [VT]) between August 2002 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcome were compared with matched groups aged 60 to 80 years and 40 to 60 years, respectively. Periprocedural and in‐hospital complications were analyzed. Results The analysis included 1191 patients (397 pts per group: 63% AFL, 23% AVNRT, 14% VT) who underwent ablation. Acute success was high in all types of arrhythmias irrespective of age (>80, 60‐80, 40‐60 years: AFL 97%/98%/98%, AVNRT 97%/95%/97%, VT 82%/86%/93%). Rate of periprocedural complications were similar in all groups treated for AFL and AVNRT. For VT ablations significant differences were noted between pts > 80 or 60 to 80 years and those aged 40‐60 years (16.1%/14.3%/3.6%). Most complications were infections and groin haematoma. No strokes, iatrogenic atrioventricular blocks and deaths related to the ablation occurred. Conclusion Ablation appears safe in pts > 80 years. Success rates were comparable to matched younger cohorts. A significant difference was observed for VT patients.

Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems are established therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death. Long-term data on ICD systems in children and adolescents is rare. The present study displays a long-term single-center follow-up of children and adolescents with ICD systems. Methods and results The present study represents a single-center experience of patients younger than 18 years who received an ICD (n = 58). Follow-up data included in-house follow-up as well as examinations of collaborating specialists. Mean age at implantation was 14.0 ± 3.3 years and 33 patients (56.9%) were male. A transvenous ICD system was implanted in 54 patients (93.1%). In 33 patients (56.9%) electrical heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation represented the underlying condition of ICD implantation. Median follow-up duration was 70 months (45; 94). 3 patients (5.2%) died during the observation period. None of these deaths was associated with ICD failure. Appropriate shocks occurred in 32 patients (55.2%). Inappropriate shock delivery was recorded in 17 patients (29.3%). Supraventricular tachycardia represented the most frequent cause of inappropriate shock delivery (9 patients, 52.9%). T-wave oversensing led to inappropriate shock delivery in 3 patients (17.6%). In 5 patients (29.4%), lead failure caused inappropriate shock delivery. Of note, during follow-up lead failure was reported in 15 patients (25.9%) leading to surgical revision. Conclusion ICD therapy in children and adolescents is effective for prevention of sudden cardiac death. The rate of appropriate shock deliveries was significantly higher as compared with large ICD trials. Inappropriate therapies occurred frequently. In particular supraventricular tachycardia, T-wave oversensing and lead failures were responsible for these episodes.

A limited number of case reports of coronary sinus (CS) diverticula complicating catheter ablation have been published. We retrospectively analysed 2245 patients who underwent ablation of an accessory pathway (AP) at our institution between 1/11/1993 and 31/10/2016. Eight patients (0.36%) were found to have a CS diverticulum in venography. APs showed a mean antegrade conduction time of 276 ± 23 ms (range 220–310 ms) and a mean retrograde conduction of 301 ± 45 ms (230–350 ms). Four patients had 1 (n = 2), 2 (n = 1), or 3 (n = 1) previously failed ablation attempts. Pathways could not be ablated with a conventional 4 mm tip catheter in 7 of 8 cases. In seven patients, ablation was successful, in two using an 8-mm ablation catheter, in two using cryoablation, and in the remaining three with an irrigated tip ablation catheter. After failed femoral approach, one 9-year-old female was successfully ablated via the right jugular vein. In one 75-year-old female, ablation was not successful. During a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 6.4 years, all patients remained free of recurrences. In inferoseptal pathways, especially with previous failed ablation attempts, venographies of the CS should be performed. After successful ablation long-term prognosis is excellent.

Background The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) has evolved as a valuable alternative to the transvenous ICD, especially in young patients. Unfortunately, some of these patients are ineligible for S-ICD implantation due to specific electrocardiographic features. So far, these patients were identified by mandatory pre-implantation screening using the manual screening tool (MST), which lacks objective value. Therefore, a novel automated screening tool (AST) has been introduced recently for objective screening, which has not been evaluated yet. Methods/results We here first investigate the novel AST, in direct comparison to MST, in 33 consecutive patients with already implanted S-ICD system to compare predicted eligibility by screening tools with true sensing of the S-ICD system. Both screening tools reliably predicted true ineligible single vectors, but also suggested overall ineligibility in a similar fraction of patients (MST: 3.0%; AST: 6.1%), albeit the implanted S-ICD worked flawlessly in these patients. AST did not predict the finally selected sensing vector better than MST. There was a surprising mismatch between AST and MST for the predicted eligibility of single vectors; only in 49% of patients did both screening tools predict eligibility for the same vectors. Conclusions The novel AST predicted overall eligibility approximately similar to MST. Both tools predicted ineligibility in a few patients, who were actually eligible. There was a striking mismatch between both screening tools when eligibility of single vectors was predicted. Thus, the AST seems to be a valuable advance, due to its standardized and objective process, but it still lacks specificity.

The subcutaneous ICD is a promising treatment option in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Approved in 2009, the first S-ICD® in Germany was implanted in June 2010. Although large prospective registry studies have shown safety and efficacy of the system, there is a lack of long-term data with regard to battery longevity of the S-ICD®. Therefore, we report follow-up of our first initial S-ICD® cases from implantation till battery depletion. All S-ICD® patients with device replacement for battery depletion in our large single-center S-ICD® registry were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a median follow-up of 75.9 ± 6.8 months. Twenty-eight patients with S-ICD® systems were included in this study. Of these patients, 21 were male and 7 were female, with an overall mean age of 41.9 ± 12.6 years. Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death was the indication in 19 patients (67.9%). Ventricular tachycardia was adequately terminated in two patients (7.1%). In 7 patients, non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias were not treated. A total of three inappropriate shocks occurred in three patients (10.7%). Mean time from implantation till battery depletion was 65.8 ± 8.1 months. Only one patient presented premature elective replacement criteria because of rapid battery depletion. No lead-related complication occurred during follow-up and no complications were seen regarding device replacement. In one patient (3.6%), the system was explanted without replacement due to patient’s preference. The estimated battery longevity of S-ICD® of about 5 years was reached in all but one patient. Compared to larger S-ICD® registry studies, frequency of inappropriate shocks was relatively high in the initial S-ICD® cases. Both technological improvement as well as programming and operators’ experience have led to a reduction of complications. Replacement of the S-ICD® seems to be a safe and effective procedure.

ZusammenfassungDie Primärprävention des plötzlichen Herztods bleibt eine große Herausforderung. Verschiedene Studien konnten eine Risikoreduktion für den plötzlichen Herztod bei Patienten mit hochgradig eingeschränkter linksventrikulärer Funktion nach Myokardinfarkt und bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz zeigen. Die aktuellen ECS-Leitlinien diskutieren intensiv die Indikationen für eine Primärprävention. Ein Großteil der zur Verfügung stehenden Daten ist verhältnismäßig alt und neue Daten stellen den Nutzen der ICD-Primärprävention bei Patienten mit z. B. dilatativer Kardiomyopathie infrage. Die Identifikation der Patienten, die tatsächlich von der primärprophylaktischen ICD-Implantation profitieren, ist eine wesentliche zukünftige Aufgabe.

The performance of the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) has been described in different kinds of heart disease and has been proven to be an important advance in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). While positive experiences with the S-ICD™ initially came from collectives of patients without structural heart diseases, positive results have also been collected from cohorts with structural heart disease. All S-ICD™ patients with either ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as the main indication for ICD implantation (n = 144 patients) or electrical heart disease/idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n = 83 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 18 ± 15 months. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the two groups in most categories. In contrast, there was no difference concerning neither appropriate nor inappropriate shock delivery between the two groups. Also other outcome parameters such as need for surgical revisions and all-cause mortality did not differ. There was a significant difference between the first- and second-generation S-ICDs™ in inadequate shocks mainly driven by patients with HCM. In our study, S-ICD™ performance was similar in patients with and without structural heart disease. Decision pro- or contra-S-ICD™ should be made rather on the basis of expected shock rate and probability of the need for future anti-tachycardia or anti-bradycardia pacing than in dependence of the underlying heart disease.

Background Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of not sufficiently understood origin. Some patients develop cardiac involvement in course of the disease which is mostly responsible for adverse outcome. In addition to complications like high degree atrioventricular (AV) block or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, there is a certain percentage of patients developing atrial tachyarrhythmias. Data is limited and the role of catheter ablation uncertain. Therefore, we studied sarcoid patients who presented with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Hypothesis Treatment and ablation of supraventricular tachycardia could be hampered by inflammation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Methods We enrolled 37 consecutive patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who presented with atrial tachyarrhythmias and underwent an electrophysiologic study over a period of 6 years (03/2013‐04/2019). In total, 16 catheter ablations for atrial tachyarrhythmias were performed. Mean follow‐up duration was 2.5 years. Results Most common ablation performed was cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter in seven patients (54%). Pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) was performed in five patients (38%). Two patients received slow‐pathway modulation for treatment of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). All but two patients with AF had no clinical recurrence during follow‐up. Two patients had recurrence of AF but still reported markedly improved european heart rhythm association (EHRA) class. Periprocedural safety was very high. There were no adverse events related to the ablation procedure. One patient died during follow‐up in the presence of electrical storm. Conclusion Catheter ablations of supraventricular tachycardias seem to be safe and effective in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Outcome is comparable to patients without inflammatory heart disease, although data from larger patient collectives are mandatory to make recommendations in this special entity.

Background Outcome of ischemic VT ablation may differ between patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) in relation to infarct localization. Methods We analyzed procedural data, acute and long-term outcomes of 152 consecutive patients (139 men, mean age 67 ± 9 years) with previous anterior or inferior MI who underwent ischemic VT ablation at our institution between January 2010 and October 2015. Results More patients had a history of inferior MI (58%). Mean ejection fraction was significantly lower in anterior MI patients (28 ± 10% vs. 34 ± 10%, p p = 0.18). Procedural parameters and acute success did not differ between the groups. During a mean follow-up of 3 ± 2 years, more anterior MI patients had undergone a re-ablation (49% vs. 33%, p = 0.09, Chi-square test). There was a trend towards more ICD shocks in patients with previous anterior MI (46% vs. 34%). After adjusting for risk factors and ejection fraction, multivariable Cox regression analyses showed no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.78) and cardiovascular mortality between infarct localizations (p = 0.6). Conclusion Clinical characteristics of patients with anterior and inferior MI are similar except for ejection fraction. Patients with inferior MI appear to have better outcome regarding survival, ICD shocks and re-ablation, but this appears to be related to better ejection fraction when compared with anterior MI.

The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) is an important advance in device therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). In some patients, decision pro- or contra-ICD implantation is particularly challenging due to inconsistent data on risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or sudden cardiac death, rare entities, special medical or family history, or patients’ wishes. Whether decision-making in these borderline cases has been facilitated with the new option of a S-ICD™ is unknown. All patients with an implanted S-ICD™ without a class I or IIa recommendation for primary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death in the current guidelines (n = 30 patients) in our large-scaled single-centre S-ICD™ registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 40 months. In all patients S-ICD™ implantation was performed for primary prevention of SCD. Of all 30 patients with an overall mean age of 40.5 ± 15.6 years, 17 were male (57%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 54.5 ± 9.9%. Indication were highly variable and ranged from structural heart disease, nsVT and LV-EF > 35% to patients with polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) and suspect syncope. During follow-up, six episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and four episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) were adequately terminated in three patients (10%). Two of these patients were implanted for polymorphic nsVT and previous syncope without structural heart disease. In three patients, T-wave-oversensing and in one patient also P-wave-oversensing resulted in an inappropriate shock (five in total), two additional episodes of oversensing ended before shock delivery. There were no S-ICD™ system-related infections. In five patients S-ICD™ replacement was performed due to battery depletion (four regular, one premature). In five patients, ablation procedures were performed after implantation (four because of frequent symptomatic ventricular extra beats, one because of atrial flutter). Change to a transvenous system was necessary in two patients due to need for antibradycardia pacing. The use of the S-ICD™ was safe in patients with borderline or unclear indication for ICD implantation in our study. Of note, during a relatively short mean follow-up there were several appropriate therapies, especially for VF in these patients. On the other hand, oversensing also occurred in about 10% of patients, while lead problems were not problematic in this collective. S-ICD™ implantation may be considered as a possible alternative in cases of borderline indications and clinical uncertainty when decision pro-ICD implantation is made. Incidence of arrhythmias was quite high and mostly consisted of VF. Nevertheless, patient education seems even more important as there is a considerable risk for inappropriate therapies as well.

Aims The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICDTM) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICDTM use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups such as adult patients with congenital heart diseases. This cohort is of high interest because of the difficult anatomic conditions in these patients. Methods and results All S-ICDTM patients with an underlying congenital heart disease (CHD) resulting in an indication for ICD implantation (n = 20 patients) in our large-scaled single-centre S-ICDTM registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 36 months. Primary prevention of SCD was the indication for implantation of an S-ICDTM in six patients (30%). Of all 20 patients with an overall mean age of 40.5 ± 11.5 years, 12 were male (60%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.5 ± 11.3%. Nine episodes of ventricular tachycardia (two monomorphic and seven polymorphic) were adequately terminated in three patients (15%). In two patients, T-Wave-Oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector or activation of the SMART PASSTM filter. There were no S-ICDTM system-related infections. In one patient, surgical revision was necessary due to a persistent haematoma. Conclusion The S-ICDTM seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in patients with various CHDs and complex anatomical anomalies. The S-ICDTM is safe and works effectively, also in these complex patients. Inadequate shock delivery was rare and could be managed by reprogramming.

Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) therapy has been established in initial clinical trials and current international guideline recommendations for patients without demand for pacing, cardiac resynchronization, or antitachycardia pacing. The promising experience in ‘ideal’ S-ICD™ candidates increasingly encourages physicians to provide the benefits of S-ICD™ therapy to patients in clinical constellations beyond ‘classical’ indications of S-ICD™ therapy, which has led to a broadening of S-ICD™ indications in many centres. However, the decision for S-ICD™ implantation is still not covered by controlled randomized trials but rather relies on patient series or observational studies. Thus, this review intends to give a contemporary update on available empirical evidence data and technical advancements of S-ICD™ technology and sheds a spotlight on S-ICD™ therapy in recently discovered fields of indication beyond ideal preconditions. We discuss the eligibility for S-ICD™ therapy in Brugada syndrome as an example for an adverse and dynamic electrocardiographic pattern that challenges the S-ICD™ sensing and detection algorithms. Besides, the S-ICD™ performance and defibrillation efficacy in conditions of adverse structural remodelling as exemplified for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is discussed. In addition, we review recent data on potential device interactions between S-ICD™ systems and other implantable cardio-active systems (e.g. pacemakers) including specific recommendations, how these could be prevented. Finally, we evaluate limitations of S-ICD™ therapy in adverse patient constitutions, like distinct obesity, and present contemporary strategies to assure proper S-ICD™ performance in these patients. Overall, the S-ICD™ performance is promising even for many patients, who may not be ‘classical’ candidates for this technology.

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) do not play a pivotal role in the current guidelines on ventricular arrhythmias except in identifying rhythm-symptom correlations if ventricular arrhythmias are assumed. Before a decision for a pure diagnostic implantable device is made, a thorough arrhythmic risk assessment is of major importance due to the potential lethal outcome of ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, some clinical circumstances exist where long-term monitoring by an ILR may add significant information in electrical heart diseases, in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, or structural heart diseases and a potential risk of ventricular arrhythmias. As medical therapy (β-blocker therapy) plays an important role in long QT syndrome (LQTS) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardias (cpVT), the ILR can be used to control therapy in patients at risk. In electrical diseases without pharmacologic therapeutic options (e. g., Brugada syndrome), the ILR may be used in low-risk patients with atypical syncope as benign faints may occur without association to the underlying disease. Evidence on cardiomyopathies with preserved left ventricular function and nonsustained VT or premature ventricular complexes is scarce. The ILR may also add long-term information on the individual risk in these circumstances. In very rare diseases like infiltrative disease or muscular dystrophies, the ILR may also provide evidence on risk stratification. In summary, ILR in electrical heart diseases and in patients with ventricular tachycardia remains a very individual decision taking into account various clinical, electrocardiographic, and genetic parameters. The following review aims at highlighting possible indications and clinical scenarios for ILR in ventricular tachycardias and electrical heart diseases with-probably debatable-case presentations.

Die neue ESC Leitlinie gibt einen umfassenden Uberblick uber den aktuellen Stand der Diagnostik, Behandlung von Kammertachykardien und der Pravention des plotzlichen Herztods. Neuer Schwerpunkt ist an vielen Stellen die genetische Diagnostik. Daruber hinaus sind vor allem Indikationen zur ICD Therapie, zur Katheterablation und zu hereditaren Erkrankungen neu bewertet worden. Publizierte Registerdaten zum vollstandig subkutanen ICD sind vielversprechend und haben zur erstmaligen Empfehlung fur den S-ICD als Alternative zu einem konventionellen transvenosen ICD gefuhrt. Der tragbare Kardioverter-Defibrillator hat ebenfalls erstmals Eingang in der aktuellen europaischen Leitlinie gefunden. Aktuelle Registerdaten untermauern den potenziellen Nutzen, insbesondere bei Patienten mit zu erwartender Erholung der linksventrikularen Funktion.

Background Left atrial tachycardias (LAT) occur in about 5% of patients after irrigated-tip circumferential antral (CA) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). They may cause debilitating symptoms in the patient and may be very difficult to treat. Objective To assess the incidence of LAT after PVI with the multielectrode phased-radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) compared to circumferential antral PVI with an irrigated-tip catheter. Methods We analyzed data from our ablation database. A total of 150 patients who underwent their first PVI with the PVAC system and 300 patients who underwent their first PVI with irrigated-tip circumferential antral (CA) radiofrequency ablation were matched by age and sex, as well as by type of atrial fibrillation. Results Of 150 PVAC patients, only 1 patient (0.7%) developed LAT during mean follow-up of 21 ± 14 months. The mechanism was macroreentry and the patient underwent successful ablation at our institution. Eleven of 300 irrigated-tip CA PVI patients (3.7%) developed LAT during mean follow-up of 22 ± 14 months and subsequently underwent ablation (P = .05). Conclusion LAT occurs more frequently after irrigated-tip CA PVI compared to single-shot-device ablation with PVAC. Apart from being less technically demanding, lower incidence of LAT may influence choice of ablation technology.