Search

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fulranumab as adjunct or monotherapy in patients with knee or hip pain related to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis. Methods: Osteoarthritic patients (aged ≥18 years) from four phase 3 randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled studies were randomized to receive placebo, fulranumab 1 mg every 4 weeks (Q4wk), or 3 mg Q4wk in 16-week DB phase, followed by a 52-week post-treatment follow-up phase. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and neurological, sympathetic, and joint-related events of interest. Efficacy assessments included pain and physical function sub-scales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. Results: Of 245 patients from the ITT set (median age = 64 years; 62% women), 84 (34%) completed the DB phase; the majority of discontinuations (57%) were due to early study termination. In the DB phase, the incidence of TEAEs in fulranumab 3 mg (57.8%) and 1 mg (56.8%) was similar to placebo (56.8%). Two events adjudicated as joint-related events of interest include rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and fracture of unknown etiology. There were no new neurological TEAEs. Fulranumab showed evidence of efficacy in improving pain and physical function based on WOMAC sub-scale scores. Due to premature study termination, the number of patients enrolled were too small to make any definitive efficacy claims. Conclusions: Treatment with fulranumab was generally tolerated with no new safety signals. Within the limited sample analyzed, fulranumab showed evidence of improvement of pain and function in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis who had failed prior therapy and were candidates for joint replacement surgery. Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT02336685; NCT02336698; NCT02289716; NCT02301234KEY POINTSFulranumab as adjuvant or monotherapy was well tolerated with no new safety signalsFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of efficacy in osteoarthritic pain of hip and kneeFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of improvement of pain and physical function in osteoarthritis Fulranumab as adjuvant or monotherapy was well tolerated with no new safety signals Fulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of efficacy in osteoarthritic pain of hip and knee Fulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of improvement of pain and physical function in osteoarthritis

Background and Objective Data from two similarly designed studies of tapentadol extended release (ER) for managing neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN; NCT00455520, NCT01041859) in adults were pooled for this analysis, allowing a detailed evaluation of efficacy in patient subgroups and secondary endpoints. Methods In each study, patients were titrated to their optimal dose of open-label tapentadol ER [100–250 mg twice daily (bid)] over 3 weeks. Patients with ≥1-point improvement in average pain intensity [11-point numerical rating scale (NRS)] were randomized (1:1) to receive placebo or tapentadol ER during a 12-week, double-blind maintenance period. Results Mean (standard deviation [SD]) changes in pain intensity from baseline to week 12 of maintenance in the placebo (n = 343) and tapentadol ER (n = 360) groups, respectively, were 1.28 (2.41) and 0.08 (1.87) [least squares mean difference (LSMD): −1.14 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: −1.435, −0.838); P

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is increased in chronic pain conditions. This study examined analgesic efficacy and safety of fulranumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-NGF antibody, in adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. Patients (n=466, intent-to-treat) were randomized to receive, in addition to their current pain therapy, subcutaneous injections in 1 of 6 parallel treatment groups: placebo (n=78), fulranumab 1 mg (n=77) or 3 mg (n=79) every 4 weeks (Q4wk), 3 mg (n=76), 6 mg (n=78), or 10 mg (n=78) every 8 weeks (Q8wk). Primary efficacy results showed that fulranumab significantly reduced the average pain intensity score (Por = 0.030) from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo in the 3mgQ4wk, 6mgQ8wk, and 10mgQ8wk groups. Secondary efficacy outcomes indicated that significant improvement occurred compared with placebo at week 12 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscales of pain, stiffness, and physical function (P0.040) across all fulranumab groups except 1mgQ4wk, on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form subscales of pain intensity (Por = 0.016) and pain interference (Por = 0.030) in the 3mgQ4wk and 10mgQ8wk groups, and on the Patient Global Assessment score (Por = 0.040) in the 3mgQ4wk, 6mgQ8wk, and 10mgQ8wk groups. The most common (or = 5% of patients) treatment-emergent adverse events in overall fulranumab groups during the first 12weeks included paresthesia (7%), headache (5%), and nasopharyngitis (5%). Most neurologic-related treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved at the end of week 12. Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients, but they were not neurologically related and resolved before study completion. Fulranumab treatment resulted in statistically significant efficacy in pain measures and physical function versus placebo and was generally well tolerated.

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN.Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase.NCT00455520.The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study.The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was -1.3 (95% confidence interval, -1.70 to -0.92; p 0.001, tapentadol ER vs. placebo). A total of 60.5% (356/588) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in pain intensity from the start to the end of the open-label titration phase; of the patients who were randomized to tapentadol ER, 53.6% (105/196) reported at least a 30% improvement from pre-titration to week 12 of the double-blind phase. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred during double-blind treatment with tapentadol ER included nausea, anxiety, diarrhea, and dizziness. Potential limitations of this study are related to the enriched enrollment randomized-withdrawal trial design, which may result in a more homogeneous patient population during double-blind treatment and may present a risk of unblinding because of changes in side effects from the open-label to the double-blind phase.Compared with placebo, tapentadol ER 100-250 mg bid provided a statistically significant difference in the maintenance of a clinically important improvement in pain 1 , 2 and was well-tolerated by patients with painful DPN.

Background: Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with μ-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor activity. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) compared with oxycodone controlled release (CR) for management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase III study during which patients received tapentadol ER, oxycodone CR or placebo for a 3-week titration period followed by a 12-week maintenance period. The study was carried out at sites in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US. A total of 1030 patients with chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain were randomized to receive tapentadol ER 100–250 mg twice daily, oxycodone HCl CR 20–50 mg twice daily or placebo. Primary endpoints (as determined prior to initiation of the study) were the changes from baseline in average daily pain intensity (rated by patients on an 11-point numerical rating scale) over the last week of maintenance and over the entire 12-week maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing values after early treatment discontinuation. Results: Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 1023 patients. Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline to week 12 of the maintenance period versus placebo (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% CI], −0.7 [−1.04, −0.33]), and throughout the maintenance period (−0.7 [−1.00, −0.33]). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline throughout the maintenance period versus placebo (LSM difference [95% CI], −0.3 [−0.67, −0.00]) but not at week 12 (−0.3 [−0.68, 0.02]). A significantly higher percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the tapentadol ER group (32.0% [110/344]) compared with the placebo group (24.3% [82/337]; p = 0.027), indicating a clinically significant improvement in pain intensity, while a significantly lower percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the oxycodone CR group (17.3% [59/342]; p = 0.023 vs placebo). In the placebo, tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, 61.1% (206/337), 75.9% (261/344) and 87.4% (299/342) of patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs were 26.1% (88/337), 43.0% (148/344) and 67.3% (230/342). Conclusion: Treatment with tapentadol ER 100–250 mg twice daily or oxycodone HCl CR 20–50 mg twice daily was effective for the management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain, with substantially lower incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs associated with treatment with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR. [Trial registration number: NCT00421928 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier)]

This study evaluated tapentadol immediate release (IR) for pain relief following orthopedic bunionectomy surgery.This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase III study included patients with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy. Randomized patients (N = 603) received tapentadol IR 50, 75, or 100 mg; oxycodone HCl IR 15 mg; or placebo orally every 4-6 hours over a 72-hour period following bunionectomy. The primary endpoint was the sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) over 48 hours. Secondary endpoints included SPID over 12, 24, and 72 hours; total pain relief, and sum of total pain relief and sum of pain intensity difference (SPRID) over 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; use of rescue medication; patient global impression of change; and onset of action assessment. Possible limitations of this study were that the intense dose monitoring and thorough nursing care were unlikely to represent actual use situations and could introduce similar bias across all treatment groups.NCT00364247.Mean SPID(48) values were significantly higher for tapentadol IR (50, 75, and 100 mg) and oxycodone HCl IR 15 mg compared with placebo (all por= 0.001). The overall incidence of adverse events was 70% for tapentadol IR 50 mg, 75% for tapentadol IR 75 mg, 85% for tapentadol IR 100 mg, 87% for oxycodone HCl IR 15 mg, and 41% for placebo. Post hoc analyses showed that tapentadol IR 100 mg and oxycodone HCl IR 15 mg provided equivalent analgesia, yet tapentadol IR 100 mg had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and/or vomiting (53% vs 70%, respectively, nominal p = 0.007).Multiple doses of tapentadol IR (50, 75, and 100 mg) significantly relieve acute pain after orthopedic surgery compared with placebo. These data suggest that at doses providing comparable efficacy, tapentadol IR 100 mg has improved gastrointestinal tolerability compared with oxycodone HCl IR 15 mg.

Objective To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fulranumab in patients with knee or hip pain caused by moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis (OA). Methods In this phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled extension study, patients who were randomized in equal proportions to receive subcutaneous doses of either placebo or fulranumab (1 mg every 4 weeks, 3 mg every 8 weeks, 3 mg every 4 weeks, 6 mg every 8 weeks, or 10 mg every 8 weeks) in the 12-week double-blind efficacy phase and who completed this double-blind efficacy phase were eligible to continue the dosage throughout a 92-week double-blind extension phase, followed by a 24-week posttreatment follow-up period. Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pre-identified AEs of interest, and joint replacements. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline to the end of the double-blind extension phase in scores on the patient's global assessment and the pain and physical function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Results Overall, 401 of the 423 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind efficacy phase entered the extension study. Long-term sustained improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters following fulranumab treatment (1 mg every 4 weeks, 3 mg every 4 weeks, and 10 mg every 8 weeks) as compared with placebo. Similar percentages of patients in both groups experienced TEAEs (88% taking placebo and 91% taking fulranumab; all phases). Across all fulranumab groups, arthralgia (21%) and OA (18%) (e.g., exacerbation of OA pain) were the most common TEAEs. The most common serious TEAEs were the requirement for knee (10%) and hip (7%) arthroplasty, with 80% occurring during the posttreatment follow-up period. Neurologic-related TEAEs (28%; all phases) were generally mild-to-moderate. Overall, 81 joint replacements were performed in 71 patients (8 [11%] receiving placebo and 63 [89%] receiving fulranumab); 15 patients (21%) had rapid progression of OA (RPOA). All cases of RPOA occurred in fulranumab-treated patients who were concurrently receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and occurred in joints with preexisting OA. Conclusion Long-term treatment with fulranumab was generally well-tolerated and efficacious. RPOA was observed as a safety signal. Future studies are warranted to demonstrate whether the risk of RPOA can be reduced in patients taking fulranumab.

BACKGROUND Several prostate cancer (PCa) susceptibility loci have been reported, but attempts to confirm them in independent data sets have produced inconsistent results. It is not yet clear, how much of this variation is due to differences between different populations. HPCX was originally identified in a combined data set of PCa families from the USA and Scandinavia. Considerable differences in the frequency of linked families were observed in this heterogeneous family sample as well as in following studies. METHODS In order to estimate the significance of HPCX in the German population, DNA samples from 104 PCa families were genotyped at six polymorphic markers spanning a region of approximately 14 cM on Xq27-28, which includes the proposed HPCX candidate locus. RESULTS In the entire data set, a maximum NPL Z score of 1.20 (P = 0.11) at marker DXS984 was observed. Statistically significant evidence for linkage was obtained in the subset of 63 families with early-onset disease (i.e., ≤ 65 years) with a maximum NPL Z score of 2.32 (P = 0.009) at the same location. CONCLUSION Our results confirm the existence of a prostate cancer susceptibility gene on Xq27-28 also in the German population. Prostate 52: 12–19, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Clonality assays can be used to address different questions of neoplasm development. The study of the X chromosome inactivation pattern in female patients provides a useful and most commonly used indirect approach to demonstrate the monoclonal status of a cell population. We used this approach to examine whether recurrent tumors of the bladder supposed to be of monoclonal origin derive from different, independently transformed cells or whether they arise from 1 primary tumor.We analyzed 45 archival or fresh frozen bladder tumors from 27 female patients. We assessed the X inactivation status of each tumor by a polymerase chain reaction based method after HpaII digestion.Surprisingly 16 of the 45 tumors revealed a polyclonal pattern. The amount of undigested DNA far exceeded what was explained by contamination with normal cells, as determined on histological sections indicating that these tumors were in fact polyclonal. This polyclonal status was further confirmed by a comprehensive series of controls.Some bladder tumors are polyclonal in origin. Our findings are at variance with earlier observations and possibilities for explanation are proposed.

It has been suggested that chromosome 7q32 contains genes that influence the progression of prostate cancer from latent to invasive disease. In an attempt to confirm this linkage to prostate cancer aggressiveness, 100 German prostate cancer families were genotyped using a panel of eight polymorphic markers on chromosome 7q. We used a multipoint allele sharing method based upon a likelihood ratio test implemented in GENEHUNTERPLUS v1.2 in order to calculate the nonparametric Z(lr) and the associated LOD scores. We applied the aggressiveness of prostate cancer given by the pathological tumour grade of each individual, and the mean age of onset of a family as covariates, and constructed two weighted models. The first (weight(0-1) model) puts weights on families with at least two cases of GIII prostate cancer. The second (weight(0-2) model) also adds weights to families with early and late onset cancer respectively. The unweighted analysis gave no evidence of linkage to chromosome 7q. The Z(lr) scores increased when including the covariates, to 2.60 (P=0.005) using the weight(0-1) and to 3.02 (P=0.001) using the weight(0-2) model for late onset prostate cancer. The associated LOD scores were respectively 1.47 (P=0.009) and 1.98 (P=0.002). The markers that gave most evidence for linkage were exactly in the range of the published prostate cancer aggressiveness region. Our results support a widespread relevance of this locus and suggest that aggressive and late onset prostate cancer is linked to chromosme 7q31-33 in the German population.

3′-untranslated regions of various mRNAs have been shown to contain sequence motifs which control mRNA stability, translatability, and efficiency of translation as well as intracellular localization. We aimed to identify protein binding regions of the long and highly conserved 3′UTR of the mRNA coding for neurofibromin, a well-known tumor suppressor protein, whose genetic deficiency causes the autosomal dominant disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). We discovered five RNA fragments that were able to undergo specific binding to proteins from cell lysates (NF1-PBRs, NF1-protein-binding regions). Additionally we identified the Elav-like protein HuR binding to NF1-PBR1. HuR interacts with AU-rich elements in the 3′UTR of many protooncogenes, cytokines, and transcription factors, thereby regulating the expression of these mRNAs on the posttranscriptional level. Transfection assays with a CAT reporter construct revealed reduced expression of the reporter, suggesting that HuR may be involved in the fine-tuning of the expression of the NF1 gene.