Search

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) mediate agonist-dependent phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) and initiate homologous receptor desensitization. Previously, we reported that charged phospholipids directly interacted with the two GRK isoforms, GRK2 and GKR3, via a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain to regulate GRK activity (DebBurman, S. K., Ptasienski, J., Boetticher, E., Lomasney, J. W., Benovic, J. L., and Hosey, M. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270: 5742-5747). Here, evidence is provided to support the hypothesis that charged phospholipids are required for agonist-dependent phosphorylation of receptors by GRK2. In the absence of charged phospholipids, the purified human m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (hm2mAChR) reconstituted in pure phosphatidylcholine vesicles or in a noninhibitory detergent was not a substrate for GRK2. However, these receptor preparations were stoichiometrically phosphorylated in an agonist-dependent manner upon addition of charged phospholipids. The known ability of G protein betagamma subunits to stimulate mAChR phosphorylation also was found to be absolutely dependent on the presence of charged phospholipids, including phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). Phospholipids also regulated GRK-mediated phosphorylation of casein, a nonreceptor-soluble substrate. Among lipids tested, lipid inositol phosphates, PIP2 and phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate, were found to be the most potent activators of GRK2 and were the only lipids that regulated GRK2 in a complex biphasic manner. At low micro concentrations, PIP2 activated GRK2 via an interaction with the GRK pleckstrin homology domain; however, at high micro concentrations, PIP2 inhibited GRK2, apparently via another mechanism. PIP2-mediated inhibition could be partly relieved by increasing ATP. The results support the hypothesis that GRK2 is a lipid-dependent protein kinase that requires charged phospholipids for enzyme activation, for regulation by Gbetagamma subunits, and potentially for membrane association.

G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling is attenuated by a process referred to as desensitization, wherein agonist-dependent phosphorylation of receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) is proposed to be a key initial event. However, mechanisms that activate GRKs are not fully understood. In one scenario, beta gamma-subunits of G proteins (G beta gamma) activate certain GRKs (beta-adrenergic receptor kinases 1 and 2, or GRK2 and GRK3), via a pleckstrin homology domain in the COOH terminus. This interaction has been proposed to translocate cytosolic beta-adrenergic receptor kinases (beta ARKs) to the plasma membrane and facilitate interaction with receptor substrates. Here, we report a novel finding that membrane lipids modulate beta ARK activity in vitro in a manner that is analogous and competitive with G beta gamma. Several lipids, including phosphatidylserine (PS), stimulated, whereas phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate inhibited, the ability of these GRKs to phosphorylate agonist-occupied m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Furthermore, both PS and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate specifically bound to beta ARK1, whereas phosphatidylcholine, a lipid that did not modulate beta ARK activity, did not bind to beta ARK1. The lipid regulation of beta ARKs did not occur via a modulation of its autophosphorylation state. PS- and G beta gamma-mediated stimulation of beta ARK1 was compared and found strikingly similar; moreover, their effects together were not additive (except at initial stages of reaction), which suggests that PS and G beta gamma employed a common interaction and activation mechanism with the kinase. The effects of these lipids were prevented by two well known G beta gamma-binding proteins, phosducin and GST-beta ARK-(466-689) fusion protein, suggesting that the G beta gamma-binding domain (possibly the pleckstrin homology domain) of the GRKs is also a site for lipid:protein interaction. We submit the intriguing possibility that both lipids and G proteins co-regulate the function of GRKs.

Muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChR) purified from chick heart were phosphorylated by protein kinase C (PKC) and reconstituted with the purified GTP-binding regulatory protein Go. The effects of PKC phosphorylation on the interaction of mAChR with Go were assessed by monitoring for agonist-stimulated guanosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP gamma S) binding to Go, agonist-stimulated GTPase activity of Go, and the capability of Go to induce high affinity agonist binding to mAChR. Both the receptor-stimulated GTP gamma S binding and GTPase activity of Go were markedly diminished as a result of PKC-mediated phosphorylation of the mAChR, whereas the ability of Go to induce high affinity agonist binding to the receptors was unaffected. When mAChR were first reconstituted with Go and then subjected to phosphorylation with PKC, a complete inhibition of the phosphorylation of mAChR by PKC was observed. The inhibitory effect of Go on mAChR phosphorylation was concentration-dependent and was prevented by the presence of GTP gamma S in the reaction mixtures. Taken together, these results indicate that the phosphorylation of mAChR by PKC modulates receptor/G-protein interactions and that the ability of the receptors to act as substrates for PKC may be regulated by receptor/G-protein interactions.

Summary Partially purified fractions of dihydropyridine and phenylalklyamine receptors associated with voltage-dependent calcium channels in rabbit skeletal muscle were found to contain two glycopeptides of similar molecular weight. A peptide of approximately 165 kDa was photoaffinity labelled with an arylazido-phenylalklyamine Ca channel inhibitor and also was phosphorylated with cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Another peptide of 170 kDa could be distinguished from the 165 kDa peptide by peptide mapping and differences in electrophoretic mobility. The results suggest that the 165 kDa peptide contains the sites responsible for regulation of calcium channel activity by calcium channel inhibitors as well as by neurotransmitters that regulate its activity in a cAMP-dependent manner.

Calcium (Ca) is an essential element for many cell processes. The major pathway by which Ca enters cells is through Ca channels located in cell membranes. Different types of Ca channels exist, and are generally classified as either voltage-dependent or receptor-dependent Ca channels. Voltage-dependent Ca channels are opened in response to a change in membrane potential, while receptor-dependent Ca channels are opened in response to the activation of an associated receptor. The subject of this review is a subclass of voltage-dependent Ca channels known as L-type or slow Ca channels [1–4]. These channels conduct a long-lasting current of large conductance [1] and are found in excitable (see refs. [2,3]) and nonexcitable [5] cells. L-type Ca channels are opened and closed in response to changes in membrane potential, but, in addition, they are regulated by receptor-dependent processes [3,6,7]. Considerable evidence from electrophy- siological studies suggests that L-type Ca channels are regulated by a cAMP- dependent phosphorylation event. In cardiac cells, any agent that elevates cAMP, such as β-adrenergic agonists, increases the probability of opening of L channels in response to a given change in membrane potential [6,7]. L-type Ca channels in other cells, including skeletal muscle [8,9], also are regulated by cAMP. Application of the purified catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase mimics the effects of cAMP [10, 11], and the inhibitor of this protein kinase prevents the effects [12]. Furthermore, the widely observed rundown of Ca channel activity over time in patch-clamp experiments has been slowed by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and ATP [13, 14]. Taken together, the results support the hypothesis that certain L channels are regulated by the cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of the channel itself or a regulatory protein. However, until recently biochemical evidence to support this hypothesis has been lacking because the protein(s) that comprise Ca channels were not known. Recently, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the structure and biochemical properties of L channels, and insights into the biochemical events involved in the regulation of the channels is now possible. This review will focus on our current understanding of the structure and regulation of Ca channels. Disease-related defects in L-type Ca channels will also be addressed.