Search

The Hsp40, Hsp70, and Hsp90 chaperone families are ancient, highly conserved, and critical to cellular protein homeostasis. Hsp40 chaperones can transfer their protein clients to Hsp70, and Hsp70 can transfer clients to Hsp90, but the functional benefits of these transfers are unclear. Recent structural and mechanistic work has opened up the possibility of uncovering how Hsp40, Hsp70, and Hsp90 work together as unified system. In this review, we compile mechanistic data on the ER J-domain protein 3 (ERdj3) (an Hsp40), BiP (an Hsp70), and Grp94 (an Hsp90) chaperones within the endoplasmic reticulum; what is known about how these chaperones work together; and gaps in this understanding. Using calculations, we examine how client transfer could impact the solubilization of aggregates, the folding of soluble proteins, and the triage decisions by which proteins are targeted for degradation. The proposed roles of client transfer among Hsp40-Hsp70-Hsp90 chaperones are new hypotheses, and we discuss potential experimental tests of these ideas.

Many bacterial pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, require inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) for infection, making this enzyme a promising new target for antibiotics. Although potent selective inhibitors of bacterial IMPDHs have been reported, relatively few have displayed antibacterial activity. Here we use structure-informed design to obtain inhibitors of S. aureus IMPDH (SaIMPDH) that have potent antibacterial activity (minimal inhibitory concentrations less than 2 μM) and low cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. The physicochemical properties of the most active compounds were within typical Lipinski/Veber space, suggesting that polarity is not a general requirement for achieving antibacterial activity. Five compounds failed to display activity in mouse models of septicemia and abscess infection. Inhibitor-resistant S. aureus strains readily emerged in vitro. Resistance resulted from substitutions in the cofactor/inhibitor binding site of SaIMPDH, confirming on-target antibacterial activity. These mutations decreased the binding of all inhibitors tested, but also decreased catalytic activity. Nonetheless, the resistant strains had comparable virulence to wild-type bacteria. Surprisingly, strains expressing catalytically inactive SaIMPDH displayed only a mild virulence defect. Collectively these observations question the vulnerability of the enzymatic activity of SaIMPDH as a target for the treatment of S. aureus infections, suggesting other functions of this protein may be responsible for its role in infection.

Hsp70-family chaperones bind short monomeric peptides with a weak characteristic affinity in the low micromolar range, but can also bind some aggregates, fibrils, and amyloids, with low nanomolar affinity. While this differential affinity enables Hsp70 to preferentially target potentially toxic aggregates, it is unknown how Hsp70s differentiate between monomeric and oligomeric states of a target protein. Here we examine the interaction of BiP (the Hsp70 paralog in the endoplasmic reticulum) with proIGF2, the pro-protein form of IGF2 that includes a long and mostly disordered E-peptide region that promotes proIGF2 oligomerization. We discover that electrostatic attraction enables the negatively charged BiP to bind positively charged E-peptide oligomers with low nanomolar affinity. We identify the specific BiP binding sites on proIGF2, and although some are positively charged, as monomers they bind BiP with characteristically low affinity in the micromolar range. We conclude that electrostatics enable BiP to preferentially recognize oligomeric states of proIGF2. Electrostatic targeting of Hsp70 to aggregates may be broadly applicable, as all the currently-documented cases in which Hsp70 binds aggregates with high-affinity involve clients that are expected to be positively charged.

Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones are critical for protein quality control in the cytosol, whereas organelle-specific Hsp70/Hsp90 paralogs provide similar protection for mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Cytosolic Hsp70/Hsp90 can operate sequentially with Hsp90 selectively associating with Hsp70 after Hsp70 is bound to a client protein. This observation has long suggested that Hsp90 could have a preference for interacting with clients at their later stages of folding. However, recent work has shown that cytosolic Hsp70/Hsp90 can directly interact even in the absence of a client, which opens up an alternative possibility that the ordered interactions of Hsp70/Hsp90 with clients could be a consequence of regulated changes in the direct interactions between Hsp70 and Hsp90. However, it is unknown how such regulation could occur mechanistically. Here, we find that the ER Hsp70/Hsp90 (BiP/Grp94) can form a direct complex in the absence of a client. Importantly, the direct interaction between BiP and Grp94 is nucleotide-specific, with BiP and Grp94 having higher affinity under ADP conditions and lower affinity under ATP conditions. We show that this nucleotide-specific association between BiP and Grp94 is largely due to the conformation of BiP. When BiP is in the ATP conformation its substrate-binding domain blocks Grp94; in contrast, Grp94 can readily associate with the ADP conformation of BiP, which represents the client-bound state of BiP. Our observations provide a mechanism for the sequential involvement of BiP and Grp94 in client folding where the conformation of BiP provides the signal for the subsequent recruitment of Grp94.

Hsp70 chaperones bind short monomeric peptides with a weak characteristic affinity in the low micromolar range, but can also bind some aggregates, fibrils, and amyloids, with low nanomolar affinity. While this differential affinity enables Hsp70 to preferentially target potentially toxic aggregates, it is unknown how a chaperone can differentiate between monomeric and aggregated states of a client protein and why preferential binding is only observed for some aggregated clients but not others. Here we examine the interaction of BiP (the Hsp70 paralog in the endoplasmic reticulum) with the client proIGF2, the pro-protein form of IGF2 that includes a long and mostly disordered E-peptide region that promotes proIGF2 oligomerization. By dissecting the mechanism by which BiP targets proIGF2 and E-peptide oligomers we discover that electrostatic attraction is a powerful driving force for oligomer recognition. We identify the specific BiP binding sites on proIGF2 and as monomers they bind BiP with characteristically weak affinity in the low micromolar range, but electrostatic attraction to E-peptide oligomers boosts the affinity to the low nanomolar level. The dominant role of electrostatics is manifested kinetically as a steering force that accelerates the binding of BiP to E-peptide oligomers by approximately two orders of magnitude as compared against monomeric peptides. Electrostatic targeting of Hsp70 provides an explanation for why preferential binding has been observed for some aggregated clients but not others, as all the currently-documented cases in which Hsp70 binds aggregates with high-affinity involve clients that have an opposite charge to Hsp70.

While cytosolic Hsp90 chaperones have been extensively studied, less is known about how the ER Hsp90 paralog Grp94 recognizes clients and influences client folding. Here, we examine how Grp94 and the ER Hsp70 paralog, BiP, influence the folding of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), an established client protein of Grp94. ProIGF2 is composed of a disulfide-bonded insulin-like hormone and a C-terminal E-peptide that has sequence characteristics of an intrinsically disordered region. BiP and Grp94 have a minimal influence on folding whereby both chaperones slow proIGF2 folding and do not substantially alter the disulfide-bonded folding intermediates, suggesting that BiP and Grp94 may have an additional influence unrelated to proIGF2 folding. Indeed, we made the unexpected discovery that the E-peptide region allows proIGF2 to form dynamic oligomers. ProIGF2 oligomers can transition from a dynamic state that is capable of exchanging monomers to an irreversibly aggregated state, providing a plausible role for BiP and Grp94 in regulating proIGF2 oligomerization. In contrast to the modest influence on folding, BiP and Grp94 have a stronger influence on proIGF2 oligomerization and these chaperones exert counteracting effects. BiP suppresses proIGF2 oligomerization while Grp94 can enhance proIGF2 oligomerization in a nucleotide-dependent manner. We propose that BiP and Grp94 regulate the assembly and dynamic behavior of proIGF2 oligomers, although the biological role of proIGF2 oligomerization is not yet known.