Search

BackgroundNo randomized trial of intracranial aneurysm coiling has compared long-term efficacy of polymer-modified coils to bare metal coils (BMCs). We report 5-year results comparing Matrix2 coils to BMCs. The primary objective was to compare the rates of target aneurysm recurrence (TAR) at 12 months. Secondary objectives included angiographic outcomes at TAR or 12 months and TAR at 5 years.MethodsA total of 626 patients were randomized to BMCs or Matrix2 coils. Detailed methods and 1-year results have been published previously.ResultsOf 580 patients eligible for 5-year follow-up, 431 (74.3%) completed follow-up or reached TAR. Matrix2 coils were non-inferior to BMCs (P=0.8) but did not confer any benefit. Core lab reported post-treatment residual aneurysm filling (Raymond III) correlated with TAR (PConclusionsAfter 5 years Matrix2 coils were non-inferior to BMCs but no benefit was demonstrated. Post-treatment residual angiographic aneurysm filling (Raymond III) is strongly associated with TAR (P

Introduction Stent-assisted coiling has widened indications and improved stability of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, stent-assisted coiling is usually not used to treat acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms to avoid antiplatelet therapy. The objective of this study is to evaluate a strategy of staged endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms including coiling at the acute phase with complementary stenting with or without coiling at the subacute phase. Material and methods Between 2012 and 2017, we retrospectively identified, in our prospectively maintained database, all patients treated for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm based on this staged stenting strategy. Clinical charts and imaging follow-up were analyzed to assess the procedural safety and feasibility as well as clinical and anatomical outcome. Results We identified 23 patients with 23 intracranial aneurysms including 15 (65.2%) women with a mean age of 50 years (range 24–69 years). No rebleeding occurred during the mean delay of 24.3 days between initial coiling and stenting. All procedures were successful and additional coiling was performed in 5/23 procedures (21.7%). Clinical status was unchanged in all patients. At follow-up, the modified Rankin scale was graded 0 in 19/23 (82.6%), 1 in 2/23 (8.7%), and 2 in 2/23 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The rate of complete occlusion rose from 30.4% before the stenting procedure to 52.2% immediately after and 72.7% at follow-up. Conclusion This strategy of early staged stenting in selected patients is safe and improves immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion and long-term stability in this population at high risk of intracranial aneurysm recurrence with coiling alone.

Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) has widened indications of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (wide-neck, fusiform aneurysms); moreover, it is associated with more stable anatomical results. Besides the development of other techniques such as flow diverter stents, bifurcation stents, or intrasaccular flow disruptors, SAC remains one of the most used endovascular techniques because it provides good clinical and anatomical results for most aneurysms. Several devices based on the same principle are available and have undergone many adaptations and developments over 20 years of intracranial stenting.The purpose of this article is to review and compare intrinsic properties of available devices and their anatomical and clinical performance.Based on this review and our experience of SAC, we will discuss the behavior and performance of those devices in different anatomic and clinical situations.