1. Effect of the ASCENT Intervention to Increase Knowledge of Kidney Allocation Policy Changes Among Dialysis Providers
- Author
-
Wairimu Magua, Mohua Basu, Stephen O. Pastan, Joyce J. Kim, Kayla Smith, Jennifer Gander, Sumit Mohan, Cam Escoffery, Laura C. Plantinga, Taylor Melanson, Michael D. Garber, and Rachel E. Patzer
- Subjects
dialysis ,effectiveness-implementation trial ,health system intervention ,kidney allocation system ,kidney transplantation ,pragmatic trial ,Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,RC870-923 - Abstract
Introduction: The Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation (ASCENT) trial was a cluster-randomized pragmatic, effectiveness-implementation study designed to test whether a multicomponent educational intervention targeting leadership, clinic staff, and patients in dialysis facilities improved knowledge and awareness of the 2014 Kidney Allocation System (KAS) change. Methods: Participants included 690 dialysis facility medical directors, nephrologists, social workers, and other staff within 655 US dialysis facilities, with 51% (n = 334) in the intervention group and 49% (n = 321) in the control group. Intervention activities included a webinar targeting medical directors and facility staff, an approximately 10-minute educational video targeting dialysis staff, an approximately 10-minute educational video targeting patients, and a facility-specific audit and feedback report of transplant performance. The control group received a standard United Network for Organ Sharing brochure. Provider knowledge was a secondary outcome of the ASCENT trial and the primary outcome of this study; knowledge was assessed as a cumulative score on a 5-point Likert scale (higher score = greater knowledge). Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: At baseline, nonintervention providers had a higher mean knowledge score (mean ± SD, 2.45 ± 1.43) than intervention providers (mean ± SD, 2.31 ± 1.46). After 3 months, the average knowledge score was slightly higher in the intervention (mean ± SD, 3.14 ± 1.28) versus nonintervention providers (mean ± SD, 3.07 ± 1.24), and the estimated mean difference in knowledge scores between the groups at follow-up minus the mean difference at baseline was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11–0.48; P = 0.039). The effect size (0.41) was low to moderate. Conclusion: Dialysis facility provider education could help extend the impact of a national policy change in organ allocation.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF