Search

Background: Tacrolimus therapy is standard of care for immunosuppression after lung transplantation. However, tacrolimus exposure variability during the early postoperative period may contribute to poor outcomes in this population. Few studies have examined tacrolimus pharmacokinetics (PK) during this high-risk period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacokinetic study in lung transplant recipients at the University of Pennsylvania who were enrolled in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort. We used nonlinear mixed-effects regression to derive a population PK model in 270 patients and examined validity in a separate cohort of 114 patients. Covariates were examined with univariate analysis and a multivariable model was developed using forward and backward stepwise selection. The performance of the final model in the validation cohort was examined with calculation of prediction error (PE). Results: We developed a 1-compartment base model with a fixed rate absorption constant. Covariates improving model fit were postoperative day, hematocrit, transplant type, CYP3A5 genotype, weight, and exposure to cytochrome p450 enzyme (CYP) inhibitor drugs. The strongest predictor of tacrolimus clearance was postoperative day, with median predicted clearance increasing more than 3-fold over the 14-day study period. In the validation cohort, the final model showed a mean PE of 36.4% (95% confidence interval 30.8%-41.9%) and a median PE of 7.2% (interquartile range −29.3% to 70.53%). Conclusions: Tacrolimus clearance is highly dynamic during the early postlung transplant period. Population PK models that include lung-transplant–specific covariates may enable precision dosing algorithms that account for this highly dynamic clearance. Future multicenters studies including a broader set of covariates are warranted.

Objective: To assess the effect of intraoperative cryoablation on postoperative patient-reported pain, opioid use, and clinical outcomes in lung transplantation. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult lung transplant recipients from August 2017 to September 2018. We compared outcomes of patients who received intraoperative cryoablation of the intercostal nerves with those who did not. Primary outcomes were postoperative patient-reported pain scores and opioid use. Secondary outcomes included postoperative sedation and agitation levels and perioperative outcomes. Data were abstracted from patients' electronic health records. Results: Of the 102 patients transplanted, 45 received intraoperative cryoablation (intervention group) and 57 received the standard of care, which did not include intercostal or serratus blocks or immediate postoperative epidural placement (control group). The intervention group had significantly lower median and maximum postoperative pain scores at days 3 and 7 and significantly lower oral opioid use at days 3, 7, and 14 compared with the control group. Chronic opioid use at 3 and 6 months' posttransplant was lower in the intervention group. Differences in perioperative outcomes, including length of mechanical ventilation, sedation and agitation levels, and hospital stay, were not clinically meaningful. Survival at 30 days and 1 year was superior in the intervention compared with the control group. Conclusions: Findings suggest that use of intraoperative cryoablation is an effective approach for treating pain and reducing opioid use in patients who undergo lung transplant, but a randomized study across multiple institutions is needed to confirm these findings.

Background. SHELTER is a trial of transplanting lungs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection into HCV-negative candidates (sponsor: Merck; NCT03724149). Few trials have reported outcomes using thoracic organs from HCV-RNA+ donors and none have reported quality of life (QOL). Methods. This study is a single-arm trial of 10 lung transplants at a single center. Patients were included who were between 18 and 67 y of age and waitlisted for lung-only transplant. Patients were excluded who had evidence of liver disease. Primary outcome was HCV cure (sustained virologic response 12 wk after completing antiviral therapy). Recipients longitudinally reported QOL using the validated RAND-36 instrument. We also applied advanced methods to match HCV-RNA+ lung recipients to HCV-negative lung recipients in a 1:3 ratio at the same center. Results. Between November 2018 and November 2020, 18 patients were consented and opted-in for HCV-RNA+ lung offers in the allocation system. After a median of 37 d (interquartile range [IQR], 6–373) from opt-in, 10 participants received double lung transplants. The median recipient age was 57 y (IQR, 44–67), and 7 recipients (70%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The median lung allocation score at transplant was 34.3 (IQR, 32.7–86.9). Posttransplant, 5 recipients developed primary graft dysfunction grade 3 on day 2 or 3, although none required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nine patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir, whereas 1 patient received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. All 10 patients were cured of HCV and survived to 1 y (versus 83% 1-y survival among matched comparators). No serious adverse events were found to be related to HCV or treatment. RAND-36 scores showed substantial improvement in physical QOL and some improvement in mental QOL. We also examined forced expiratory volume in 1 s—the most important lung function parameter after transplantation. We detected no clinically important differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s between the HCV-RNA+ lung recipients versus matched comparators. Conclusions. SHELTER adds important evidence regarding the safety of transplanting HCV-RNA+ lungs into uninfected recipients and suggests QOL benefits.

Background. Historically, many organs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were discarded. The advent of highly curative direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies motivated transplant centers to conduct trials of transplanting HCV-viremic organs (nucleic acid amplification test positive) into HCV-negative recipients, followed by DAA treatment. However, the factors that influence candidates’ decisions regarding acceptance of transplant with HCV-viremic organs are not well understood. Methods. To explore patient-level perceptions, influences, and experiences that inform candidate decision-making regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors, we conducted a qualitative semistructured interview study embedded within 3 clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of transplanting lungs and kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients. The study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2021. Results. Among 44 HCV-negative patients listed for organ transplant who were approached for enrollment in the applicable clinical trial, 3 approaches to decision-making emerged: positivist, risk analyses, and instinctual response. Perceptions of risk contributed to conceptualizations of factors influencing decisions. Moreover, most participants relied on multiple decision-making approaches, either simultaneously or sequentially. Conclusions. Understanding how different decisional models influence patients’ choices regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors may promote shared decision-making among transplant patients and providers.