Search

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasivesphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistula-in-ano involving endoscopic assessmenttreatment of perianal fistula. This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study is the first Australian study of VAAFT. It is also the longest study of VAAFT to-date.From January 2014 to September 2019, 59 patients with a complex anal fistula were identified via MRIunderwent VAAFT. Fourteen patients had undergone previous definitive surgery for anal fistula. Specialized Karl Storz video equipment (fistuloscope) was used in the procedure. The rigid fistuloscope was used to directly visualize the fistula tract/sinternal opening. Closure of the internal opening was then performed. The fistula tract/s were then treated via fulguration. The external opening was kept patentdressed. Patients were then followed up for a mean 59.5 months.67.9% (n = 38) of patients achieved primary healing (needing nil further intervention) at a median of 13 weeks. 12.5% (n = 7) experienced healing followed by recurrence while 19.6% (n = 11) experienced non-healing. Of the recurrence/non-healing groups, 11/18 underwent repeat VAAFT with healing occurring in 10/11 patients at a median of 7 weeks. The mean operating time was 41.1 min. There were no major complicationscontinence scores were not affected. Three patients were lost to follow up.VAAFT is both effectivesafe for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. Its minimally invasive nature means that in the instance of recurrence or persistence, VAAFT can be repeated with minimal morbidityreasonable likelihood of success.

Emergency colorectal surgery tends to be associated with poorer outcomes compared to elective colorectal surgery. This study assessed the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency and elective colorectal resection in two metropolitan hospitals.Patients were identified retrospectively from two institutions between April 2018 and July 2020. Baseline, operative and postoperative parameters were collected for comparative analysis between emergency and elective surgery groups. A binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications.During the study period, 454 patients underwent colorectal resection, 135 were emergency cases (29.74%) and 319 were elective cases (70.26%). Compared with elective resections, patients undergoing emergency resections were observed to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV (53.33% vs. 38.56%) (P = 0.004). The mortality rate was similar between the emergency and elective group (1.48% vs. 0.63%, P = 0.369). The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency resections (64.44% vs. 36.68%, P 0.001), but the major complication rate was similar between groups (12.59% vs. 10.34%, P = 0.484). Independent predictors for postoperative complications included emergency surgery (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.77, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.66 to 4.61) and an ASA Score of III to IV (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.84 to 4.47).The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection, however, rates of major complications and mortality were similar between groups. Higher complication rates reflect advanced disease pathology in patients who are more comorbid.

Sigmoid-urachal fistula is exceedingly rare in adults and only a few cases have been reported in the world literature. We present the case of a 54-year-old man with symptomatic sigmoid-urachal fistula managed successfully with a laparoscopic assisted high anterior resection, primary anastomosis and an en bloc resection of the urachal cyst and the involved cuff of bladder.