Search

Your search keyword '"Josh Kornegay"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Josh Kornegay"
2 results on '"Josh Kornegay"'

1. The Flipped Classroom: A Critical Appraisal

Author

Aaron S. Kraut, Rodney Omron, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Jaime Jordan, David Manthey, Stephen J. Wolf, Lainie M. Yarris, Stephen Johnson, and Josh Kornegay

Subjects
Medicine, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, RC86-88.9
Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to review and critically appraise the medical education literature pertaining to a flipped-classroom (FC) education model, and to highlight influential papers that inform our current understanding of the role of the FC in medical education. Methods: A search of the English-language literature querying Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), PsychINFO, PubMed, and Scopus identified 296 papers related to the FC using either quantitative, qualitative, or review methods. Two reviewers independently screened each category of publications using previously established exclusion criteria. Eight reviewers then independently scored the remaining 54 publications using either a qualitative, quantitative, or review-paper scoring system. Each scoring system consisted of nine criteria and used parallel metrics that have been previously used in critical appraisals of education research. Results: A total of 54 papers (33 quantitative, four qualitative, and 17 review) on FC met a priori criteria for inclusion and were critically appraised and reviewed. The top 10 highest scoring articles (five quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and three review papers) are summarized in this article. Conclusion: This installment of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) Academy Critical Appraisal series highlights 10 papers that describe the current state of literature on the flipped classroom, including an analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of an FC approach, practical implications for emergency medicine educators, and next steps for future research.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Author

Matt Hansen, Tabria Harrod, Nathan Bahr, Amanda Schoonover, Karen Adams, Josh Kornegay, Amy Stenson, Vivienne Ng, Jennifer Plitt, Dylan Cooper, Nicole Scott, Sneha Chinai, Julia Johnson, Lauren Weinberger Conlon, Catherine Salva, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Trang Huynh, David Jones, Katherine Jorda, Jamie Lo, Ryanne Mayersak, Emmanuelle Paré, Kate Hughes, Rami Ahmed, Soha Patel, Suzana Tsao, Eileen Wang, Tony Ogburn, and Jeanne-Marie Guise

Subjects
Internship and Residency, General Medicine, Bias, Implicit, United States, Education, Obstetrics, Leadership, Education, Medical, Graduate, Gynecology, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Curriculum
Abstract

To determine whether a brief leadership curriculum including high-fidelity simulation can improve leadership skills among resident physicians.This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial among obstetrics-gynecology and emergency medicine (EM) residents across 5 academic medical centers from different geographic areas of the United States, 2015-2017. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study arms: the Leadership Education Advanced During Simulation (LEADS) curriculum, a shortened Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum, or as active controls (no leadership curriculum). Active controls were recruited from a separate site and not randomized to limit any unintentional introduction of materials from leadership curricula. The LEADS curriculum was developed in partnership with the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine as a novel way to provide a leadership toolkit. Both LEADS and the abbreviated TeamSTEPPS were designed as six 10-minute interactive web-based modules.The primary outcome of interest was the leadership performance score from the validated Clinical Teamwork Scale instrument measured during standardized high-fidelity simulation scenarios. Secondary outcomes were 9 key components of leadership from the detailed leadership evaluation measured on 5-point Likert scales. Both outcomes were rated by a blinded clinical video reviewer.One hundred ten obstetrics-gynecology and EM residents participated in this 2-year trial. Participants in both LEADS and TeamSTEPPS had statistically significant improvement in leadership scores from "average" to "good" ranges both immediately and at the 6-month follow-up, while controls remained unchanged in the "average" category throughout the study. There were no differences between LEADS and TeamSTEPPS curricula with respect to the primary outcome.Residents who participated in a brief structured leadership training intervention had improved leadership skills that were maintained at 6-month follow-up.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results