Search

Background With 8.7 years follow-up, the prospective phase III randomized MINDACT trial (EORTC 10041/BIG3-04) continues to meet its primary objective, i.e. 95.1% (95%CI 93.1-96.6), 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in clinical high (C-High)/genomic low (G-Low) risk patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) (Cardoso et al., ASCO 2020). In addition, about half of the MINDACT patients had a low clinical risk (C-Low) defined by pre-specified clinical-pathological characteristics. Here, we evaluated the outcome of this C-Low population stratified by the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint®) (G-Low or G-High) for outcome considering age, and present data on the total G-low population (C-Low and C-High combined). Methods Of 6693 patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial between 2007 and 2011, 3337 were C-Low, characterized as mainly T1, grade 1 or 2, and node negative. We evaluated the pre-specified DMFS, distant metastasis free interval (DMFI), and overall survival (OS) rates at 5 and 8 years in the C-Low population: i) in patients with genomic low risk (C-Low/G-Low, n=2744) who were recommended to receive endocrine therapy only (for 99% HR+), and ii) in C-Low/G-High who received ACT or not following randomization (ITT, n=690, 81% HR+). Exploratory analyses by age, ≤50 and >50, were conducted for ACT vs no ACT received in C-Low/G-High. In parallel we estimated survival rates for all G-low patients if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT (C-Low/G-Low, and C-High/G-Low randomized to no ACT double weighted, n=4130). We used Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to event endpoints and hazard ratios with 95%CI from Cox-regression models adjusted for stratification factors used for the randomization. Results C-low/G-low patients who were recommended endocrine therapy only (compliance > 79%, based on local guidelines) have excellent 5 and 8 year survival rates for all endpoints (Table 1). The estimated survival rates for all G-Low patients, if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT, is excellent as well (Table 1), albeit this population includes both C-Low and C-High patients. The survival estimates for C-Low/G-High patients are for all endpoints a few percentage points lower than for the C-Low/G-Low group (Table 1). At 8 years of follow-up, in the relatively small subset of 690 patients with C-Low/G-High tumors assigned to ACT or not by randomization (ITT), a 1.5% (SE ±2.3%) higher DMFS is seen in the ACT group, and a 2.9% (SE ±2.0%) higher DMFI. This suggested benefit is mostly seen in patients under 50 years of age (absolute Δ in DMFS for ACT vs no ACT at 8 years: 5.4% for age ≤50 vs -0.3% for age >50). Conclusion Patients with a 70-gene G-Low risk tumor have an excellent 8 year outcome in the context of C-Low characteristics when recommended for endocrine therapy only, very close to the outcome in the larger group of all G-Low patients regardless of clinical risk. Stratification of C-Low patients in to G-Low and G-high provides meaningful information. The benefit of ACT in C-Low patients with a 70-gene G-High risk tumor needs further confirmation, especially relevant in younger women. Table 1All Patients PopulationPatientsObserved events% at 5 years (95% CI)% at 8 years (95% CI)DMFSC-Low / G-Low274417097.3 (96.6-97.9)94.7 (93.8-95.6)C-Low / G-High5936194.2 (92.0-95.9)91.1 (88.4-93.3)DMFIC-Low / G-Low274410398.5 (97.9-98.9)96.7 (95.9-97.3)C-Low / G-High5934695.8 (93.8-97.2)93.5 (91.0-95.3)OSC-Low / G-Low274412298.2 (97.6-98.7)96.5 (95.7-97.2)C-Low / G-High5934496.8 (94.9-98.0)93.1 (90.5-95.0)Patients G-low (C-Low & C-High)PatientsEstimated events% at 5 years% at 8 yearsDMFSAll G-Low - no ACT413033996.492.8DMFIAll G-Low - no ACT413024497.494.6OSAll G-Low - no ACT413022397.995.7 Citation Format: Laura J van 't Veer, Fatima Cardoso, Coralie Poncet, Josephine Lopes Cardozo, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Yves Pierga, Peter Vuylsteke, Etienne Brain, Giuseppe Viale, Sherko Kümmel, Isabel T Rubio, Gabriele Zoppoli, Alistair Thompson, Erika Matos, Khalil Zaman, Susan Knox, Florentine Hilbers, Aleksandra Peric, Bart Meulemans, Martine Picccart, Emiel J Th Rutgers. How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-11.

PURPOSE Patients with 70-gene signature ultralow-risk breast cancers have shown excellent survival in historic cohorts, including randomized trials. The ultralow-risk subgroup was characterized to help avoid overtreatment. We evaluated outcomes of ultralow-risk patients in the largest cohort to date. METHODS Of the 6,693 patients enrolled in the EORTC-10041/BIG-3-04 randomized phase III MINDACT trial, profiling revealed an ultralow-risk 70-gene signature in 1,000 patients (15%). Distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) were assessed in patients stratified by 70-gene signature result (high, low, and ultralow) by Kaplan-Meier analysis and hazard ratios with 95% CI from Cox regression. RESULTS Median follow-up was 8.7 years. Of the ultralow-risk patients (n = 1,000), 67% were > 50 years, 81% had tumors ≤ 2 cm, 80% were lymph node–negative, 96% had grade 1 or 2 tumors, and 99% were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive. Systemic therapy was received by 84% of patients (69% endocrine therapy, 14% endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy, 1% other) and 16% received no adjuvant systemic treatment. The 8-year DMFI for ultralow-risk patients was 97.0% (95% CI, 95.8 to 98.1), which was 2.5% higher than for patients with low-risk tumors (n = 3,295, 94.5% [95% CI, 93.6 to 95.3]). The hazard ratio for DMFI was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94) for ultralow versus low risk, after adjusting for clinical-pathologic and treatment characteristics. The 8-year BCSS for ultralow-risk patients was 99.6% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100). CONCLUSION Patients with an ultralow-risk 70-gene signature have the best prognosis, distinctive from low risk, with 8-year BCSS above 99%, and very few patients developed distant metastases with an 8-year DMFI rate of 97%. These patients could be candidates for further de-escalation of treatment, to avoid overtreatment and the risk of side effects.

The MINDACT trial showed excellent 5-year distant metastasis-free survival of 94·7% (95% CI 92·5-96·2) in patients with breast cancer of high clinical and low genomic risk who did not receive chemotherapy. We present long-term follow-up results together with an exploratory analysis by age., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: The MINDACT trial showed excellent 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of 94·7% (95%CI 92·5-96·2) in clinical high (C-High)/genomic low (G-Low) risk patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Long-term follow-up is presented. Methods: 6693 patients were enrolled 2007 to 2011. We reassessed DMFS rate at 5 years in C-High/G-Low patients not receiving chemotherapy (n=644) (primary analysis), updated DMFS and overall survival in C-High/G-Low patients receiving chemotherapy or not (n=749 and 748, respectively) (secondary analysis), and examined a potential age effect ( 50y) for women with HR+/HER2- disease. Findings: At a median follow-up of 8·7 years, the updated 5-year DMFS rate for C-High/G-Low patients receiving no chemotherapy is 95·1% (95%CI 93·1-96·6), above the predefined non-inferiority boundary of 92%, proving MINDACT as a positive de-escalation trial.The 5-year and 8-year outcome of C-High/G-Low patients show a respective 0·9% (SE ±1·1) 2·6% (SE ±1·6) difference in DMFS for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy (HR 0·66; 95%CI 0·48-0·92), without differences in overall survival (95·7% vs 94·3%).The same comparisons confined to HR+/HER2- disease (91% of patients) generate different gain estimates from chemotherapy administration for DMFS according to age: 5% (SE ±2·8%) in women ≤50 years versus 0·2% (SE ±2·3%) in women > 50 years. Interpretation: The clinical utility of a low risk 70-gene signature for foregoing adjuvant chemotherapy in the presence of a high clinical risk (and up to 3 positive nodes) remains proven. In C-high/G-low patients > 50 years chemotherapy did not improve outcome across the whole follow-up trajectory. At longer follow-up in younger women, while underpowered, a clinically relevant benefit of about 5% was observed, possibly due to chemotherapy-induced ovarian function suppression, and should be part of informed, shared decision-making. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NTC00433589; EudraCT number, 2005-002625-31. Funding Statement: Funded by the European Commission Sixth Framework Programme and other grants. Declaration of Interests: None to declare. Ethics Approval Statement: All patients gave written informed consent. The ethics committees of all participating sites approved the study, which involved collaboration of seven member groups under the Breast International Group umbrella.

506 Background: The 70-gene signature MammaPrint has been shown to identify breast cancer patients for whom adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) could be safely omitted even in the presence of unfavorable standard clinical-pathological criteria. The MINDACT primary endpoint at 5 years median follow-up was met in 2016 (Cardoso et al, NEJM 2016) with a distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) rate at 5 years of 94.7% (95% CI: 92.5-96.2) in clinical high (C-High) / genomic low (G-Low) risk patients who received no CT. Longer follow-up is now available. Methods: 6693 patients were enrolled in the prospective phase III randomized MINDACT study (EORTC 10041/BIG3-04) between 2007-2011. We assessed the DMFS rate at 5 years in the primary test (PT) population of C-High / G-Low patients who were randomized to receive no CT (n = 644). As secondary analysis, we evaluated DMFS and overall survival (OS) in the intention to treat (ITT) population of the C-High / G-Low group randomized to CT vs no CT (n = 749 and 748 respectively). Comparisons between CT and no CT groups are low-powered. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to event endpoints and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI from cox-regression models adjusted for stratification factors used for the randomization. Results: The median follow-up is 8.7 years, resulting in an updated 5-year DMFS rate for the PT population of C-High / G-Low patients with no CT of 95.1% (95% CI 93.1-96.6). The updated outcomes of the ITT population of C-High / G-Low patients are shown in the table. Further analyses will update the suggested age-dependent effect of CT omission for luminal breast cancer seen at 5 years in pre- versus post-menopausal women as in Tailor-X (Piccart et al, SABCS 2019). Conclusions: The primary DMFS endpoint at 5 years continues to be met in CT untreated C-High / G-Low risk women, confirming MINDACT as a positive de-escalation study. With longer follow-up and in line with the natural history of luminal breast cancer, more distant relapses do occur but the estimated gain of 2.6% for CT administration in C-High / G-Low patients remains small in light of CT harmful effects. The level IA evidence for the clinical utility of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant CT decision making is maintained. Clinical trial information: NCT00433589 . [Table: see text]