Search

Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE-induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be "non-clonal" cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials. ispartof: ALLERGY vol:78 issue:1 pages:47-59 ispartof: location:Denmark status: published

Mastocytosis comprises rare heterogeneous diseases characterized by an increased accumulation of abnormal mast cells in various organs/tissues. The pathogenesis of mastocytosis is strongly linked to the presence of KIT-activating mutations. In systemic mastocytosis (SM), the most frequent mutation encountered is KIT p.D816V, whose presence constitutes one of the minor diagnostic criteria. Different techniques are used to search and quantify the KIT p.D816V mutant; however, allele-specific quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR are today the most sensitive. The analysis of the KIT p.D816V allele burden has undeniable interest for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring. The analysis of non–mast cell hematological compartments in SM is similarly important because KIT p.D816V multilineage involvement is associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, in advanced forms of SM, mutations in genes other than KIT are frequently identified and affect negatively disease outcome and response to therapy. Thus, combined quantitative and sensitive analysis of KIT mutations and next-generation sequencing of other recurrently involved myeloid genes make it possible to better characterize the extent of the affected cellular compartments and additional molecular aberrations, providing a more detailed overview of the complex mutational landscape of SM, in relation with the clinical heterogeneity of the disease. In this article, we report the latest recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group presented in September 2020 in Vienna during an international working conference, on the techniques we consider standard to detect and quantify the KIT p.D816V mutant in SM and additional myeloid mutations found in SM subtypes., D.D.M., J.J.L., and M.C.C. were supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. P.V. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant nos. F4704-B20 and P32470-B).

Mast cell activation (MCA) is common and occurs in a number of pathologic conditions, including IgE-dependent and independent allergic reactions, atopic disorders, autoimmune processes, and mastocytosis. In a subset of patients, no underlying disease and no known trigger of MCA are found. When the symptoms are severe, systemic, and recurrent, and accompanied by a diagnostic increase in the serum tryptase level or other mast cell mediators, an MCA syndrome (MCAS) may be diagnosed. In these patients, the symptoms typically respond to drugs suppressing MCA, mediator production in mast cells, or mediator effects. In each case, diagnostic consensus criteria must be fulfilled to diagnose MCAS. In other patients, MCA may be local, less severe, or less acute, or may be suspected but not confirmed, so that the diagnostic criteria of MCAS are not fulfilled. In these patients, it may be difficult to prove MCA, for example, by measuring multiple mast cell mediators or basophil activation, the latter as a surrogate of IgE-dependent hypersensitivity. However, validated diagnostic criteria for implicating suspected MCA behind such conditions are lacking, even if some of these conditions have recently been assigned to an International Classification of Diseases-10-Clinical Modification code (ICD-10-CM). In this article, we discuss diagnostic features and criteria and propose a ICD-10-CM–adjusted classification for disorders associated with MCA, herein referred to as MCA disorders (MCADs), with special emphasis on the delineation between confirmed MCAS, MCAD not fulfilling MCAS criteria, and suspected MCAD that is not present. In addition, we discuss the discrimination between overt MCAD and predisposing conditions, such as atopic states, mastocytosis, and hereditary alpha tryptasemia., T.G. was supported by grants from the Konsul TH C Bergh Foundation and the Stockholm County Council Research Funds (ALF), Sweden. M.C.C., J.J.L, and D.D.M. were supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH. P.V. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; projects P32470-B and F4704-B20).

The chemical structure and molecular weight of BPR1J373

The body weight change of Kasumi-1 xenograft mice during and after indicated treatments.

The cell cycle analysis of Kasumi-1, KG-1 and K562 cells treated with BPR1J373

The cell cycle analysis of Kasumi-1 and KG-1 cells treated with 1uM and 50nM of BPR1J373, respectively in indicated time

BPR1J373 induces apoptosis in Kasumi-1 and KG-1 cells

Patients with systemic mastocytosis often have symptoms of mast cell activation, which is associated with elevated levels of urinary mast cell mediator metabolites. Patients with hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) may present with symptoms of mast cell activation. Whether levels of mast cell mediators are elevated in this patient population is not known.The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with HαT and symptoms of mast cell activation have elevated levels of urinary mediators and compare the levels with those in patients with systemic mastocytosis.We retrospectively analyzed mast cell mediators in 63 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HαT, 20 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), and 23 healthy controls. All patients were referred to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Mastocytosis Center or the Mayo Clinic for evaluation of mast cell activation disorders.Our population was predominantly female (85.7%) with an average age of 53.8 years. The average baseline serum tryptase level was significantly higher in patients with ISM than in those with HαT (65.9 vs 19.3 ng/mL [P lt; .01]). When compared with patients with HαT, those with ISM had statistically significant increases in their levels of urinary N-methylhistamine (P lt; .01) and 2,3-dinor-11β-prostaglandin F2α (P lt; .05).Patients with symptomatic HαT do not have elevations of mast cell urinary metabolites, suggesting that granule- and membrane-derived mediators may not drive symptoms in HαT.

Pathology plays a central role in the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM), its delineation from other neoplasms and reactive conditions, and in monitoring of SM under therapy. The morphologic hallmark of SM is the accumulation of spindle-shaped, hypogranulated mast cells (MCs) in bone marrow (BM) and other extracutaneous tissues. Four of the 5 World Health Organization–defined diagnostic criteria (ie, compact MC aggregates [=major criterion]; atypical MC morphology; activating KIT point mutations; aberrant expression of CD25 and/or CD2 and/or CD30 in MCs [=minor criteria]) can be addressed by the pathologist. The final classification of SM variants as either BM mastocytosis, indolent SM, smoldering SM, aggressive SM (ASM), SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), or MC leukemia (MCL) has important prognostic significance and requires the integration of certain morphological, clinical, radiological, and biochemical data, referred to as B- and C-findings. Substantial diagnostic challenges may be posed to the pathologist and clinician especially in the so-called advanced SM variants, that is, ASM, MCL, and SM-AHN. In this article, updated recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group regarding standards of pathology in the diagnosis of SM, presented during the year 2020 Working Conference held in September in Vienna, are reported., T. I. George was supported by the ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology. K. Hartmann was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number 310030_207705. D. D. Metcalfe, J. J. Lyons, and M. Carter were supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Allergic and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH. P. Valent was supported by the Austrian Science Funds (FWF), projects F4701-B20 and F4704-B20.

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is characterized by the presence of KIT D816V and other somatic mutations (eg, in SRSF2, ASXL1, and RUNX1) in 95% and 60% to 70% of patients, respectively. The biological and clinical consequences of AdvSM include multilineage involvement (eg, associated hematologic neoplasm) in 60% to 80% of patients, variable infiltration and damage (C-findings) of predominantly bone marrow and visceral organs through affected mast cell (MC) and non-MC lineages, and elevated levels of serum tryptase. Recently, the treatment landscape has substantially changed with the introduction of the multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin and the selective KIT D816V inhibitor avapritinib. In this review, we discuss the evolution of AdvSM response criteria that have been developed to better capture clinical benefit (eg, improved responses and progression-free and overall survival). We propose refined response criteria from European Competence Network on Mastocytosis and American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases investigators that use a tiered approach to segregate the effects of histopathologic (eg, bone marrow MC burden, tryptase), molecular (eg, KIT D816V variant allele frequency), clinical (eg, C-findings), and symptom response on long-term outcomes. These response criteria require evaluation in future prospective clinical trials of selective KIT inhibitors and other novel agents., J. Gotlib expresses gratitude to the Charles and Ann Johnson Foundation and the Stanford Cancer Institute Clinical Innovation Fund for their support of mastocytosis research at Stanford. J. Schwaab, J. Lübke, and A. Reiter were supported by Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung Grant No. DJCLS 08R/2020. M.C. Carter, J.J. Lyons, and D.D. Metcalfe are supported by federal funds from the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National

In recent years, knowledge about mechanisms underlying mast cell activation (MCA) and accumulation in various pathologic conditions increased substantially. In addition, criteria and a classification of MCA syndromes (MCASs) have been set forth. MCAS is defined by typical clinical symptoms, a substantial increase in serum tryptase level during an attack over the patient's baseline tryptase, and a response of the symptoms to drugs targeting mast cells, mediator production, and/or mediator effects. Alternative diagnostic criteria of MCAS have also been suggested, but these alternative criteria often lack specificity and validation. In this report, we critically review the contemporary literature relating to MCAS and compare the specificity, sensitivity, and strength of MCAS-related parameters within proposals to diagnose and classify MCAS and its variants. Furthermore, we highlight the need to apply specific consensus criteria in the evaluation and classification of MCAS in individual patients. This is an urgent and important medical necessity because as an increasing number of patients are being given a misdiagnosis of MCAS based on nonspecific criteria, which contributes to confusion and frustration by patients and caregivers and sometimes may delay recognition and treatment of correct medical conditions that often turn out to be unrelated to MCA. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Mastocytosis is a hematologic neoplasm characterized by expansion and focal accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MC) in diverse organs, including the skin, bone marrow (BM), spleen, liver, and gastrointestinal tract. The World Health Organization classification divides the disease into prognostically distinct variants of cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) and systemic mastocytosis (SM). Although this classification remains valid, recent developments in the field and the advent of new diagnostic and prognostic parameters created a need to update and refine definitions and diagnostic criteria in MC neoplasms. In addition, MC activation syndromes (MCAS) and genetic features predisposing to SM and MCAS have been identified. To discuss these developments and refinements in the classification, we organized a Working Conference comprised of experts from Europe and the United States in August 2020. This article reports on outcomes from this conference. Of particular note, we propose adjustments in the classification of CM and SM, refinements in diagnostic criteria of SM variants, including smoldering SM and BM mastocytosis (BMM), and updated criteria for MCAS and other conditions involving MC. CD30 expression in MC now qualifies as a minor SM criterion, and BMM is now defined by SM criteria, absence of skin lesions and absence of B- and C-findings. A basal serum tryptase level exceeding 20 ng/mL remains a minor SM criterion, with recognition that hereditary alpha-tryptasemia and various myeloid neoplasms may also cause elevations in tryptase. Our updated proposal will support diagnostic evaluations and prognostication in daily practice and the conduct of clinical trials in MC disorders.

Our current recommendations for diagnosing and treating primary mast cell (MC) activation syndrome make use of the latest studies and consensus guidelines for clinically recognizing systemic anaphylaxis in real time, regardless of whether allergen-triggered or other pathways are involved; our current understanding of the biomarkers secreted by activated MCs that best discriminate this disorder from other conditions; and the therapeutic drugs that might selectively affect those mediators or MCs themselves. Finding familial or somatic mutations of genes that cause MCs to be hyperactivatable would extend our diagnostic tools and potentially indicate new therapeutic interventions, targeting either the mutated gene product or the associated molecular pathway. In conclusion, we trust that the clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic criteria for primary MC activation syndromes described herein will provide clinicians with practical criteria of sufficient sensitivity and specificity to diagnose most cases without overdiagnosing the disorder in patients who likely have other conditions.

Mastocytosis is a myeloid neoplasm defined by expansion and focal accumulation of clonal mast cells (MCs) in one or more organs. The disease exhibits a complex pathology and may be complicated by MC activation, bone abnormalities, neurological problems, gastrointestinal symptoms, and/or hematologic progression. The World Health Organization divides mastocytosis into cutaneous forms, systemic mastocytosis (SM) and MC sarcoma. In most patients with SM, somatic mutations in KIT are detected. Patients with indolent SM have a normal to near-normal life expectancy, whereas patients with advanced SM, including aggressive SM and MC leukemia, have a poor prognosis. In those with advanced SM, multiple somatic mutations and an associated hematologic neoplasm may be detected. Mediator-related symptoms can occur in any type of mastocytosis. Symptoms may be mild, severe, or even life-threatening. In patients with severe acute symptoms, an MC activation syndrome may be diagnosed. In these patients, relevant comorbidities include IgE-dependent and IgE-independent allergies. Management of patients with SM is an emerging challenge in daily practice and requires in-depth knowledge and a multidisciplinary and personalized approach with selection of appropriate procedures and interventions. In this article, we review the current knowledge on SM and MC activation syndrome, with emphasis on multidisciplinary aspects in diagnosis and patient-specific management. In addition, we provide a user’s guide for application of markers, algorithms, prognostic scores, and treatments for use in daily practice., This work was supported in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; projects F4704 and P32470-B to P.V.) and the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) (to M.C.C. and D.D.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH.

Background A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study (200622) showed that mepolizumab reduces disease flares for patients with uncontrolled FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor α–negative hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and two or more flares in the previous year. Objective To further characterize the safety, clinical benefit, and pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab. Methods Eligible patients from both treatment arms of the double-blind study could enter an open-label extension study (205203; NCT03306043) to receive 4-weekly mepolizumab (300 mg subcutaneously) plus background therapy for 20 weeks. Primary end points were safety-based; other end points included flare rates and changes from baseline in mean daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose and blood eosinophil count. Results Of 104 patients who completed the double-blind study, 98% (previous placebo, n = 52; previous mepolizumab, n = 50) enrolled in the open-label extension. Overall, 66 of patients reported adverse events (AEs) (65%), 15 reported treatment-related AEs (15%), and nine reported serious AEs (9%). No events were fatal. The annualized flare rate (95% confidence interval) in the previous placebo and previous mepolizumab groups was 0.37 (0.16-0.86) and 0.14 (0.04-0.49) events/y, respectively. Of 72 patients receiving OCS during weeks 0 to 4, 20 (28%; previous placebo, n = 14; previous mepolizumab, n = 6) achieved 50% or greater reductions in mean daily dose during weeks 16 to 20. At week 20, blood eosinophil count was reduced by 89% in patients previously receiving placebo and remained reduced for those previously receiving mepolizumab. Conclusions Extended mepolizumab treatment was associated with a positive benefit–risk profile. Continued control of disease flares and blood eosinophil counts, plus reductions in OCS use, were observed with mepolizumab in patients with FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor α–negative HES.

The American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases (AIM) held its inaugural investigator conference at Stanford University School of Medicine in May 2019. The overarching goal of this meeting was to establish a Pan-American organization of physicians and scientists with multidisciplinary expertise in mast cell disease. To serve this unmet need, AIM envisions a network where basic, translational, and clinical researchers could establish collaborations with both academia and biopharma to support the development of new diagnostic methods, enhanced understanding of the biology of mast cells in human health and disease, and the testing of novel therapies. In these AIM proceedings, we highlight selected topics relevant to mast cell biology and provide updates regarding the recently described hereditary alpha-tryptasemia. In addition, we discuss the evaluation and treatment of mast cell activation (syndromes), allergy and anaphylaxis in mast cell disorders, and the clinical and biologic heterogeneity of the more indolent forms of mastocytosis. Because mast cell disorders are relatively rare, AIM hopes to achieve a coordination of scientific efforts not only in the Americas but also in Europe by collaborating with the well-established European Competence Network on Mastocytosis., The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (award no. R13TR002722 to J.G.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. We thank The Mast Cell Disease Society, Inc (TMS), a national 501c3 nonprofit, for their partnership and support of AIM, for patient-centered research, and for sponsoring international physicians at this inaugural meeting. J.G. expresses gratitude for the support of the Charles and Ann Johnson Foundation, the staff of the Stanford Mastocytosis Center, and the Stanford Cancer Institute Innovation Fund. M.C., J.J.L., and D.D.M. are supported in part by the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH. D.F.D. is supported by the Asthma and Allergic Diseases Cooperative Research Centers Opportunity Fund (award no. U19AI07053 from the NIH). P.V. has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant nos. F4701-B20, F4704-B20, and P32470-B).

Mastocytosis is a neoplasm characterized by an accumulation of mast cells in various organs and increased risk for severe anaphylaxis in patients with concomitant allergies. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that is associated with a relatively high rate of severe lung disease and mortality. The mortality is particularly high in those with certain comorbidities and increases with age. Recently, several companies have developed an effective vaccination against COVID-19. Although the reported frequency of severe side effects is low, there is an emerging discussion about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with severe allergies and mastocytosis. However, even in these patients, severe adverse reactions are rare. We therefore recommend the broad use of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with mastocytosis on a global basis. The only well-established exception is a known or suspected allergy against a constituent of the vaccine. Safety measures, including premedication and postvaccination observation, should be considered in all patients with mastocytosis, depending on the individual personal risk and overall situation in each case. The current article provides a summary of published data, observations, and expert opinion that form the basis of these recommendations.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic has massively distorted our health care systems and caused catastrophic consequences in our affected communities. The number of victims continues to increase, and patients at risk can only be protected to a degree, because the virulent state may be asymptomatic. Risk factors concerning COVID-19 induced morbidity and mortality include advanced age, an impaired immune system, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cancer treated with chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the risk and impact of COVID-19 in patients with mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes. Because no published data are yet available, expert opinions are, by necessity, based on case experience and reports from patients. Although the overall risk to acquire the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may not be elevated in mast cell disease, certain conditions may increase the risk of infected patients to develop severe COVID-19. These factors include certain comorbidities, mast cell activation related events affecting the cardiovascular or bronchopulmonary system, and chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, such treatments should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis during a COVID-19 infection. In contrast, other therapies, such as anti-mediator-type drugs, venom immunotherapy, or vitamin D, should be continued. Overall, patients with mast cell disorders should follow the general and local guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic and advice from their medical provider.

A clinical laboratory’s ability to routinely measure products resulting from increased number of mast cells or from degranulation by mast cells is severely limited. Although measured excessive levels of histamine, prostaglandin, and leukotriene metabolites are not currently included among the criteria for the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis, the ability to quantitate mast cell mediator metabolites can substantiate the presence of excessive numbers of these cells and support the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. Moreover, when samples are obtained contemporaneously to acute symptoms of mast cell activation, increased levels of these metabolites above baseline serve to corroborate mast cell contribution to clinical symptoms. Noninvasive urine specimens easily obtained from the patient at the time of presenting symptoms can be used to simultaneously measure metabolites from histamine, prostaglandin, and leukotriene pathways. These results can subsequently provide evidence-based targets for medication treatment to prevent symptomatic re-occurrence.

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and some cases of chronic idiopathic urticaria are disorders in which increased baseline urinary excretion of leukotriene(LT)E4 further increases following aspirin administration. Increased urinary excretion of the metabolites of prostaglandin D2, 11β-prostaglandin(PG)F2α and (2,3-dinor)-11β-PGF2α, have been documented in systemic mastocytosis (SM) and in mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). Symptoms due to increased baseline and/or episodic release of PGD2 can be prevented with aspirin, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX)1 and COX2. Here by retrospective chart review we discovered 8 of 10 patients with SM in whom normalization of an elevated urinary (2,3-dinor)-11β-PGF2α occurred with aspirin therapy also had a parallel increased excretion of LTE4 by an average of nearly 13-fold. How widespread this phenomenon occurs in SM is unknown; however, this occurrence needs to be considered when interpreting changes in these urinary mast cell mediator metabolites during aspirin therapy.

To compare echocardiograms and endomyocardial biopsies to diagnose cardiac involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome.We examined the agreement between echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsies to detect cardiac involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome by reviewing cases identified as hypereosinophilia or hypereosinophilic syndrome in Mayo Clinic databases from January 1978 through June 2009. Single-organ cases of eosinophilia such as eosinophilic fasciitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis were excluded. We recorded echocardiogram and endomyocardial biopsy results including biopsy staining for eosinophil granule major basic protein (if performed). Clinical and laboratory features documented included presenting symptom(s), maximum total eosinophil count, dose of prednisone (if any) and eosinophil count at the time of endomyocardial biopsy, cardiac enzymes, serum tryptase level, electrocardiogram result, the result of testing for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene, complications associated with the biopsy procedures and available follow-up information.From a total of 387 patients' records screened 288 met the criteria for hypereosinophilic syndrome and of these 240 had echocardiograms. Among these patients there were 138 normal echocardiograms, 67 had echocardiograms without findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome but with one or more other abnormalities, and 35 had echocardiograms with findings consistent with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Twenty-five patients from this group of 35 patients had both echocardiogram and endomyocardial biopsy. In 15 patients there was agreement between both endomyocardial biopsy and echocardiography as to the presence (n = seven) or absence (n = eight) for findings of cardiac involvement. In 10 of 25 patients test results diverged: 3 patients with positive echocardiographic changes did not have confirmatory findings by endomyocardial biopsy and seven patients with positive biopsy findings had echocardiograms without findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome.Echocardiograms and endomyocardial biopsies agree for presence or absence of cardiac involvement 60% of the time. Endomyocardial biopsy detected cardiac involvement in 7 patients in whom the echocardiogram was negative for findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome.

The development and utilization of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been of great interest in all fields of medicine. A substantial increase in the production and development of mAbs has occurred because these biologic agents are proving to be effective and less toxic given their targeted mechanism of action. However, data are limited on coadministration of two or more mAbs. With the increasing availability of mAbs and the comorbidities of some patients, assessment is needed of the ability to safely use multiple mAbs for an individual patient. Although the efficacy of coadministered mAbs may be inferred from their specific targets, we could find no literature reporting such a finding. Herein, we report our experience using two different classes of mAbs to treat hypereosinophilic syndrome and ulcerative colitis in a single patient.

Introduction: Although 4 mast cell mediators can be routinely measured, the results of initial testing to evaluate symptoms of mast cell activation have not been widely reported. Objective: We examined the results of mast cell mediator tests used to assess patients with mast cell activation symptoms during a 5-year time span. Methods: After excluding patients with alternative diagnoses, records of 108 patients were reviewed for initial mediator test results. Mediators included serum tryptase plus urinary N-methyl histamine (N-MH), leukotriene (LT)E4, and 11β-prostaglandin (PG) F2α or 2,3-dinor-11β-PGF2α (BPG). Results: Most commonly, either a single measured elevation of 1 mediator (48.1%) or elevations of 2 (33.3%) mediators was found at baseline, during symptoms or at both time points. Elevated levels of a single mediator in order of frequency were: BPG > tryptase > LTE4 > N-MH, and for two mediators: BPG + tryptase (n = 16 cases) > BPG + LTE4 (n = 9) > BPG + N-MH (n = 6). Elevations in 3 mediators (n = 8) or 4 mediators (n = 2) were much less frequent. Monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (n = 6), and systemic and cutaneous mastocytosis (n = 4) were also infrequent. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase values were obtained in only 7 patients. Conclusions: This survey suggests that elevations of 1 or 2 mediators are the most common (total 81.4% of cases) findings from initial tests for mast cell activation. Elevated levels of BPG were most commonly found both singly and in combination with other mediators, followed by the finding of elevated levels of tryptase. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase levels were measured in only a minority of patients.

Mast cells (MCs) leave evidence of their presence and activation. Aside from increased numbers of MCs in tissues, this evidence includes detecting elevated serum levels of tryptase and discovering increased excretion of urinary metabolites of prostaglandin (PG) D2, leukotriene (LT) C4, and/or histamine. The importance of measuring these nontryptase mediator metabolites has largely gone unnoticed. We reviewed the utility of quantitating urinary levels of MC mediator metabolites in systemic mastocytosis (SM) and MC activation disorders and summarized the relative production of these mediators by MCs and other cell types. Quantitation of urinary n-methyl histamine, 2,3-dinor-11βPGF2α, and LTE4 offers a simple, noninvasive avenue to monitor their constitutive release as well as contemporaneous discharge during MC activation as well as supporting a diagnosis of SM. These increases can occur independently of or in addition to raised levels of tryptase. Quantitation of these mediator metabolites potentially offers targets for therapeutic intervention. Synthesis of PGD2, a product nearly exclusively of MCs, can be controlled with aspirin, histamine increase by H1 and H2 receptor blockade, and LTC4 by a 5-LO inhibitor or LT receptor antagonist. Although other sources are reported, the increase in MC numbers in SM supports this cell as the predominant origin of all 3 mediators.

Background & Aims Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is assessed endoscopically (endoscopic activity), based on grades of edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and strictures (EREFS). We examined variations in endoscopic assessments of severity, developed and validated 3 EREFS-based scoring systems, and assessed responsiveness of these systems using data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of patients with EoE. Methods For the development set, 5 gastroenterologists reviewed EREFS findings from 266 adults with EoE and provided endoscopist global assessment scores (EndoGA, scale of 0 to 10); variation (ΔEndoGA) was assessed using linear regression. We evaluated simple scores (features given arbitrary values from 0 to 3) and developed 2 scoring systems (adjusted score range, 0–100). We then fitted our linear regression model with mean EndoGA to data from 146 adults recruited in centers in Switzerland and the United States between April 2011 and December 2012. For the validation set, we collected data from 120 separate adults (recruited in centers in Switzerland and the United States between May 2013 and July 2014), assessing regression coefficient-based scores using Bland-Altman method. We assessed the responsiveness of our scoring systems using data from a randomized trial of patients with EoE given fluticasone (n=16) or placebo (n=8). Results The distribution of EndoGA values differed among endoscopists (mean ΔEndoGA, 2.6±1.8; range 0–6.6). We developed 2 regression-based scoring systems to assess overall and proximal and distal esophageal findings; variation in endoscopic features accounted for more than 90% of the mean EndoGA variation. In the validation group, differences between mean EndoGA and regression-based scores were small (ranging from –4.70 to 2.03), indicating good agreement. In analyses of data from the randomized trial, the baseline to end of study change in patients given fluticasone was a reduction of 24.3 in simple score (reduction of 4.6 in patients given placebo, P=.052); a reduction of 23.5 in regression-based overall score (reduction of 6.56 in patients given placebo, P=.12), and a reduction of 23.8 (reduction of 8.44 in patients given placebo, P=.11). Conclusion Assessments of endoscopic activity in patients with EoE vary among endoscopists. In an analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, we found that newly developed scoring systems are no better than simple scoring system in detecting changes in endoscopic activity. These results support the use of a simple scoring system in evaluation of endoscopic activity in patients with EoE. clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT00939263 and NCT 01386112

Providers caring for patients with mastocytosis are tasked with the decision to consider therapeutic options. This can come with some trepidation because information available in the public domain lists numerous mast cell (MC) activators based on data that do not discriminate between primates, rodents, and MC lines; do not consider dosage; and do not take into account previous exposure and resultant clinical findings. This being said, there is support in the literature for an enhanced MC response in some patients with mastocytosis and in cases in which there is a greater incidence of adverse reactions associated with certain antigens, such as venoms and drugs. Thus this report provides a comprehensive guide for those providers who must decide on therapeutic options in the management of patients with clonal MC disease.

Mast cell activation (MCA) accompanies diverse physiologic and pathologic processes and is one of the more frequently encountered conditions in medicine. MCA-related symptoms are usually mild and often transient. In such cases, histamine receptor blockers and other mediator-targeting drugs can usually control MCA. In severe cases, an MCA syndrome (MCAS) may be diagnosed. However, overt MCAS is an unusual condition, and many patients referred because of suspected MCAS are diagnosed with other diseases (autoimmune, neoplastic, or infectious) unrelated to MCA or suffer from MCA-related (eg, allergic) disorders and/or comorbidities without fulfilling criteria of an overt MCAS. These considerations are important as more and more patients are informed that they may have MCA or even MCAS without completing a thorough medical evaluation. In fact, in several instances, symptoms are misinterpreted as MCA/MCAS, and other clinically relevant conditions are not thoroughly pursued. The number of such referrals is increasing. To avoid such unnecessary referrals and to prevent misdiagnoses, we here propose a diagnostic algorithm through which a clinically relevant (systemic) MCA can be suspected and MCAS can subsequently be documented or excluded. In addition, the algorithm proposed should help guide the investigating care providers to consider the 2 principal diagnoses that may underlie MCAS, namely, severe allergy and systemic mastocytosis accompanied by severe MCA. Although validation is required, we anticipate that this algorithm will facilitate the management of patients with suspected MCAS., This study was supported in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), projects F4701-B20 and F4704-B20, and the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Objective/Hypothesis Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is a variant of chronic otitis media that is characterized by the development of thick mucoid middle ear effusion, adult onset bronchial asthma, sinonasal polyposis, and aspirin sensitivity. EOM is typically refractory to corticosteroid therapy and surgical intervention. Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) has effectively treated hypereosinophilic syndrome in clinical trials; however, the efficacy of this medication for EOM treatment remains undefined. Study Design Retrospective, case series, tertiary academic center. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on EOM patients from 2008–2014. A total of 32 patients met the clinical criteria for EOM according to established diagnostic guidelines. Outcomes of all patients with severe, refractory EOM who initiated PEG-IFN therapy are reported. Results Eight patients were treated with pegylated interferon-α 2a or 2b for refractory EOM. Half of the patients had significant side effects with interferon treatment. Three of these were able to continue at a reduced dosage without side effect reoccurrence, and one patient stopped the medication permanently. Four of eight (50%) patients had a complete clinical response with total resolution of otorrhea and normalization of middle ear mucosa, and were able to discontinue corticosteroid treatment. Two patients attempted to stop PEG-IFN therapy after prolonged symptom remission and had recurrent otorrhea. Both patients had symptom resolution after PEG-IFN reinitiation. Conclusions These data demonstrate that pegylated interferon-α 2a and 2b therapy may benefit patients with severe, refractory EOM. Further larger studies with long-term follow-up are required to validate these early but promising results. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 127:1208–1216, 2017

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a disorder characterized by the excessive accumulation of clonally derived mast cells in various tissues. When triggered, mast cells release large amounts of histamine, prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Leukotriene E4 (LTE4) is the primary stable metabolite of total cysteinyl leukotrienes. We hypothesized that secretion of LTE4 would be increased in SM and could be used alone or in combination with current urinary biomarkers to optimize screening for SM.LTE4 was measured by liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Analytical assay validation was performed using residual urine specimens. LTE4 results were normalized to urine creatinine for clinical use. Reference interval was established using a healthy volunteer cohort. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for SM detection were determined by measuring urinary biomarkers (LTE4, N-methyl histamine [NMH] and 11β-prostaglandin F2α [BPG]) in a cohort of 409 patients referred to allergy specialists, 66 (16%) of which were diagnosed with SM.Urinary LTE4 measurement was accurate, precise and linear across a range of 31-3020pg/mL. The 95th percentile of the reference interval population was104pg/mg creatinine. Median urine LTE4 concentrations were significantly higher among patients with SM (97pg/mg cr. vs. 50pg/mg cr.; p0.01). Elevated urinary LTE4 was 48% sensitive and 84% specific for SM. Clinical sensitivity was 53% for BPG (1000ng/mL) and 71% for NMH (200ng/mL). Incorporating all three urinary metabolites improved the SM diagnostic sensitivity to 97%, with minimal change in specificity.We have developed a sensitive and precise LC-MS/MS assay for quantitation of LTE4 in urine. Incorporating LTE4 into a panel including BPG and NMH provides a much-needed screening tool for a complicated disease with non-specific symptoms and invasive confirmatory testing.

Background Urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) is a well-validated marker of the cysteinyl leukotriene pathway, and LTE4 elevation has been described in conditions such as asthma, aspirin sensitivity, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). There have been a number of reports investigating the role of spot urine LTE4 to predict aspirin sensitivity; however, variability in urinary LTE4 may affect the accuracy of this approach. Objective Here, we explored the utility of 24-hour urinary LTE4 in 5 clinical diagnoses of allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), CRS without nasal polyps, and aspirin sensitivity. Methods This was a retrospective review of patients who had 24-hour quantification of urinary LTE4 by a clinically validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method and their assigned diagnoses after assessment and clinical care. Results Twenty-four-hour urinary LTE4 elevations were seen in those with asthma and those with CRSwNP but influenced by underlying aspirin sensitivity. Elevation in LTE4 was significant in those with CRSwNP after adjusting for aspirin sensitivity. Allergic rhinitis was not associated with elevated LTE4 excretion. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of 24-hour urinary LTE4 showed that a cutoff value of 166 pg/mg Cr suggested the presence of history of aspirin sensitivity with 89% specificity, whereas a cutoff value of 241 pg/mg Cr discriminated "challenge-confirmed" aspirin-sensitive subjects with 92% specificity. Conclusions Elevated 24-hour excretion of urinary LTE4 is a reliable and simple test to identify aspirin sensitivity in patients with respiratory diagnoses.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology 389(7), 671-694 (2016). doi:10.1007/s00210-016-1247-1, Published by Springer, Berlin

Patients with clonal mast cell activation syndromes (MCAS) including cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis (SM) may present with symptoms of mast cell activation, but in addition can have organ damage from the local effects of tissue infiltration by clonal mast cells. Patients with nonclonal MCAS may have chronic or episodic mast cell activation symptoms with an increase in serum tryptase and/or urinary metabolites of histamine, prostaglandin D2, and leukotrienes. Symptoms of MCAS and SM can be managed by blockade of mediator receptors (H1 and H2 antihistamines, leukotriene receptor blockade), inhibition of mediator synthesis (aspirin, zileuton), mediator release (sodium cromolyn), anti-IgE therapy, or a combination of these approaches. Acute episodes of mast cell activation require epinephrine, and prolonged episodes may be addressed with corticosteroids. Patients with clonal mast cell syndromes may need a reduction in the number of mast cells to prevent severe symptoms including anaphylaxis and/or progression to aggressive diseases.

Mast cells leave evidence, a "fingerprint," of their participation in acute and chronic clinical events. That fingerprint is an elevation, either chronic or acute, in levels of their secreted mediators or their metabolites. Of these, only serum tryptase is currently one of the diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis or mast cell activation. Combinations of easily obtained and quantified urinary mast cell mediator metabolite levels correlate well with bone marrow findings of systemic mastocytosis. By inhibiting synthesis of or blockading receptors to the elevated mast cell mediator, relief of clinical symptoms can often be achieved.

Objective: A growing number of cancer antineoplastic agents can cause life-threatening acute infusion reactions. Because previous studies have not studied these reactions from the perspective of patients, this study was undertaken with that objective in mind. Methods: Patients who had an acute infusion reaction were interviewed based on the Leventhal model. Once saturation of content was achieved, interviews were transcribed and analyzed with qualitative methodology. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Most were women (n = 15); the median age was 58 years, and paclitaxel was the most common inciting agent. Three themes emerged. First, these reactions are frightening; patients made remarks such as “I was just thinking oh my God, I am dying.” Second, prior education about these reactions seemed to mitigate this fear, “Basically everything the nurses told me potentially could happen, like happened. So, I was prepared.” Third, when health-care providers were prompt and attentive during the reaction, patients described less fear with future chemotherapy, “So no, I’m really not fearful about going in tomorrow because I know they’ll be there and they’ll be watching me.” Conclusion: These reactions evoke fear which can be mitigated with education prior to and with prompt responsiveness during the acute infusion reaction.

Mastocytosis is a term used to denote a group of rare diseases characterized by an abnormal accumulation of neoplastic mast cells in various tissues and organs. In most patients with systemic mastocytosis, the neoplastic cells carry activating mutations in KIT. Progress in mastocytosis research has long been hindered by the lack of suitable in vitro models, such as permanent human mast cell lines. In fact, only a few human mast cell lines are available to date: HMC-1, LAD1/2, LUVA, ROSA and MCPV-1. The HMC-1 and LAD1/2 cell lines were derived from patients with mast cell leukemia. By contrast, the more recently established LUVA, ROSA and MCPV-1 cell lines were derived from CD34+ cells of non-mastocytosis donors. While some of these cell lines (LAD1/2, LUVA, ROSAKIT WT and MCPV-1) do not harbor KIT mutations, HMC-1 and ROSAKIT D816V cells exhibit activating KIT mutations found in mastocytosis and have thus been used to study disease pathogenesis. In addition, these cell lines are increasingly employed to validate new therapeutic targets and to screen for effects of new targeted drugs. Recently, the ROSAKIT D816V subclone has been successfully used to generate a unique in vivo model of advanced mastocytosis by injection into immunocompromised mice. Such a model may allow in vivo validation of data obtained in vitro with targeted drugs directed against mastocytosis. In this review, we discuss the major characteristics of all available human mast cell lines, with particular emphasis on the use of HMC-1 and ROSAKIT D816V cells in preclinical therapeutic research in mastocytosis.

Background The utility of measuring histamine and prostaglandin metabolites in the urine of patients with mastocytosis has not been critically examined in a large series of patients. This study examined the relationship between the extent of increase in urinary excretion of 11β-prostaglandinF2α and N-methyl histamine, with serum tryptase, whole blood serotonin, and bone marrow findings including morphology, percentage involvement, and abnormal mast cell phenotype. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 90 patients who were continuously enrolled in the study for a period of 6 years (2008–2014). We recorded serum tryptase, whole blood serotonin, levels of urinary mast cell metabolites 11β-prostaglandinF2α and N-methyl histamine (NMH), and bone marrow findings. Results Urinary mast cell metabolites 11β-prostaglandinF2α and N-methyl histamine correlated with levels of serum tryptase, mast cell burden in the bone marrow, the presence of mast cell aggregates, and atypical mast cells on bone marrow biopsy. Whole blood serotonin did not have a significant correlation with the serum tryptase or mast cell burden in the bone marrow. Urinary NMH was significantly different between c-kit D816V-positive and c-kit D816V-negative patients, while 11β-prostaglandinF2α was not. Urinary 11β-prostaglandinF2α 24-h excretion >3500 ng and NMH levels >400 μg/gm Cr corresponded with the high degree of bone marrow biopsies positive for atypical mast cells, the presence of aggregates, and c-kit mutation. Conclusions Easily obtained and quantified urinary metabolites of histamine (greater than twice the upper limit of normal) and prostaglandin D2 (>3.4 times the upper limit of normal) correlate well with bone marrow findings of mastocytosis.

Severe intraoperative hypotension has been reported in patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 antagonists. We describe a patient on lisinopril who developed refractory intraoperative hypotension associated with increased serum tryptase level suggesting mast cell activation (allergic reaction). However, allergology workup ruled out an allergic etiology as well as mastocytosis, and hypotension recalcitrant to treatment was attributed to uninterrupted lisinopril therapy. Elevated serum tryptase was attributed to our patient's chronic renal insufficiency.

Mastocytosis is an emerging differential diagnosis in patients with more or less specific mediator-related symptoms. In some of these patients, typical skin lesions are found and the diagnosis of mastocytosis can be established. In other cases, however, skin lesions are absent, which represents a diagnostic challenge. In the light of this unmet need, we developed a diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected mastocytosis. In adult patients with typical lesions of mastocytosis in the skin, a bone marrow (BM) biopsy should be considered, regardless of the basal serum tryptase concentration. In adults without skin lesions who suffer from mediator-related or other typical symptoms, the basal tryptase level is an important parameter. In those with a slightly increased tryptase level, additional investigations, including a sensitive KIT mutation analysis of blood leucocytes or measurement of urinary histamine metabolites, may be helpful. In adult patients in whom (i) KIT D816V is detected and/or (ii) the basal serum tryptase level is clearly increased (>25-30 ng/ ml) and/or (iii) other clinical or laboratory features suggest the presence of 'occult' mastocytosis or another haematologic neoplasm, a BM investigation is recommended. In the absence of KIT D816V and other signs or symptoms of mastocytosis or another haematopoietic disease, no BM investigation is required, but the clinical course and tryptase levels are monitored in the follow-up. In paediatric patients, a BM investigation is usually not required, even if the tryptase level is increased. Although validation is required, it can be expected that the algorithm proposed herein will facilitate the management of patients with suspected mastocytosis and help avoid unnecessary referrals and investigations., This work was supported in part by the Austrian Science Funds (FWF) Project SFB F4611 and SFB F4704-B20 and the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID.

Mast cell sarcoma is a disorder that results in abnormal mast cells as identified by morphology, special stains, and in some publications, c-kit mutation analysis. It affects animal species such as canines more commonly than humans. In humans it is a very rare condition, with variable clinical presentation. There is no standard therapy for the disorder. It can affect any age group. It is occasionally associated with systemic mastocytosis and/or urticaria pigmentosa. The prognosis of mast cell sarcoma in published literature is very poor in humans.

Background The outcomes of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) desensitization have been widely reported in the HIV literature but less so in the non-HIV literature. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of graded administration of TMP-SMX in patients without HIV and with a history of TMP-SMX adverse drug reaction (ADR). Methods A retrospective chart review, 2004-2012, of all the patients without HIV seen in the Division of Allergic Diseases and with a history of TMP-SMX ADR who underwent outpatient graded administration of TMP-SMX was conducted. The medical record was reviewed for age, sex, details of the initial ADR to TMP-SMX, an indication for TMP-SMX administration, and outcome. Patients also were contacted by telephone, and medical records were reviewed to determine long-term outcomes. Results Seventy-two patients (46 women [64%]; mean [SD] age, 57.7 ± 13.89 years]) were included. The most common patient-reported reactions to TMP-SMX were rash 39 (54%), and hives 9 (13%). TMP-SMX administration was needed for the following indications: prophylaxis (62 [86%]) and treatment of infection (10 [14%]). Forty-three of the patients (60%) underwent a 1-day TMP-SMX administration protocol. Thirty-five of the 43 (81%) underwent a 6-step (90 minutes to 6 hours) protocol and 7 of the 43 (16%) underwent a novel 14-step TMP-SMX protocol. Twenty-nine (40%) underwent a >1-day TMP-SMX administration protocol. Our overall success rate was 90% (mean duration of 11 months). Ninety-eight percent of the patients successfully completed a 1-day graded administration protocol, and 76% successfully completed a >1-day protocol. TMP-SMX was stopped in 8 patients because of the ADR. Conclusion We report the largest case series of successful outpatient graded administration of TMP-SMX with both 1-day and >1-day protocols, which have shown to be safe and well tolerated in patients without HIV and with a history of sulfonamide ADR.