da Silva Brum,Igor, Frigo,Lucio, Goncalo Pinto dos Santos,Paulo, Nelson Elias,Carlos, Fonseca,Guilherme Aparecido Monteiro Duque da, Jose de Carvalho,Jorge, da Silva Brum,Igor, Frigo,Lucio, Goncalo Pinto dos Santos,Paulo, Nelson Elias,Carlos, Fonseca,Guilherme Aparecido Monteiro Duque da, and Jose de Carvalho,Jorge
Igor da Silva Brum,1 Lucio Frigo,2 Paulo Goncalo Pinto dos Santos,1 Carlos Nelson Elias,3 Guilherme Aparecido Monteiro Duque da Fonseca,2 Jorge Jose de Carvalho4 1Implantology Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2Periodontology Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil; 3Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 4Biology Department, School of Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilCorrespondence: Lucio FrigoPeriodontology Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade Guarulhos, Praça Teresa Cristina, 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, 07023-070, BrazilTel/Fax +55-11- 2464-1684Email luciofrigo@uol.com.brBackground: Synthetic biomaterials have played an increasingly prominent role in the substitution of naturally derived biomaterials in current surgery practice. In vitro and in vivo characterization studies of new synthetic biomaterials are essential to analyze their physicochemical properties and the underlying mechanisms associated with the modulation of the inflammatory process and bone healing.Purpose: This study compares the in vivo tissue behavior of a synthetic biomaterial nano-hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate (nano-HA/ß-TCP mixture) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in a rat calvarial defect model. The innovation of this work is in the comparative analysis of the effect of new synthetic and commercially xenogenic biomaterials on the inflammatory response, bone matrix gain, and stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis.Methods: Both biomaterials were inserted in rat defects. The animals were divided into three groups, in which calvarial defects were filled with xenogenic biomaterials (group 1) and synthetic biomaterials (group 2), or left unfilled (group 3, controls). Sixty days after calvarial bone defects filled with biomaterials, periodic acid Schi