Search

Includes supplementary methods, figures, and tables.

Purpose:PI3K–Akt–mTOR and androgen receptor (AR) signaling are commonly aberrantly activated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with PTEN loss associating with poor prognosis. We therefore conducted a phase Ib/II study of the combination of ipatasertib, an Akt inhibitor, with the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone in patients with mCRPC.Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to ipatasertib 400 mg, ipatasertib 200 mg, or placebo, with abiraterone 1,000 mg orally. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in the intent-to-treat population and in patients with PTEN-loss tumors.Results:rPFS was prolonged in the ipatasertib cohort versus placebo, with similar trends in overall survival and time-to-PSA progression. A larger rPFS prolongation for the combination was demonstrated in PTEN-loss tumors versus those without. The combination was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths.Conclusions:In mCRPC, combined blockade with abiraterone and ipatasertib showed superior antitumor activity to abiraterone alone, especially in patients with PTEN-loss tumors.See related commentary by Zhang et al., p. 901

LBA441 Background: Two interim OS analyses from IMvigor130 demonstrated non-statistically significant OS benefit with atezo monotherapy (Arm B) vs placebo + platinum (investigator [INV] choice of carboplatin or cisplatin [carbo or cis])/gemcitabine (plt/gem; Arm C) in patients (pts) with PD-L1–high (IC2/3) mUC, as well as a favorable safety profile vs chemo (Galsky Lancet 2020, Davis AACR 2021). Exploratory data showed clinical benefit with atezo monotherapy in cis-ineligible pts with IC2/3 tumors. Here, we report the final OS analysis from IMvigor130 Arms B and C. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to Arm A (atezo + plt/gem; not reported here), B or C. Due to the statistical testing hierarchy, no formal comparison of OS (co-primary endpoint) in Arm B vs C was performed in ITT and IC2/3 pts. ORR and DOR, both per INV-assessed RECIST 1.1 (secondary endpoints), and safety were assessed. Subgroup analyses of OS in cis-ineligible pts and disease control rate (DCR, confirmed CR, PR or [SD ≥6 mo]) were exploratory. Results: As of data cutoff Aug 31, 2022, time since last pt randomly assigned was 49 mo. OS data (Table) did not show benefit for ITT pts, while an HR of 0.56 (0.34, 0.91) was seen in the cis-ineligible IC2/3 subgroup. In the ITT population, the 24-mo OS rates were 34% in Arm B and 32% in Arm C. ORR was 24% (87/359; 38% DCR) in Arm B and 44% (158/356; 59% DCR) in Arm C; median DOR was 29.6 and 8.1 mo, respectively. In cis-ineligible IC2/3 pts, ORR was 40% (20/50) in Arm B and 33% (14/43) in Arm C. Median DOR was not evaluable in Arm B and 6.2 mo in Arm C. Of safety-evaluable pts, 57 of 354 in Arm B (16%) and 312 of 389 in Arm C (80%) had a Gr 3/4 treatment-related AE (TRAE); 3 (1%) and 4 (1%), respectively, had a Gr 5 TRAE. Gr 3/4 AEs of special interest occurred in 36 pts (10%) in Arm B and 17 (4%) in Arm C. Conclusions: The final OS analysis was consistent with previous data. Atezo monotherapy continued to show better tolerability vs chemo with no new safety concerns. These exploratory data support the benefit-risk ratio of atezo monotherapy vs chemo for first-line cis-ineligible IC2/3 mUC. Clinical trial information: NCT02807636 . [Table: see text]

22 Background: In preliminary analyses from the randomized phase 2, open-label CheckMate 650 trial, nivolumab (NIVO) 1 mg/kg (N1) plus ipilimumab (IPI) 3 mg/kg (I3) Q3W × 4 doses showed clinical activity in patients (pts) with post-chemotherapy (post-CT) mCRPC, particularly those with high tumor mutational burden (TMB), but early toxicity contributed to treatment discontinuations. Here, we report results from pts with post-CT mCRPC receiving alternative NIVO+IPI dosing regimens vs IPI alone vs cabazitaxel (CABA) in CheckMate 650. Methods: Newly enrolled pts previously treated with docetaxel for mCRPC were randomized 2:2:1:2 to cohorts D1 (NIVO 3 mg/kg [N3] + IPI 1 mg/kg [I1] Q3W × 4 doses then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), D2 (N1 Q3W × 8 doses + I3 Q6W × 4 doses then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), D3 (I3 Q3W × 4 doses), or D4 (CABA 20 or 25 mg/m2 Q3W + prednisone 10 mg × 10 doses). Crossover from cohorts D3 and D4 to cohort D1 was allowed after radiographic progressive disease. Outcomes included safety, objective response rate (ORR), prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR; confirmed PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR), and overall survival (OS). Associations between efficacy and TMB were assessed. Results: Overall, 259 pts were randomized (D1, n = 73; D2, n = 74; D3, n = 38; D4, n = 74). Median (range) follow-up for OS was 23.3 (6.0–31.5) months. In the NIVO+IPI cohorts (D1 and D2), median duration of therapy was 2.8 and 2.4 months; the median number of IPI doses received was 4 and 2, and 15% and 26% of pts discontinued due to study drug toxicity, respectively. Two pts died due to study drug toxicity (1 each in cohorts D1 and D2). Key safety and efficacy data are shown. Several pts in cohorts D1 and D2 showed notable reductions (75-100%) in tumor size and PSA. Approximately one-third of pts in cohorts D3 and D4 crossed over to D1. Based on preliminary analyses in small numbers of evaluable pts, there was no clear and consistent association between efficacy and tissue or blood TMB in the NIVO+IPI cohorts (D1 and D2). Conclusions: These results further support the clinical activity of NIVO+IPI in select pts with post-CT mCRPC. Detailed evaluations of the characteristics of responders to NIVO+IPI, including more expansive biomarker analyses, are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02985957 . [Table: see text]

LBA440 Background: The IMvigor130 primary analysis demonstrated statistically significant PFS benefit with 1L atezo + plt/gem (Arm A) vs placebo + plt/gem (Arm C) in pts with mUC (Galsky Lancet 2020). Interim data showed improved OS with Arm A vs C but did not cross the pre-specified threshold for significance (Galsky Lancet 2020; Galsky AACR 2021). In exploratory analyses, OS improved when atezo was combined with cisplatin (cis) vs carboplatin (carbo) regardless of PD-L1 status. Here, we report final OS data from Arms A and C. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to Arm A, B (atezo alone) or C. Arm A and C pts received cis or carbo per investigator (INV) choice. Co-primary endpoints were PFS per INV RECIST 1.1 and OS (Arm A vs C), and OS (Arm B vs C), tested hierarchically. Safety, ORR and DOR, disease control rate (DCR; confirmed CR, PR or [SD ≥ 6 mo]) and pre-specified exploratory OS data are also reported. Results: As of data cutoff Aug 31, 2022 (49 mo since last pt randomly assigned), in ITT pts, OS benefit was not statistically significant; in the cis subgroup, HR was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57, 1.01; Table). In ITT pts, DCR was 65% (290/447) in Arm A and 60% (239/397) in Arm C. 81% of safety-evaluable pts (370/454) in Arm A and 80% (312/389) in Arm C had a Gr 3/4 tx-related AE (TRAE). Gr 5 TRAEs occurred in 9 pts (2%) in Arm A and 4 (1%) in Arm C; Gr 3/4 AEs of special interest were seen in 41 pts (9%) in Arm A and 17 (4%) in Arm C. Conclusions: In this final analysis, improved OS with atezo + plt/gem vs placebo + plt/gem did not reach statistical significance in ITT pts with mUC. As seen with prior exploratory data, improved OS with atezo + plt/gem was greater when pts received cis vs carbo. No new safety signals were seen. Clinical trial information: NCT02807636 . [Table: see text]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) previously showed that pembro+olaparib was associated with antitumor activity and acceptable safety in molecularly unselecte...

Current first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma has a limited duration of response. The MAJA study aimed to compare vinflunine (VFL) plus best supportive care (BSC) maintenance therapy versus BSC alone in 88 patients after first-line treatment with cisplatin/gemcitabine. Results demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit and a positive OS trend (with limited power due to the small sample size) with VFL in maintenance therapy with no unexpected long-term adverse effects. Introduction: The MAJA study compared vinflunine (VFL) plus best supportive care (BSC) maintenance therapy versus BSC alone in advanced urothelial carcinoma responsive to first-line chemotherapy. The primary end point of progression-free survival was achieved. We present the final overall survival (OS) and long-term follow-up safety analyses. Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled, and a subsequent post hoc analysis was performed on the basis of radiologic response or stabilization to first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) chemotherapy (4-6 cycles), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). VFL + BSC versus BSC alone were randomly assigned until disease progression. Results: At final analysis, 58 patients (66.7%) had died while 29 (33.3%) had survived; the BSC arm had higher mortality (VFL thorn BSC, n = 26, 59.1% vs. BSC, n = 32, 74.4%). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 38.8 months (interquartile range, 23.8-61.6). Median OS was 16.7 months (95% confidence interval, 0-34.5) in VFL and 13.2 months (95% confidence interval, 6-20.4) in the BSC groups (hazard ratio, 0.736; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.24, P=.182). Post hoc group division did not affect median OS in either study arm. Conclusion: Final analysis supported a benefit of VFL in maintenance therapy in patients with disease control after first-line treatment with CG, with no unexpected long-term adverse effects. The study was insufficiently powered to show a significant OS advantage. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

484 Background: Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody with proven efficacy in clinical trials for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) after progression to platinum-based chemotherapy. Following EMA marketing authorization and before prizing and reimbursement was granted in Spain, the Spanish Medicines Agency authorized a compassionate use program. We describe the patient characteristics and atezolizumab effectiveness in this compassionate use program. Methods: It was a multicentre cohort study based on the retrospective chart review of patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic UC who received atezolizumab, following progression to platinum-based chemotherapy, under the compassionate use program in Spain. The primary endpoint was their demographic and clinical characterization. Secondary endpoints included the best response to atezolizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 109 evaluable patients were included, with a median age (interquartile range, IQR) of 68.0 years (62.0-75.0), 87 males (79.8%) and 96 Caucasians (88.1%). Median age (IQR) at diagnosis was 64.0 years (58.0-72.0) and 92 (84.4%) had pure urothelial carcinoma. Twenty-four (22.0%) had received BCG, 18 (16.5%) neoadjuvant treatment, 19 (17.4%) adjuvant treatment, and 19 (17.4%) radiotherapy for primary tumour. Regarding prior metastatic treatments, 98 (89.9%) had received first-line chemotherapy, 46 (42.2%) second line, 19 (17.4%) third line, and 5 (4.6%) more lines. When starting atezolizumab, median age (IQR) was 69.0 years (62.0-74.0) and 105 (96.3%) had metastases: 71 (65.1%) in lymph nodes and 64 (58.7%) visceral (skeletal n = 31, lung n = 29, liver n = 26, other n = 13). Atezolizumab was used for a median (IQR) of 2.8 (1.4-8.4) months and 5.0 (3.0-13.0) administered doses. The overall response rate was 23.8%, with 6 patients (5.5%) achieving complete response and 20 (18.3%) partial response. Stable disease was observed in 21 (19.3%), progression in 44 (40.4%) and response was not evaluable in 18 (16.5%). The median PFS (95% CI) was 3.7 months (2.8-5.8), with PFS rates at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 of 57.5%, 38.0%, 30.5% and 26.1%, respectively. The median OS (95% CI) reached 8.5 (6.6-12.6) months, with a 12-month OS of 43.4%. Twenty-three patients (21.1%) reported 26 delays (adverse event n = 16, intercurrent event n = 10) and 2 (1.8%) interruptions (adverse event n = 1, intercurrent event n = 1). Atezolizumab was discontinued in 64 (58.7%) due to disease progression (n = 43, 67.2%), death (n = 13, 20.3%), adverse events (n = 7, 10.9%) and lost to follow-up (n = 1, 1.6%). Conclusions: This study provides real-world evidence on the characteristics of patients with advanced or metastatic UC treated with atezolizumab under the Spanish compassionate use program, supporting its effectiveness in the clinical setting.

Aim Cabazitaxel (CBZ), a novel tubulin-binding taxane, improves overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses during or after docetaxel treatment. We have designed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBZ as a weekly schedule for ‘unfit’ mCRPC patients after docetaxel failure. Methods In this single arm phase II study. CBZ was weekly administered in 1-hour infusion on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, every 5 weeks at 10 mg/m2 to eligible ‘unfit’ patients; oral prednisone (5 mg) was administered twice a day. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were also collected. New treatment scheme was considered effective if at least 65% of patients met a clinical benefit criteria based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-progression-free survival (PFS) values at week 12. Results Seventy patients (median age: 73.9 years) were enrolled; overall, 71.4% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 2; and 84%, 16% and 11% had bone, liver and lung metastases, respectively. Objective partial response or stable disease was achieved in 61% of patients, while PSA responses of ≥50% and ≥80% were observed in 34.8% and 10.6%, respectively. The median PSA-PFS was 4.8 months; and 68.6% of patients had no progression at week 12. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (2.8%), leukopenia (5.7%) and thrombocytopaenia (9%); no cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. Early CTC response was significantly correlated with PSA-PFS. Conclusions CBZ/prednisone administered weekly to ‘unfit’ mCRPC patients appears to be as effective as classical standard 3-week scheme (TROPIC study) but with significantly lower toxicities and better tolerance. Early CTC response appears to be valuable as an early end-point of therapeutic efficacy.

Summary Background Atezolizumab can induce sustained responses in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We report the results of IMvigor130, a phase 3 trial that compared atezolizumab with or without platinum-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Methods In this multicentre, phase 3, randomised trial, untreated patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, from 221 sites in 35 countries, were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group A), atezolizumab monotherapy (group B), or placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group C). Patients received 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 body surface area, administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle), plus either carboplatin (area under the curve of 4·5 mg/mL per min administered intravenously) or cisplatin (70 mg/m2 body surface area administered intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle with either atezolizumab (1200 mg administered intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) or placebo. Group B patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab, administered intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The co-primary efficacy endpoints for the intention-to-treat population were investigator-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 progression-free survival and overall survival (group A vs group C) and overall survival (group B vs group C), which was to be formally tested only if overall survival was positive for group A versus group C. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02807636 . Findings Between July 15, 2016, and July 20, 2018, we enrolled 1213 patients. 451 (37%) were randomly assigned to group A, 362 (30%) to group B, and 400 (33%) to group C. Median follow-up for survival was 11·8 months (IQR 6·1–17·2) for all patients. At the time of final progression-free survival analysis and interim overall survival analysis (May 31, 2019), median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·2 months (95% CI 6·5–8·3) in group A and 6·3 months (6·2–7·0) in group C (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·82, 95% CI 0·70–0·96; one-sided p=0·007). Median overall survival was 16·0 months (13·9–18·9) in group A and 13·4 months (12·0–15·2) in group C (0·83, 0·69–1·00; one-sided p=0·027). Median overall survival was 15·7 months (13·1–17·8) for group B and 13·1 months (11·7–15·1) for group C (1·02, 0·83–1·24). Adverse events that led to withdrawal of any agent occurred in 156 (34%) patients in group A, 22 (6%) patients in group B, and 132 (34%) patients in group C. 50 (11%) patients in group A, 21 (6%) patients in group B, and 27 (7%) patients in group C had adverse events that led to discontinuation of atezolizumab or placebo. Interpretation Addition of atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment prolonged progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with that observed with the individual agents. These results support the use of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin 1 and 2 regulate angiogenesis and vascular remodelling by interacting with the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2, and inhibition of angiogenesis has shown promise in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We aimed to assess whether trebananib, a peptibody that inhibits binding of angiopoietin 1 and 2 to Tie2, improved progression-free survival when added to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in a phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: TRINOVA-3, a multicentre, multinational, phase 3, double-blind study, was done at 206 investigational sites (hospitals and cancer centres) in 14 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with biopsy-confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III to IV epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using a permuted block method (block size of six patients) to receive six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve 5 or 6) every 3 weeks, plus weekly intravenous trebananib 15 mg/kg or placebo. Maintenance therapy with trebananib or placebo continued for up to 18 additional months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01493505, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 30, 2012, and Feb 25, 2014, 1164 patients were screened and 1015 eligible patients were randomly allocated to treatment (678 to trebananib and 337 to placebo). After a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 17·7-34·2), 626 patients had progression-free survival events (405 [60%] of 678 in the trebananib group and 221 [66%] of 337 in the placebo group). Median progression-free survival did not differ between the trebananib group (15·9 months [15·0-17·6]) and the placebo group (15·0 months [12·6-16·1]) groups (hazard ratio 0·93 [95% CI 0·79-1·09]; p=0·36). 512 (76%) of 675 patients in the trebananib group and 237 (71%) of 336 in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events; of which the most common events were neutropenia (trebananib 238 [35%] vs placebo 126 [38%]) anaemia (76 [11%] vs 40 [12%]), and leucopenia (81 [12%] vs 35 [10%]). 269 (40%) patients in the trebananib group and 104 (31%) in the placebo group had serious adverse events. Two fatal adverse events in the trebananib group were considered related to trebananib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (lung infection and neutropenic colitis); two were considered to be related to paclitaxel and carboplatin (general physical health deterioration and platelet count decreased). No treatment-related fatal adverse events occurred in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not improve progression-free survival as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. The combination of trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not produce new safety signals. These results show that trebananib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is minimally effective in this patient population. FUNDING: Amgen. ispartof: LANCET ONCOLOGY vol:20 issue:6 pages:862-876 ispartof: location:England status: published

434 Background: Atezo (anti–PD-L1) monotherapy is approved for cis-ineligible pts who have locally advanced or mUC with PD-L1–expressing immune cells on ≥ 5% of the tumor area (IC2/3 per VENTANA SP142 IHC assay). The IMvigor130 primary analysis demonstrated a significant PFS benefit with atezo + platinum/gemcitabine (plt/gem) (arm A) vs placebo (pbo) + plt/gem (arm C) as 1L treatment for mUC (Galsky Lancet 2020); at that time, interim OS data for arm A vs C were encouraging but immature. OS with atezo monotherapy (arm B) could not be formally tested, but favorable efficacy was seen in IC2/3 pts. In this exploratory analysis, we assess outcomes by PD-L1 status in cis-ineligible pts. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to arms A, B or C (Galsky Lancet 2020). Evaluation of OS (co-primary EP) was performed via a hierarchical fixed sequence procedure: arm A vs C ITT pts; then, arm B vs C ITT and IC2/3 pts. No formal testing was performed in this exploratory subgroup analyses; OS and RECIST 1.1 ORR (per investigator [secondary EP]) were descriptively evaluated. Results: Efficacy data suggested OS and ORR benefit in atezo-treated cis-ineligible IC2/3 pts (Table). In the overall safety population, all-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) had occurred in 60% and 96% of arm B and C pts, respectively; grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 15% and 81%, respectively. Biomarker data evaluating PD-L1 biology (assessed by SP142) and associated transcriptome analysis in arms B vs C will be presented. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of IMvigor130 pts with 1L cis–ineligible IC2/3 mUC provides additional evidence for clinical benefit with single-agent atezo, a well-tolerated treatment with a distinct safety profile vs chemo. Analyses with longer OS follow-up are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02807636 . Research Sponsor: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd[Table: see text]

Purpose: PI3K–Akt–mTOR and androgen receptor (AR) signaling are commonly aberrantly activated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with PTEN loss associating with poor prognosis. We therefore conducted a phase Ib/II study of the combination of ipatasertib, an Akt inhibitor, with the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone in patients with mCRPC. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to ipatasertib 400 mg, ipatasertib 200 mg, or placebo, with abiraterone 1,000 mg orally. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in the intent-to-treat population and in patients with PTEN-loss tumors. Results: rPFS was prolonged in the ipatasertib cohort versus placebo, with similar trends in overall survival and time-to-PSA progression. A larger rPFS prolongation for the combination was demonstrated in PTEN-loss tumors versus those without. The combination was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In mCRPC, combined blockade with abiraterone and ipatasertib showed superior antitumor activity to abiraterone alone, especially in patients with PTEN-loss tumors. See related commentary by Zhang et al., p. 901

95 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) improves OS and rPFS in first line mCRPC patients (pts). After AA progression D is commonly used as standard second line therapy. However, the value of maintaining AA in combination with D despite progression has not been tested beyond small exploratory studies (Tagawa ST, Eur Urol 2016) ABIDO is a randomized-phase II trial that evaluates efficacy and safety of D + AA vs D after first-line AA progression in mCRPC. Methods: Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC pts with no visceral metastases, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ functions were included. The study has two stages: In stage I pts receive AA (1000 mg/d + prednisone (P) 10 mg qd) until radiological or unequivocal clinical progression. In stage II pts were randomized to D 75 mg/m2 q3wk in combination with AA 1000 mg/d (arm A) or without AA (arm B) The primary endpoint was rPFS and the secondary endpoints radiological response (RR), OS, PSA-response, PSA-PFS and safety. Results: 88 pts were randomized, (46 arm A, 42 Arm B). Median age was 69 y/o, 43% had ECOG 0 and 91%/11%/5% had bone, liver and lung metastases. Median rPFS was 11.4 months (m) in arm A vs 10.5 m in ARM B; 12-m rPFS was 43% vs 45%; Median PSA PFS was 6.2 vs 5.5 m and median OS was 17.3 vs 16.9 m. Twenty four pts (52%) in arm A and 19 (46%) in arm B achieve ≥50% PSA response. RR was achieved in 15% vs 7% of pts and disease control rate in 74% in both arms. No statistically significant differences were found in efficacy parameters. Half of pts received 10 cycles of D (median 7 and 8). D median dose intensity was 86% and 90% for each arm and 91% for AA. Eleven pts discontinued treatment due to non-hematological toxicity, 5 in arm A and 6 in arm B. Most frequent G3-4 toxicities per arm (A/B) were: neutropenia (57%/29%; P=0.027), febrile neutropenia (17%/10%), diarrhea (9%/7%), and asthenia (11%/10%). Conclusions: ABIDO trial was unable to demonstrate the significant clinical benefit of maintenance AA approach + D after AA first-line therapy. No differences were observed in RR, PSA PFS, rPFS and OS. In AA + D cohort, more frequent and severe hematological toxicity (neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) were reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02036060.

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in men. Many patients have prolonged survival and die of other diseases, so treatment decisions are often influenced by age and coexisting comorbidities. The main procedure to diagnose PC is an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, which is indicated when a digital rectal examination (DRE) finds nodularity or when PSA is >10 ng/ml, but is also recommended with PSA between 4.0 and 10 ng/ml. Depending on age, PSA, Gleason score and characteristics of the tumour, treatment options for localised PC are active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) should be added to radiotherapy for men with intermediate- or high-risk PC. ADT is the current standard first-line treatment for metastatic PC. Castration-resistant PC is a heterogeneous entity. Several treatments such as sipuleucel-T, docetaxel-based chemotherapy, radium 223, cabazitaxel or abiraterone plus prednisone, zoledronic and denosumab, are useful for this situation.

TPS4589Background: Platinum-based chemo is the standard of care for most pts with untreated mUC, although clinical outcomes remain poor. Atezo (anti–PD-L1) was approved in the United States, Europe...

623 Background: Treatment of mRC is not affected by gender, studying possible differences in a real-world study, could increase the knowledge of toxicity and possible prognostic factors. Methods: SPAZO2 (NCT03091465) was a retrospective real-world study to analyze the effectiveness of 1st-line pazopanib and subsequent therapies in mRC. Data from 530 pt treated outside CT were collected in 50 spanish centers, and externally monitored. Ineligibility criteria: ECOG > 1, pure nonclear-cell, Hgb < 9 g/dl, renal failure, severe cardiovascular disease, chronic liver disease, or recent neoplasia Results: 530 pt were included, 67.2% men (M), mean age was 66.2 years (26-92). There were no significant differences (M vs W) in the age > 75 (24.7 vs 24.1%), clear cell carcinoma (77.2 vs 79.9%), nephrectomy (72.5 vs 68.4%), IMDC (favourable: 15.2 vs 12.1%, intermediate: 59.3 vs 64.4%, poor: 25.6 vs 23.6%), metastases (lymph nodes: 46.1 vs 43.1%, lung: 69,7 vs 67,2 %, liver: 16 vs 20.1%, bone: 27 vs 24.1%, skin/soft tissues: 1.1 vs 3,4% and CNS: 4,8% vs 6.3%). Discontinuation due to toxicity or comorbidities was 12.4 vs 9.8%. There were no differences in the second lines received (57.9 vs 56.9%), neither response, PFS and OS (table). Median follow up was 39 mo. The gender has no prognostic value when adjusted for the prognostic groups of IMDC (HR of PFS 0.96, CI 95% 0.78-1.2, HR of OS: 0.92, CI 95% 0.72-1.14). Only diarrhea and elevation of uric acid were higher in the men group. Conclusions: Pazopanib was safe and effective in both groups with similar outcome. Women had less diarrhea and less increased uric acid. There were not differences in OS or PFS. In IMDC subgroup analysis, there is a trend towards a better evolution or PFS in the poor prognosis women subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT03091465. [Table: see text]

310 Background: In Phase III studies, ipilimumab did not extend OS in unselected populations with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (Kwon, 2014; Beer, 2014), suggesting that successful cancer immunotherapy development strategies require the evaluation of treatment effects in biomarker-driven segments. In addition, PTEN loss has been identified as a potential mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy (Peng, 2016). Therefore, we explored possible associations between cancer immunity (CI)-related biomarkers and PTEN loss in mCRPC samples. Methods: Tumor samples obtained in the Phase II study of AA ± Ipat in patients with mCRPC (de Bono, ESMO 2016) were retrospectively profiled. DNA alterations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were assessed by FoundationOne. RNA-seq analysis of multiple CI-related expression signatures was performed. Tumor-immune lymphocyte (TIL) scores were analyzed in 3 compartments (stromal, sTIL; intratumoral, iTIL; peritumoral, pTIL) based on H&E stained specimens. Up to 10 evenly distributed fields were examined; the average of these fields was used to estimate the %TILs for each compartment. Results: Strong associations were observed between multiple CI-related signatures (e.g., INFγ-induced, immune checkpoints, Treg, checkpoint inhibitors). Fewer than 10% of the samples had a high level (≥ 10% of the tumor area) of TIL infiltration in any compartment (Table). TIL scores, TMB values, PTEN status and Gleason score all appeared to be independently associated, and none were associated with CI-related gene signatures, except for a possible association between pTILs and the B-cell signature (ρ = 0.49, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Comprehensive high-content profiling of prostate cancer samples suggests that PTEN status and CI-related biomarkers were independently associated, while TMB and TIL values were generally not associated with CI-related signatures. Clinical trial information: NCT01485861. [Table: see text]

e16536 Background: AA improves OS and rPFS in asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic mCRPC patients. D is currently one of the standard treatments after progression to AA. However, the value of maintaining AA along with D despite progression to AA has not been tested. ABIDO trial aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of AA + D maintenance after disease progression to first line AA in mCRPC. Clinicopathologic features associated with rPFS during first line AA are presented. Methods: ABIDO trial is a randomized, phase II, open-label study with two stages. In stage I pts receive AA (1000 mg + prednisone (P) 10 mg qd) until progressive disease. In the stage II pts will be randomized to receive three-weekly D 75 mg/m2plus P 10 mg/d with (arm A) or without (arm B) AA 1000 mg/d. Pts had no visceral metastases, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ functions. Clinicopathological predictors for rPFS to first line AA were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and independent associations were evaluated using Cox regression models. Results: 143 pts were included. Analyzed variables were: median age was 70y, 60% of pts had ECOG 0, 84% bone metastases (18% > 4), 42% BPI score 2-3, 53% Gleason > = 8, 30% PSA > 80 ng/mL, 38% node involvement and 11% had at least one lymph node > = 3 cm; 53% of pts achieved 4 weeks PSA reduction > 50%.Median rPFS was 18 months. Univariate analysis identified as significant variables: PSA, BPI, Gleason, node involvement, 4 weeks PSA reduction > 50%, and total volume of lymph node metastasis. On multivariate analysis, BPI (0-1 vs 2-3) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81; p = 0.039), Gleason ( < 8 vs > = 8) (HR 2.51; p = 0.005), node involvement (no nodes, nodes < 3 cm and at least 1 node > = 3 cm (HR 2.8; p = 0.001 and 3.57; p = 0.009) and PSA reduction > 50% (HR 3.06; p < 0.001) were independently associated with rPFS. Median rPFS was superior in pts with 3 or more good prognostic factors (14m vs not reached; p < 0.001). Conclusions: BPI, Gleason, node involvement and 4-week PSA response were identified as independent prognostic factors for rPFS in first line AA treated patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02036060.

4526 Background: CheckMate 275 (NCT02387996), a phase II, single-arm study of nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) treatment in platinum-refractory patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, showed an objective response rate of 19.6% (95% CI, 15.0%–24.9%) with manageable toxicity. The objective of this analysis was to examine the impact of nivolumab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the study. Methods: HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and visual analog scale (VAS). Questionnaires were completed at baseline and every 8 weeks thereafter for the first 48 weeks. The analysis cohort included pts with scores recorded at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessments while on treatment. Data were analyzed using mixed models, adjusting for baseline score. Results: Of the 270 patients treated with nivolumab, 168 (62%) had an assessment at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessment and were included in HRQoL analyses. Completion rates at baseline were 97% for both questionnaires. Statistically significant ( P< 0.05) improvements in mean scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales measuring role, emotional, and social functioning; global health status/quality of life; nausea/vomiting; pain; dyspnea; insomnia; appetite loss; constipation; and diarrhea were observed at ≥1 time points. With the exception of cognitive functioning, no significant worsening in subscale scores was observed in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement (based on a minimally important difference of 7) in EQ-5D VAS was noted between weeks 17 and 41. EQ-5D-3L utility index scores based on the UK tariff remained stable during treatment. Conclusions: Results of CheckMate 275 indicate that pts with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed or recurred after treatment with a platinum agent exhibited stable, or in some cases statistically significantly improved, HRQoL while being treated with nivolumab, as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L. Clinical trial information: NCT02387996.

The consumption of oral antineoplastics -and more particularly of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI)- has increased in recent years. These therapies show a better tolerance but still, the nutritional alterations related to their daily and chronic clinical use are under investigation. This study assesses the effects of TKI on the intake, nutritional status and micronutrients as well as the patients quality of life.A prospective longitudinal study was conducted including adult patients having started some TKI treatment from July 2012 to June 2013, and a 6 month follow-up period was established. Demographic pharmacotherapeutic, nutritional and biochemical variables were collected and also a EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire at baseline, first, third and sixth month of treatment.31 patients were included in the study. The percentage of weight loss at treatment baseline was statistically matched to the results on the patient-generated Global Subjective Assessment. Appetite decreased after one month of treatment, and so did the calorie consumption; 62.1% of the patients lost weight, 55.5% on the third month and 70.6% on the sixth month. 6-17% of the patients suffered from malnutrition to some degree during the follow-up period and a decrease of calcium, phosphate and magnesium plasma levels was detected. The emotional scale was the one with a lowest score in EORTC QLQ-30, and fatigue and lack of appetite were the most common symptoms at treatment baseline, progressively increasing those of nausea, vomits and diarrhea.Patients treated with TKI did not show a relevant malnutrition. Considering the results, it is important to take into account weight loss at treatment baseline; it is also important to control calcium and phosphate levels during treatment, to advise and counsel the patient on the GI effects (nausea, vomits and diarrhea) and emotionally reinforce the patient.El consumo de antineoplásicos orales y concretamente de inhibidores tirosin kinasa (ITK) se ha incrementado en los últimos años. Son terapias mejor toleradas y, sin embargo, las alteraciones nutricionales relativas a su uso clínico diario y crónico están aún en estudio. El presente estudio valora la repercusión de los ITK sobre la ingesta, estado nutricional y micronutrientes y valora la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.Se realizó un estudio prospectivo y longitudinal en el que se incluyeron aquellos pacientes adultos que iniciaron tratamiento con algún ITK de julio 2012 a junio 2013 con un periodo de seguimiento de 6 meses. Se recogieron variables demográficas, farmacoterapéuticas, nutricionales, bioquímicas y el cuestionario EORTC-QLQ30 al inicio, primer, tercer y sexto mes de tratamiento.Se incluyeron 31 pacientes. El porcentaje de pérdida de peso al inicio del tratamiento se relacionó estadísticamente con la clasificación de la Valoración Subjetiva Global-generada por el paciente. Tras un mes de tratamiento descendió el apetito, las calorías consumidas y un 62,1% de los pacientes perdió peso, 55,5% al tercer mes y 70,6% al sexto mes. Entre un 6-17% de los pacientes sufría algún grado de desnutrición durante el seguimiento y se detectó una disminución de los niveles plasmáticos de calcio, fosfato y magnesio. En el EORTC QLQ-30, la escala emocional fue la peor puntuada y los síntomas más comunes al inicio de tratamiento fueron la fatiga y pérdida de apetito, aumentando progresivamente las náuseas, vómitos y la diarrea.Los pacientes tratados con ITK no presentaron una desnutrición importante. A la vista de los resultados es importante valorar la pérdida de peso al inicio de tratamiento, monitorizar los niveles de calcio y el fosfato durante el tratamiento, aconsejar y prevenir al paciente sobre los efectos gastrointestinales (náuseas, vómitos y diarrea) y reforzar emocionalmente al paciente.

5017Background: mCRPC commonly has hyperactivated PI3K/Akt signaling, usually via PTEN loss; androgen receptor (AR) blockade activates Akt, supporting mCRPC cell survival. We hypothesized that co-i...

4529Background: Vinflunine (VFL) is a microtubule inhibitor approved by EMA as treatment after platinum progression in metastatic UC. We evaluated whether maintenance VFL delays progression after r...

5058Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) improves OS and rPFS in asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic mCRPC patients (pts) who are chemotherapy (CT) naive through CYP17 inhibition. Upon progression t...

e16022 Background: Docetaxel (D) is the standard treatment for symptomatic or aggressive mCRPC. Abiraterone acetate (AA) in combination with prednisone improves OS and rPFS in mCRPC chemotherapy (CT) naive patients (pts) with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic disease (Ryan CJ, 2013; ZYTIGA Janssen Biotech, Inc., 2012). This study aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of AA maintenance in combination with D after disease progression to first line AA in mCRPC. Methods: This is a randomized, phase II, open-label study conducted in CT naive mCRPC pts progressing after AA treatment. Pts with confirmed histologically or cytologically adenocarcinoma of the prostate, metastatic disease other than visceral, progression to previous castration, ECOG PS 0-1, testosterone < 50 ng/dL and adequate, hematologic, hepatic, and renal function were included to receive AA treatment (1000 mg qd plus prednisone 10 mg qd) until disease progression determined by PSCWG2 criteria. In a second stage pts will be randomized to rece...

e15597 Background: The IMRCC prognostic model for mRCC treated with VEGF-targeted agents (Heng, JCO '09) has been externally validated (Heng, Lancet Oncol '13), however, pt treated with Pz were not...

e16051 Background: Ra improves survival in bone symptomatic mCRPC pts. Response assessment to Ra is difficult because of low PSA responses and pts are monitored through alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and clinically. CTCs count is a well-known predictive and prognostic biomarker in mCRPC. The aim of the study was to assess CTCs as a predictive biomarker for response to Ra therapy. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 46 pts with mCRPC treated with Ra at 8 hospitals in Spain between February and October 2014. Samples were obtained at baseline, at cycle 3 and at progression and were centrally analyzed using the CellSearch System. Statistic analysis was done with SAS v9.3 program. CTCs outcome at cycle 3 was defined as: response: decrease > 50% in relation to baseline or ≤ 5 CTCs; progression: increase > 50% or > 5 CTCs; and stabilization: absence of either response or progression. Results: We collected samples at baseline, cycle 3 and progression from 42, 32 and 18 pts respectively (see table). Pts charact...

4525 Background: Treatment of mTCC progressing to cisplatin is an unmet need. Prognostic factors (PF) for worse overall survival (OS) are ECOG >0, Hb

167 Background: Cabazitaxel (C), a novel taxane developed to overcome D resistance, showed an overall survival improvement after D in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in a three-weekly schedule. Its main toxicity is hematological, especially in unfit patients. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of weekly C/prednisone (P) schedule in "unfit" mCRPC previously treated with D. Methods: Unfit pts defined as ECOG 2, dose reduction due to febrile neutropenia during D treatment or radiation therapy affecting more than 25% of bone marrow reserve, with mCRPC progressing after D treatment with adequate bone marrow, liver and kidney functions were included. C 10 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 5-week cycles with P (5 mg b.i.d.). Radiological and PSA response were evaluated according to the PCWG2 (Scher H, 2008) criteria and toxicity according NCI-CTC AE. Results: To date 70 pts have been enrolled and data are available for 66. Median age was 73 y (range 54-84), 67% pts had ECOG 2, 87% had bone, 14% liver and 11% lung metastases. Half of pts had Gleason >7. Treatment: 271 cycles (median: 3; range: 1-12); 1002 weekly infusions (median 11; range 1-48). Median dose intensity was 93%. Eighteen of 55 pts (32.7%) achieve ≥50% PSA response and 5 (9.1%) ≥80% PSA response. Radiological response was evaluable in 56 pts. PR was observed in 4 pt (7.1%) and SD in 29 pts (51.8%). Median PFS was 3.9 months. Median OS was 14.2 months. Most frequent toxicities of all grades as % of pts were: anemia (71.2%), asthenia (43.9%), thrombocytopenia (15.1%), leukopenia (24.2%), diarrhea (27.3%), nauseas (18.2%), neutropenia (12.1%), peripheral neuropathy (7.6%), and anorexia (18.2%). Grade 3-4: thrombocytopenia (4.5%), anemia (6%), neutropenia (3.0%), asthenia (10.6%), diarrhea (1.5%), anorexia (1.5%), No grade IV diarrhea nor febrile neutropenia were observed. Conclusions: Weekly cabazitaxel (10 mg/m2) plus prednisone administered to unfit pts seems a highly effective treatment and safe, with no grade 4 neutropenia, diarrhea or febrile neutropenia reported. Clinical trial information: NCT01518283.

e22019 Background: CECs counts have been proposed as a marker of endothelial damage in CCRCC. However, standardization of the technics of assessment and an homogeneous definition of CECs are lackin...

TPS5096 Background: Docetaxel (D) is the standard treatment for symptomatic or aggressive disease in mCRPC patients. Abiraterone acetate (AA), a specific inhibitor of CYP17, blocks persistent extra...

e16034 Background: Docetaxel (D) is standard first-line chemotherapy in patients (pts) with mCRPC. Cabazitaxel (C), a novel taxane developed to overcome D resistance, showed an overall survival imp...

e15586 Background: Angiogenesis inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the management of CCRCC. Since CECs counts have been proposed as a surrogate biomarker of antiangiogenic activity they could potentially be used to assess the efficacy of such drugs. Methods: An observational prospective multicenter study was designed. Patients with confirmed CCRCC on first line treatment (any drug) who have not progressed after 3 months on therapy were considered eligible. CECs (CD146+, CD 105+,CD 45- DAPI + cells assessed by the Cell Search system), were determined every 6 weeks for 15 months or radiological tumor progression. External monitoring of clinical data was performed. Results: 75 patients (29% female, 71% male) were included between June 2011 and January 2013 from 11 Spanish institutions. Median age was 62 years (range 37-81). Distribution of patients according to MSKCC risk cathegories was: good 32%, intermediate 66% and poor 1.5%. 90% of patients have received sunitinib, 6% pazopanib, 1% temsirolimus, and was not available in 3%. With a median follow-up of 7 months (range 0-11.8) 13 patients have progressed and median progression free survival (PFS) has not been reached. At baseline median CECs count was 47 cells/4 ml (range 4-485). A trend towards worse PFS has been identified in patients with basal CEC levels below the median (p= 0.063 Breslow test). When baseline CEC counts were compared to counts at tumor progression no significant difference was found. Patient and/or tumor characteristics (sex, MSKCC prognostic cathegory, number of metastatic sites, and prior response to therapy) did not seem to influence CECs levels at baseline. Conclusions: CEC counts remain estable in CCRCC patients treated with antiangiogenic inhibitors whohad not progressed to first line therapy. Low CEC counts seem to identify a population with shorter response to therapy. Thus, CEC could be a reliable pharmacodynamic marker able to assess the antiangiogenic activity of a drug. Long-term follow-up results will be presented.

e15609 Background: In clinical trials pazopanib (P) was superior to placebo, noninferior to sunitinib, and very well tolerated as 1st-line for mRC, but there is limited information in daily clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 159 patients (p) who received P in in 31 centers in Spain during the first 18 month after P approval, to evaluate the timing of use and its efficacy. Results: Mean age was 66 y, 64.8% were males, 81.1% clear-cell, 12% non-clear cell, and 6.9% unspecified. At diagnosis of mRC 73.6% had nephrectomy, 78.6% and 71.7% of p were of good-intermediate risk (MSKCC and Heng criteria respectively). Metastatic sites were lung (59.7%), lymph nodes (26.4%), bone (22.6%), skin/soft-tissues (17.6%), liver (11.9%), CNS (2.5%), and 31.4% others (adrenal, pancreas, etc.). Median follow-up since diagnosis of mRC was 16 months (m). P was given as 1st systemic treatment in 81 p, (50.9%), as 2nd line in 32 p (20.1%, most after sunitinib, 17 due to intolerance), or as ≥3r line (46 p, 29%). Median follow-up after P was 7 m in 1st line, and 10 m in 2nd or ≥ 3rd line. Toxicity was as expected. No toxic deaths were registered. At the time of analysis, 85 p have discontinued P (progression: 73 p, toxicity: 10 p, other causes: 2 p), and 35 p have died. The table shows time to treatment failure due to progression or toxicity (TTF), and overall survival (OS) since the 1st dose of P. There were statistically significant differences in 1st line TTF and OS between MSKCC subgroups. Conclusions: In p with mRC and good-intermediate prognosis, P appears to be as effective in daily clinical practice as it was in 1st line trials. P also showed efficacy in p with poor risk, in 2nd-line (particularly progression or intolerance to sunitinib), and after 2 or more TKIs. Updated analysis will be available in June 2013. [Table: see text]

4560 Background: Metastases of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) to brain are a rare event. Prognostic is poor and there is little evidence on optimal management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective review of case records of germ cell tumor patients within the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group from 1994 to 2012 was conducted. Results: Thirty-tree cases of testicular germ cell tumors from 17 institutions were reported. Nineteen patients (57%) presented with brain metastases at primary diagnosis (group 1: synchronous), thirteen (40%) developed brain metastases at relapse (group 2: metachronous) and only one patient developed brain metastasis during cisplatin based-chemotherapy (3%) (excluded from the analysis). Main demographics and comparison between series are shown on table. Median serum BHCG levels at initial diagnosis were higher in group 1(279.083 versus 175.873), whereas those of AFP were higher in group 2(1320 versus 4181). The most common histology in the primary tumor was choriocarcinoma for group; versus embryonal carcinoma for group 2. Patients had neurological symptoms at diagnosis of brain metastases (63% synchronic/93% metachronus). Performance status was also poor (PS 2-3: 52,6%group 1-62,2% group 2). Four patients (21%) in group 1 had a solitary brain lesion vs seven (54%) on group 2. Median time since last dose of cisplatin to development of brain metastases on group 2 was 6 months (3-22).Median overall survival was 16 months (95% CI 5,3-26,6): group 1: 16 (95% CI 13,9-18);23 group 2 (95% CI 0-165). We have not found significant differences in survival between both groups. Overall 37,5% of patients achieved long-term survival (38,9% in group 1 versus 38,5% in group 2). Patients achieving complete response of brain metastases had a better survival (log rank p:0,003). Conclusions: Long term survival can be achieved in approximately 1/3 of patients with brain metastases. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. Selection bias because of the retrospective nature of review should make us be careful with the conclusions.

TPS4672 Background: Advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (TCCU) on progression after previous cisplatin-based combination is generally an incurable disease. The appropriate management of these patients is still an unmet need. Many drugs have shown modest or no activity in previous phase 2 trials. Population heterogeneity in these studies emerges as one of the key determinants that could explain the variable outcomes. Recently, in a phase III study in this setting, prognostic factors (PF) for overall survival were identified (Bellmunt J et al, JCO 2010). Taxanes are active drugs in 2nd-line metastatic TCCU. Cabazitaxel (C) is a semi-synthetic taxane that is a poor substrate for the multidrug resistance system. C could be a valid alternative in this patient population. Methods: This is an open label phase II study of C in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic TCCU who have progressed within 12 months after receiving a 1st-line platinum based chemotherapy. There are three treatment arms as patients will be assigned to one of three groups previously defined based on the presence of 0, 1 or 2-3 PFs as defined by Bellmunt et al. The activity of C will be assessed separately in each group and overall. The primary endpoint is response rate (RR) evaluated according to RECIST 1.1, a maximum of 35 pts are needed in each subgroup (maximum number of pts required: 105). Secondary objectives are RR in the whole population, toxicity, progression-free survival and overall survival. In addition, an external validation of the prognostic model proposed by Bellmunt will be conducted, as well as a pharmacogenomic study in order to better define the toxicity profile of the drug and the potential responders.

TPS4674 Background: Vinflunine is a novel microtubule inhibitor currently approved by EMA as treatment after platinum progression, in metastasic bladder cancer. It is distinguished from the other vinca-alkaloids because it binds relatively weakly to tubulin, suggesting an improved tolerance profile as a result of less neuropathy. Based on the fact that no cumulative toxicity is expected and the results reported in second-line, we aim to test the role of vinflunine in first line therapy, as maintenance treatment for patients who obtain clinical benefit after platinum. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, open label, proof-of-concept study that will be performed in 20 institutions members of the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG). Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive vinflunine 320 mg/m2 every 21 days plus BSC vs BSC alone until disease progression. Vinflunine dose will be 280mg/m2 for patients with PS=1, age ≥ 75 years, prior pelvic radiotherapy or creatinine clearance Cr

TPS4688 Background: Dovitinib is a novel targeted therapy, that has proven to inhibit, among other tyrosin kinases, the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). Since this pathway has been proposed to play a major role in ACC, we aim to test the clinical efficacy of dovitinib in this tumor. Methods: An open label phase II trial has been designed in patients with advanced non-resectable ACC. The objective will be to obtain at least a 15% response rate according to RECIST criteria. Taking as a basis the two-stage Gehan model, 15 patients would need to be included in the first stage to demonstrate a treatment efficacy of at least 15%. Sample size calculation was done based on the following parameters, probability of Type I error α = 0.05, power of the test (1 - β) = 0.8. Main inclusion criteria are advanced non-resectable disease and no prior therapy (other than mitotane). Dovitinib scheduled dose matches currently employed standard in the drug development (500mg daily for 5 days then 2 days off) for 6 months. If clinical benefit is obtained longer treatment will be allowed for particular patients. Since this is an extremely unfrequent disease 7 institutions, members of the SOGUG (Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group), will participate. The active support of a big collaborative group will guarantee candidate patients to be refereed to such institutions. Starting January 26th 2012 recruitment is scheduled to last around 12 months. A translational research, including whole exome analysis, will be performed in order to improve our scarce knowledge of ACC.

5544 Background: Pembro + olaparib has shown antitumor activity and acceptable safety in docetaxel-pretreated pts with mCRPC enrolled in cohort A of the phase I/II KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573). Updated results with new biomarker data are reported. Methods: Pts with docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC who progressed within 6 mo of screening received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + olaparib 400-mg capsule or 300-mg tablet PO BID. Pts might have received 1 other chemotherapy and ≤2 second-generation androgen-receptor targeted therapies. Primary end points: PSA response rate (decrease ≥50% from baseline, confirmed by a second value ≥3 wks later), ORR per RECIST v1.1, and safety. Key secondary end points: DCR, DOR, rPFS, and OS. Biospecimens (eg, blood, tissue) were collected for biomarker analysis (tissue PD-L1 expression, androgen receptor variant 7 [AR-v7] expression in circulating tumor cells [CTCs], and a T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile [GEP]). ctDNA was analyzed by Guardant Health 360 (GH360) and Omni (GH Omni) assays. FFPE tissue was analyzed by FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) assay. Results: 84 of 87 enrolled pts were treated; 48/84 (57.1%) had measurable disease. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 3.6 mo (0.0-29.2) for all pts and 26.7 mo (21.2-29.2) for 41 pts with ≥27 wks’ follow-up. Confirmed PSA response rate was 9% (95% CI, 3.5-16.8) in 82 pts with a baseline PSA assessment. Median time to PSA progression: 3.8 mo (95% CI, 2.9-4.4). In 24 pts with measurable disease and ≥27 wks’ follow-up, ORR was 8.3% (95% CI, 1.0-27.0; 2 PRs) and DCR ≥6 mo was 20.8% (95% CI, 7.1-42.2). Median (range) DOR was NR (12.0+ to 21.4+ mo); 2 pts had DOR ≥12 mo. In all pts, median rPFS was 4.3 mo (95% CI, 3.4-7.7) and median OS was 14.4 mo (95% CI, 8.1-18.5). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 29 pts (35%); 2 pts died of TRAEs (1 myocardial infarction, 1 unknown). Overall, 26% had PD-L1+ tumors (combined positive score ≥1). Of 31 pts with CTC data, 12.9% were AR-v7+. No BRCA1/2 mutation was detected by GH360 (n=42). Of 57 pts analyzed by GH Omni, 2 had BRCA2 mutations, 1 had a BRCA1 mutation, 4 had ATM mutations, 1 had a CHEK1 mutation, and 6 had CDK12 mutations. Of 49 pts analyzed by F1CDx, 4 had BRCA mutations; 1 pt had a copy number loss mutation not detected by ctDNA analysis. GEP was not associated with ORR or PSA response. Conclusions: Pembro + olaparib continued to show activity and acceptable safety in pts with docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC. A phase III study of this combination is ongoing (KEYLYNK-010, NCT03834519). Clinical trial information: NCT02861573 .

100 Background: KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) is a phase 1b/2 study evaluating pembro + other agents in mCRPC. Updated results from cohort A (pembro + olaparib) are reported. Methods: Docetaxel-pretreated, molecularly unselected pts with mCRPC with progression within 6 mo of screening per PSA or radiologic bone/soft tissue progression enrolled. Pts may have received 1 other chemotherapy and ≤2 2nd-generation hormone therapy (HT). Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + olaparib 400 mg PO BID. Primary end points: safety, PSA response rate (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%), and ORR per blinded independent central review. Results: Of 84 treated pts, 42 discontinued, primarily due to progression (n=29). Median age was 71 y (range, 47-83); 26% were PD-L1+, 26% had visceral disease, and 57% had RECIST-measurable disease. Median follow-up was 3 mo for all pts (n=81) and 14 mo for pts with ≥27 wks’ follow-up (n=41). See Table for efficacy outcomes. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 70 (83%) pts. Most frequent (≥30%) were nausea (33%) and anemia (31%). Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 29 (35%) pts. Three pts died of AEs (2 treatment related [l myocardial infarction, 1 unknown cause]). Conclusions: With additional follow-up, pembro + olaparib continued to show activity in docetaxel-pretreated, molecularly unselected pts who previously received HT for mCRPC. Safety of the combination was consistent with individual profiles of each agent. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573. [Table: see text]

5542 Background: Adding BEV to CT significantly improved PFS in platinum-resistant OC in the open-label phase III AURELIA trial. As symptom improvement is a major goal of treatment, determining effects on HRQoL was a key secondary aim of AURELIA. Methods: After investigator selection of single-agent CT (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, or weekly paclitaxel), patients (pts) with measurable/assessable platinum-resistant OC were randomized to CT ± BEV. HRQoL and symptoms were assessed at baseline and every 2 or 3 cycles (8/9 wks) until PD using the EORTC OC Module (OV28) and FOSI. The primary HRQoL endpoint was an absolute improvement of ≥15% (≥15 points) on the 100-point OV28 subscale for abdominal (abdo)/GI symptoms (items 1–6) at wk 8/9. Pts with missing questionnaires (Qs) were included and considered not to have improved. A sensitivity analysis excluded pts with Qs missing for reasons other than PD/death or switch from CT to BEV. Subgroup analyses of symptomatic pts included only those with a baseline score ≥15 (sufficient to show ≥15-point improvement). Mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used to compare Qs from all time points until PD/death, not just wk 8/9. The FOSI was analyzed similarly. Results: Baseline Qs were available from 89% of 361 randomized pts. At wk 8/9, 81% of BEV–CT vs 68% of CT pts who were alive and PD-free returned OV28 Qs. For the primary HRQoL endpoint, more BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in the OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale at wk 8/9 (21.9% vs 9.3%, 12.7% difference [95% CI 4.4–20.9]; p = 0.002). The sensitivity analysis described above showed a 13.3% difference [95% CI 4.5–22.1]. In the subgroup of 233 pts with a baseline score ≥15, there was a 16.9% difference (95% CI 6.1–27.6) favoring BEV–CT (29.6% vs 12.7%). MMRM analysis of OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale scores also favored BEV–CT (6.4-point difference [95% CI 1.28–11.6]). More BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in FOSI score at wk 8/9 (12.2% vs 3.1%, 9.0% difference [95% CI 2.9–15.2]). Conclusions: Adding BEV to CT resulted in more frequent ≥15% improvements in patient-reported abdo/GI symptoms in platinum-resistant OC. Clinical trial information: NCT00976911.