Search

Your search keyword '"Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres"
3 results on '"Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres"'

1. Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 2.5×1018 eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory

Author

Jaroslaw Stasielak, Ana Martina Botti, Marcus Niechciol, Alberto Daniel Supanitsky, Alexey Yushkov, Petr Schovánek, Pavel Horváth, Pedro Assis, Nataliia Borodai, Luis Lopes, Luis Nunez, Carla Bleve, Alberto Blanco, Katharine Mulrey, Antonella Castellina, Francesca Zuccarello, Felicia Carla Tiziana Barbato, Emanuele De Vito, Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres, Fausto Guarino, Jeffrey Brack, Kai Daumiller, Dariusz Gora, Christian Sarmiento-Cano, Alessio Gorgi, Peter Biermann, Teresa Bister, LORENZO CACCIANIGA, Beatriz Garcia, Bruce Dawson, Alena Bakalova, MASSIMO MASTRODICASA, Edivaldo Moura Santos, Stijn Buitink, Bernardo Tomé, Ana Laura Müller, Mario BUSCEMI, Francesco Salamida, Johannes Hulsman, Henryk Wilczyński, Michael Unger, Ronald Cintra Shellard, Miguel Mostafa, Achille Nucita, Frederic Sarazin, Paul Mantsch, Ruben Conceição, Roger Clay, Lukáš Václavek, Giovanni Marsella, Markus Roth, Jakub Jurysek, Lorenzo Cazon, Eva Dos Santos, Corbin Covault, Francesco Fenu, Dalibor Nosek, Rossella Caruso, Alexandra Saftoiu, Tim Huege, Antonio CONDORELLI, Orazio Zapparrata, Jaime Alvarez-Muniz, Denise Boncioli, Guillermo Torralba Elipe, Martin Erdmann, Bruno Lazarotto Lago, Carlos José Todero Peixoto, Geraldina Golup, Jan Pękala, Maximilian Stadelmaier, Raul Sarmento, Enrique Varela, Antoine Letessier selvon, Vincenzo Rizi, Eleonora Guido, Pedro T. Abreu, Rafael Alves Batista, Arjen Van Vliet, and Jan Ebr

Subjects
Pierre Auger Observatory, Physics, Spectral index, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Hadron, Flux, Cosmic ray, Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, Flattening, 0103 physical sciences, 010306 general physics, Anisotropy, Zenith
Abstract

We report a measurement of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays for energies above 2.5×1018 eV based on 215,030 events recorded with zenith angles below 60°. A key feature of the work is that the estimates of the energies are independent of assumptions about the unknown hadronic physics or of the primary mass composition. The measurement is the most precise made hitherto with the accumulated exposure being so large that the measurements of the flux are dominated by systematic uncertainties except at energies above 5×1019 eV. The principal conclusions are(1) The flattening of the spectrum near 5×1018 eV, the so-called "ankle,"is confirmed.(2) The steepening of the spectrum at around 5×1019 eV is confirmed.(3) A new feature has been identified in the spectrum: in the region above the ankle the spectral index γ of the particle flux (∝E-γ) changes from 2.51±0.03 (stat)±0.05 (syst) to 3.05±0.05 (stat)±0.10 (syst) before changing sharply to 5.1±0.3 (stat)±0.1 (syst) above 5×1019 eV.(4) No evidence for any dependence of the spectrum on declination has been found other than a mild excess from the Southern Hemisphere that is consistent with the anisotropy observed above 8×1018 eV.

Published
2020

2. Features of the Energy Spectrum of Cosmic Rays above 2.5×1018 eV Using the Pierre Auger Observatory

Author

Jaroslaw Stasielak, Ana Martina Botti, Marcus Niechciol, Alberto Daniel Supanitsky, Alexey Yushkov, Petr Schovánek, Toshihiro Fujii, Pavel Horváth, Pedro Assis, Nataliia Borodai, Luis Lopes, Luis Nunez, Carla Bleve, Alberto Blanco, Katharine Mulrey, Antonella Castellina, Francesca Zuccarello, Felicia Carla Tiziana Barbato, Emanuele De Vito, Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres, Fausto Guarino, Jeffrey Brack, Kai Daumiller, Dariusz Gora, Christian Sarmiento-Cano, Carola Dobrigkeit Chinellato, Alessio Gorgi, Peter Biermann, Teresa Bister, LORENZO CACCIANIGA, Beatriz Garcia, Bruce Dawson, Alena Bakalova, MASSIMO MASTRODICASA, Edivaldo Moura Santos, Stijn Buitink, Bernardo Tomé, Ana Laura Müller, Mario BUSCEMI, Francesco Salamida, Johannes Hulsman, Henryk Wilczyński, Michael Unger, Ronald Cintra Shellard, Miguel Mostafa, Achille Nucita, Frederic Sarazin, Paul Mantsch, Ruben Conceição, Roger Clay, Lukáš Václavek, Giovanni Marsella, Markus Roth, Jakub Jurysek, Lorenzo Cazon, Eva Dos Santos, Corbin Covault, Francesco Fenu, Dalibor Nosek, Rossella Caruso, Alexandra Saftoiu, Tim Huege, Antonio CONDORELLI, Orazio Zapparrata, Jaime Alvarez-Muniz, Denise Boncioli, Guillermo Torralba Elipe, Martin Erdmann, Bruno Lazarotto Lago, Carlos José Todero Peixoto, Geraldina Golup, Jan Pękala, Maximilian Stadelmaier, Raul Sarmento, Enrique Varela, Antoine Letessier selvon, Vincenzo Rizi, Eleonora Guido, Pedro T. Abreu, Rafael Alves Batista, Arjen Van Vliet, and Jan Ebr

Subjects
010308 nuclear & particles physics, 0103 physical sciences, General Physics and Astronomy, 010306 general physics, 01 natural sciences
Published
2020

3. Comparison of the moments of the distribution predicted by different cosmic ray shower simulation models

Author

Divay Kothandan, Carlos José Todero Peixoto, Vitor De souza, and Jose Alfredo Bellido Caceres

Subjects
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE), Physics, Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Hadron, Monte Carlo method, Astrophysics::Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, FOS: Physical sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cosmic ray, Interaction model, ASTROFÍSICA, Function (mathematics), Table (information), Computational physics, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), Range (statistics), Statistical physics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Parametrization
Abstract

In this paper we study the depth at which a cosmic ray shower reaches its maximum (\Xmax) as predicted by Monte Carlo simulation. The use of \Xmax in the determination of the primary particle mass can only be done by comparing the measured values with simulation predictions. For this reason it is important to study the differences between the available simulation models. We have done a study of the first and second moments of the \Xmax distribution using the \Corsika and \Conex programs. The study was done with high statistics in the energy range from $10^{17}$ to \energy{20.4}. We focus our analysis in the different implementations of the hadronic interaction models \Sibyll and \Qgsjet in \Corsika and \Conex. We show that the predictions of the \meanXmax and \sigmaXmax depend slightly on the combination of simulation program and hadronic interaction model. Although these differences are small, they are not negligible in some cases (up to 5 g/cm$^2$ for the worse case) and they should be considered as a systematic uncertainty of the model predictions for \meanXmax and \sigmaXmax. We have included a table with the suggested systematic uncertainties for the model predictions. Finally, we present a parametrization of the \Xmax distribution as a function of mass and energy according to the models \Sibyll and \Qgsjet, and showed an example of its application to obtain the predicted \Xmax distributions from cosmic ray propagation models., Submitted to Astroparticle Physics

Published
2013

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results