1. Post-Activation Potentiation Enhancement Response of Two Complex Training Sequences
- Author
-
Violeta Muñoz de la Cruz, Sergio Rodríguez-Barbero, Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Juan José Salinero, José María González-Ravé, and Fernando González-Mohíno
- Subjects
performance ,conditioning activity ,warm-up ,Technology ,Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,TA1-2040 ,Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 ,Physics ,QC1-999 ,Chemistry ,QD1-999 - Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the effects of two complex training sequences on acute post-activation potentiation enhancement in countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Methods: Twenty-two recreationally active males performed CMJ before and 1, 4, and 8 min after two sequences of complex training conducted in reverse order, consisting of a heavy load comprising three sets of squats with a 15% velocity-loss and three sets of maximal CMJ with a 10% height-loss for the low load. Results: No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in the interaction time × condition in CMJ variables. At the individual level, 23, 9, and 32% of participants improved CMJ performance in the high loads–low loads sequence at 1, 4, and 8 min compared to the baseline, respectively. In comparison, 14%, 23%, and 27% of participants improved CMJ performance in the light loads–high loads sequence. Eight participants in each sequence did not improve CMJ performance at any time, although these participants were not the same in both sequences. Conclusions: Stronger athletes (1.65 ± 0.28 relative force) seemed to benefit more from the high loads-low loads sequence. In conclusion, there were no non-responders, as all the participants improved at some time point. The strength levels may be one of the moderating variables.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF