Search

Early extubation is a fundamental element integrated into enhanced recovery protocols in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim is to evaluate whether early extubation influences short- and medium-term postoperative morbidity and mortality.A cohort of 209 patients who underwent OLT in a tertiary hospital in a period from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1: early extubation in the intensive care unit and group 2: delayed extubation. Mortality is compared between both groups in the first month and first and third year. Postoperative morbidity was also compared.Patients in group 1 (n = 165, 79.9%) presented, with statistical significance, lower mortality at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years; shorter duration of admission to the critical care unit and of hospital stay; lower incidence of surgical reoperation and retransplant; lower rate of transfusion of blood products; fewer pulmonary, digestive, neurologic, cardiologic, hemodynamic, kidney, surgical, infectious, metabolic, thrombotic, vascular, and graft complications; less need for kidney replacement therapy; less refractory ascites; and greater infectious risk. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the need for hospital readmission; in biliary, endocrine, nutritional, hematologic, thrombotic, and hematologic complications; or in graft rejection. In group 1, 6.6% of patients required reintubation. In group 2, 97% of patients could be extubated during the first week; 7.8% required noninvasive mechanical ventilation type bilevel positive airway pressure and 8.1% high flow. Only 2.8% of patients required tracheotomy.The role of early extubation seems key to improve outcomes in OLT because it reduces the incidence of multiple complications and mortality, with low reintubation rates. It is a feasible and safe procedure.

Extended criteria donor livers are increasingly being accepted for transplant in an attempt to bridge the gap between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of available donor livers. Our objective was to describe our first case of hepatic resuscitation by means of an ex situ perfusion machine in hypothermia with oxygen insufflation of a liver graft extracted from a donor in type 3 asystole after regional perfusion in normothermia.A 53-year-old woman with disabling polycystic liver disease was included on the liver transplant waiting list. Donation was offered in type 3 asystole with regional perfusion in normothermia. Given that it was an elderly donor with a low-weight graft, hepatic resuscitation was decided by means of an ex situ perfusion machine in hypothermia with oxygen insufflation.After performing the bench work, the injector is selectively cannulated via the portal to connect it to the hypothermic perfusion machine. The average temperature of the perfusate (3 L modified Belzer) was 10°C for 120 minutes at 250 mL/min. The implant was completed without the need for transfusion of blood products, postreperfusion Sd, or vasoactive support. Peak of GOT/GPT was 803/276 at 24 hours posttransplant.

An organ shortage is the reason why it is necessary to expand the pool of donors, which can be achieved by using elderly donors. The main goal of this study is to analyze the outcomes of liver transplant (LT) when it is performed with donors older than 75 years.We carried out a retrospective case-control study (N = 212) that included LTs with donors older than 75 years (group A, n = 106 cases) that were performed in our center between the years 2010 and 2020. This cohort has been paired off with a similar control group (group B, n = 106) whose donors were significantly younger. A survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier model was performed.Average (SD) age of donors in group A was statistically greater than group B (A, 79.1 [3.0] years vs B, 54.4 [15.3], P.001). There were no differences either in the average age of the recipients or in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of both groups. Indications for LT were distributed equally in both groups: the most common was cellular hepatocarcinoma followed by alcohol-related cirrhosis. Survival rates for group A were 81%, 78%, and 67%, in 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, while in group B they were 85%, 76%, and 71%, respectively, without differences found between the groups (P = .57).Using elderly liver donors is safe, achieving good outcomes in terms of short- and midterm rates of survival.

The protective capacity and duration of humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet understood in solid organ transplant recipients. A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies in liver transplant recipients 6 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resolution. A total of 71 liver transplant recipients were matched with 71 immunocompetent controls by a propensity score including variables with a well-known prognostic impact in COVID-19. Paired case-control serological data were also available in 62 liver transplant patients and 62 controls at month 3 after COVID-19. Liver transplant recipients showed a lower incidence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies at 3 months (77.4% vs. 100%, p < .001) and at 6 months (63.4% vs. 90.1%, p < .001). Lower levels of antibodies were also observed in liver transplant patients at 3 (p = .001) and 6 months (p < .001) after COVID-19. In transplant patients, female gender (OR = 13.49, 95% CI: 2.17-83.8), a longer interval since transplantation (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), and therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR = 7.11, 95% CI: 1.47-34.50) were independently associated with persistence of antibodies beyond 6 months after COVID-19. Therefore, as compared with immunocompetent patients, liver transplant recipients show a lower prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and more pronounced antibody levels decline.