Camenzind, E., Wijns, W., Mauri, L., Kurowski, V., Parikh, K., Gao, R., Bode, C., Greenwood, J.P., Boersma, E., Vranckx, P., McFadden, E., Serruys, P.W., O'Neil, W.W., Jorissen, B., Leeuwen, F van, Steg, P.G., Verheugt, F.W., et al., Camenzind, E., Wijns, W., Mauri, L., Kurowski, V., Parikh, K., Gao, R., Bode, C., Greenwood, J.P., Boersma, E., Vranckx, P., McFadden, E., Serruys, P.W., O'Neil, W.W., Jorissen, B., Leeuwen, F van, Steg, P.G., Verheugt, F.W., and et al.
Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the long-term safety of two devices with different antiproliferative properties: the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES; Medtronic, Inc) and the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) in a broad group of patients and lesions. METHODS: Between May 21, 2007 and Dec 22, 2008, we recruited 8791 patients from 36 recruiting countries to participate in this open-label, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries. Patients were randomly assigned to either receive E-ZES and C-SES (ratio 1:1). Randomisation was stratified per centre with varying block sizes of four, six, or eight patients, and concealed with a central telephone-based or web-based allocation service. The primary outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years and was analysed by intention to treat. Patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957. FINDINGS: PROTECT randomised 8791 patients, of whom 8709 provided consent to participate and were eligible: 4357 were allocated to the E-ZES group and 4352 patients to the C-SES group. At 3 years, rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis did not differ between groups (1.4% for E-ZES [predicted: 1.5%] vs 1.8% [predicted: 2.5%] for C-SES; hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.58-1.14, p=0.22). Dual antiplatelet therapy was used in 8402 (96%) patients at discharge, 7456 (88%) at 1 year, 3041 (37%) at 2 years, and 2364 (30%) at 3 years. INTERPRETATION: No evidence of superiority of E-ZES compared with C-SES in definite or probable stent thrombosis rates was noted at 3 years. Time analysis suggests a difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis between groups is emerging over time, and a longer follow-up is therefore needed given the clinical relevance of stent thrombosi