Search

The field of nanotechnology is at the forefront of a scientific revolution, where the term "nano" transcends mere size and opens the door to enormous possibilities. In the context of drug development, the selection of a suitable drug delivery system (corresponding to a certain active pharmaceutical ingredient) is a pivotal decision. Accordingly, nanosystems have emerged as a promising avenue, offering innovative solutions, and gaining recognition for addressing healthcare issues. While these products hold immense promise, they have faced certain complexities in their translation from the preclinical to the clinical setting, reflected in the lack of proper assessment protocols for quality and safety aspects and, consequently, an insufficiently defined regulatory environment. Since the groundbreaking US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of liposomal doxorubicin in 1995, approximately 80 nanomedicine products have received regulatory approval so far. Recent attention has gravitated toward lipid-based nanomedicines, particularly in the development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, further highlighting their significance. However, the relatively modest number of approved nanomedicines compared to the extensive research efforts raises important questions and underscores areas of uncertainty. This article provides an overview of the challenges in defining nanomedicines, their properties, the complexities of regulatory frameworks, and the imperative for standardized characterization protocols.

The injectability of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers is influenced by polymer concentration, polymer cross-linking type and degree, the presence of lidocaine or other functional excipients, types of syringes, and injection techniques. Finished product injectability constitutes a critical quality attribute for clinical injectors, as it strongly influences product applicability and ease of use in aesthetic medicine. While injectable product extrusion force specifications are provided by the respective device manufacturers, the qualitative informative value of such datasets is low for injectors wishing to compare product brands and technologies from an injectability standpoint. Therefore, the present study comparatively assessed 28 cross-linked HA dermal fillers (JUVÉDERM®, Restylane®, BELOTERO®, TEOSYAL RHA®, and STYLAGE® brands) using various injectability benchmarking setups for enhanced clinical-oriented relevance. Manual product injections were performed by three specialized and experienced clinicians, whereas automatic product extrusion was performed using a Texture Analyzer instrument. The various hydrogel products were injected into ex vivo human skin and into SimSkin® cutaneous equivalents to appropriately account for injection-related counterpressure. The injectability results revealed important variability between and within product brands, with a strong influence of the local anesthetic lidocaine, HA contents, and needle gauge size. Critical appraisals of the investigated products were performed, notably from manufacturing process-based and clinical ease of application-based standpoints, centered on respective experimental injectability quality levels. Generally, it was confirmed that each HA-based dermal filler product requires specific expertise for optimal injection, mainly due to differing viscoelastic characteristics and injectability attributes. Overall, the present study set forth evidence-based and clinical-oriented rationale elements confirming the importance for injectors to work with injectable products with which they are experienced and comfortable to optimize clinical results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most marketed HA-based dermal fillers use chemical cross-linking to improve mechanical properties and extend their lifetime in vivo; however, stiffer products with higher elasticity require an increased extrusion force for injection in clinical practice. To balance longevity and injectability, we propose a thermosensitive dermal filler, injectable as a low viscosity fluid that undergoes gelation in situ upon injection. To this end, HA was conjugated via a linker to poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM), a thermosensitive polymer using "green chemistry", with water as the solvent. HA-L-pNIPAM hydrogels showed a comparatively low viscosity (G′ was 105.1 and 233 for Candidate1 and Belotero Volume®, respectively) at room temperature and spontaneously formed a stiffer gel with submicron structure at body temperature. Hydrogel formulations exhibited superior resistance against enzymatic and oxidative degradation and could be administered using a comparatively lower injection force (49 N and >100 N for Candidate 1 and Belotero Volume®, respectively) with a 32G needle. Formulations were biocompatible (viability of L929 mouse fibroblasts was >100% and ~85% for HA-L-pNIPAM hydrogel aqueous extract and their degradation product, respectively), and offered an extended residence time (up to 72 h) at the injection site. This property could potentially be exploited to develop sustained release drug delivery systems for the management of dermatologic and systemic disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]