Search

The experience of pain associated with labour is complex and challenging to assess. A range of pain measurement tools are reported in the literature. This review aimed to identify current tools used in research to assess labour pain across the past decade and to evaluate their implementation and adequacy when used in the context of labour pain. A literature search was conducted in databases MEDLINE and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, using search terms relating to labour, pain, and measurement. A total of 363 articles were selected for inclusion. Most studies (89.9%) assessed pain as a unidimensional experience, with the most common tool being the Visual Analogue Scale, followed by the Numerical Rating Scale. Where studies assessed pain as a multidimensional experience, the most common measurement tool was the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Only 4 studies that used multidimensional tools selected a tool that was capable of capturing positive affective states. Numerous variations in the implementation of scales were noted. This included 35 variations found in the wording of the upper and lower anchors of the Visual Analogue Scale, some assessment tools not allowing an option for “no pain,” and instances where only sections of validated tools were used. It is clear that development of a standardised pain assessment strategy, which evaluates the multidimensions of labour pain efficiently and effectively and allows for both positive and negative experiences of pain to be reported, is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Pain and Movement Reasoning Model is a tool to assist clinical reasoning. It was created for physiotherapists to use in musculoskeletal outpatient clinics but may be appropriate in other clinical contexts. The Model has also been used in physiotherapy education. To determine physiotherapists' perceptions of the appropriateness (suitability) and benefit (utility) of the Pain and Movement Reasoning Model across clinical contexts in hospital and community practice. Methods Physiotherapists from two health networks in Melbourne, Australia, received training in using the Model and over 4-6 weeks applied it in their clinical interactions. Drawing on a deductive phenomenological approach, transcripts from focus groups and interviews were analysed to determine the suitability and utility of the Model across clinical areas. Twenty-nine physiotherapists from 12 different clinical areas participated. Two themes represented the participants' comments: Suitability for Practice and Utility in Practice. Participants reported the approach to clinical reasoning, promoted by the Model, aligned with existing physiotherapy practice. Enhancements to practice included more comprehensive assessment, selection of broader management techniques and increased confidence with reasoning and explaining the complexity of pain to patients. Participants described using the Model for developing junior staff and training postgraduate students. They also saw potential in adapting the Model for other disciplines and for other multifactorial conditions. Physiotherapists working in a range of clinical contexts considered the Pain and Movement Reasoning Model appropriate and beneficial in clinical practice and in teaching. Further evaluation of the Model in wider settings is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was adopted as one of the key models to support early health professional learning across a suite of new preregistration health science courses. It was decided that an online resource should be developed to enable students, course designers and teaching staff, across all disciplines, to have access to the same definitions, government policies and other supporting information on disability. As part of the comprehensive curriculum review, enquiry-based learning was adopted as the educational approach. Enquiry-based learning promotes deeper learning by encouraging students to engage in authentic challenges. As such, it was important that the online resource was not merely a site for accessing content, but enabled students to make decisions about where else to explore for credible information about the ICF. The selection of a host location that all students and staff could access meant that the resource could not be located in the existing online learning management system. Construction using software being trialled by the library at La Trobe University allowed for the required access, as well as alignment with an enquiry-based learning approach. Consultation for the content of the online resource included formal and informal working groups on curriculum review. The published version included resources from the World Health Organization, examples of research completed within different disciplines, a test of knowledge and a preformatted search page. The format of the online resource allows for updating of information, and feedback on the utilisation of the software has been used to enhance the student experience. The key issues for the development of this online resource were accessibility for students and staff, alignment with the adopted educational approach, consultation with all disciplines, and ease of modification of information and format once published., (Copyright © 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)