Search

We assessed fidelity of delivery and participant engagement in the implementation of a community paramedic coach-led Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) program adapted for use following emergency department (ED) visits. The adapted CTI for ED-to-home transitions was implemented at three university-affiliated hospitals in two cities from 2016 to 2019. Participants were aged ≥60 years old and discharged from the ED within 24 hours of arrival. In the current analysis, participants had to have received the CTI. Community paramedic coaches collected data on program delivery and participant characteristics at each transition contact via inventories and assessments. Participants provided commentary on the acceptability of the adapted CTI. Using a multimethod approach, the CTI implementation was assessed quantitatively for site- and coach-level differences. Qualitatively, barriers to implementation and participant satisfaction with the CTI were thematically analyzed. Of the 863 patient participants, 726 (84.1%) completed their home visits. Cancellations were usually patient-generated (94.9%). Most planned follow-up visits were successfully completed (94.6%). Content on the planning for red flags and post-discharge goal setting was discussed with high rates of fidelity overall (95% and greater), while content on outpatient follow-up was lower overall (75%). Differences in service delivery between the two sites existed for the in-person visit and the first phone follow-up, but the differences narrowed as the study progressed. Participants showed a 24.6% increase in patient activation (i.e., behavioral adoption) over the 30-day study period (p < 0.001). Overall, participants reported that the program was beneficial for managing their health, the quality of coaching was high, and that the program should continue. Not all participants felt that they needed the program. Community paramedic coaches reported barriers to CTI delivery due to patient medical problems and difficulties with phone visit coordination. Coaches also noted refusal to communicate or engage with the intervention as an implementation barrier. Community paramedic coaches delivered the adapted CTI with high fidelity across geographically distant sites and successfully facilitated participant engagement, highlighting community paramedics as an effective resource for implementing such patient-centered interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines recommend patients with anaphylaxis are prescribed epinephrine autoinjectors (EAI), carry the EAI with them, and are referred to an allergist. There also are barriers to EAI administration, such as acquiring the medication, having it available, recognizing when to use it, and administering it appropriately. Objective: The objective was to describe how often patients with anaphylaxis discharged from the emergency department (ED) receive an EAI prescription and allergist referral; also, to assess the frequency of EAI pick-up by the patient from the outpatient pharmacy, out-of-pocket cost, change in EAI device during dispensing, and if patient training on EAI use and allergist follow-up occurred. Patient-specific factors associated with the occurrence of these variables were investigated. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of adult and pediatric ED patients who presented with anaphylaxis between July and December 2020. Data were collected from medical records and telephone calls to outpatient pharmacies and included patient demographics; ED treatment; EAI prescribing, EAI pick-up from the outpatient pharmacy, and cost; device changes; EAI training; and allergist referral and follow-up. Data are presented descriptively, and bivariate analyses were used for comparisons between patient-specific factors and incidence of EAI prescribing, patient pick-up, and allergist referral. Results: A total of 102 patients were included; mean age ± standard deviation 34 ± 7 years, 52% were < 18 years of age; and 54% had a history of allergy and/or anaphylaxis. EAI prescribing occurred in 79% of the patients. Of these, 71% picked up the EAI from the outpatient pharmacy, the median cost to the patient was $5 (range, $0‐$379), 18% had an EAI device change at dispensing, and 23% received EAI training. Allergist referral occurred in 22%, and 28% followed up with an allergist within 60 days. Presenting symptoms of mucosal edema and respiratory stridor were associated with the occurrence of EAI prescribing. Presenting symptoms of respiratory wheezing, hoarseness, throat itching, skin flushing and allergist referral from the ED were associated with the occurrence of EAI pick-up from the outpatient pharmacy. Conclusion: Overall, 79% of ED patients with anaphylaxis had an EAI prescribed and 22% had an allergist referral; 71% picked up the EAI from the outpatient pharmacy, EAI dispensing changes occurred, and training was infrequent. Collaboration between emergency medicine clinicians, allergists, and pharmacists is needed to streamline treatment and follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/objectives: Despite a high prevalence and association with poor outcomes, screening to identify cognitive impairment (CI) in the emergency department (ED) is uncommon. Identification of high‐risk subsets of older adults is a critical challenge to expanding screening programs. We developed and evaluated an automated screening tool to identify a subset of patients at high risk for CI. Methods: In this secondary analysis of existing data collected for a randomized control trial, we developed machine‐learning models to identify patients at higher risk of CI using only variables available in electronic health record (EHR). We used records from 1736 community‐dwelling adults age > 59 being discharged from three EDs. Potential CI was determined based on the Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration (BOMC) test, administered in the ED. A nested cross‐validation framework was used to evaluate machine‐learning algorithms, comparing area under the receiver‐operator curve (AUC) as the primary metric of performance. Results: Based on BOMC scores, 121 of 1736 (7%) participants screened positive for potential CI at the time of their ED visit. The best performing algorithm, an XGBoost model, predicted BOMC positivity with an AUC of 0.72. With a classification threshold of 0.4, this model had a sensitivity of 0.73, a specificity of 0.64, a negative predictive value of 0.97, and a positive predictive value of 0.13. In a hypothetical ED with 200 older adult visits per week, the use of this model would lead to a decrease in the in‐person screening burden from 200 to 77 individuals in order to detect 10 of 14 patients who would fail a BOMC. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that an algorithm based on EHR data can define a subset of patients at higher risk for CI. Incorporating such an algorithm into a screening workflow could allow screening efforts and resources to be focused where they have the most impact. See related editorial by Hirshon in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Improving care transitions following emergency department (ED) visits may reduce post‐ED adverse events among older adults (e.g., ED revisits, decreased function). The Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) improves hospital‐to‐home transitions; however, its effectiveness at improving post‐ED outcomes is unknown. We tested the effectiveness of the CTI with community‐dwelling older adult ED patients, hypothesizing that it would reduce revisits and increase performance of self‐management behaviors during the 30 days following discharge. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial among patients age ≥ 60 discharged home from one of three EDs in two states. Intervention participants received a minimally modified CTI, with a home visit 24 to 72 h postdischarge and one to three phone calls over 28 days. We collected demographic, health status, and psychosocial data at the initial ED visit. Medication adherence and knowledge of red flag symptoms were assessed via phone survey. Care use and comorbidities were abstracted from medical records. We performed multivariate regressions for intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol (PP) analyses. Results: Participant characteristics (N = 1,756) were similar across groups: mean age 72.4 ± 8.6 years and 53% female. Of those randomized to the intervention, 84% completed the home visit. Overall, 12.4% of participants returned to the ED within 30 days. The CTI did not significantly affect odds of 30‐day ED revisits (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 1.30) or medication adherence (AOR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.32). Participants receiving the CTI (PP) had increased odds of in‐person follow‐up with outpatient clinicians during the week following discharge (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.51) and recalling at least one red flag from ED discharge instructions (AOR = 1.34 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.71). Conclusions: The CTI did not reduce 30‐day ED revisits but did significantly increase key care transition behaviors (outpatient follow‐up, red flag knowledge). Additional research is needed to explore if patients with different conditions benefit more from the CTI and whether decreasing ED revisits is the most appropriate outcome for all older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: About half of older adults with impaired cognition who are discharged home from the emergency department (ED) return for further care within 30 days. We tested the effect of an adapted Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) at reducing ED revisits in this vulnerable population. Methods:We conducted a pre-planned subgroup analysis of community-dwelling, cognitively impaired older (age =60 years) participants from a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of the CTI adapted for ED-to-home transitions. The parent study recruited ED patients from three university-affiliated hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Subjects eligible for this sub-analysis had to: (1) have a primary care provider within these health systems; (2) be discharged to a community residence; (3) not receive care management or hospice services; and (4) be cognitively impaired in the ED, as determined by a score >10 on the Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration Test. The primary outcome, ED revisits within 30 days of discharge, was abstracted from medical records and evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Of our sub-sample (N = 81, 36 control, 45 treatment), 57% were female and the mean age was 78 years. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for the presence of moderate to severe depression and inadequate health literacy, found that the CTI significantly reduced the odds of a repeat ED visit within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07 to 0.90) but not 14 days (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.93). Multivariate analysis of outpatient follow-up found no significant effects. Discussion: Community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment receiving the CTI following ED discharge experienced fewer ED revisits within 30 days compared to usual care. Further studies must confirm and expand upon this finding, identifying features with greatest benefit to patients and caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Determine national estimates of injuries, mechanisms of injury (MOI), and injury severity among men and women engaging in track and field activities in the United States (U.S.), aged 18 years and older, who present to emergency departments (ED). Retrospective analyses of injury narratives were conducted using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), comprising individuals 18 and older presenting to U.S. EDs from 2004 to 2015, with injuries associated with track and field, applying the NEISS product code 5030 and patient narratives. National injury estimates were calculated using sample weights. National injury incidence rates were determined using U.S. census estimate data (denominator), and comparisons of categorical variables by gender were made using a chi-squared test, and associated p-values. Estimated 42,947 ED visits among individuals 18 and older presented for track and field-related injuries in the U.S. from 2004 to 2015, consisting of 23,509 incidents among men, and 19,438 among women. The highest rates of injury occurred in 2010 among men, and 2011 among women, with 3.47, and 2.70 injuries per 100,000 U.S. population, respectively. No statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) were found between genders for injury severity (p = 0.32), injury diagnosis (p = 0.30), and body region (p = 0.13), but there was a significant difference overall between genders for mechanism of injury (p = 0.01). To develop appropriate injury preventive interventions for track and field athletes, additional studies exploring associations between injury characteristics, namely the mechanisms of injury, and gender, are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Older adults discharged from the emergency department (ED) are at high risk for adverse outcomes. Adherence to ED discharge instructions is necessary to reduce those risks. The objective of this study is to determine the individual‐level factors associated with adherence with ED discharge instructions among older adult ED outpatients. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the control group of a randomized controlled trial testing a care transitions intervention among older adults (age ≥ 60 years) discharged home from the ED in two states. Taking data from patient surveys and chart reviews, we used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with adherence to printed discharge instructions. Outcomes were patient‐reported medication adherence, provider follow‐up visit adherence, and knowledge of "red flags" (signs of worsening health requiring further medical attention). Results: A total 824 patients were potentially eligible, and 699 had data in at least one pillar. A total of 35% adhered to medication instructions, 76% adhered to follow‐up instructions, and 35% recalled at least one red flag. In the multivariate analysis, no factors were significantly associated with failure to adhere to medications. Participants with poor health status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31 to 0.98) were less likely to adhere to follow‐up instructions. Participants who were older (AORs trended downward as age category increased) or depressed (AOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.85) or had one or more functional limitations (AOR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.94) were less likely to recall red flags. Conclusion: Older adults discharged home from the ED have mixed rates of adherence to discharge instructions. Although it is thought that some subgroups may be higher risk than others, given the opportunity to improve ED‐to‐home transitions, EDs and health systems should consider providing additional care transition support to all older adults discharged home from the ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine if the Mechanism of Injury Criteria of the Field Triage Decision Scheme (FTDS) are accurate for identifying children who need the resources of a trauma center. EMS providers transporting any injured child ≤15 years, regardless of severity, to a pediatric trauma center in 3 midsized communities over 3 years were interviewed. Data collected through the interview included EMS observed physiologic condition, suspected anatomic injuries, and mechanism. Patients were then followed to determine if they needed the resources of a trauma center by reviewing their medical record after hospital discharge. Patients were considered to need a trauma center if they received an intervention included in a previously published consensus definition. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics including positive likelihood ratios (+LR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). 9,483 provider interviews were conducted and linked to hospital outcome data. Of those, 230 (2.4%) met the consensus definition for needing a trauma center. 1,572 enrolled patients were excluded from further analysis because they met the Physiologic or Anatomic Criteria of the FTDS. Of the remaining 7,911 cases, 62 met the consensus definition for needing a trauma center (TC). Taken as a whole, the Mechanism of Injury Criteria of the FTDS identified 14 of the remaining 62 children who needed the resources of a trauma center for a 77% under-triage rate. The mechanisms sustained were 36% fall (16 needed TC), 28% motor vehicle crash (MVC) (20 needed TC), 7% struck by a vehicle (10 needed TC), <1% motorcycle crash (none needed TC), and 29% had a mechanism not included in the FTDS (16 needed TC). Of those who sustained a mechanisms not listed in the FTDS, the most common mechanisms were sport related injuries not including falls (24% of 2,283 cases with a mechanism not included) and assault (13%). Among those who fell from a height greater than 10 feet, 4 needed a TC (+LR 5.9; 95%CI 2.8-12.6). Among those in a MVC, 41 were reported to have been ejected and none needed a TC, while 31 had reported meeting the intrusion criteria and 0 needed a TC. There were 32 reported as having a death in the same vehicle, and 2 needed a TC (+LR 7.42; 95%CI: 1.90-29.0). Over a quarter of the children who needed the resources of a trauma center were not identified using the Physiologic or Anatomic Criteria of the Field Triage Decision Scheme. The Mechanism of Injury Criteria did not apply to over a quarter of the mechanisms experienced by children transported by EMS for injury. Use of the Mechanism Criteria did not greatly enhance identification of children who need a trauma center. More work is needed to improve the tool used to assist EMS providers in the identification of children who need the resources of a trauma center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Across the spectrum of patient care for opioid overdose, an important, yet frequently overlooked feature is the bystander, or witness to the overdose event. For other acute medical events such as cardiac arrest and stroke, research supports that the presence of a bystander is associated with better outcomes. Despite the similarities, however, this well-established conceptual framework has yet to be applied in the context of overdose patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the association between the nature of the bystander-patient relationship and prehospital care measures in patients being treated for opioid overdose. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among adults who received naloxone in the prehospital setting for suspected opioid overdose. Patients were identified using a preexisting, longitudinal registry documenting all prehospital administrations of naloxone by first responders in a midsized community. Individuals who received at least one naloxone administration for a suspected opioid overdose between June 1st, 2016 to July 31st, 2018, with available EMS and medical record data were eligible for study inclusion. Bystander type was defined referencing psychology literature and were categorized as: close (spouse/family), proximal (friends), and distal (no relation to patient). The association between bystander type and prehospital patient care measures were estimated using logistic and linear regression models. A total of 602 opioid overdose encounters among 545 patients were identified. Patents tended to be male (67.2%), white (73.6%), and aged 25–44 years (57.1%). Among patients with proximal bystanders present, average time to naloxone administration was 2.4 min less (95% CI = −4.7, −0.2), compared to distal bystanders, after adjusting for covariates. Overdose encounters with 911 dispatch codes more indicative of opioid overdose (i.e., 'overdose/poisoning' vs 'unconscious/fainting') were associated with having a close or proximal bystander present compared to a distal bystander (ORclose vs. distal = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0, 3.3; ORproximal vs. distal = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.8, 7.1). Presence of a proximal bystander during an overdose event is associated with dispatch codes indicative of an overdose and shorter times to naloxone administration compared with those with distal bystanders. These findings offer opportunities for public education and engagement of overdose harm reduction strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. We sought to identify a scale or components of a scale that optimize detection of older adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who require transport to a trauma center, regardless of mechanism. Methods. We assembled a consensus panel consisting of nine experts in geriatric emergency medicine, prehospital medicine, trauma surgery, geriatric medicine, and TBI, as well as prehospital providers, to evaluate the existing scales used to identify TBI. We reviewed the relevant literature and solicited group feedback to create a list of candidate scales and criteria for evaluation. Using the nominal group technique, scales were evaluated by the expert panel through an iterative process until consensus was achieved. Results. We identified 15 scales for evaluation. The panel's criteria for rating the scales included ease of administration, prehospital familiarity with scale components, feasibility of use with older adults, time to administer, and strength of evidence for their performance in the prehospital setting. After review and discussion of aggregated ratings, the panel identified the Simplified Motor Scale, GCS-Motor Component, and AVPU (alert, voice, pain, unresponsive) as the strongest scales, but determined that none meet all EMS provider and patient needs due to poor usability and lack of supportive evidence. The panel proposed that a dichotomized decision scheme that includes domains of the top-rated scales -level of alertness (alert vs. not alert) and motor function (obeys commands vs. does not obey) -may be more effective in identifying older adult TBI patients who require transport to a trauma center in the prehospital setting. Conclusions. Existing scales to identify TBI are inadequate to detect older adult TBI patients who require transport to a trauma center. A new algorithm, derived from elements of previously established scales, has the potential to guide prehospital providers in improving the triage of older adult TBI patients, but needs further evaluation prior to use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Non-English speaking patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for acute care and may present a challenge to efficient clinical ED management and disposition. This study aimed to assess differences in the disposition and clinical management of Spanishspeaking patients and Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users, who worked with a certified, in-person interpreter, compared with English proficient patients who did not utilize interpreter services. Methods: A retrospective study querying electronic medical records was performed at an academic medical center ED. Patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain were chosen for this study, as this is a common chief complaint and these patients often require numerous tests. Variables obtained from the query included patient demographic information, number of tests and imaging studies ordered, and arrival and disposition times. Bivariate tests were used to assess differences in the management and disposition of patients who worked with an in-person, certified Spanish or ASL interpreter compared with those who did not utilize interpreter services. Results: The study sample was comprised of 310 patients, 155 of whom utilized interpreter services and 155 controls who did not. Of those who utilized interpreter services, 69% were Spanish speaking and 31% Deaf ASL users. For patients who worked with an interpreter, compared with those who did not, the median door-to-ED disposition time was significantly longer (398 minutes vs. 322 minutes; p=0.0049). There were also more imaging studies ordered (p=0.0135) in the non-English speaking group. For English proficient patients, there was a higher rate of leaving before complete evaluation (2.6% vs. 0.0%) or against medical advice (3.2% vs. 0.0%) [p<0.0088]. Conclusions: In a sample of ED patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, there were statistically significant differences in the door-to-disposition time and number of imaging tests among those who were non-English speaking, utilizing in-person certified interpreter services, compared with those who were proficient in English. These results underscore the need for future research to further investigate the reasons for the differences in the evaluation and timely management of Deaf ASL users and Spanish-speaking ED patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuromuscular ultrasound plays an increasing role in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are limited data supporting the correlation between the electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurements in CTS., Objective: To assess the association between different electrodiagnostic severities and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in CTS., Design: A retrospective cohort study., Setting: An academic tertiary care center., Patients: Patients 18 years or older evaluated with upper limb electrodiagnostic studies and neuromuscular ultrasound., Main Outcome Measurement: Ultrasound measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the wrist and the calculated wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) were compared with the electrodiagnostic severity (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Mean analysis and analysis of variance test (α = 0.05) were performed to assess the association., Results: A total of 1359 limbs were identified. There was a statistically significant association between electrodiagnostic severity of CTS and median nerve CSA at the wrist (p < .001), as well as the WFR (p < .001). The mean median nerve CSA at the wrist and WFR were 7.01 ± 2.06 mm 2 (95% CI: 6.80-7.20) and 1.24 ± 0.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.24) in electrodiagnostically normal median nerves, 10.47 ± 2.82 mm 2 (95% CI: 10.25-10.75) and 2.06 ± 0.67 (95% CI: 2.04-2.16) in electrodiagnostically mild CTS, 12.95 ± 4.74 mm 2 (95% CI: 12.41-13.59) and 2.49 ± 1.04 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.63) in electrodiagnostically moderate CTS, and 14.69 ± 5.38 mm 2 (95% CI: 13.95-15.44) and 2.71 ± 1.02 (95% CI: 2.56-2.84) in electrodiagnostically severe CTS, respectively., Conclusion: This study suggests a direct association between electrodiagnostic severity and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in patients with suspected CTS., (© 2024 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Objective: Pediatric trauma centers use reports from emergency medical service providers to determine if a trauma team should be sent to the emergency department to prepare to care for the patient. Little scientific evidence supports the current American College of Surgeons (ACS) indicators for trauma team activation. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the ACS Minimum Criteria for Full Trauma Team Activation for children as well as the accuracy of the modified criteria used at the local sites for trauma activation., Methods: Emergency medical service providers who transported an injured child aged 15 years or younger to a pediatric trauma center in 1 of 3 cities were interviewed after emergency department arrival. Emergency medical service providers were asked if each of the activation indicators were present based on their evaluation. The need for full trauma team activation was determined through a medical record review using a published criterion standard definition. Undertriage and overtriage rates and positive likelihood ratios (+LRs) were calculated., Results: Emergency medical service provider interviews were conducted and outcome data were obtained for 9483 children. There were 202 (2.1%) cases that met the criterion standard for need for trauma team activation. Based on the ACS Minimum Criteria, 299 (3.0%) cases should have received a trauma activation. The ACS Minimum Criteria undertriaged 44.1% and overtriaged 20% (+LR, 27.9; 95% confidence interval, 23.1-33.7). Based on the actual activation status using the local criteria, 238 cases received a full trauma activation, 45% were undertriaged, and 1.4% were overtriaged (+LR, 40.1; 95% confidence interval, 32.4-49.7). There was 97% agreement between the ACS Minimum Criteria and the actual local activation status at the receiving institution., Conclusions: The ACS Minimum Criteria for Full Trauma Team Activation for children have a high rate of undertriage. Changes that individual institutions have made to improve the accuracy of activations at their institutions seem to have had a limited effect on decreasing undertriage., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hydroxocobalamin is used for cyanide toxicity after smoke inhalation, but diagnosis is challenging. Retrospective studies have associated hydroxocobalamin with acute kidney injury (AKI). This is a retrospective analysis of patients receiving hydroxocobalamin for suspected cyanide toxicity. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting predefined appropriate use criteria defined as ≥1 of the following: serum lactate ≥8 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg, new-onset seizure, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest. Secondary outcomes included incidence of AKI, pneumonia, resolution of initial neurologic symptoms, and in-hospital mortality. Forty-six patients were included; 35 (76%) met the primary outcome. All met appropriate use criteria due to respiratory arrest, 15 (43%) for lactate, 14 (40%) for SBP, 12 (34%) for cardiac arrest. AKI, pneumonia, and resolution of neurologic symptoms occurred in 30%, 21%, and 49% of patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients meeting criteria, 49% vs. 9% (95% CI 0.16, 0.64). When appropriate use criteria were modified to exclude respiratory arrest in a post-hoc analysis, differences were maintained, suggesting respiratory arrest alone is not a critical component to determine hydroxocobalamin administration. Predefined appropriate use criteria identify severely ill smoke inhalation victims and provides hydroxocobalamin treatment guidance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Presentations to the emergency department for rectal foreign bodies are common, but there is little epidemiologic information on this condition. This limits the ability to provide evidence-based education to trainees regarding the populations affected, the types and frequency of foreign bodies, and factors associated with hospitalization. To address this, we analyzed national estimates of emergency department presentations for rectal foreign bodies from 2012 to 2021 in the US., Methods: We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for any injury to the 'pubic region' or 'lower trunk' with an accompanying diagnosis of foreign body, puncture, or laceration. Two authors manually reviewed all clinical narratives to identify cases of rectal foreign bodies. National estimates were determined using weighting and strata variables, incidence rates calculated using census data, trends assessed by linear regression, and factors associated with hospitalization identified by multivariable logistic regression., Results: From 885 cases, there were an estimated 38,948 (95% CI, 32,040-45,856) emergency department visits for rectal foreign bodies among individuals ≥15 years from 2012 to 2021. The average age was 43, 77.8% were male, 55.4% of foreign bodies were sexual devices, and 40.8% required hospitalization. The annual incidence of presentations for rectal foreign bodies increased from 1.2 in 2012 to 1.9 per 100,000 persons in 2021 (R 2  = 0.84, p < 0.01). Males have a bimodal age distribution peaking in the fifth decade, while females have a right-skewed age distribution peaking in the second decade. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.6) and, compared to sexual devices, balls/marbles (OR 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05-0.6) or drugs/paraphernalia (OR 0.1; 95% CI, 0.05-0.4) are associated with a reduced odds of hospitalization., Conclusions: Presentations to the emergency department for rectal foreign bodies increased for males and females from 2012 to 2021 in the United States. These epidemiologic estimates for a complex form of anorectal trauma provide preclinical information for emergency medicine, surgery, and radiology trainees., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Fleming reported receiving author royalties from UpToDate outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported, (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To quantify surgeon intuition, determine whether a surgeon's prediction of outcomes after hip arthroscopy correlates with actual patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and identify differences in clinical judgment between expert and novice examiners., Methods: This prospective, longitudinal study was conducted at an academic medical center on adults undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. A Surgeon Intuition and Prediction (SIP) score was completed preoperatively by an attending surgeon (expert) and physician assistant (novice). Baseline and postoperative outcome measures included legacy hip scores (e.g., Modified Harris Hip score) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System tools. Mean differences were assessed using t -tests. Generalized estimating equations assessed longitudinal changes. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) evaluated associations between SIP score and PRO scores., Results: Data from 98 patients (mean age 36 years, 67% female) with complete data sets at 12-month follow-up were analyzed. Weak-to-moderate strength correlations were seen between SIP score and PRO scores (r = 0.36 to r = 0.53) for pain, activity and physical function. Significant improvements were seen in all primary outcome measures at 6 and 12 months postoperatively when compared to baseline scores ( P < .05), with about 50% to 80% of patients achieving the minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state thresholds postoperatively., Conclusions: An experienced, high-volume hip arthroscopist had only weak-to-moderate ability to intuitively predict PRO. Surgical intuition and judgment were not superior in an expert examiner compared to a novice., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Objective: Motivating older adults to follow up with an outpatient clinician after discharge from emergency departments (ED) is beneficial yet challenging. We aimed to answer whether psychological needs for motivation and discrete emotions observed by care transition coaches would predict this behavioral outcome., Methods: Community-dwelling older adults following ED discharge were recruited from three EDs in two U.S. states. We examined home visit notes documented by coaches (N = 725). Retrospective chart reviews of medical records tracked participants' health care utilization for 30 days., Results: Observed knowledge-based competence predicted higher likelihood of outpatient follow-up within 30 days, while observed sadness predicted a lower likelihood of follow-up within seven days following discharge. Moreover, participants who demonstrated happiness were marginally more likely to have an in-person follow-up within seven days, and those who demonstrated knowledge-based competence were more likely to have an electronic follow-up within 30 days., Conclusions: Knowledge-based competence and emotions, as observed and documented in coach notes, can predict older adults' subsequent outpatient follow-up following their ED-discharge., Practice Implications: Intervention programs might encourage coaches to check knowledge-based competence and to observe emotions in addition to delivering the content. Coaches could also customize strategies for patients with different recommended timeframes of follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Family Caregiver Activation in Transitions (FCAT) tool in its current, non-scalar form is not pragmatic for clinical use as each item is scored and intended to be interpreted individually. The purpose of the current study was to create a scalar version of the FCAT to facilitate better care communications between hospital staff and family caregivers. We also assessed the scale's validity by comparing the scalar version of the measure against patient health measures. Data were collected from 463 family caregiver-patient dyads from January 2016 to July 2019. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on the 10-item FCAT, resulting in a statistically homogeneous six-item scale focused on current caregiving activation factors. The measure was then compared against patient health measures, with no significant biases found. The six-item scalar FCAT can provide hospital staff insight into the level of caregiver activation occurring in the patient's health care and help tailor care transition needs for family caregiver-patient dyads. [ Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48 (12), 35-42.].

Introduction: The purpose was to compare hemostatic efficacy rates for fixed- and variable-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for warfarin reversal., Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with non-intracranial major bleeding or undergoing emergent surgery/procedure who received 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal from September 2013 through August 2020. Hemostatic efficacy at 48 h following fixed- or variable-dose 4F-PCC was evaluated using modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria for major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of post-4F-PCC INR ≤ 1.5, in-hospital mortality, time to 4F-PCC administration, and 4F-PCC cost. Univariate analyses were completed and logistic regression used to identify patient-specific factors associated with hemostatic efficacy., Results: A total of 265 patients, 90 (34%) fixed- and 175 (66%) variable-dose 4F-PCC, were included. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 34 (37.8%) and 38 (21.7%) in fixed- and variable-dose groups, respectively, p = 0.005. Achievement of INR ≤ 1.5 occurred in 55 (62.5%) in the fixed- and 120 (69.4%) in the variable-dose groups, p = 0.26, and there was no in-hospital mortality difference. Time to administration was a mean 20 min faster and cost was reduced by a mean $1881/dose in the fixed-dose group. The unadjusted odds of achieving hemostatic efficacy was 2.27 among those receiving fixed-dose compared to variable-dose 4F-PCC (95% CI 1.30, 3.98); this was not confounded by initial INR or patient weight., Conclusion: Fixed-dose 4F-PCC is associated with a higher likelihood of achieving hemostatic efficacy, quicker time to administration, and reduced cost compared to variable-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To perform a systematic review comparing outcomes of segmental versus circumferential arthroscopic labral reconstruction as a treatment for symptomatic irreparable or unsalvageable acetabular labral pathology., Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study groups were divided into segmental and circumferential labral reconstructions. Studies with <2 years follow up, overlapping patient populations, or indications for labral reconstruction other than irreparable or unsalvageable pathology were excluded., Results: The literature search resulted in nine included publications. Five studies presented data on segmental labral reconstruction (166 hips in 164 patients), and seven studies presented data on circumferential labral reconstruction (261 hips in 253 patients). All circumferential reconstruction studies used allograft only, while segmental studies used a combination of autograft and allograft. The range of conversion to total hip arthroplasty was 9.1% to 26.8% in the segmental studies and 3.1% to 9.9% in the circumferential studies. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was the only patient-reported outcome measure reported in three or more studies in both groups. The mean change from preoperative to postoperative mHHS ranged from 17.8 to 29 in the segmental group and from 20.4 to 31.7 in the circumferential group. Weighted estimates were not calculated due to significant heterogeneity for both the segmental and circumferential groups (I 2  = 63.9% and 72.9%, respectively)., Conclusions: Segmental and circumferential reconstructions are both reasonable options for arthroscopic treatment of irreparable or unsalvageable labral pathology. Articles in both groups demonstrated improvement in patient-reported outcomes (mHHS). Because of study heterogeneity, low level of evidence, and high risk of bias, the scores were unable to be directly compared. Although there are theoretical biomechanical and technical advantages of one technique over another, this systematic review did not demonstrate clinical superiority of either technique., Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies., (Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Quantify prehospital time intervals, describe prehospital stroke management, and estimate potential time saved if certain procedures were performed en route to the emergency department (ED)., Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients who arrived via emergency medical services (EMS) between 2012 and 2016 were identified. We determined the following prehospital time intervals: chute, response, on-scene, transport, and total prehospital times. Proportions of patients receiving the following were determined: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) assessment, prenotification, glucose assessment, vascular access, and 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). For glucose assessment, ECG acquisition, and vascular access, the location (on-scene vs. en route) in which they were performed was described. Difference in on-scene times among patients who had these three interventions performed on-scene vs. en route was assessed., Results: Data from 870 patients were analyzed. Median total prehospital time was 39 min and comprised the following: chute time: 1 min; response time: 9 min; on-scene time: 15 min; and transport time: 14 min. CPSS was assessed in 64.7% of patients and prenotification was provided for 52.0% of patients. Glucose assessment, vascular access initiation, and ECG acquisition was performed on 84.1%, 72.6%, and 67.2% of patients, respectively. 59.0% of glucose assessments, 51.2% of vascular access initiations, and 49.8% of ECGs were performed on-scene. On-scene time was 9 min shorter among patients who had glucose assessments, vascular access initiations, and ECG acquisitions all performed en route vs. on-scene., Conclusions: On-scene time comprised 38.5% of total prehospital time. Limiting on-scene performance of glucose assessments, vascular access initiations, and ECG acquisitions may decrease prehospital time., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Follow-up with outpatient clinicians after discharge from the emergency department (ED) reduces adverse outcomes among older adults, but rates are suboptimal. Social isolation, a common factor associated with poor health outcomes, may help explain these low rates. This study evaluates social isolation as a predictor of outpatient follow-up after discharge from the ED., Materials and Methods: This cohort study uses the control group from a randomized-controlled trial investigating a community paramedic-delivered Care Transitions Intervention with older patients (age≥60 years) at three EDs in mid-sized cities. Social Isolation scores were measured at baseline using the PROMIS 4-item social isolation questionnaire, grouped into tertiles for analysis. Chart abstraction was conducted to identify follow-up with outpatient primary or specialty healthcare providers and method of contact within 7 and 30 days of discharge., Results: Of 642 patients, highly socially-isolated adults reported significantly worse overall health, as well as increased anxiety, depressive symptoms, functional limitations, and co-morbid conditions compared to those less socially-isolated (p<0.01). We found no effect of social isolation on 30-day follow-up. Patients with high social isolation, however, were 37% less likely to follow-up with a provider in-person within 7 days of ED discharge compared to low social isolation (OR:0.63, 95% CI:0.42-0.96)., Conclusion: This study adds to our understanding of how and when socially-isolated older adults seek outpatient care following ED discharge. Increased social isolation was not significantly associated with all-contact follow-up rates after ED discharge. However, patients reporting higher social isolation had lower rates of in-person follow-up in the week following ED discharge., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)