Search

Background and purpose Previous studies suggest that mechanisms and outcomes in patients with COVID-19-associated stroke differ from those in patients with non-COVID-19-associated strokes, but there is limited comparative evidence focusing on these populations. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine if a significant association exists between COVID-19 status with revascularization and functional outcomes following thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion (LVO), after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Methods A cross-sectional, international multicenter retrospective study was conducted in consecutively admitted COVID-19 patients with concomitant acute LVO, compared to a control group without COVID-19. Data collected included age, gender, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, details of the involved vessels, procedural technique, and various outcomes. A multivariable-adjusted analysis was conducted. Results In this cohort of 697 patients with acute LVO, 302 had COVID-19 while 395 patients did not. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the mean age (in years) and gender of patients, with younger patients and more males in the COVID-19 group. In terms of favorable revascularization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] grade 3), COVID-19 was associated with lower odds of complete revascularization (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001), which persisted on multivariable modeling with adjustment for other predictors (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.77; p = 0.012). Moreover, endovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher among COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion COVID-19 was an independent predictor of incomplete revascularization and poor functional outcome in patients with stroke due to LVO. Furthermore, COVID-19 patients with LVO were more often younger and had higher morbidity/mortality rates.

Introduction Carotid Web (CaW) represents an important and overlooked etiology for ischemic stroke and has been associated with high rates of stroke recurrence. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to have comparable performance to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and has been suggested to be the non‐invasive imaging of choice for CaW detection. However, misdiagnosis has been demonstrated to be common even in specialized centers. We evaluated the impact of adding CTA multiplane reconstruction (MPR) andthree‐dimensional maximum intensity projection (3D MIP) reformat on the diagnostic performance of CTA in CaW detection. Methods After exclusion of patients aged >65 years old and patients with no available/poor quality CTA,CaW cases (n = 31 consecutive patients leading to 31 ipsilateral carotids to the stroke derived from out prospective CaW database), as well as two other groups: 1)carotid atherosclerosis (n = 27consecutivepatients from out carotid stenting database leading to 27 carotids contralateral to the index lesion) and 2) consecutive normal carotid cases (n = 49 patients with normal carotids extracted from the electronic medical records for patients imaged due to suspected blunt cerebrovascular trauma) were included. All CTA images were deidentified and reviewed independently by three stroke neurologists to record the diagnosis and level of diagnostic certainty (in form of a scale (1[lowest]‐to‐5[highest]) after evaluating the CTA axial plane alone, then after sagittal and coronal planes (MPR) reconstructions, and then after evaluation of3D MIP reformatted images.The analyses were made for the total number of observations for all readers (93 CaWs, 81 atherosclerosis cases and 147 normal carotids). Results On reviewing CTA axial projection alone, raters correctly diagnosed 44.1% of CaW, 87.7% of carotid atherosclerosis and 83% of normal carotid images. Sagittal and coronal MPR significantly increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (76.3%‐Table 1) The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis as well as normal carotid using the CTA axial projection alone (3.0[3.0‐4.0] vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001 and vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MPR (4.0[3.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.0‐5.0],p = 0.01; and vs 4.0[4.0‐5.0],p< 0.001). The certainty level became similar between CaW and atherosclerosis as well as normal carotids with the addition of 3D MIP (5.0[5.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.5‐5.0], p = 0.61; and vs 5.0[5.0‐5.0],p = 0.15) respectively. Inter‐rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k = 0.46(0.35‐0.57);p< 0.05usingaxial section to k = 0.80(0.69‐0.91);p< 0.05 with MPR. Axial projection alone had lower sensitivity in CaW detection (AUC = 0.69(0.62‐0.76),sensitivity = 44%,specificity = 95%,p< 0.05) compared to MPR (AUC = 0.86(0.80‐0.91),sensitivity = 76%,specificity = 96%,p< 0.05). Misdiagnosed CaW cases, after using all planes with 3D MIP (n = 23/93), were older (56[46‐61] vs 52[46‐57] years,p = 0.04) and lower length/base ratio (0.51[0.49‐0.87] vs 0.92[0.74‐1.19],p< 0.001) compared to the correctly diagnosed CaW cases (n = 70/93). Conclusions CTA axial plane alone is unreliable to detect CaW and the addition of sagittal/coronal MPR and 3D MIPs are important to increase accurate diagnosis and perceived reader diagnostic certainty.

Introductions: Clinical trials have shown that aspiration thrombectomy is as safe and effective as stent-retriever thrombectomy. Multiple improvements have been made to the aspiration technique over the last few years. In this study, we aim to assess the effect of aspiration catheter bore size on the outcomes of A direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) thrombectomy. Methods: We included patients who underwent ADAPT thrombectomy for M1 or internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T) occlusions in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) database. Patients included between July 2016 and July 2022. We compared baseline characteristics, procedural metrics and outcomes between patients who underwent thrombectomy using small bore (0.035”-0.060”), medium bore (0.062”-0.068”) and large bore (0.070”-0.074”) catheters. Results: A total of 1158 patients were included; 576 (49.7%) females, 645 (70%) White, and 464 (40.6%) received IV-tPA. No difference was noticed in age, sex, and vascular risk factors between the 3 different groups. There was higher rate of IV-tPA in the small-bore catheter group (48.8%) compared to the medium and large bore catheter groups (38.4% and 36.7%, respectively) (P=0.03). Procedure duration was shorter when using medium (20 min) and large (18 min) compared to small bore catheters (30 min) (P=0.01). Both medium and large bore catheters were associated with higher rate of successful recanalization (88.9% and 87.9%, respectively) compared to small bore catheters (81.6%) (P=0.010). However, the difference in successful recanalization or procedure duration between medium and large bore catheters was not significant. No difference was noted in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sICH) (4.7%, 5.3%, and 7.1%; P=0.345), 90-day favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) (41.8%, 39.3%, 40.8%; P=0.766) or 90-day mortality (18.1%, 23.5%, 24.4%; P=0.111) between the groups. Conclusions: Higher rate of successful recanalization and shorter procedure duration were observed when using medium and large bore aspiration catheters compared with small bore catheters in ADAPT technique. However, these procedural benefits were not observed when comparing large bore to medium bore catheters.

Background: While mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and salvageable brain tissue, limited data is currently available regarding the benefits of MT in patents with medium vessel occlusions (MeVO) especially in the posterior circulation (P2 occlusions). Methods: We used the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm registry (STAR) which included data from 35 stroke centers in North America, Europe, Asia, and South America. We included patients who presented with MeVO in the M2, M3 or P2 segments and underwent MT. We used a Generalized Linear Model to assess the relationship between location of occlusion and outcomes. Results: 9812 patients were included in STAR at the time of this analysis; 43 underwent MT for P2 occlusion, 130 underwent MT for M3 occlusion; and 1273 underwent MT for M2 occlusion. There was no difference in age, sex, race, rate of IV-tPA and stroke severity between patients in all 3 groups (Table 1). There was a trend toward lower rate of atrial fibrillation in patients with P2 and M3 occlusions. Patients with P2 occlusions were less likely to achieve successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction score≥2b); intraarterial thrombolysis was used less in P2 occlusions (4.7% compared to 16.2% in M3 occlusions and 10.1% in M2 occlusions). However, there was no difference in the rate of successful first pass. On multivariable analysis, P2 occlusions were not associated with hemorrhagic transformation (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-5.7, P 0.186), 90-day mortality (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.4, P 0.183), or 90-day favorable outcome (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.4, P 0.084). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, there was no significant difference in safety and efficacy of MT in patients with MeVOs in posterior circulation (P2 occlusions) compared to M2 and M3 occlusions. Improved techniques for successful recanalization are needed for posterior circulation MeVOs.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy is standard of care for acute ischemic stroke secondary to LVO however MT failure (MTF) occurs in approximately 15% of cases. Objective: Investigate patient and procedural characteristics that predict MTF. Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected, Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients who underwent MT for LVO were included and categorized by MT Success (MTS) or MTF, defined as mTICI≥2b or Results: A total of 8452 patients were analyzed, and 1301(15.4%) experienced MTF.MTF patients were older(73 vs.71, p=0.008)had higher poor premorbid mRS(10.8% vs 8.4%, p=0.17).Onset to puncture was greater in MTF group(442 vs.411 min, p=0.006).There were more ICA occlusions(15.6% vs. 13.5%)and basilar occlusions(7.8% vs.6.2%)in the MTF group and more M1 occlusions(42.2%vs.37.5%)in the MTS group (p Conclusion: MTF is associated with more complications and worse outcome. Final use of aspiration and rescue intracranial stenting may increase chances of recanalization.

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for the treatment of proximal anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. However, little is known about its efficacy and safety in the treatment of distal intracranial occlusions. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with MT at 15 comprehensive centers between January 2015 and December 2018. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the location of occlusion (proximal vs. distal). Distal occlusion was defined as occlusion of M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery, any segment of the anterior cerebral artery, or any segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Only isolated distal occlusion was included. Good outcome was defined as 90-day modified Rankin scale score 0–2. Results A total of 4710 patients were included in this study, of whom 189 (4%) had MT for distal occlusions. Compared with the proximal occlusion group, distal occlusion group had a higher rate of good outcome (45% vs. 36%; P = 0.03) and a lower rate of successful reperfusion (78% vs. 84%; P = 0.04). However, the differences did not retain significance in adjusted models. Otherwise there was no difference in the rate of hemorrhagic complications, mortality, or procedure-related complications between the 2 groups. Successful reperfusion, age, and admission stroke severity emerged as predictors of good functional outcome in the distal occlusion group. Conclusions Thrombectomies of distal vessels achieve high rate of successful reperfusion with similar safety profile to those in more proximal locations.

BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has become the mainstay treatment for large vessel occlusion, with favorable safety and efficacy profile. However, the safety and efficacy of EVT in concurrent multi-territory occlusions (MTVOs) remains unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence, clinical and technical outcomes of concurrent EVT for MTVOs.MethodsData were included from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) with 32 stroke centers for EVT performed to treat bilateral anterior or concurrent anterior and posterior circulation occlusions between 2017 and 2021. Patients with MTVO were identified, and propensity score matching was used to compare this group with patients with occlusion in a single arterial territory.ResultsOf a total of 7723 patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke, 54 (0.7%) underwent EVT for MTVOs (mean age 69±12.5; female 50%). 28% had bilateral and 72% had anterior and posterior circulations occlusions. The rate of successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3), complications, modified Rankin score at 90 days, and mortality was not significantly different between the matched cohorts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MTVOs were not associated with poor functional outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or longer procedure time.ConclusionCompared with EVT for single vessel occlusions, EVT in appropriately selected patients with MTVOs has a similar efficacy and safety profile.

OBJECTIVE Ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms are rare pathologies that pose significant challenges from a treatment standpoint. Endovascular treatment via flow diversion represents an increasingly popular option; however, drawbacks include the requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy and the potential for thromboembolic complications, particularly acute complications in the ruptured setting. The Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology (PED-Shield) offers reduced material thrombogenicity, which may aid in the treatment of ruptured internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms. METHODS The authors conducted a multi-institution, retrospective case series to determine the safety and efficacy of PED-Shield for the treatment of ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Clinical, radiographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis. Seventeen underwent placement of a single device, and 16 underwent placement of two devices. No thromboembolic complications occurred. Four patients were maintained on aspirin alone, and all others were treated with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. Among patients with 3-month follow-up, 93.8% had a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2. Complete occlusion at follow-up was observed in 82.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS PED-Shield represents a new option for the treatment of ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. The reduced material thrombogenicity appeared to improve the safety of the PED-Shield device, as this series demonstrated no thromboembolic complications even among patients treated with only single antiplatelet therapy. The efficacy of PED-Shield reported in this series, particularly with placement of two devices, demonstrates its potential as a first-line treatment option for these pathologies.

OBJECTIVE Although younger adults have been shown to have better functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the significance of this relationship in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is not well defined given its undefined rarity. Correspondingly, the goal of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of age in this specific demographic following MT for large-vessel occlusions. METHODS A prospectively maintained international multi-institutional database, STAR (Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry), was reviewed for all patients aged 12–18 (adolescent) and 19–25 (young adult) years. Parameters were compared using chi-square and t-test analyses, and associations were interrogated using regression analyses. RESULTS Of 7192 patients in the registry, 41 (0.6%) satisfied all criteria, with a mean age of 19.7 ± 3.3 years. The majority were male (59%) and young adults (61%) versus adolescents (39%). The median prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 0 (range 0–2). Strokes were most common in the anterior circulation (88%), with the middle cerebral artery being the most common vessel (59%). The mean onset-to–groin puncture and groin puncture–to-reperfusion times were 327 ± 229 and 52 ± 42 minutes, respectively. The mean number of passes was 2.2 ± 1.2, with 61% of the cohort achieving successful reperfusion. There were only 3 (7%) cases of reocclusion. The median mRS score at 90 days was 2 (range 0–6). Between the adolescent and young adult subgroups, the median mRS score at last follow-up was statistically lower in the adolescent subgroup (1 vs 2, p = 0.03), and older age was significantly associated with a higher mRS at 90 days (coefficient 0.33, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Although rare, MT for AIS in the AYA demographic is both safe and effective. Even within this relatively young demographic, age remains significantly associated with improved functional outcomes. The implication of age-dependent stroke outcomes after MT within the AYA demographic needs greater validation to develop effective age-specific protocols for long-term care across both pediatric and adult centers.

BackgroundThe mechanisms and outcomes in coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-associated stroke are unique from those of non-COVID-19 stroke.ObjectiveTo describe the efficacy and outcomes of acute revascularization of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the setting of COVID-19 in an international cohort.MethodsWe conducted an international multicenter retrospective study of consecutively admitted patients with COVID-19 with concomitant acute LVO across 50 comprehensive stroke centers. Our control group constituted historical controls of patients presenting with LVO and receiving a mechanical thrombectomy between January 2018 and December 2020.ResultsThe total cohort was 575 patients with acute LVO; 194 patients had COVID-19 while 381 patients did not. Patients in the COVID-19 group were younger (62.5 vs 71.2; P < .001) and lacked vascular risk factors (49, 25.3% vs 54, 14.2%; P = .001). Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 3 revascularization was less common in the COVID-19 group (74, 39.2% vs 252, 67.2%; P < .001). Poor functional outcome at discharge (defined as modified Ranklin Scale 3-6) was more common in the COVID-19 group (150, 79.8% vs 132, 66.7%; P = .004). COVID-19 was independently associated with a lower likelihood of achieving modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 3 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.7; P < .001) and unfavorable outcomes (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4-4.5; P = .002).ConclusionCOVID-19 was an independent predictor of incomplete revascularization and poor outcomes in patients with stroke due to LVO. Patients with COVID-19 with LVO were younger, had fewer cerebrovascular risk factors, and suffered from higher morbidity/mortality rates.

Aneurysmal recurrence after successful flow-diversion embolization is exceptionally rare. The rarity of recurrence has called into question the yield of interval surveillance imaging. Here we report the case of a recurrent intracranial aneurysm despite complete angiographic resolution after flow-diversion therapy with a Pipeline embolization device (PED). Given the absence of poor wall apposition, endoleak, and device migration, how this aneurysm recurred remains unclear, particularly given the recurrence was at a timepoint at which complete reendothelialization of the device would be expected. The patient ultimately underwent interval treatment with a second device placed across the neck of the aneurysm. Although rare, reports of aneurysmal recurrences support the use of interval non-invasive imaging surveillance to ensure successful embolization in this patient population.

BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard-of-care for proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Data on technical and clinical outcomes in distal vessel occlusions (DVOs) remain limited.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients undergoing EVT for stroke at 32 international centers. Patients were divided into LVOs (internal carotid artery/M1/vertebrobasilar), medium vessel occlusions (M2/A1/P1) and isolated DVOs (M3/M4/A2/A3/P2/P3) and categorized by thrombectomy technique. Primary outcome was a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included recanalization, procedure-time, thrombectomy attempts, hemorrhage, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of technical variables. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcome in patients with DVO treated with aspiration versus stent retrieverResultsWe included 7477 patients including 213 DVOs. Distal location did not independently predict good functional outcome at 90 days compared with proximal (p=0.467). In distal occlusions, successful recanalization was an independent predictor of good outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.11, pConclusionsOutcomes following EVT for DVO are comparable to LVO with similar results between techniques. Techniques may exhibit different futility metrics; stent retriever thrombectomy was influenced by attempts whereas aspiration was more dependent on procedure time.

BackgroundThe benefit of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3) over near-complete reperfusion (≥90%, mTICI 2c) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-treated stroke patients with mTICI 2c versus 3.MethodsThis is a retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) comprising 33 centers. Adults with anterior circulation arterial vessel occlusion who underwent MT yielding mTICI 2c or mTICI 3 reperfusion were included. Patients were categorized based on reperfusion grade achieved. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were mRS scores at discharge and 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge, procedure-related complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.ResultsThe unmatched mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 cohorts comprised 519 and 1923 patients, respectively. There was no difference in primary (42.4% vs 45.1%; p=0.264) or secondary outcomes between the unmatched cohorts. Reperfusion status (mTICI 2c vs 3) was also not predictive of the primary outcome in non-imputed and imputed multivariable models. The matched cohorts each comprised 191 patients. Primary (39.8% vs 47.6%; p=0.122) and secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts, except the 90-day mRS which was lower in the matched mTICI 3 cohort (p=0.049). There were increased odds of the primary outcome with mTICI 3 in patients with baseline mRS ≥2 (36% vs 7.7%; p=0.011; pinteraction=0.014) and a history of stroke (42.3% vs 15.4%; p=0.027; pinteraction=0.041).ConclusionsComplete and near-complete reperfusion after MT appear to confer comparable outcomes in patients with acute stroke.

BackgroundReducing intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can improve patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) intervention. We sought to identify ICH risk factors after AIS thrombectomy.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) database. All patients who underwent AIS thrombectomy with available ICH data were included. Multivariable regression models were developed to identify predictors of ICH after thrombectomy. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified by symptom status and European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) grade.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 6860 patients. Any ICH and symptomatic ICH (sICH) occurred in 25% and 7% of patients, respectively. Hemorrhagic infarction 1 (HI1) occurred in 36%, HI2 in 24%, parenchymal hemorrhage 1 (PH1) in 22%, and PH2 in 17% of patients classified by ECASS grade. Intraprocedural complications independently predicted any ICH (OR 3.8083, PConclusionsThis study identified ICH risk factors after AIS thrombectomy using real-world data. There was a propensity towards a reduced sICH risk with direct aspiration. Procedural complications and ethnicity were predictors congruent between categories of any ICH, sICH, PH1, and PH2. Further investigation of technique and ethnicity effects on ICH and outcomes after AIS thrombectomy is warranted.

BackgroundCraniocervical catheter access in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic strokes can be challenging in cases of unfavorable aortic arch/cervical vascular anatomy, leading to lower recanalization rates, increased procedural time and worse clinical outcomes. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the balloon-anchoring technique (BAT) that can be attempted before switching to alternative access sites.MethodsRetrospective review of prospectively collected information on 11 patients in which two variants of the BAT (proximal anchoring: balloon guide catheter (BGC) is inflated to provide support for distal access; distal anchoring: compliant balloon is inflated in an intracranial artery to allow advancement of the support system) were utilized to facilitate craniocervical access due to failure of conventional maneuvers.ResultsTen patients had anterior and one patient had posterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Mean age was 81 years and 81% were females. Type 3 arches were found in 82% and a 9 French balloon guide catheter was used in 82%. Proximal anchoring with BGC was used in four cases while distal anchoring was used in seven patients to allow access to the target vessel, avoiding the need to puncture alternative access sites. Successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 2b-3) was achieved in all cases and no complications were observed.ConclusionBAT is safe and feasible. It can be considered as a rescue maneuver in order to avoid switching to a different access during thrombectomy in individuals with unfavorable aortic arch/craniocervical anatomy.

Background Endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) is the standard of care for large vessel occlusion(LVO) stroke. Data on technical and clinical outcome in proximal medium vessel occlusions(pMeVOs) comparing frontline techniques remain limited. Methods We report an international multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing EVT for stroke at 32 centers between 2015–2021. Patients were divided into LVOs(ICA/M1/Vertebrobasilar) or pMeVOs(M2/A1/P1) and categorized by thrombectomy technique. Primary outcome was 90-day good functional outcome(mRS ≤ 2). Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of technical variables on clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcome in patients with pMeVO treated with aspiration versus stent-retriever. Results In the cohort of 5977 LVO and 1287 pMeVO patients, pMeVO did not independently predict good-outcome(p = 0.55). In pMeVO patients, successful recanalization irrespective of frontline technique(aOR = 3.2,p Conclusions Clinical outcomes following EVT for pMeVO are comparable to those in LVOs. The golden hour or 3-pass rules in LVO thrombectomy still apply to pMeVO thrombectomy. Different techniques may exhibit different futility metrics; SR thrombectomy was more influenced by attempts whereas aspiration was more dependent on procedure time.

Introduction Limited data is available about the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients presenting with a large core infarct. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of MT in patients with large vessel occlusion and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 2-5. Methods Data from Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), which combined the prospectively maintained databases of 28 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers in the US, Europe, and Asia, was interrogated. We identified thrombectomy patients presenting with an occlusion in the Internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with favorable 90-day outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3), including interaction terms between ASPECTS 2-5 and receiving MT in the extended window (≥ 6 hours from symptom-onset). Results Among MT patients who presented with ICA or M1 occlusion, 2132 had ASPECTS≥6 and 213 patients had ASPECTS 2-5. Patients in the low ASPECTS group were younger (70 vs. 72 years old, P=0.003) and more likely to present with an ICA occlusion (47.9% vs. 28.8%, P Conclusion More than one in three patients presenting with ASPECTS (2-5) may achieve favorable 90-day functional outcome following MT. Favorable outcome was 4 times higher in low ASPECTS patients who had successful recanalization. The effect of low ASPECTS on 90-day outcome did not differ in patients presenting in the early versus extended MT window. Disclosures E. Almallouhi: None. S. Al Kasab: None. Z. Hubbard: None. G. Porto: None. A. Alawieh: None. R. Chalhoub: None. E. Bass: None. P. Jabbour: None. R. Starke: None. S. Wolfe: None. A. Arthur: None. I. Maier: None. J. Grossberg: None. A. Rai: None. M. Park: None. J. Mascitelli: None. M. Psychogios: None. R. De Leacy: None. D. Raper: None. T. Dumont: None. M. Levitt: None. A. Polifka: None. J. Osbun: None. R. Crosa: None. J. Kim: None. W. Casagrande: None. M. Mokin: None. C. Matouk: None. A. Shaban: None. I. Fragata: None. A. Yoo: None. A. Spiotta: 1; C; Stryker, Penumbra, and Medtronic. 2; C; Penumbra, Stryker, Cerenovus, Terumo.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has led to excess mortality out of proportion to documented COVID-19 cases while also affecting the care of non-COVID-19 related diseases. No data exist on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care and outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Here we determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on latency to presentation and clinical outcomes for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients presenting to a single center in Atlanta, Georgia, USA with aSAH between 2012 and 2020. COVID-19 was first reported in Georgia on March 2, 2020. All patients presenting from March 2nd through June 30th of a given calendar year were compared from the pre-COVID-19 era (2012- 2019) to the COVID-19 era (2020). Patient characteristics, latency from ictus to presentation, and clinical outcomes were compared. Every index digital subtraction angiogram was scored for the presence of vasospasm, and all cranial imaging studies were reviewed for infarcts consistent with delayed cerebral ischemia. Results 470 patients presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage during the study period. 433 and 37 presented before and during the COVID-19 era, respectively. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 era patients, patients presenting during the early phase of the pandemic were more likely to delay presentation (2.3 ± 1.3 days vs. 0.9 ± 2.2 days, respectively, p

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) associated ischemic stroke is associated with worse functional outcomes, less effective recanalization, and increased rates of hemorrhagic complications after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Conversely, AF is not associated with hemorrhagic complications or functional outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). This differential effect of MT and IVT in AF associated stroke raises the question of whether bridging thrombolysis increases hemorrhagic complications in AF patients undergoing MT.MethodsThis international cohort study of 22 comprehensive stroke centers analyzed patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing MT between June 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on comorbid AF and IVT exposure. Baseline patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes were reported and compared.Results6461 patients underwent MT for LVO. 2311 (35.8%) patients had comorbid AF. In non-AF patients, bridging therapy improved the odds of good 90 day functional outcomes (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.60, p=0.025) and did not increase hemorrhagic complications. In AF patients, bridging therapy led to significant increases in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and parenchymal hematoma type 2 (aOR 1.66, 1.07 to 2.57, p=0.024) without any benefit in 90 day functional outcomes. Similar findings were noted in a separate propensity score analysis.ConclusionIn this large thrombectomy registry, AF patients exposed to IVT before MT had increased hemorrhagic complications without improved functional outcomes, in contrast with non-AF patients. Prospective trials are warranted to assess whether AF patients represent a subgroup of LVO patients who may benefit from a direct to thrombectomy approach at thrombectomy capable centers.

The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic led to significant healthcare avoidance, perhaps explaining some of the excess reported deaths that exceeded known infections. The impact of the early COVID-19 era on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) care remains unclear.To determine the impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on latency to presentation, neurological complications, and clinical outcomes after aSAH.We performed a retrospective cohort study from March 2, 2012, to June 30, 2021, of all patients with aSAH admitted to our center. The early COVID-19 era was defined as March 2, 2020, through June 30, 2020. The pre-COVID-19 era was defined as the same interval in 2012 to 2019.Among 499 patients with aSAH, 37 presented in the early COVID-19 era. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 era patients, patients presenting during this early phase of the pandemic were more likely to delay presentation after ictus (median, interquartile range; 1 [0-4] vs 0 [0-1] days, respectively, P.001). Radiographic-delayed cerebral ischemia (29.7% vs 10.2%, P.001) was more common in the early COVID-19 era. In adjusted analyses, presentation in the early COVID-19 era was independently associated with increased inhospital death or hospice disposition (adjusted odds ratio 3.29 [1.02-10.65], P = .046). Both latency and adverse outcomes returned to baseline in 2021.aSAH in the early COVID-19 era was associated with delayed presentation, neurological complications, and worse outcomes at our center. These data highlight how healthcare avoidance may have increased morbidity and mortality in non-COVID-19-related neurosurgical disease.

Background The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been increasingly used for the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. The purpose of the present study was to examine the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with vertebrobasilar aneurysms treated with the PED. Methods We performed a retrospective review of vertebrobasilar aneurysms treated with the PED at 4 high-volume neurovascular centers. Patient, aneurysm, and procedural data were collected, including perioperative and delayed complications. Aneurysm occlusion on follow-up imaging studies was defined as complete (100%), near-complete (>90%), or incomplete ( Results The cohort included 35 patients with 37 vertebrobasilar aneurysms who underwent 36 treatment sessions. Of the 35 patients, 10 were men (29%), and the mean patient age was 54.1 years (range, 32–75). Eight patients (23%) underwent urgent treatment because of a ruptured aneurysm (n = 6), brainstem perforator stroke (n = 1), or post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). Of the 37 aneurysms, 22 arose from the vertebral artery (59%) and 15 from the basilar artery (41%). Also, 19 were saccular aneurysms (51%), with a mean size of 7.7 mm (range, 1.7–38.0); 17 were fusiform aneurysms (46%), with a mean size of 11.0 mm (range, 4.3–34); and 1 was a 2.9-mm blister aneurysm. The overall procedural complication rate was 14% (5 of 36), including 3 neurologically symptomatic complications. At a mean follow-up period of 14 months (range, 3–59), 24 of 34 aneurysms (71%) were completely occluded and 29 of 34 (85%) were completely or near-completely occluded. Conclusion Our results show that Pipeline embolization of vertebrobasilar aneurysms is associated with acceptable occlusion and complication rates.

Background and Purpose: Several reports have described lower mortality rates in overweight or obese patients as compared to normal weight ones. In the past decade, several studies have investigated the phenomenon, commonly known as the obesity paradox, with mixed results thus far. We sought to determine whether outcomes differ between patients with large vessel occlusion strokes (LVOS) after endovascular therapy (ET) according to their body mass index (BMI). Methods: We reviewed our prospectively collected endovascular database at a tertiary care academic institution. All patients that underwent ET for acute LVOS were categorized according to their BMI into 4 groups: (1) underweight (BMI < 18.5), (2) normal weight (BMI = 18.5–25), (3) overweight (BMI = 25–30), and (4) obese (BMI > 30). Baseline characteristics, procedural radiological as well as outcome parameters where compared. Results: A total of 926 patients qualified for the study, of which 20 (2.2%) were underweight, 253 (27.3%) had a normal weight, 315 (34%) were overweight, and 338 (36.5%) were obese. When compared with normal weight (reference), overweight patients were younger, had higher rates of dyslipidemia and diabetes and higher glucose levels, while obese patients were younger, less often smokers, and had higher rates of hypertension and diabetes and higher glucose levels. Other baseline and procedural characteristics were comparable. The rates of successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia, 2b–3), parenchymal hematomas, 90-day good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scale, 0–2), and 90-day mortality were comparable between groups. On multivariate analysis, BMI was not associated with good outcomes nor mortality. Conclusion: In patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, BMI is not associated with outcomes. However, patients who are overweight or obese have more comorbidities and a higher stroke risk and, thus, should strive for a normal weight.

Objective: To examine outcomes for thrombectomy devices used for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M2 segment emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) as the optimal device for such reperfusion is not clearly defined. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIS patients with MCA M2 ELVO undergoing thrombectomy from 3 academic medical centers was conducted from October 1999 through June 2016. The patients were divided based on the device utilized. Multivariate analysis of associations between devices (stent retriever or aspiration only [manual or pump aspiration system]) was performed. Primary outcomes were good recanalization (i.e., modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥2b) and a favorable modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (i.e. ≤2). The secondary outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Results: A total of 197 AIS patients underwent MCA M2 ELVO thrombectomy with either a stent retriever (n = 120) or aspiration only (n = 77). The aspiration-only group utilized either manual (n = 38) or pump aspiration (n = 39). Utilization of a stent retriever over manual aspiration is independently associated with higher odds of a favorable mRS score (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.02–9.7) and lower odds of sICH (OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.03–0.31). Utilization of a stent retriever over a pump aspiration system is independently associated with higher odds of good recanalization (OR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.5–9.6). Utilization of a newer-generation pump aspiration catheter compared to a stent retriever resulted in similar rates of favorable mRS scores, sICH, successful recanalization, and mortality. Conclusion: Utilization of a newer-generation pump aspiration catheter compared to a stent retriever resulted in similar outcomes, but worse outcomes were seen with the manual aspiration technique. These findings need to be confirmed with a large randomized trial utilizing stent retrievers and newer-generation pump aspiration systems.

BackgroundThe pipeline embolization device (PED) is approved for the treatment of large aneurysms of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA). Its off-label application in treating aneurysms located specifically at the ICA terminus (ICA-T) has not been studied.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients from 2011 to 7 treated with PEDs. Out of 365 patients, 10 patients with ICA-T aneurysms were included. Patient demographics, procedural information, follow-up imaging, and clinical assessments were recorded.ResultsMean age was 46.9 years (± 8.8), and 6 (60%) patients were women. The mean maximum diameter of the aneurysms treated was 14.7 mm (± 10.7) and the mean neck diameter was 9.3 mm (± 6.6). Reasons for presentation included six incidental findings, one acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and three patients with prior SAH. Kamran–Byrne Occlusion Scale scores for the treated aneurysms were as follows: three class IV (complete obliteration), four class III (ConclusionThe PED has potential for treating ICA-T aneurysms not amenable to conventional treatment strategies. Further studies are warranted to confirm the long term outcomes.

* on behalf of the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) Collaborators Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis complications are enriched in AF associated stroke, as these patients have worse functional outcomes, less effective recanalization, and increased rates of hemorrhagic complications. These data suggest that AF patients may be at particularly high risk for complications of bridging therapy for large vessel occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here we determine whether clinical outcomes differ in AF associated stroke treated with MT and bridging therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Stroke and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from January 2015 to December 2018 and identified 4,169 patients who underwent MT for an anterior circulation stroke, 1,517 (36.4 %) of which had comorbid AF. Prospectively defined baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: Hemorrhagic complications after MT were similar in patients with or without AF. In patients without AF, bridging therapy improved 90-day outcomes (aOR 1.32, 1.02-1.74, p Conclusions: Bridging therapy in AF patients undergoing thrombectomy independently increased the odds of intracranial hemorrhage and did not improve functional outcomes. AF patients may represent a high-risk subgroup for thrombolytic complications. Randomized trials are warranted to determine whether patients with AF associated stroke may benefit by deferring bridging therapy at thrombectomy-capable centers.

Introduction: The benefit of thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion (LVO) is well proven. There is minimal data on concurrent thrombectomy for multi-territory occlusions. Methods: We reviewed the STAR registry from 2015-8 for patients treated with either right and left sided thrombectomy or anterior and posterior circulation thrombectomy at 15 comprehensive stroke centers. Results: There were 4966 patients in the study period who had completed outcome data and LVO thrombectomy. 38 (0.8%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy for multi-territory occlusions. 26% had bilateral occlusions and 74% had anterior and posterior circulation occlusions. Among the 38, 50% were female, 49% were white, and 91% had a prestroke mRS6 and 55% received iv t-pa. 83% of patients had successful recanalization (TICI 2B/3) for both territories. The overall complication rate was 15%. 5% of patients had sICH or PH2. 26% of patients had a 90day mRS Conclusion: With similar selection to single territory LVOs, good outcome can be achieved in multi-territory infarction with reasonable procedure time and no additional risk of hemorrhage or poor outcome.

Introduction: Successful first pass (SFP) has been identified as a key benchmark of the success of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, studies that evaluate the predictors and outcomes of SFP using ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration first Pass Technique) are limied by the small number of patients or single center design. Methods: We used data from the prospectively collected data from 28 stroke centers that are included in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions at the level of M1 or M2 segments were included. SFP was defined by achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score≥2b with a single aspiration attempt. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of SFP and evaluate the relationship between SFP and favorable 90-day outcome (90-day modified Rankin scale ≤2). Results: Out of 6123 patients included in STAR, 1002 (16.4%) underwent MT of M1 or M2 occlusion using ADAPT technique. SFP was achieved in 390 (38.9%) patients. SFP patients were older (72 vs. 69, P=0.007), had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on presentation (9 vs. 8, P=0.018) (Table 1). On multivariable analysis, neither age (aOR 1.006, 95% CI 0.996-1.016, P=0.252) nor ASPECTS (aOR 1.055, 95% CI 0.976-1.141, P=0.179) were independent predictor of SFP. Importantly, SFP was independently associated with favorable 90-day outcome (aOR 2.769, 95% CI 1.988-3.858, P Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with M1 or M2 occlsuion undergoing MT using ADAPT technique, patients who had SFP were older and had better ASPECTS. However, both age and ASPECTS were not independently associated with SFP. Also, patients who had SFP were almost 3 times more likely to achieve favorable 90-day outcome.