Search

To evaluate the costs and benefits associated with the use of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) for lower limb spasticity in children, upper and lower limb spasticity in adults, and cervical dystonia in adults.This pharmacoeconomic analysis compared aboBoNT-A with onaBoNT-A. A decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon was conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective using data from a variety of sources: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), network meta-analyses (NMAs), observational studies, and a physician survey investigating treatment patterns and resource utilization. Four patient populations were included: pediatric patients with lower limb spasticity (PLL), and adults with upper limb spasticity (AUL), lower limb spasticity (ALL), and cervical dystonia (CD). Outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, cost per responder, and incremental cost per QALY gained. The effectiveness of each treatment was evaluated as a response to treatment. The base case assumption was that all patients in the model continued to receive botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatments at regular intervals regardless of treatment response status. Scenario analysis evaluated the impact of discontinuing BoNT-A for patients without a response to the first injection.The model found that aboBoNT-A resulted in greater quality-of-life and lower costs compared with onaBoNT-A for the management of spasticity and CD in all included indications. Across populations, cost savings ranged from £304 to £3,963 and QALYs gained ranged from 0.010 to 0.02 over a 1-year time horizon. Results were robust to scenario analyses and were driven by the impact of treatment response on health-related quality-of-life.AboBoNT-A was associated with higher treatment response, improved quality-of-life, and reduced costs in spasticity and CD versus onaBoNT-A. These findings could help deliver more effective and efficient healthcare in the NHS.The objective of this study was to compare the costs and health outcomes associated with abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dysport) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A; Botox) for treating children and adults with a variety of conditions related to limb spasticity and cervical dystonia. Therapies such as aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A have been shown to reduce spasticity, deformity, pain, and cervical dystonia symptoms. They can also improve function, movement, and self-care abilities. We estimated the treatment costs for patients with spasticity and patients with cervical dystonia receiving aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A in the UK. We also estimated other health-related costs that patients were expected to incur while receiving these treatments, as well as their quality of life.For each indication (spasticity in the upper and lower limbs in adults and children, cervical dystonia in adults), research studies were identified to estimate the likelihood of patient response for aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A. Survey studies were assessed to understand use of health services and costs for patients who respond to therapy vs. those who do not. We estimated total costs over one year and expected quality of life for patients. Costs included the costs of aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A treatments, as well as other health services.In all identified studies, the likelihood of response was higher for aboBoNT-A than for onaBoNT-A. This was associated with reduced need for other health services (and therefore lower costs), and better quality of life for patients receiving aboBoNT-A. In addition, the cost per year of aboBoNT-A treatment was lower than onaBoNT-A treatment for all indications. Therefore, treatment with aboBoNT-A was consistently associated with lower costs and better quality of life. This outcome is referred to as “economically dominant,” meaning that from a health economic perspective, aboBoNT-A would be preferred to onaBoNT-A for treating patients with spasticity or cervical dystonia.

To compare the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) for the treatment of refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), using an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). A systematic literature review was used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of refractory NDO. Treatments were compared using a Bucher ITC approach. Efficacy outcomes were reduction in number of weekly urinary incontinence (UI) episodes at 6, 12, and 24 weeks of follow-up. The safety outcome was the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent urinary tract infections (TE-UTIs) during follow-up. Subgroup/sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the impact of heterogeneity. Fifteen studies of botulinum toxin type A were identified. Among these, onaBoNT-A 200 U was the only botulinum toxin type A considered an appropriate comparator for aboBoNT-A 600 U and 800 U. As such, six RCTs that evaluated onaBoNT-A or aboBoNT-A were included in the ITC. In base-case analyses, there were no statistically significant differences between aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A in terms of UI episodes or TE-UTIs. Numerically, the trend favored aboBoNT-A (either dose) for all endpoints and time points. At 12 and 24 weeks, the difference in reduction of UI episodes per week was considered clinically relevant when comparing aboBoNT-A 800 U with onaBoNT-A 200 U, but not when comparing the lower dose of aboBoNT-A (600 U) with onaBoNT-A 200 U. Results from subgroup/sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. Heterogeneity across studies was observed; however, strong consistency of trends across analyses suggests the impact of heterogeneity is low. There may be potential advantages of aboBoNT-A over onaBoNT-A, in terms of UI reduction, in patients with refractory NDO. More confirmatory studies are needed owing to the sparsity of current evidence. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is a condition in which the bladder muscle wall is overactive and does not function normally. This can lead to urinary incontinence (i.e. accidental leakage of urine). NDO may also cause urinary tract infections and upper urinary tract damage if it is left untreated or if treatment does not work (i.e. refractory NDO). Botulinum toxin is a treatment that relaxes muscles in patients with refractory NDO, so they have less chance of experiencing urinary incontinence. This study used results from clinical trials to compare two types of botulinum toxin – abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) – to see if one works better than the other. Clinical trials are experiments to assess how well treatments work by giving different treatments to different patients and observing the results. When there is no clinical trial that compares the two treatments you are interested in, it is possible to combine results from a number of different clinical trials instead. This is known as an indirect treatment comparison. We used an indirect treatment comparison to compare aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A for the treatment of refractory NDO. Results showed that aboBoNT-A may be more effective than onaBoNT-A in reducing the frequency of urinary incontinence episodes. On average, patients treated with aboBoNT-A had at least three fewer episodes of urinary incontinence per week than those treated with onaBoNT-A. These results suggest that patients treated with aboBoNT-A could have a better quality of life than those treated with onaBoNT-A.

Understanding the evolutionary consequences of anthropogenic change is imperative for estimating long-term species resilience. While contemporary genomic data can provide us with important insights into recent demographic histories, investigating past change using present genomic data alone has limitations. In comparison, temporal genomics studies, defined herein as those that incorporate time series genomic data, leverage museum collections and repeated field sampling to directly examine evolutionary change. As temporal genomics is applied to more systems, species, and questions, best practices can be helpful guides to make the most efficient use of limited resources. Here, we conduct a systematic literature review to synthesize the effects of temporal genomics methodology on our ability to detect evolutionary changes. We focus on studies investigating recent change within the past 200 years, highlighting evolutionary processes that have occurred during the past two centuries of accelerated anthropogenic pressure. We first identify the most frequently studied taxa, systems, questions, and drivers, before highlighting overlooked areas where further temporal genomic studies may be particularly enlightening. Then, we provide guidelines for future study and sample designs while identifying key considerations that may influence statistical and analytical power. Our aim is to provide recommendations to a broad array of researchers interested in using temporal genomics in their work.

Objective: To describe the development of the Spasticity-related Quality of Life 6-Dimensions instrument (SQoL-6D) and its sensitivity to clinical change (responsiveness). Design: Multicentre, prospective, longitudinal cohort study at 8 UK sites (NCT03442660). Patients: Adults (n = 104) undergoing focal treatment of upper limb spasticity. Methods: No condition-specific health-related quality of life tool is available for upper-limb spasticity of any aetiology. The SQoL-6D was developed to fulfil this need, designed to complement the Upper Limb Spasticity Index (which incorporates the Goal Attainment Scaling evaluation of upper limb spasticity [GASeous] tool) with targeted standardised measures. The 6 dimensions of the SQoL-6D (score range 0–4) map onto common treatment goal areas identified in upper-limb spasticity studies. A Total score (0–100) provides overall spasticity-related health status. To assess responsiveness, the SQoL-6D, Global Assessment of Benefit scale and ”GASeous” were administered at enrolment and 8 weeks. Results: Significant differences in mean SQoL-6D Total score change and effect sizes across patients rating ”some benefit” (0.51) and ”great benefit” (0.88) supported responsiveness. Conclusion: The SQoL-6D is a promising new measure of health status in upper limb spasticity, that enables systematic assessment of the impact of this condition in relation to patients’ priority treatment goals. A psychometric evaluation of SQoL-6D is presented separately. LAY ABSTRACT Upper-limb spasticity is a condition in which muscles become ”tight”, restricting use of the arm and hand. Questionnaires have been developed to assess a person’s quality of life, but are not specifically designed to assess the impact of spasticity on a person. The Spasticity-related Quality of Life 6-Dimensions instrument (SQoL-6D) was created to address this deficiency. The development of the SQoL-6D is described here, along with analysis of its responsiveness to ensure that the SQoL-6D detects changes in spasticity symptoms following treatment (as reported by patients using other questionnaires). These analyses showed that the SQoL-6D captured changes in the burden of spasticity for people with this problem. Other technical psychometric properties of the SQoL-6D are reported in the companion paper available in this issue

To assess the reliability and validity of age-specific versions of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ), developed to measure the impact of FOP on physical function and activities of daily living.FOP-PFQ development included a literature review, two iterative phases of qualitative work involving individuals with FOP, and clinical expert review. The analysis used pooled FOP-PFQ data from an FOP natural history study (NCT02322255), a patient registry (NCT02745158), and phase II trials (NCT02190747; NCT02279095; NCT02979769). Item-level and factor analysis informed item retention and determined factor structure. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing scores with age, the Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale (PROMIS), and heterotopic ossification (HO) volume. Known-groups validity assessment used age, CAJIS, and HO volume.Factor analysis confirmed a two-factor solution: Mobility and Upper Extremity. Results reflected high internal consistency and were supportive of test-retest reliability; correlation coefficients0.90 demonstrated FOP-PFQ scores were stable over a one- to three-week period. The majority of scores were moderately (r = 0.30-0.50) to highly (r ≥ 0.50) correlated with CAJIS and HO volume, supporting convergent validity. With the exception of some age-based and functional groups, FOP-PFQ scores were significantly worse in groups with more severe disease, demonstrating known-groups validity.The FOP-PFQ was demonstrated to be a reliable, valid measure that may be responsive to change in individuals with FOP, although some results were inconclusive for pediatric versions.

Objective: Psychometric evaluation of the Spasticity-related Quality of Life 6-Dimensions instrument (SQoL-6D). Design: A clinimetric evaluation conducted in a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal cohort study at 8 UK sites. Patients: Adult patients (n=104) undergoing focal treatment of upper-limb spasticity. Methods: The SQoL-6D was administered in the clinic at enrolment and at 8 weeks, then 1–4 days later at home to assess test-retest reliability. Results: The SQoL-6D demonstrated adequate construct validity and unidimensionality of the scale, allowing the calculation of a Total score. Cronbach’s alpha (0.74) supported the internal consistency reliability, while the intraclass correlation coefficient supported test-retest reliability (0.82). Correlation coefficients with established instruments supported convergent validity, while significant differences between known-groups (of differing clinical severity) in SQoL-6D Total score confirmed its sensitivity to both cross-sectional and longitudinal differences. Conclusion: The SQoL-6D is a promising new measure to assess health status for patients with upper-limb spasticity of any aetiology. Further investigation and exploration of the allocation of weights to convert the SQoL-6D to a health-related quality of life utility index, are required. Lay Abstract In upper-limb spasticity, the use of the arm and hand become restricted due to “tight” muscles. Although questionnaires to assess a person’s quality of life have been developed, they do not specifically assess the impact of upper-limb spasticity. To address this deficiency, the Spasticity-related Quality of Life 6-Dimensions (SQoL-6D) questionnaire was developed (see also the companion “development” paper available in this issue). To test that the SQoL-6D works as expected, it was completed by 104 people living with spasticity and compared with other questionnaires they completed. The results show that the SQoL-6D questions are relevant to people with spasticity. The answers were reliable when the SQoL-6D was repeated, and differences in the burden of spasticity between people grouped by the severity of their condition were captured accurately. The SQoL-6D is a promising new measure to assess aspects of quality of life in people living with spasticity.

The essay presents through close readings an overview of Gary Snyder’s life as an ecologically focused poet, deeply grounded in the history and practice of Buddhism. John Whalen-Bridge explores effective techniques for teaching Snyder’s early works, select essays, and his magnum opus Mountains and Rivers Without End. The essay provides succinct guidance on basic Buddhist tenets, and illustrates how Snyder integrates the city itself into a vision of an ecologically sustainable future.

There is a common misconception that those who have deeply studied Buddhist doctrines of emptiness and who aspire to see the nature of emptiness in all things and experiences will pass off death, d...