Search

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy requiring efficient detection when the primary tumor is still resectable. We previously developed the MxPancreasScore comprising 9 analytes and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), achieving an accuracy of 90.6%. The necessity for 5 different analytical platforms and multiple analytical runs, however, hindered clinical applicability. We therefore aimed to develop a simpler single-analytical run, single-platform diagnostic signature.We evaluated 941 patients (PDAC, 356; chronic pancreatitis [CP], 304; nonpancreatic disease, 281) in 3 multicenter independent tests, and identification (ID) and validation cohort 1 (VD1) and 2 (VD2) were evaluated. Targeted quantitative plasma metabolite analysis was performed on a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry platform. A machine learning-aided algorithm identified an improved (i-Metabolic) and minimalistic metabolic (m-Metabolic) signatures, and compared them for performance.The i-Metabolic Signature, (12 analytes plus CA19-9) distinguished PDAC from CP with area under the curve (95% confidence interval) of 97.2% (97.1%-97.3%), 93.5% (93.4%-93.7%), and 92.2% (92.1%-92.3%) in the ID, VD1, and VD2 cohorts, respectively. In the VD2 cohort, the m-Metabolic signature (4 analytes plus CA19-9) discriminated PDAC from CP with a sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 89.6%, with an overall accuracy of 82.4%. For the subset of 45 patients with PDAC with resectable stages IA-IIB tumors, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 73.2%, 89.6%, and 82.7%, respectively; for those with detectable CA19-92 U/mL, 81.6%, 88.7%, and 84.5%, respectively; and for those with CA19-937 U/mL, 39.7%, 94.1%, and 76.3%, respectively.The single-platform, single-run, m-Metabolic signature of just 4 metabolites used in combination with serum CA19-9 levels is an innovative accurate diagnostic tool for PDAC at the time of clinical presentation, warranting further large-scale evaluation.

ObjectiveGATA6 is a key regulator of the classical phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Low GATA6 expression associates with poor patient outcome.GATA4is the second most expressed GATA factor in the pancreas. We assessed whether, and how, GATA4 contributes to PDAC phenotype and analysed the association of expression with outcome and response to chemotherapy.DesignWe analysed PDAC transcriptomic data, stratifying cases according toGATA4andGATA6expression and identified differentially expressed genes and pathways. The genome-wide distribution of GATA4 was assessed, as well as the effects ofGATA4knockdown. A multicentre tissue microarray study to assess GATA4 and GATA6 expression in samples (n=745) from patients with resectable was performed. GATA4 and GATA6 levels were dichotomised into high/low categorical variables; association with outcome was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models.ResultsGATA4messenger RNA is enriched in classical, compared with basal-like tumours. We classified samples in 4 groups as high/low forGATA4andGATA6. Reduced expression ofGATA4had a minor transcriptional impact but low expression ofGATA4enhanced the effects ofGATA6low expression. GATA4 and GATA6 display a partially overlapping genome-wide distribution, mainly at promoters. Reduced expression of both proteins in tumours was associated with the worst patient survival.GATA4andGATA6expression significantly decreased in metastases and negatively correlated with basal markers.ConclusionsGATA4andGATA6cooperate to maintain the classical phenotype. Our findings provide compelling rationale to assess their expression as biomarkers of poor prognosis and therapeutic response.

Importance: Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death; however, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer lack mandatory measures for reporting baseline and prognostic factors, which hampers comparisons between outcome measures. Objective: To develop a consensus on baseline and prognostic factors to be used as mandatory measurements in RCTs of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Evidence Review: We performed a systematic literature search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Embase for RCTs on resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with overall survival as the primary outcome. We produced a systematic summary of all baseline and prognostic factors identified in the RCTs. A Delphi panel that included 13 experts was surveyed to reach a consensus on mandatory and recommended baseline and prognostic factors. Findings: The 42 RCTs that met inclusion criteria reported a total of 60 baseline and 19 prognostic factors. After 2 Delphi rounds, agreement was reached on 50 mandatory baseline and 20 mandatory prognostic factors for future RCTs, with a distinction between studies of neoadjuvant vs adjuvant treatment. Conclusion and Relevance: This findings of this systematic review and international expert consensus have produced this Consensus Statement on Mandatory Measurements in Pancreatic Cancer Trials for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Disease (COMM-PACT-RB). The baseline and prognostic factors comprising the mandatory measures will facilitate better comparison across RCTs and eventually will enable improved clinical practice among patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Patient characteristics of samples used for discovery and independent validation.

Top upstream regulators significantly enriched in PDAC vs PAT and PAT vs CP, as determined using IPA.

Comparison of TSP-1 tissue expression in PDAC patients with clinicopathological parameters.

Detection of CA1-9 by ELISA in (A) individual time to diagnosis groups and (B) diagnosed samples and controls.

Patient characteristics of UoL serum sample cohorts.

Patient characteristics of samples included on TMAs histologically stained for TNC.

Although fibrotic stroma forms an integral component of pancreatic diseases, whether fibroblasts programmed by different types of pancreatic diseases are phenotypically distinct remains unknown. Here, we show that fibroblasts isolated from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), chronic pancreatitis (CP), periampullary tumors, and adjacent normal (NA) tissue (N = 34) have distinct mRNA and miRNA profiles. Compared with NA fibroblasts, PDAC-associated fibroblasts were generally less sensitive to an antifibrotic stimulus (NPPB) and more responsive to positive regulators of activation such as TGFβ1 and WNT. Of the disease-associated fibroblasts examined, PDAC- and CP-derived fibroblasts shared greatest similarity, yet PDAC-associated fibroblasts expressed higher levels of tenascin C (TNC), a finding attributable to miR-137, a novel regulator of TNC. TNC protein and transcript levels were higher in PDAC tissue versus CP tissue and were associated with greater levels of stromal activation, and conditioned media from TNC-depleted PDAC-associated fibroblasts modestly increased both PDAC cell proliferation and PDAC cell migration, indicating that stromal TNC may have inhibitory effects on PDAC cells. Finally, circulating TNC levels were higher in patients with PDAC compared with CP. Our characterization of pancreatic fibroblast programming as disease-specific has consequences for therapeutic targeting and for the manner in which fibroblasts are used in research.Significance:Primary fibroblasts derived from various types of pancreatic diseases possess and retain distinct molecular and functional characteristics in culture, providing a series of cellular models for treatment development and disease-specific research.

Supplementary Material and Methods

Supplementary Legends

Purpose: Identification of serum biomarkers enabling earlier diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could improve outcome. Serum protein profiles in patients with preclinical disease and at diagnosis were investigated.Experimental Design: Serum from cases up to 4 years prior to PDAC diagnosis and controls (UKCTOCS, n = 174) were studied, alongside samples from patients diagnosed with PDAC, chronic pancreatitis, benign biliary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and healthy subjects (n = 298). Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) enabled comparisons of pooled serum from a test set (n = 150). Validation was undertaken using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and/or Western blotting in all 472 human samples and samples from a KPC mouse model.Results: iTRAQ identified thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) as reduced preclinically and in diagnosed samples. MRM confirmed significant reduction in levels of TSP-1 up to 24 months prior to diagnosis. A combination of TSP-1 and CA19-9 gave an AUC of 0.86, significantly outperforming both markers alone (0.69 and 0.77, respectively; P < 0.01). TSP-1 was also decreased in PDAC patients compared with healthy controls (P < 0.05) and patients with benign biliary obstruction (P < 0.01). Low levels of TSP-1 correlated with poorer survival, preclinically (P < 0.05) and at clinical diagnosis (P < 0.02). In PDAC patients, reduced TSP-1 levels were more frequently observed in those with confirmed diabetes mellitus (P < 0.01). Significantly lower levels were also observed in PDAC patients with diabetes compared with individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (P = 0.01).Conclusions: Circulating TSP-1 levels decrease up to 24 months prior to diagnosis of PDAC and significantly enhance the diagnostic performance of CA19-9. The influence of diabetes mellitus on biomarker behavior should be considered in future studies. Clin Cancer Res; 22(7); 1734–43. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Materials and Methods, Supplementary Figure 1. Representation of the DNA sequence upstream of the miR-192 gene and location of differentially methylated CpG dimers. Supplementary Figure 2. Assessment of in vitro DNA methylation of the CpG island sequence upstream the miR-192 transcription start site (TSS) by agarose gel electrophoresis after digesting with restriction endonuclease AciI. Supplementary Figure 3. Heatmap showing differentially expressed microRNAs in PDAC compared to normal pancreas tissue. Supplementary Figure 4. Heatmap displaying differentially expressed microRNAs in CP compared to normal pancreas tissue. Supplementary Figure 5. Heatmap showing a three-way comparison of microRNA expression in PDAC, CP and healthy pancreas tissues. Supplementary Figure 6. Result of bisulfite sequencing of the CpGI located 2.3 kb upstream of miR-181c. Supplementary Figure 7. Analysis of the effect of 5-azacytidine treatment on miR-192 expression in cell lines BXPC-3 and PANC-1. Supplementary Figure 8. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve displaying the ability of miR-192 expression to discriminate between CP and PDAC samples. Supplementary Figure 9. Correlation of miR-192 expression and tumor stage. Supplementary Table 1. List of analyzed patient samples with information about relevant clinical annotations and the types of analysis that were performed with each sample. Supplementary Table 2. List of all DNA primer sequences used in this study. Supplementary Table 3. Summary of the methylation status of the analyzed CpG islands found upstream of the TSSs of the set of 13 miRNAs that exhibited differential expression of a similar nature in both CP and PDAC and had CpGIs within 10 kb upstream their TSSs. Supplementary Table 4. List of predicted miR-192 targets.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by very early metastasis, suggesting the hypothesis that metastasis-associated changes may occur prior to actual tumor formation. In this study, we identified miR-192 as an epigenetically regulated suppressor gene with predictive value in this disease. miR-192 was downregulated by promoter methylation in both PDAC and chronic pancreatitis, the latter of which is a major risk factor for the development of PDAC. Functional studies in vitro and in vivo in mouse models of PDAC showed that overexpression of miR-192 was sufficient to reduce cell proliferation and invasion. Mechanistic analyses correlated changes in miR-192 promoter methylation and expression with epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cell proliferation and invasion were linked to altered expression of the miR-192 target gene SERPINE1 that is encoding the protein plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), an established regulator of these properties in PDAC cells. Notably, our data suggested that invasive capacity was altered even before neoplastic transformation occurred, as triggered by miR-192 downregulation. Overall, our results highlighted a role for miR-192 in explaining the early metastatic behavior of PDAC and suggested its relevance as a target to develop for early diagnostics and therapy. Cancer Res; 76(14); 4149–59. ©2016 AACR.

Background: Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) represents 5–10% of all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases, and the etiology of this form is poorly understood. It is not clear if established PDAC risk factors have the same relevance for younger patients. This study aims to identify genetic and non-genetic risk factors specific to EOPC. Methods: A genome-wide association study was performed, analysing 912 EOPC cases and 10 222 controls, divided into discovery and replication phases. Furthermore, the associations between a polygenic risk score (PRS), smoking, alcohol consumption, type 2 diabetes and PDAC risk were also assessed. Results: Six novel SNPs were associated with EOPC risk in the discovery phase, but not in the replication phase. The PRS, smoking, and diabetes affected EOPC risk. The OR comparing current smokers to never-smokers was 2.92 (95% CI 1.69–5.04, P = 1.44 × 10−4). For diabetes, the corresponding OR was 14.95 (95% CI 3.41–65.50, P = 3.58 × 10−4). Conclusion: In conclusion, we did not identify novel genetic variants associated specifically with EOPC, and we found that established PDAC risk variants do not have a strong age-dependent effect. Furthermore, we add to the evidence pointing to the role of smoking and diabetes in EOPC.

Pancreatic cancer has an incidence that almost matches its mortality. Only a small number of risk factors and 33 susceptibility loci have been identified. so Moreover, the relative rarity of pancreatic cancer poses significant hurdles for research aimed at increasing our knowledge of the genetic mechanisms contributing to the disease. Additionally, the inability to adequately power research questions prevents small monocentric studies from being successful. Several consortia have been established to pursue a better understanding of the genetic architecture of pancreatic cancers. The Pancreatic disease research (PANDoRA) consortium is the largest in Europe. PANDoRA is spread across 12 European countries, Brazil and Japan, bringing together 29 basic and clinical research groups. In the last ten years, PANDoRA has contributed to the discovery of 25 susceptibility loci, a feat that will be instrumental in stratifying the population by risk and optimizing preventive strategies.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide, most notably in Europe and North America. Great strides have been made in combining the most effective conventional therapies to improve survival at least in the short and medium term. The start of treatment can only be made once a diagnosis is made, which at this point, the tumor volume is already very high in the primary cancer and systemically. If caught at the earliest opportunity (in circa 20% patients) surgical resection of the primary followed by combination chemotherapy can achieve 5-year overall survival rates of 30%–50%. A delay in detection of even a few months after symptom onset will result in the tumor having only borderline resectabilty (in 20%–30% of patients), in which case the best survival is achieved by using short-course chemotherapy before tumor resection as well as adjuvant chemotherapy. Once metastases become visible (in 40%–60% of patients), cure is not possible, palliative cytotoxics only being able to prolong life by few months. Even in apparently successful therapy in resected and borderline resectable patients, the recurrence rate is very high. Considerable efforts to understand the nature of pancreatic cancer through large-scale genomics, transcriptomics, and digital profiling, combined with functional preclinical models, using genetically engineered mouse models and patient derived organoids, have identified the critical role of the tumor microenvironment in determining the nature of chemo- and immuno-resistance. This functional understanding has powered fresh and exciting approaches for the treatment of this cancer.

IntroductionOnly a small number of risk factors for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been established. Several studies identified a role of epigenetics and of deregulation of DNA methylation. DNA methylation is variable across a lifetime and in different tissues; nevertheless, its levels can be regulated by genetic variants like methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs), which can be used as a surrogate.Materials and methodsWe scanned the whole genome for mQTLs and performed an association study in 14 705 PDAC cases and 246 921 controls. The methylation data were obtained from whole blood and pancreatic cancer tissue through online databases. We used the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium and the Pancreatic Cancer Case–Control Consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS) data as discovery phase and the Pancreatic Disease Research consortium, the FinnGen project and the Japan Pancreatic Cancer Research consortium GWAS as replication phase.ResultsThe C allele of 15q26.1-rs12905855 showed an association with a decreased risk of PDAC (OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.94, p=4.93×10−8in the overall meta-analysis), reaching genome-level statistical significance. 15q26.1-rs12905855 decreases the methylation of a 'C-phosphate-G' (CpG) site located in the promoter region of theRCCD1antisense (RCCD1-AS1) gene which, when expressed, decreases the expression of the RCC1 domain-containing (RCCD1) gene (part of a histone demethylase complex). Thus, it is possible that the rs12905855 C-allele has a protective role in PDAC development through an increase ofRCCD1gene expression, made possible by the inactivity ofRCCD1-AS1.ConclusionWe identified a novel PDAC risk locus which modulates cancer risk by controlling gene expression through DNA methylation.

BACKGROUND: The utility of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreas cancer is yet to be determined, but has commonly included chemoradiation. We evaluated outcomes in patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy without chemoradiation. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients in our institutional pancreatic cancer registry was performed, which identified 36 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2016. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 66.3 years. Chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine (n=17), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n=8), or 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) (n=11). Surgical resection was performed in 69% of patients (n=25), with an R0 resection rate of 92% (n=23 patients). During chemotherapy, distant disease became apparent in 19% of patients (n=7), while no patients had evidence of local progression. Resection rates were similar between chemotherapy regimens (single agent =59%, multiple agent =79%). Median overall survival for all patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 30.3 and 34.4 months for those who underwent surgical resection. There was no difference in median survival for patients treated with gemcitabine (31.3 months) or multi-agent chemotherapy (29.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: A short course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without chemoradiation may improve patient selection prior to surgical resection for pancreas cancer. Further, local disease progression did not limit surgical resection in this small series.

To introduce sub-adventitial divestment technique (SDT), a procedure to remove the tumor while preserving the artery during curative pancreatectomy. Peri-operative safety profile was also evaluated. In a single center consecutive series of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, the outcome of patients who had pancreatectomy with SDT was compared to standard pancreatic surgery. From June 2014 to June 2016, 72 patients had pancreatectomy with SDT and 235 had standard surgery. Tumor stage was T4 in all 72 (100%) tumors removed using SDT compared to four (2%) with standard pancreatectomy (p

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease with limited treatment options. Recently, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib has been approved for maintenance therapy after successful platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Approval was based on the POLO study that has shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival for patients with metastatic PDAC after at least 4 months of platinum-based chemotherapy. Hopefully, this first biomarker-directed targeted therapy for a relevant subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients is only the beginning of an era of personalized therapy for pancreatic cancer. The potential role for PARPi in improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer containing somatic tumor mutations has yet to be established. Multiple studies investigating whether PARPi therapy might benefit a larger group of pancreatic cancer patients with homologous recombination repair deficiency and whether combinations with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or small molecules can improve efficacy are currently underway. We here review the molecular basis for PARPi therapy in PDAC patients and recent developments in clinical studies.

Whether a Blumgart anastomosis (BA) is superior to Cattell-Warren anastomosis (CWA) in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy.Complications driven by POPF following pancreatic cancer resection may hinder adjuvant therapy, shortening survival. BA may reduce complications compared to CWA, improving the use of adjuvant therapy and prolonging survival.A multicenter double-blind, controlled trial of patients undergoing resection for suspected pancreatic head cancer, randomized during surgery to a BA or CWA, stratified by pancreatic consistency and duct diameter. The primary end point was POPF, and secondary outcome measures were adjuvant therapy use, specified surgical complications, quality of life, and survival from the date of randomization. For a 10% POPF reduction, 416 patients were required, 208 per arm (two-sided α = 0·05; power = 80%).Z-score at planned interim analysis was 0.474 so recruitment was held to 238 patients; 236 patients were analyzed (112 BA and 124 CWA). No significant differences in POPF were observed between BA and CWA, odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) 1·04 (0.58-1.88),PANasta represents the most robust analysis of BA versus CWA to date.

This study aims to study the depth of artery wall tumour invasion in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Specimens from 47 pancreatic cancer patients with major arterial (splenic, SA; celiac, CA; common hepatic, CHA) invasion were examined: 45 left (distal) pancreatectomies, including 11 celiac artery resections, and two total pancreatectomies. Dissection of tumour-invaded arteries in 25 fresh specimens was attempted ex vivo using the sub-adventitial dissection technique (SDT). Tumour invasion of 66 arteries was graded using the tumour-free distance (TFD) from the external elastic lamina (EEL): 0 = no arterial invasion; I = TFD ≥ 1 mm; II = TFD 1 mm; and grade III = EEL invasion.AJCC TNM staging was IA = 1 (2%), IB = 4 (9%), IIA = 5 (11%), IIB = 17(36%) and III = 20 (43%). Grade III tumour invasion was found in 17/47(36%) SAs, in 5/11 (45%) CAs and in 1/8 (13%) CHAs (p = 0.318). Attempted ex vivo SDT undertaken in 33 arteries from 25 specimens was complete in 16 and incomplete in 17 arteries. The median (IQR) TFD was 0.97 (0.11-2.54) mm in dissected and 0.14 (0.10, 0.14) mm in non-dissected SAs (p = 0.034). EEL tumour invasion occurred in 0/12 (0%) dissected compared to 7/13 (54%) non-dissected SAs (p = 0.005). Grades 0, I, II and III invasion were found in four (33%), two (17%) and six (50%), respectively, of 12 dissected SAs and grades II and III in six 6 (46%) and seven (54%), respectively, of 13 non-dissected SAs (p = 0.002).The grading system described may form the basis for classification to further develop arterial dissection techniques for pancreatic cancer.

Although fibrotic stroma forms an integral component of pancreatic diseases, whether fibroblasts programmed by different types of pancreatic diseases are phenotypically distinct remains unknown. Here, we show that fibroblasts isolated from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), chronic pancreatitis (CP), periampullary tumors, and adjacent normal (NA) tissue (N = 34) have distinct mRNA and miRNA profiles. Compared with NA fibroblasts, PDAC-associated fibroblasts were generally less sensitive to an antifibrotic stimulus (NPPB) and more responsive to positive regulators of activation such as TGFβ1 and WNT. Of the disease-associated fibroblasts examined, PDAC- and CP-derived fibroblasts shared greatest similarity, yet PDAC-associated fibroblasts expressed higher levels of tenascin C (TNC), a finding attributable to miR-137, a novel regulator of TNC. TNC protein and transcript levels were higher in PDAC tissue versus CP tissue and were associated with greater levels of stromal activation, and conditioned media from TNC-depleted PDAC-associated fibroblasts modestly increased both PDAC cell proliferation and PDAC cell migration, indicating that stromal TNC may have inhibitory effects on PDAC cells. Finally, circulating TNC levels were higher in patients with PDAC compared with CP. Our characterization of pancreatic fibroblast programming as disease-specific has consequences for therapeutic targeting and for the manner in which fibroblasts are used in research. Significance: Primary fibroblasts derived from various types of pancreatic diseases possess and retain distinct molecular and functional characteristics in culture, providing a series of cellular models for treatment development and disease-specific research.

Background: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery provides globally accepted definitions for reporting of complications after pancreatic surgery. This International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project aims to provide a standardized framework for reporting of the results of operative treatment for chronic pancreatitis. Methods: An International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project circulation list was created with pre-existing and new members and including gastroenterologists in addition to surgeons. A computerized search of the literature was undertaken for articles reporting the operative treatment of chronic pancreatitis. The results of the literature search were presented at the first face-to-face meeting of this International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project group. A document outlining proposed reporting standards was produced by discussion during an initial meeting of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. An electronic questionnaire was then sent to all current members of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Responses were collated and further discussed at international meetings in North America, Europe, and at the International Association of Pancreatology World Congress in 2019. A final consensus document was produced by integration of multiple iterations. Results: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery consensus standards for reporting of surgery in chronic pancreatitis recommends 4 core domains and the necessary variables needed for reporting of results: clinical baseline before operation; the morphology of the diseased gland; a new, standardized, operative terminology; and a minimum outcome dataset. The 4 domains combine to give a comprehensive framework for reports. Conclusion: Adoption of the 4 domains of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery reporting standards for surgery for chronic pancreatitis will facilitate comparison of results between centers and help to improve the care for patients with this debilitating disease.

Die Resektion ist die einzige kurative Therapieoption beim Pankreaskarzinom. Adjuvante Chemotherapie kann das krankheitsfreie Uberleben und Gesamtuberleben nach Resektion verbessern. Zurzeit werden daruber hinaus neoadjuvante Konzepte in zahlreichen Studien untersucht. Zusammenfassung der aktuellen Datenlage bezuglich adjuvanter und neoadjuvanter Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms. Analyse der wissenschaftlichen Literatur und Leitlinien. Nach Resektion eines Pankreaskarzinoms sollte eine moglichst intensive Chemotherapie mit mFOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabin plus Capecitabin oder Gemcitabin/5-Fluorouracil(5-FU)-Monotherapie durchgefuhrt werden. Neoadjuvante Konzepte sind vielversprechend, sollten aber in prospektiven Studien weiter evaluiert werden.

The management of pancreatic cancer has dramatically changed since the first major randomized trial published in 2001 by the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) stimulated the development of multimodality oncosurgical therapies. ESPAC-1 demonstrated a survival improvement from upfront surgery of only 8%, increasing to 21% 5-year survival for 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid but only 10.8% for chemoradiotherapy. ESPAC-4 has shown a 5-year survival rate of 30% for all patients without restriction of 30% using a combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine, rising to 40% in those with an R0 resection margin, or nearly 50% in those with N0 lymph node status. In selected patients with favorable prognostic features mFOLFIRINOX can produce a 50% 5-year survival rate but with added toxicity. While a positive resection margin is associated with an increased likelihood of local recurrence, this of itself is not the contributor to reduced survival, but rather reflects the increased probability of systemic disease. Thus, strategies aimed at local control, may reduce subsequent local progression, but will not improve overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly utilized in cases of borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but there is still a lack of proof of concept studies. High-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials to identify the indications and benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer are required. The use of patient-derived tumor organoids may predict response to chemotherapy which could open a new opportunity in pancreatic cancer treatment, stratifying patients into treatment groups based on their response to these therapies in the laboratory.

Prognostic prediction had been widely used in various cancer entities, from early screening to end-stage patient caring. Currently, there is hardly any well-validated nomogram which exists for long-term survival prediction in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) patients in a post-surgery setting. Our objectives are to identify possible prognostic factors in PC patients following radical resection and to develop a prognostic nomogram based on independent survival predictors. From 2009 to 2014, a total of 432 PC patients who underwent curative intended surgeries with complete follow-up data were included in this current retrospective long-term survival analysis. Clinicopathological data were extracted from medical records, and all missing values (percentage 0.9–8.3%) were imputed five times with the “PMM” method. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. A nomogram was formulated based on results from the multivariate regression model so as to predict OS at 1-, 2- and 3-year as well as median OS. Validations, including discrimination and calibration, were carried out with 1000 bootstrap resamples. External validation was conducted in order to verify the accuracy of our nomogram at 1 and 2 years by utilizing the clinicopathological data of 122 PC patients who underwent curative intended surgeries in 2015 in our centre. Age, abdominal pain, back pain, tumour location, preoperative neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, preoperative CA19-9, tumour differentiation, microscopic nerve invasion, microscopic vascular invasion, T stage, lymph node ratio, M stage and adjuvant chemotherapy were all assembled into nomogram. The concordance index (C-index) of internal and external validation was 0.702 and 0.688, respectively. The C-index of the TNM staging system was 0.572 (P

Comprehensive molecular landscaping studies reveal a potentially brighter future for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Blood-borne biomarkers obtained from minimally invasive “liquid biopsies” are now being trialled for early disease detection and to track responses to therapy. Integrated genomic and transcriptomic studies using resectable tumour material have defined intrinsic patient subtypes and actionable genomic segments that promise a shift towards genome-guided patient management. Multimodal mapping of PDAC using spatially resolved single cell transcriptomics and imaging techniques has identified new potentially therapeutically actionable cellular targets and is providing new insights into PDAC tumour heterogeneity. Despite these rapid advances, defining biomarkers for patient selection remain limited. This review examines the current PDAC cancer biomarker ecosystem (identified in tumour and blood) and explores how advances in single cell sequencing and spatially resolved imaging modalities are being used to uncover new targets for therapeutic intervention and are transforming our understanding of this difficult to treat disease.

Background: The progression and response to systemic treatment of cancer is substantially dependent on the balance between cancer cell death (apoptosis and necroptosis) and cancer cell survival (autophagy). Although well characterized in experimental systems, the status of cancer cell survival and cell death in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), especially in response to chemotherapy and different types of chemotherapy is poorly described. Results: The median (95% confidence interval) survival was 31.6 (24.5–44.5) months after FOLFIRINOX versus 15.8 (2.0–20.5) months after gemcitabine-based therapy (p = 0.039). PDAC tissue autophagy was reduced compared to normal pancreata based on reduced BECLIN-1 expression and LC3-Lamp-2 colocalization, whilst necroptosis (RIP-1) was increased. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with further reduced autophagy based on p62/SQSTM-1 accumulation, and increased necroptosis (RIP3 and pMLKL) and apoptosis (BAX, cleaved CASPASE-9 and CASPASE-3) markers, increased nuclear p65 (NF-κB) and extracellular HMGB1 expression, with greater CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration. Survival was associated with reduced autophagy and increased apoptosis. Necroptosis (RIP-3, pMLKL) and apoptosis (BAX and cleaved CASPASE-9) markers were higher after FOLFIRINOX than gemcitabine-based treatment. Patients and methods: Cancer cell autophagy, apoptosis, and necroptosis marker expression was compared in pancreatic tissue samples from 51 subjects, comprising four groups: (1) surgical resection for PDAC after FOLFIRINOX (n = 11), or (2) after gemcitabine-based (n = 14) neoadjuvant therapy, (3) patients undergoing PDAC resection without prior chemotherapy (n = 13), and (4) normal pancreata from 13 organ donors. Marker expression was undertaken using semi-automated immunofluorescence-FACS-like analysis, defining PDAC cells by CK-7+ expression.

BACKGROUND: Mortality in infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is dynamic over the course of the disease, with type and timing of interventions as well as persistent organ failure being key determinants. The timing of infection onset and how it pertains to mortality is not well defined. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between mortality and the development of early IPN. METHODS: International multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with IPN, confirmed by a positive microbial culture from (peri) pancreatic collections. The association between timing of infection onset, timing of interventions and mortality were assessed using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 743 patients from 19 centers across 3 continents with culture-confirmed IPN from 2000 to 2016 were evaluated, mortality rate was 20.9% (155/734). Early infection was associated with a higher mortality, when early infection occurred within the first 4 weeks from presentation with acute pancreatitis. After adjusting for comorbidity, advanced age, organ failure, enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition, early infection (=4 weeks) and early open surgery (=4 weeks) were associated with increased mortality [HR: 2.45 (95% CI: 1.63-3.67), p 0.05). CONCLUSION: Early infection was associated with increased mortality, independent of interventions. Early surgery remains a strong predictor of excess mortality.