Search

ObjectiveIn statin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), residual risk of cardiovascular events is partly explained by plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This study aimed to estimate individual benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition in CAD patients already treated with high-dose statin.MethodsIndividual lifetime benefit was estimated in months gain free of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) until age 80 years. Predictions were based on two competing risk models developed in data from 4853 patients with CAD originating from the atorvastatin 80 mg arm of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. The relative effect of PCSK9 inhibition was added to the models and was assumed based on average estimates from large clinical trials. We accounted for individual LDL-C levels, assuming 50% LDL-C reduction by PCSK9 inhibition and 21% cardiovascular risk reduction per mmol/L (39 mg/dL) LDL-C lowering.ResultsEstimated individual gain was 1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL). Estimated benefit was lowest (≤5 months) in older patients (≥70 years), in particular if LDL-C and other risk factors levels were low.ConclusionThe individual estimated lifetime benefit from PCSK9 inhibition in patients with stable CAD on high-dose statin varied from Trial registration numberNCT00327691; Post-results

Background: Among patients with clinically manifest vascular disease, the risk of recurrent vascular events is likely to vary. We assessed the distribution of estimated 10-year risk of recurrent vascular events in a secondary prevention population. We also estimated the potential risk reduction and residual risk that can be achieved if patients reach guideline-recommended risk factor targets. Methods: The SMART score (Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease) for 10-year risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death was applied to 6904 patients with vascular disease. The risk score was externally validated in 18 436 patients with various manifestations of vascular disease from the TNT (Treating to New Targets), IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering), SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels), and CAPRIE (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trials. The residual risk at guideline-recommended targets was estimated by applying relative risk reductions from meta-analyses to the estimated risk for targets for systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, physical activity, and use of antithrombotic agents. Results: The external performance of the SMART risk score was reasonable, apart from overestimation of risk in patients with 10-year risk >40%. In patients with various manifestations of vascular disease, median 10-year risk of a recurrent major vascular event was 17% (interquartile range, 11%–28%), varying from 30% in 22% of the patients. If risk factors were at guideline-recommended targets, the residual 10-year risk would be 30% in 9% of the patients (median, 11%; interquartile range, 7%–17%). Conclusions: Among patients with vascular disease, there is very substantial variation in estimated 10-year risk of recurrent vascular events. If all modifiable risk factors were at guideline-recommended targets, half of the patients would have a 10-year risk 20% and even >30% 10-year risk, clearly delineating an area of substantial unmet medical need.

Background: Diabetes is a robust risk factor for cardiovascular events which is marked in African Americans for reasons that may be attributed to socioeconomic and biologic vulnerabilities. Both structural (arterial thickening) and functional (arterial stiffness) abnormalities of the vasculature are predictive of incidental clinical events. Study objective was to determine the risk factors and relationship between large artery stiffness and carotid intimal thickness in African Americans with type II diabetes. Methods: 125 patients with diabetes were recruited from medical clinics. Medical information was obtained via interview and electronic medical record review. Large artery stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) using applanation tonometry. Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) was obtained using B-mode ultrasound image analysis of the common carotid artery. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23. Results: Mean age 60±8 years, 64% female. 82% hypertension, dyslipidemia 83%, diabetes duration 10.2±7.6 years, Mean HbA1C= 8.1±2.2%. Mean CIMT=0.68±0.15, PWV= 8.6±2.9. There was no significant association between PWV and CIMT. CIMT positively correlated with gender (r=0.302, p=0.001), smoking (r=0.278, p=0.002), creatinine (r=0.260, p=0.006), triglycerides (r=0.279, p=0.002), pooled cohort score (r=0.353, p=0.001), and negatively with HDL (r= -0.196, p=0.031). PWV positively correlated with creatinine (r=0.300, p=0.001), duration of diabetes (r=0.195, p=0.037) and age (β=0.359, p Conclusion: Our findings indicate that PWV and CIMT differ in risk factor profile in African Americans with type II diabetes mellitus. Further studies are needed to clarify mediating factors. Disclosure A. Eluwole: None. A.M. Adedayo: None. F. Tedla: None. A. Kremer: None. N. Mastrogiovanni: None. C. Rosenberg: None. P. Dreizen: None. J. LaRosa: None. L. Salciccioli: None. M. Boutjdir: None. M. Banerji: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. C. Brown: None. M. Salifu: None. A. Bakillah: None. J. Lazar: None.

Previous studies have shown that HDL isolated from human atherosclerotic lesions and the blood of patients with established coronary artery disease contains elevated levels of nitrated apolipoprotein AI (NT-apoAI). The significance of NT-apoAI in the pathogenesis of vascular diabetic complications is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between plasma NT-apoAI and vascular function in African-Americans diabetic patients. 125 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled over a 6 months period. Levels of plasma NT-apoAI was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Microvascular function was assessed by vascular reactivity index (VRI). Large artery stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was assessed by B-mode ultrasound image analysis. Patients population was divided in two groups (well-controlled: HbA1c ≤7.0%, N=54; poorly-controlled: HbA1c >7.0%, N=71). Mean age 60±8 years; 64% female; 80% had hypertension; 90% had dyslipidemia and 15% had CKD. Mean HbA1c levels were 8.1±2.2% and duration of diabetes was 10.29±3.79 years. NT-apoAI was negatively correlated with levels of apoAI and VRI in well-controlled patients but not in poorly-controlled patients (r= -0.298, p=0.025 and r= -0.265, p=0.042; respectively). Multi-regression analysis revealed that NT-apoAI was independently associated with VRI, but neither with PWV nor CIMT, after adjustment for independent variables such as age, gender, weight, hypertension, stroke, smoking, duration of diabetes, dyslipidemia, total cholesterol, HDLc, triglycerides, and LDLc (β= 0.001, p= 0.025; r2= 0.325 for the model). NT-apoAI, independently of other clinical variables, can predict microvascular dysfunction particularly in well-controlled diabetic patients. NT-apoAI could be used as marker to identify diabetic patients at risk of developing early vascular complications. Disclosure A.M. Adedayo: None. A. Eluwole: None. F. Tedla: None. A. Kremer: None. N. Mastrogiovanni: None. C. Rosenberg: None. P. Dreizen: None. J. LaRosa: None. L. Salciccioli: None. M. Boutjdir: None. M. Banerji: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. C. Brown: None. M. Salifu: None. J. Lazar: None. A. Bakillah: None.

Background: LDL plays a key role in development and progression of atherosclerosis. Elevated LDL amplifies the atherosclerotic process but the significance of modified LDL in pathogenesis of vascular complications is unclear. We aimed to assess plasma modified LDL levels and their relationship with vascular function in African American diabetic patients. Methods: 125 patients with type-2 diabetes were enrolled. Levels of glycated LDL (g-LDL), carbamylated LDL (c-LDL), nitrated LDL (n-LDL) and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) were quantified by ELISA. Microvascular function was assessed by vascular reactivity index (VRI), which assesses changes in digital temperature before and after release of arterial cuff occlusion. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessed arterial stiffness using applanation tonometry. B-mode ultrasound image analysis assessed Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). Patient population was divided into well-controlled: HbA1c ≤7.0%, N=54; poorly-controlled: HbA1c >7.0%, N=71. Results: Age 60±8 years; 64% Female, 80% Hypertension, 90% Dyslipidemia and 15% CKD. HbA1c level 8.1±2.2%, diabetes duration 10.29±3.79 years. Mean plasma g-LDL, c-LDL, n-LDL and ox-LDL were 1.56±0.64 mg/dL, 0.85±0.11 mg/dL, 2.33±0.39 ng/mL, and 61.93±9.25 ng/mL. Ox-LDL was positively correlated with CIMT in well-controlled patients (r= 0.45, p=0.001), but not in poorly-controlled (r= 0.12, p=0.30). Multi-regression analysis revealed ox-LDL was independently associated with CIMT, but neither with PWV nor VRI after adjustment for variables such as age, gender, weight, smoking, total cholesterol, HDLc, triglycerides, and LDLc (β= 0.003, p= 0.012; r2= 0.38). Conclusion: Ox-LDL offered better predictive value for CIMT in well-controlled patients than other forms of modified LDL. These data favor ox-LDL as potential marker to identify diabetic patients at risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular complications. Disclosure A.M. Adedayo: None. A. Eluwole: None. F. Tedla: None. A. Kremer: None. N. Mastrogiovanni: None. C. Rosenberg: None. P. Dreizen: None. J. LaRosa: None. L. Salciccioli: None. M. Boutjdir: None. M. Banerji: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. C. Brown: None. M. Salifu: None. J. Lazar: None. A. Bakillah: None.

Human F11 receptor (F11R) is an important cell adhesion molecule implicated in inflammatory thrombosis. F11R is associated with the presence and severity of cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes has been attributed to lack of bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), another key

Background— It is unclear whether levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) remain inversely associated with cardiovascular risk among patients who achieve very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on statin therapy. It is also unknown whether a rise in HDL-C or apoA-I after initiation of statin therapy is associated with a reduced cardiovascular risk. Methods and Results— We performed a meta-analysis of 8 statin trials in which lipids and apolipoproteins were determined in all study participants at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Individual patient data were obtained for 38 153 trial participants allocated to statin therapy, of whom 5387 suffered a major cardiovascular event. HDL-C levels were associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–0.86 per 1 standard deviation increment), as were apoA-I levels (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72–0.82). This association was also observed among patients achieving on-statin low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels Conclusions— Among patients treated with statin therapy, HDL-C and apoA-I levels were strongly associated with a reduced cardiovascular risk, even among those achieving very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. An apoA-I increase was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events, whereas for HDL-C this was not the case. These findings suggest that therapies that increase apoA-I concentration require further exploration with regard to cardiovascular risk reduction.

BACKGROUND This post hoc nested case-control analysis of the TNT study was designed to investigate whether baseline vitamin D level is a significant predictor of cardiovascular risk among statin-treated patients and whether changes in vitamin D after treatment with atorvastatin are associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS A total of 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg for a median of 4.9 years. This analysis included 1,509 patients (497 with a subsequent cardiovascular event and 1,012 without an event) with vitamin D levels determined at baseline and 1 year. Event rates were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model by baseline vitamin D levels, with vitamin D as a continuous variable, and with change in vitamin D level as the predictor. RESULTS Vitamin D deficiency (

Objective.To evaluate lipids and apolipoproteins as predictors of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (CVD) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA).Methods.In the pooled cohort of participants in the IDEAL, TNT, and CARDS trials, 50 had ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 36 had psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 21,641 did not have AS or PsA (non-SpA). We compared lipid levels at baseline between AS or PsA and non-SpA, and hazard ratios (HR) for CVD were calculated in a Cox proportional hazard model.Results.Atherogenic lipids were lower in samples from AS, but not in PsA, compared to non-SpA. The HR for 1 SD increase in baseline lipids for future CVD was for total cholesterol 1.39 (95% CI 0.82, 2.36) in AS, 1.01 (95% CI 0.44, 2.31) in PsA, and 1.10 (95% CI 1.07, 1.14) in non-SpA. Both high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein (ApoA-1) were significantly associated with CVD in AS (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.47, 9.06, and HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.02, 3.54, respectively), in contrast to PsA (HDL: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.49, 2.15; ApoA-1: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34, 1.89) and non-SpA (HDL: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.89; ApoA-1: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85, 0.91).Conclusion.HDL and ApoA-1 were surprisingly associated with increased risk of future CVD in patients with AS, whereas these lipids were protective in non-SpA.

Background— Carriers of the KIF6 719Arg variant may be at increased risk for CVD and may benefit more from statin therapy, in terms of CVD risk reduction, than noncarriers. Our objective was to investigate whether carriers of the KIF6 719Arg genetic variant (rs20455) are at increased cardiovascular risk and obtain more benefit from high-dose statin therapy than do noncarriers. Methods and Results— We used an adjusted Cox proportional hazard model to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for the reduction of major cardiovascular events by 80 mg/d atorvastatin over 10 mg/d atorvastatin in 4599 patients of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study and by 80 mg/d atorvastatin over 20–40 mg/d simvastatin in 6541 patients of the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid-Lowering (IDEAL) study. A total of 381 and 648 patients had a cardiovascular event during follow-up in TNT and IDEAL, respectively. Heterozygotes and homozygotes for the minor allele were not at increased risk compared with noncarriers. In TNT, for noncarriers of the 719Arg allele, the HR for high- versus low-dose atorvastatin was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.11). In carriers of 1 or 2 minor alleles, the HR was 0.85 (0.66–1.11) and carriers of 2 copies of the minor allele obtained a significant risk reduction (HR: 0.44, 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.84). In IDEAL, the respective HRs were 0.85 (0.67–1.10), 0.88 (0.62–1.07) and 0.91 (0.58–1.43). The interaction term for carrier status by treatment was also nonsignificant ( P =0.810 in TNT and P =0.909 in IDEAL). Conclusions— In these 2 large, randomized clinical trials, carriers of the KIF6 719Arg allele were not at increased cardiovascular risk and did not obtain consistent cardiovascular benefit from high-dose statin therapy compared with noncarriers. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00327691.

Aim In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a J-curve relationship has been reported between blood pressure (BP) and future cardiovascular events. However, this is controversial. The purpose of the study was to determine the relationship between on-treatment BP and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CAD. Methods and results We evaluated 10 001 patients with CAD and a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level

Analyses of randomized clinical trials are usually restricted to examination of time to first event. However, because many patients have multiple events, this approach precludes much potentially useful clinical and economic data. To assess the effect on overall disease burden in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study, we evaluated the effect of treatment with atorvastatin 80 versus 10 mg in the period after the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event. In TNT, 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease received double-blind therapy with atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg and were followed for 4.9 years. Post hoc time-to-event analysis was used to estimate separate hazard ratios for time to any first, second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent cardiovascular events. During TNT, 3,082 patients had a first recurrent cardiovascular event, with 1,516, 698, 345, and 197 developing second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent events, respectively. In patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg, the relative risk of a first recurrent event was significantly decreased compared to those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg. Significant benefit with the 80-mg dose was also observed for second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent events. Similar findings were recorded in 5,854 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome and in 3,809 patientsor = 65 years of age compared to younger patients. In conclusion, treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg continued to significantly decrease the risk of any cardiovascular event over time compared to atorvastatin 10 mg in patients who had survived previous events. In TNT, analyses limited to the primary end point significantly underestimated the decrease in total cardiovascular disease burden achieved by intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering.

The Treating to New Targets (TNT) study demonstrated that intensive atorvastatin therapy to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations well below recommended target levels provides an incremental clinical benefit in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This post hoc analysis of the TNT study was conducted to investigate whether this benefit extends to patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 10,001 patients with clinically evident coronary artery disease, including 5,407 patients with previous PCI, were randomized to atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg/day and followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event. Revascularization, a component of a secondary end point, was also examined. In patients with previous PCI, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at study end were 79.5 mg/dl in the 80-mg arm and 100.8 mg/dl in the 10-mg arm. First major cardiovascular events occurred in 230 patients (8.6%) receiving high-dose atorvastatin and 289 patients (10.6%) receiving low-dose atorvastatin (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.94, p = 0.008). Repeat revascularization during follow-up (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting) was performed in 466 patients (17.3%) in the 80-mg arm and 624 patients (22.9%) in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.82, p

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this post hoc analysis from the TNT (Treating to New Targets) trial is to determine whether patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery achieved clinical benefit from intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol lowering. BACKGROUND: The development and progression of atherosclerosis is accelerated in coronary venous bypass grafts. METHODS: A total of 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease, including 4,654 with previous CABG, were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg/day and were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke). RESULTS: A first major cardiovascular event occurred in 11.4% of the patients with prior CABG and 8.5% of those without prior CABG (p < 0.001). In CABG patients, mean LDL-cholesterol levels at study end were 79 mg/dl in the 80-mg arm and 101 mg/dl in the 10-mg arm, and the primary event rate was 9.7% in the 80-mg arm and 13.0% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.87, p = 0.0004). Repeat revascularization during follow-up, either CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention, was performed in 11.3% of the CABG patients in the 80-mg arm and 15.9% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.82, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive LDL-cholesterol lowering to a mean of 79 mg/dl with atorvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with previous CABG reduces major cardiovascular events by 27% and the need for repeat coronary revascularization by 30%, compared with less intensive cholesterol-lowering to a mean of 101 mg/dl with atorvastatin 10 mg/day. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691)

BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels are a strong inverse predictor of cardiovascular events. However, it is not clear whether this association is maintained at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the recently completed Treating to New Targets (TNT) study assessed the predictive value of HDL cholesterol levels in 9770 patients. The primary outcome measure was the time to a first major cardiovascular event, defined as death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal non-procedure-related myocardial infarction, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke. The predictive relationship between HDL cholesterol levels at the third month of treatment with statins and the time to the first major cardiovascular event was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses and was also assessed for specific LDL cholesterol strata, including subjects with LDL cholesterol levels below 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter). RESULTS: The HDL cholesterol level in patients receiving statins was predictive of major cardiovascular events across the TNT study cohort, both when HDL cholesterol was considered as a continuous variable and when subjects were stratified according to quintiles of HDL cholesterol level. When the analysis was stratified according to LDL cholesterol level in patients receiving statins, the relationship between HDL cholesterol level and major cardiovascular events was of borderline significance (P=0.05). Even among study subjects with LDL cholesterol levels below 70 mg per deciliter, those in the highest quintile of HDL cholesterol level were at less risk for major cardiovascular events than those in the lowest quintile (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, HDL cholesterol levels were predictive of major cardiovascular events in patients treated with statins. This relationship was also observed among patients with LDL cholesterol levels below 70 mg per deciliter. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00327691 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)

High-dose statin therapy has been demonstrated to provide incremental benefit when low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations are lowered well below recommended target levels. This secondary analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study was conducted to investigate whether the attainment of very low LDL cholesterol levels was associated with a further reduction in major cardiovascular events compared with higher LDL cholesterol concentrations and whether any incremental benefit was achieved without additional safety risk. Patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effects on cerebrovascular events of treating patients with stable coronary disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially below 100 mg/dl. BACKGROUND: Lowering LDL-C with statins has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with stable coronary disease. In observational studies, naturally low cholesterol levels have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The cerebrovascular benefits of treating patients with stable coronary disease to LDL-C levels substantially below 100 mg/dl have not been previously investigated. METHODS: We describe an analysis of cerebrovascular events in the Treating to New Targets study, a trial where 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day and followed for a median of 4.9 years. RESULTS: Mean LDL-C levels were 101 mg/dl on 10 mg atorvastatin and 77 mg/dl on 80 mg. In addition to the reduction in major cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.89; p = 0.0002), the primary end point of the trial, patients in the 80-mg arm experienced a reduction in cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93; p = 0.007) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). Each 1-mg/dl reduction in LDL-C with treatment was associated with a 0.6% relative risk reduction in cerebrovascular events (p = 0.002) and a 0.5% relative risk reduction in stroke (p = 0.041). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was similar in the 80-mg and 10-mg groups, 16 and 18 respectively, and the hemorrhagic strokes were distributed evenly across quintiles of achieved LDL-C during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with established coronary disease, treating to an LDL-cholesterol substantially below 100 mg/dl with 80 mg/day atorvastatin reduces both stroke and cerebrovascular events by an additional 20% to 25% compared with the 10 mg/day dose. An increase in hemorrhagic stroke was not seen at low LDL-C levels. (Treating to New Targets; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00327691)

OBJECTIVE—The Treating to New Targets study showed that intensive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day provides significant clinical benefit beyond that afforded by atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). The objective of our study was to investigate whether similar benefits of high-dose intensive atorvastatin therapy can be achieved in patients with CHD and diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 1,501 patients with diabetes and CHD, with LDL cholesterol levels of RESULTS—End-of-treatment mean LDL cholesterol levels were 98.6 mg/dl with atorvastatin 10 mg and 77.0 mg/dl with atorvastatin 80 mg. A primary event occurred in 135 patients (17.9%) receiving atorvastatin 10 mg, compared with 103 patients (13.8%) receiving atorvastatin 80 mg (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.58–0.97], P = 0.026). Significant differences between the groups in favor of atorvastatin 80 mg were also observed for time to cerebrovascular event (0.69 [0.48–0.98], P = 0.037) and any cardiovascular event (0.85 [0.73–1.00], P = 0.044). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the rates of treatment-related adverse events and persistent elevations in liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS—Among patients with clinically evident CHD and diabetes, intensive therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg significantly reduced the rate of major cardiovascular events by 25% compared with atorvastatin 10 mg.

Evolution of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) guidelines for lipid lowering reflects a movement toward global risk assessment, including improved identification of risk in individuals without established coronary heart disease (CHD), and toward more aggressive lipid-lowering targets to reduce CHD risk. The current guidelines, for example, identify a segment of the population without established CHD as being at high risk on the basis of criteria that indicate CHD risk equivalency, recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma level

Recent clinical trials of statins have clearly demonstrated the benefit of statin therapy in preventing both coronary and cerebral vascular events. These benefits have been demonstrated to be present without reference to older age, sex, or comorbid conditions, including hypertension and diabetes. Future trials will test the value of more aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering, the value of immediate statin intervention during acute coronary syndromes, the role of cholesterol lowering with or without angioplasty, and the role of cholesterol lowering in stroke prevention.

Atherosclerosis was relatively uncommon 100 years ago, when researchers first established its link to elevated cholesterol. As the twentieth century progressed, however, factors such as high-fat diets, sedentary lifestyles, cigarette smoking, and urbanization combined to increase the prevalence of both hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease (CHD) throughout the developed world. Atherogenesis begins at an early age and progresses throughout life, and cholesterol levels during young adulthood strongly predict the risk of CHD and related mortality during the ensuing decades. The total cholesterol level in youth also determines the actual age at which a critical level of atherosclerosis will be reached. Early studies on the primary and secondary prevention of CHD failed to identify a linear relationship between lipid lowering and risk reduction, primarily because older lipid-lowering agents lacked the potency to reduce cholesterol levels significantly enough to achieve lower cardiovascular event and mortality rates. The introduction of the statins, with their powerful lipid-lowering activity, overcame this limitation. Several large-scale trials of statins firmly established the efficacy of these agents in both primary and secondary CHD prevention. With the availability of statin therapy, we are now able to reduce the risk of major adverse CHD events by an average of 30%, regardless of patient age or gender.

Until the recent introduction of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), the potential effect of cholesterol lowering on the prevention of clinical manifestations of coronary disease was a matter of debate. In trials conducted before the introduction of statins, cholesterol levels were lowered, on average, by only approximately 10%, resulting in prevention of coronary events but with no effect on total mortality rates. However, statins have been able to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by a mean of roughly 28%, significantly decreasing both relative and absolute risk levels of coronary events and total mortality. These benefits have been demonstrated not only in middle-aged men but also in women and patients aged >65 years. Aggressive cholesterol lowering has also been shown to yield larger decreases in the incidence of subsequent coronary events than angioplasty, and to reduce the occurrence of such events in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery, which raises the question of whether these procedures should be relegated to symptom relief, with cholesterol lowering as the primary means of coronary heart disease event prevention. Statins, therefore, have unequivocally shown the importance of cholesterol lowering in the prevention of morbidity and mortality due to coronary disease. Ongoing research will elucidate the role of statin therapy in the prevention of strokes and in the treatment of patients aged >75 years, and future trials will be needed to evaluate the potential role of statins in primary prevention for younger populations who cannot control cholesterol with lifestyle changes.

Elevated triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are more important coronary risk factors in women, and elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels less important in women, than men. There is clear-cut evidence in clinical trials that the benefit of cholesterol lowering in women and men is virtually identical. Modifiers of lipids and lipoproteins in women include diabetes mellitus, bodyweight and its distribution, and menopausal status. Diabetes is a more powerful predictor of risk in women than men. This may relate to the importance of elevated triglycerides as a risk factor in women, and to the effects of lipoprotein glycosylation, which lead to increased susceptibility to arterial deposition of LDL and decreased reverse cholesterol transport with HDL. Therapy for lipoprotein disorders in women and men is identical. For the overwhelming majority of patients, treatment with statin therapy is both highly efficacious and well tolerated.

Lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels is a worthwhile intervention in older (more than 65-70 years of age) subjects, since age itself is a powerful predictor of vascular disease risk. Although studies have not consistently demonstrated an overall beneficial effect on total mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are favorably affected. The drugs most extensively studied are statins, but similar results are at least suggested for other agents. The efficacy, safety, and benefits of statins make them the drugs of choice. Statin intolerance can be managed and should not lead immediately to an abandonment of therapy. In cases in which it cannot be overcome, other lipid-lowering drugs, either singly or in combination, can be used, although their side effects are generally more problematic and their benefits are less prominent. In older patients, prevention of disability from stroke, heart disease, or peripheral vascular diseases may be as important a goal as an overall beneficial effect on mortality, which, in the long run, is unavoidable.

Poor compliance with prescribed regimens remains a potent barrier to good outcomes in coronary heart disease and other chronic diseases. Such poor compliance is related to disease, patient, provider, and treatment factors and has yet to be fully understood. In general, the less complex the regimen, the better informed the patient and the physician, and the more serious the disease, the better the compliance.

The most common cause of death in both men and women is coronary atherosclerosis, although atherosclerotic death in women occurs 5 to 10 years later than it does in men. Major risk factors predict coronary risk in both. Available evidence suggests that women benefit from cholesterol lowering just as men do. The role of exogenous estrogenic compounds in favorably affecting lipoprotein levels and promoting antiatherogenesis in both men and women is a promising area for future research.

A new model for the development of atherosclerosis is emerging (1,2). The development process, called atherogenesis, is now thought to begin with metabolic dysfunction of the endothelial cells that line the innermost portion of the arterial wall. Endothelial dysfunction precedes visible changes in endothelial structure. Dysfunctional endothelium loses its ability to maintain vascular smooth muscle relaxation and instead promotes vasospasm, chemotaxis and inflammation, platelet aggregation, and diminished clot lysis. Endothelial dysfunction appears to occur di, ffusely, rather than discretely, in affected vessels. Accordingly, local anatomical interventions, such as bypass surgery or angioplasty, can be expected to have only limited success in the treatment of patients with atherosclerotic disease. More definitive treatments must be directed at the risk factors initiating or enhancing atherogenesis. Such interventions are more likely to be medical than surgical or mechanical. With appropriate understanding of the underlying process of atherogenesis and its clinical manifestations, such medical interventions can be carried out within the boundaries of everyday practice.

The Framingham Heart Study has contributed importantly to understanding of the causes of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases. Framingham research has helped define the quantitative and additive nature of these causes or, as they are now called, “cardiovascular risk factors.”1 The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)2 3 has made extensive use of Framingham data in developing its strategy for preventing CHD by controlling high cholesterol levels. The NCEP guidelines2 3 adjust the intensity of cholesterol-lowering therapy with absolute risk as determined by summation of risk factors. The National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) has set forth a parallel approach for blood pressure control. In contrast to the NCEP,2 however, earlier NHBPEP reports issued through the Joint National Committee4 did not match the intensity of therapy to absolute risk for CHD. “Normalization” of blood pressure is the essential goal of therapy regardless of risk status. Blood pressure–lowering therapy is carried out as much for prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular complications as for reduction of CHD risk. Nonetheless, risk assessment could be important for making decisions about type and intensity of therapy for hypertension. Thus, the most recent Joint National Committee report5 gives more attention to risk stratification for adjustment of therapy for hypertension. Although Framingham data have already been influential in the development of national guidelines for risk factor management, the opportunity may exist for both cholesterol and blood pressure programs to draw more extensively from Framingham results when formulating improved risk assessment guidelines and recommending more specific strategies for risk factor modification. The American Heart Association has previously used Framingham risk factor data to prepare charts for estimating CHD risk. Framingham investigators of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute prepared the original charts and have now revised …

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse disease of arteries. It cannot be definitively treated by procedures such as bypass surgery or angioplasty which correct only discrete anatomical lesions. The only definitive treatments for atherosclerosis are medical. In both men and women with coronary disease, treatment includes interventions such as smoking cessation, lipid management and blood pressure lowering, restriction of dietary calories, fat, and salt, increased physical activity, body weight reduction, β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs during the first 6 to 12 months or so after an infarct, and, in patients with congestive heart failure, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.

Background— Clinicians need to identify coronary artery disease patients for whom the benefits of high-dose versus usual-dose statin therapy outweigh potential harm. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a model for prediction of the incremental treatment effect of high-dose statins for individual patients in terms of reduction of 5-year absolute risk for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary death, or cardiac resuscitation. Methods and Results— Based on data from the Treating to New Targets trial (TNT; n=10 001), a Cox proportional hazards model was developed comprising 13 easy-to-measure clinical predictors: age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, congestive heart failure or abdominal aortic aneurysm, glomerular filtration rate, and treatment status (ie, atorvastatin 80 mg or 10 mg). External validation in the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering trial (IDEAL; n=8888) confirmed adequate goodness-of-fit and calibration, but moderate discrimination (C-statistic, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.65). Still, among participants of both trials combined, the model identified a group of 11.7% whose predicted 5-year number needed to treat was ≤25 and a group of 41.9% whose predicted needed to treat was ≥50. A decision curve shows that making treatment decisions on the basis of predictions using our model may improve net benefit. Conclusions— Estimation of the incremental treatment effect of high-dose versus usual-dose statin therapy in individual coronary artery disease patients enables selection of high-risk patients that benefit most from more aggressive therapy. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00327691 and NCT00159835.

One of the most vexing conundrums in the science and practice of medicine is the designation of arbitrary “cutpoints” separating what we will consider normal from abnormal. We can pretend that a blood pressure of 121 mm Hg is different from one of 119 mm Hg, but we should not take that literally

Risk factors that predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in younger individuals also predict risk in older people. Although the relative risk of cardiovascular disease associated with any given risk factor may decrease as individuals get older, the absolute risk of morbidity and mortality increases markedly with age. Because the elderly carry the greatest burden of atherosclerosis, they should not be excluded automatically from cholesterol-lowering interventions with either diet or drugs. Such interventions, however, should be undertaken with special attention to their potential adverse effects in the older population.

Based on the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes data derived predominantly from 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) trials, guidelines have set low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets at successively lower levels over time. Recent data have demonstrated that more-intensive statin therapy (and, consequently, lower LDL cholesterol level) is more effective at reducing CV events than less-intensive statin therapy. Although the average LDL cholesterol level for a United States adult is 119 mg/dl, within the "normal" range (90 to 130 mg/dl) per the United States National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, data from fetal studies, diet studies, contemporary hunter-gatherer populations, and other mammals have suggested that the "normal" physiologic range for LDL cholesterol in humans is likely 50 to 70 mg/dl. Low LDL cholesterol levels have been sporadically associated with an increased risk of cancer, hemorrhagic stroke, and other complications in population studies and clinical trials. However, statin clinical trials have generally not demonstrated correlations between on-treatment LDL cholesterol levels and safety. Clinical data have suggested a linear relation between LDL cholesterol lowering and CV risk reduction, supporting a favorable risk/benefit ratio for attaining very low levels of LDL cholesterol to minimize the risk of CV events. In conclusion, clinical trial evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of LDL cholesterol lowering to a very low level is essential to ascertain the benefits and risks in reducing the residual risk of vascular disease.

CONTEXT: Statin therapy has been associated with pancreatitis in observational studies. Although lipid guidelines recommend fibrate therapy to reduce pancreatitis risk in persons with hypertriglyceridemia, fibrates may lead to the development of gallstones, a risk factor for pancreatitis.\ud \ud OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between statin or fibrate therapy and incident pancreatitis in large randomized trials.\ud \ud DATA SOURCES: Relevant trials were identified in literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science (January 1, 1994, for statin trials and January 1, 1972, for fibrate trials, through June 9, 2012). Published pancreatitis data were tabulated where available (6 trials). Unpublished data were obtained from investigators (22 trials).\ud \ud STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled cardiovascular end-point trials investigating effects of statin therapy or fibrate therapy. Studies with more than 1000 participants followed up for more than 1 year were included.\ud \ud DATA EXTRACTION: Trial-specific data described numbers of participants developing pancreatitis and change in triglyceride levels at 1 year. Trial-specific risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and combined using random-effects model meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.\ud \ud RESULTS: In 16 placebo- and standard care-controlled statin trials with 113,800 participants conducted over a weighted mean follow-up of 4.1 (SD, 1.5) years, 309 participants developed pancreatitis (134 assigned to statin, 175 assigned to control) (RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.97; P = .03; I2 = 0%]). In 5 dose-comparison statin trials with 39,614 participants conducted over 4.8 (SD, 1.7) years, 156 participants developed pancreatitis (70 assigned to intensive dose, 86 assigned to moderate dose) (RR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.59-1.12; P = .21; I2 = 0%]). Combined results for all 21 statin trials provided RR 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95; P = .01; I2 = 0%). In 7 fibrate trials with 40,162 participants conducted over 5.3 (SD, 0.5) years, 144 participants developed pancreatitis (84 assigned to fibrate therapy, 60 assigned to placebo) (RR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.00-1.95; P = .053; I2 = 0%]).\ud \ud CONCLUSION: In a pooled analysis of randomized trial data, use of statin therapy was associated with a lower risk of pancreatitis in patients with normal or mildly elevated triglyceride levels.

Objective To examine the effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a composite cardiovascular outcome (cardiovascular disease [CVD]), consisting of mortality and morbidity end points, in patients with inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], ankylosing spondylitis [AS], or psoriatic arthritis [PsA]) by post hoc analysis of 2 prospective trials of statins with a secondary end point of CVD outcome (the Treating to New Targets [TNT] and Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering [IDEAL] studies). Methods Of the 18,889 patients participating in the 2 trials, 199 had RA, 46 had AS, and 35 had PsA. Lipid-lowering therapy consisted of an intensive regimen of atorvastatin 80 mg or a conventional/low-dose regimen of atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20–40 mg. The median duration of followup was nearly 5 years. Changes in lipid levels were examined by analyses of covariance. The effect on CVD was examined by Cox regression analyses, and heterogeneity tests were performed. Results Patients with RA and those with AS had lower baseline cholesterol levels than patients without inflammatory joint disease (least squares mean ± SEM 180.7 ± 2.3 mg/dl and 176.5 ± 4.7 mg/dl, respectively, versus 185.6 ± 0.2 mg/dl; P = 0.03 and P = 0.05, respectively). Statin treatment led to a comparable decrease in lipid levels and a 20% reduction in overall risk of CVD in both patients with and those without inflammatory joint disease. Conclusion Our findings indicate that patients with and those without inflammatory joint disease experience comparable lipid-lowering effects and CVD risk reduction after intensive treatment with statins.

This post hoc nested case-control analysis of the TNT study was designed to investigate whether baseline vitamin D level is a significant predictor of cardiovascular risk among statin-treated patients and whether changes in vitamin D after treatment with atorvastatin are associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes.A total of 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg for a median of 4.9 years. This analysis included 1,509 patients (497 with a subsequent cardiovascular event and 1,012 without an event) with vitamin D levels determined at baseline and 1 year. Event rates were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model by baseline vitamin D levels, with vitamin D as a continuous variable, and with change in vitamin D level as the predictor.Vitamin D deficiency (15 ng/mL) or insufficiency (15-30 ng/mL) was present in 108 (7.2%) of 1,509 and 625 (41.4%) of 1,509 of patients, whereas 46 (3.0%) of 1,509 had elevated vitamin D. There was no relationship between baseline vitamin D levels or change in vitamin D levels and cardiovascular events or mortality. Modeling of events with vitamin D as a continuous variable similarly showed no relationship of vitamin D to events. These findings held true after adjustment for seasonal variations in vitamin D and other confounders.In statin-treated patients with stable coronary heart disease, vitamin D levels did not predict cardiovascular risk. Changes in plasma concentrations of vitamin D after 1 year of treatment made no contribution to the efficacy of atorvastatin therapy.

Cholesterol lowering in both primary and secondary prevention has been clearly demonstrated to lower coronary morbidity and, in secondary prevention, to lower coronary mortality as well. Putative dangers of cholesterol lowering remain unproven. Population studies linking low cholesterol to noncoronary mortalities do not demonstrate cause-and-effect relations. In fact, based on current studies, the opposite is more likely to be the case. Neither gender nor age should automatically exclude persons from cholesterol screening. Drug intervention, however, should be used conservatively, particularly in young adults and the elderly. Drugs should be used only after diet and lifestyle interventions have failed. The evidence linking high blood cholesterol to coronary atherosclerosis and cholesterol lowering to its prevention is broad-based and definitive. Concerns about cholesterol lowering and spontaneously low cholesterols should be pursued but should not interfere with the implementation of current public policies to reduce the still heavy burden of atherosclerosis in Western society.

Dyslipoproteinemia is prevalent in women as well as in men. In both, its consequences of premature atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) morbidity and mortality are common. Although clinical evidence of the benefits of cholesterol lowering is less abundant in women, it is not entirely absent. As in men, cholesterol lowering in women is associated with a decline in CAD risk and regression of coronary atherosclerosis.

In 875 predominantly white (89%), postmenopausal women, aged 45–-65 years, enrolled in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial, univariate analysis showed that mean total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B, and triglyceride (TG) levels were positively associated with age (p < 0.01) across 5-year age groups, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I did not vary by age. HDL-C levels were positively associated with leisure time exercise level (p < 0.01), income (p < 0.01), alcohol intake (p < 0.01), and education level (p < 0.05). Current smokers have lower HDL-C levels than former smokers and those who never smoked (p < 0.01). TG levels were negatively associated with leisure time exercise (p < 0.01) and education (p < 0.01), and higher TG levels occurred in current smokers compared with former smokers and those who never smoked (p < 0.05). LDL-C showed no significant associations with these lifestyle varia...

Major risk factors predict coronary risk in both women and men. It is inadvisable and unwarranted to suggest that women be excluded from cholesterol screening. In fact, what evidence is available suggests that women, similar to men, benefit from cholesterol lowering. This is not an insignificant issue. Women, similar to men, die mostly of coronary atherosclerosis, although atherosclerotic death in women occurs 5 to 10 years later than in men. There are some risk factors that are unique in women. LDL-c levels may be less predictive of risk in women than in men; HDL-c levels may be more predictive. Triglycerides are a stronger predictor of risk in women than in men. Finally, diabetes is a major risk factor in women and almost eliminates the differences in risk seen in comparing nondiabetic men and women. Exogenous gonadal hormones, both in the form of OCs and HRT, have the potential to influence coronary risk in women. In premenopausal women, use of OCs is associated with increased risk of coronary disease in women who smoke, particularly in women older than age 35. In postmenopausal women, estrogen use is generally associated with protection against coronary disease. These results may be in part due to favorable effects on circulating lipoproteins but may as well be related to the protective effects of estrogen on the arterial wall. Definitive recommendations about the use of estrogen in postmenopausal women for the primary prevention of coronary disease await the completion of clinical trials of estrogen alone and in combination with progestins. Cholesterol and its lipoprotein subfractions continue to be predictors of both morbidity and mortality in older populations. The value of cholesterol-altering therapy in older individuals is not as well established in clinical trials as in middle-aged men. Nevertheless, there is good reason to believe that the results from both primary and secondary prevention studies in younger individuals can readily be extrapolated to older individuals. In particular, individuals with symptomatic coronary disease but a relatively good prognosis should be offered the same benefits from secondary prevention as younger individuals. Thus, although data are more limited in women and the elderly than in middle-aged men, there is good reason to believe that cholesterol interventions are likely to be effective, particularly in postmenopausal women and in older individuals with established coronary disease. To withhold therapy based simply on gender or chronologic age is a mistake.

O a vigorously debated subject, the importance of cholesterol lowering in the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) is now well established. Cholesterol lowering has been demonstrated to be a powerful factor in reducing morbidity and mortality resulting from coronary atherosclerosis. As such, it is reasonable to ask what role it has to play in the treatment of older patients. The older population is increasing rapidly in the United States, both in absolute number and as a percentage of the population. The incidence of new CHD events and prevalence of coronary deaths are highest in those aged 65 years,1 and 85% of all deaths attributable to CHD occur in this group.2 At one time, the idea that preventive medicine had value in persons who were closer to the end rather than the beginning of their lives would have been dismissed. However, preventive measures, cannot only extend life but can also decrease morbidity and therefore prevent disability and improve quality of life.