Search

Background: Acute on chronic pancreatitis (ACP) is a relatively common condition, but there are significant gaps in our knowledge on the definition, incidence, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Methods: A systematic review that followed PICO (Population; Intervention; Comparator; Outcome) recommendation for quantitative questions and PICo (Population, Phenomenon of Interest, Context) for qualitative research was done to answer 10 of the most relevant questions about ACP. Quality of evidence was judged by the GRADE criteria (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The manuscript was sent for review to 12 international experts from various disciplines and continents using a Delphi process. Results: The quality of evidence, for most statements, was low to very low, which means that the recommendations in general are only conditional. Despite that, it was possible to reach strong levels of agreement by the expert panel for all 10 questions. A new consensus definition of ACP was reached. Although common, the real incidence of ACP is not known, with alcohol as a major risk factor. Although pain dominates, other non-specific symptoms and signs can be present. Serum levels of pancreatic enzymes may be less than 3 times the upper limit of normal and cross-sectional imaging is considered more accurate for the diagnosis in many cases. It appears that it is less severe and with a lower mortality risk than acute pancreatitis.Conclusions: Although the evidence base is poor, this position statement provides a foundation from which to advance management of ACP.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of IAP and EPC. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis represent high morbidity diseases, which are frequently associated with chronic abdominal pain, pancreatic insufficiencies, and reduced quality of life. Currently, there are no therapies to reverse or delay disease progression, and clinical trials are needed to investigate potential interventions that would address this important gap. This conference report provides details regarding information shared during a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-sponsored workshop on Clinical Trials in Pancreatitis that sought to clearly delineate the current gaps and opportunities related to the design and conduct of patient-focused trials in recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis. Key stakeholders including representatives from patient advocacy organizations, physician investigators (including clinical trialists), the US Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health convened to discuss challenges and opportunities with particular emphasis on lessons learned from trials in participants with other painful conditions, as well as the value of incorporating the patient perspective throughout all stages of trials.

Measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is important for management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Intra-bladder pressure (IBP) is an indirect index that reflects IAP, but measuring techniques vary. We sought to optimise IBP measuring techniques in predicted SAP patients.Predicted SAP patients consecutively admitted between June 2018 and January 2020 were scrutinised. Eligible patients had their IBP monitored for the first 72 h at 6-h intervals, and were then sequentially allocated into three research scenarios: (1) in the supine position along with head of bed elevation(HoBE)of 0, 15 and 30° at various points including the iliac crest the midaxillary line, pubic symphysis, and right atrium level, instilled with 25 mL normal saline (NS) at room temperature (RT); (2) NS instillation volume from 0, 10, 25, 40-50 mL at the iliac crest with HoBE15 at RT; and (3) NS instillation (25 mL) at either RT or 37 °C with HoBE15.The dynamic IBP values measured at the pubic symphysis and iliac crest were fairly similar between HoBE0 and HoBE15 (all P 0.05), but greatly increased at HoBE30 (all P 0.01). IBP was significantly increased with escalating instillation volumes of NS (all P 0.01 versus 0 mL NS), while there was no significant difference between 25 mL and 10 mL (P = 0.055). IBP was similar between NS at RT and under 37 °C (P = 0.643).In predicted SAP patients, measuring IBP at the iliac crest with HoBE15 after instilling 10 mL of NS seems to be appropriate for monitoring IAP.

Acute Mesenteric Ischaemic (AMI) is a rare condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Many causes of AMI exist, which usually begin with mucosal injury. Onset is insiduous and there is frequent diagnostic delay. Current treatments can only control established injury and prevent propagation, hence new interventions are needed. The prevention and treatment of AMI by intraluminal delivery of oxygen has yet to be investigated in the clinical setting. This article aims to systemically review experimental studies investigating this novel therapy.Following the PRISMA guidelines, searches of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE databases were performed up to June 2022. Two independent investigators extracted the data.There were 20 experimental studies, 16 of which used an occlusive ischaemia reperfusion model. Six different formulations were used to deliver intraluminal oxygen, with perflurocarbon being the most common. Studies consistently showed local and systemic benefits. Intraluminal oxygen therapy improved histological severity of mucosal injury in all studies when oxygen was delivered during the ischaemia phase, but could cause harm if given during the reperfusion phase. Improvement was also demonstrated in endpoints assessing intestinal function, biomarkers of intestinal damage, measures of systemic physiological derangement and mortality.Intraluminal oxygenation appears to be an effective treatment for AMI. There remain significant questions regarding optimal timing and delivery formulation before clinical translation of this treatment strategy.

The cisterna chyli is a lymphatic structure found at the caudal end of the thoracic duct that receives lymph draining from the abdominal and pelvic viscera and lower limbs. In addition to being an important landmark in retroperitoneal surgery, it is the key gateway for interventional radiology procedures targeting the thoracic duct. A detailed understanding of its anatomy is required to facilitate more accurate intervention, but an exhaustive summary is lacking. A systematic review was conducted, and 49 published human studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies included both healthy volunteers and patients and were not restricted by language or date. The detectability of the cisterna chyli is highly variable, ranging from 1.7 to 98%, depending on the study method and criteria used. Its anatomy is variable in terms of location (vertebral level of T10 to L3), size (ranging 2–32 mm in maximum diameter and 13–80 mm in maximum length), morphology, and tributaries. The size of the cisterna chyli increases in some disease states, though its utility as a marker of disease is uncertain. The anatomy of the cisterna chyli is highly variable, and it appears to increase in size in some disease states. The lack of well-defined criteria for the structure and the wide variation in reported detection rates prevent accurate estimation of its natural prevalence in humans.

The goals and approaches to fluid therapy vary through different stages of resuscitation. This pilot study was designed to test the safety and feasibility of a fluid therapy protocol for the second or optimisation stage of resuscitation in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).Spontaneously breathing patients with predicted SAP were admitted after initial resuscitation and studied over a 24-h period in a tertiary hospital ward. Objective clinical assessment (OCA; heart rate, mean arterial pressure, urine output, and haematocrit) was done at 0, 4, 8, 12, 18-20, and 24 h. All patients had mini-fluid challenge (MFC; 250 ml intravenous normal saline within 10 min) at 0 h and repeated at 4 and 8 h if OCA score ≥2. Patients who were fluid responsive (10% change in stroke volume after MFC) received 5-10 ml/kg/h, otherwise 1-3 ml/kg/h until the next time point. Passive leg raising test (PLRT) was done at each time point and compared with OCA for assessing volume status and predicting fluid responsiveness.This fluid therapy protocol based on OCA, MFC, and PLRT and designed for the second stage of resuscitation was safe and feasible in spontaneously breathing predicted SAP patients. The PLRT was superior to OCA (at 0 and 8 h) for predicting fluid responsiveness and guiding fluid therapy.This pilot study found that a protocol for intravenous fluid therapy specifically for the second stage of resuscitation in patients with predicted SAP was safe, feasible, and warrants further investigation.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction/failure (GDF) is a common cause of concern in critically ill patients. Although the gut plays an important role in the genesis of organ failure, its exclusion from organ severity scoring systems has made it challenging for intensivists to score it sufficiently at the bedside. We aimed to survey intensive care specialists about their perceptions, attitudes, and approaches towards the assessment of the gut in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs). An electronic (online) questionnaire was used to survey intensive care specialists from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). The survey comprised 10 questions focused on four key areas: (i) the extent of the problem with GDF in ICUs, (ii) the use and reliability of the current gut scoring tools, (iii) personal approaches and practices associated with GDF assessment, and (4) potential value of a novel GDF scoring system and its incorporation into an organ severity score. Our results showed that GDF was a significant concern amongst ICUs in Australia and New Zealand intensivists (84%; 66/79), with a small number of participants (14%; 3/79) using a gut scoring tool in their ICUs. Despite this, we have no established objective scoring tool for its assessment. The survey highlighted the need for developing a novel scoring tool to assess the gut was considered important amongst majority of the intensivists (92%; 72/78), which would prove useful in clinical practice and potentially lead to incorporation into an organ severity score in the future.

Chronic symptoms of gastric dysfunction are common following gastric surgery, but the mechanisms underlying these have remained poorly understood. Disturbances of foregut motility are suspected to play a central role, however knowledge of how these abnormalities manifest and relate to symptoms requires elucidation. Emerging data suggests that abnormalities of the gastric conduction system are a common consequence of gastric surgery and may contribute to dysmotility and post-operative symptoms. This review provides a primer on the gastric conduction system. The normal physiology of the gastric conduction system and factors that influence resilience to surgery are outlined, together with focused discussion on three surgical procedures that impact post-operative gastric dysfunction: resection of the gastric pacemaker, resection or bypass of the pylorus, and vagotomy. The mechanistic pathways that underpin the clinical effects of these procedures are discussed. Future horizons are also evaluated, including newly established body surface gastric mapping techniques that provide a non-invasive method to detect changes in the gastric conduction system and relate these to symptoms in postoperative patients, with the goal of developing targeted interventions for prevention and therapy.

Introduction: Gut-lymph in animal models of acute disease is altered by intestinal ischemia and contributes to the development of systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction. Investigating gut-lymp...

We recently published in GUT the outcomes of acute pancreatitis (AP) and coexisting SARS-CoV-2 infection.1 A number of patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive had AP of unknown aetiology (25%) speculating SARS-CoV-2 as a cause for AP similar to other viruses.2 However, most patients did not complete investigations to exclude other causes of AP. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause aberrant glycometabolic control,3 however it is unknown if this increases the risk of long-term diabetes mellitus (DM). The follow-up data were collected 12 months from the date of recruitment for 1476 patients (118 patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive and 1358 patients who were negative) to establish an aetiology for AP and development of DM. Among the 118 patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive, 35 patients had idiopathic or unknown aetiology AP. Sixteen patients underwent either MRCP (n=13) or EUS (n=4) and the remaining patients underwent biochemical investigations to exclude other causes of AP. The final aetiology of AP was available for 83 (70.3%) patients and included gallstones (56, 47.4%), alcohol (19, 16.1%), post ERCP (2, 1.7%) and other (6, 5.1%). Overall, 23 patients had a change of aetiology, and in 35 (29.7%) patients AP was considered idiopathic. Patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive were more likely to have idiopathic AP (34.7% vs 13.9%, p

The thoracic duct (TD) drains most of the body's lymph back to the venous system via its lymphovenous junction (LVJ), playing a pivotal role in fluid homeostasis, fat absorption and the systemic immune response. The respiratory cycle is thought to assist with lymph flow, but the precise mechanism underpinning terminal TD lymph flow into the central veins is not well understood. The aim of this study was to use ultrasonography (US) to explore the relationship between terminal TD lymph flow, the respiratory cycle, and gravity. The left supraclavicular fossa was scanned in healthy non-fasted volunteers using high-resolution (13-5 MHz) US to identify the terminal TD and the presence of a lymphovenous valve (LVV). The TD's internal diameter was measured in relation to respiration (inspiration vs. expiration) and body positioning (supine vs. Trendelenburg). The terminal TD was visualized in 20/33 (61%) healthy volunteers. An LVV was visualized in only 4/20 (20%) cases. The mean terminal TD diameter in the supine position was 1.7 mm (range 0.8-3.1 mm); this increased in full inspiration (mean 1.8 mm, range 0.9-3.2 mm, p < 0.05), and in the Trendelenburg position (mean 1.8 mm, range 1.2-3.1 mm, p < 0.05). The smallest mean terminal TD diameter occurred in full expiration (1.6 mm, range 0.7-3.1 mm, p < 0.05). Respiration and gravity impact the terminal TD diameter. Due to the challenges of visualizing the TD and LVJ, other techniques such as dynamic magnetic resonance imaging will be required to fully understand the factors governing TD lymph flow.

Refereed/Peer-reviewed Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) encases mesenteric lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes through which lymph is transported from the intestine and mesentery. Whether mesenteric lymphatics contribute to adipose tissue inflammation and metabolism and insulin resistance is unclear. Here we show that obesity is associated with profound and progressive dysfunction of the mesenteric lymphatic system in mice and humans. We find that lymph from mice and humans consuming a high-fat diet (HFD) stimulates lymphatic vessel growth, leading to the formation of highly branched mesenteric lymphatic vessels that ‘leak’ HFD-lymph into VAT and, thereby, promote insulin resistance. Mesenteric lymphatic dysfunction is regulated by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C–VEGF receptor (R)3 signalling. Lymph-targeted inhibition of COX-2 using a glyceride prodrug approach reverses mesenteric lymphatic dysfunction, visceral obesity and inflammation and restores glycaemic control in mice. Targeting obesity-associated mesenteric lymphatic dysfunction thus represents a potential therapeutic option to treat metabolic disease.

Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed abdominal operations. Rising demands on acute operating theater availability and resource utilization in the daytime have led to acute cholecystectomy being performed out-of-hours (in the evenings, at night, or on weekends), although it remains unknown whether outcomes differ between out-of-hours and in-hours (during the daytime on weekdays) acute cholecystectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes following out-of-hours versus in-hours acute cholecystectomy.The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021226127). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies comparing outcomes following out-of-hours and in-hours acute cholecystectomy in adults with any acute benign gallbladder disease. The outcomes of interest were rates of bile leakage, bile duct injury, overall postoperative complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, specific intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, and mortality. Subgroup (evening/night-time vs. daytime, weekend vs. weekday, acute surgical unit [ASU]-only, non-ASU, and laparoscopic-only) and sensitivity analyses of adjusted multivariate regression analysis results was also performed.Eleven studies were included. There were no differences between out-of-hours and in-hours acute cholecystectomy for rates of bile leakage, bile duct injury, overall postoperative complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, operative duration, readmission, mortality, and postoperative length of stay. Higher rates of postoperative sepsis (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.41; p = 0.03) and pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.26; p = 0.02) were observed following out-of-hours acute cholecystectomy on univariate meta-analysis, but not after the adjusted multivariate meta-analysis. Higher conversion rates were observed when out-of-hours cholecystectomy was performed in centers without an ASU.This systematic review and meta-analysis has not shown an increased risk in overall or specific complications associated with out-of-hours compared with in-hours acute cholecystectomy. However, future studies should assess the potential impact of structural hospital factors, such as an ASU, on outcomes following out-of-hours acute cholecystectomy.Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study, Level IV.

Contains fulltext : 238998.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Pancreatic duct disruption or disconnection is a potentially severe complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. With no existing treatment guidelines, it is unclear whether there is any consensus among experts in clinical practice. We evaluated current expert opinion regarding the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic duct disruption and disconnection in an international case vignette study. METHODS: An online case vignette survey was sent to 110 international expert pancreatologists. Expert selection was based on publications in the last 5 years and/or participation in development of IAP/APA and ESGE guidelines on acute pancreatitis. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 75% of the experts. RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (n = 56). Forty-four experts (79%) obtained a MRI/MRCP and 52 experts (93%) measured amylase levels in percutaneous drain fluid to evaluate pancreatic duct integrity. The majority of experts favored endoscopic transluminal drainage for infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct disruption (84%, n = 45) or disconnection (88%, n = 43). Consensus was lacking regarding the treatment of patients with persistent percutaneous drain production, and with persistent sterile necrosis. CONCLUSION: This international survey of experts demonstrates that there are many areas for which no consensus existed, providing clear focus for future investigation.

A workshop was sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to focus on research gaps and opportunities in pancreatic pain. The event was held on July 21, 2021, and structured into 4 sessions: (1) pathophysiology; (2) biomarkers, mediators, and pharmacology of pain; (3) pain assessment; and (4) pain treatment challenges and opportunities. The current state of knowledge was reviewed; many knowledge gaps and research needs were identified that require further investigation. Common themes included the need to better understand the underlying mechanisms of pain in pancreatic diseases, the relationship of visceral neural pathways and central pain centers, the role of behavioral factors and disorders on the perception of pain, and differences in pain perception and processes in children when compared with adults. In addition, the role of genetic risk factors for pain and the mechanisms and role of placebos in pain treatment were discussed. Methods of pain assessment including quantitative sensory testing were examined, as well as the process of central sensitization of pain. Finally, newer approaches to pain management including cognitive behavioral therapy, nerve stimulation, experimental (nonopioid) drugs, and cannabinoid compounds were covered.

The pathophysiology of small bowel dysfunction in critical illness includes perfusion abnormalities, tissue oedema, metabolic response to stress, alterations in endocrine and immunological functions, and gut barrier alterations. Several of these aspects are related to critical illness, others are the result of treatments or an interaction between the two. The small bowel can become hypoperfused, oedematous, and distended with changes in microbiome, all of which can have consequences for gastrointestinal surgery during critical illness, and its clinical outcome. Specific monitoring tools for small bowel (dys)function in critically ill patients are lacking and management options are largely supportive, aiming at restoration of tissue perfusion and minimizing factors causing bowel dysmotility.

Chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes (NVSs) are prevalent and debilitating disorders. Putative mechanisms include gastric neuromuscular disease and dysregulation of brain-gut interaction, but clinical tests for objectively defining gastric motor function are lacking. A medical device enabling noninvasive body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) was developed and applied to evaluate NVS pathophysiology. BSGM was performed in 43 patients with NVS and 43 matched controls using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry), a conformable high-resolution array (8 × 8 electrodes; 20-mm interelectrode spacing), wearable reader, and validated symptom-logging app. Continuous measurement encompassed a fasting baseline (30 minutes), 482-kilocalorie meal, and 4-hour postprandial recording, followed by spectral and spatial biomarker analyses. Meal responses were impaired in NVS, with reduced amplitudes compared to controls (median, 23.3 microvolts versus 38.0 microvolts, P < 0.001), impaired fed-fasting power ratios (1.1 versus 1.6, P = 0.02), and disorganized slow waves (spatial frequency stability, 13.6 versus 49.5; P < 0.001). Two distinct NVS subgroups were evident with indistinguishable symptoms (all P > 0.05). Most patients (62%) had normal BSGM studies with increased psychological comorbidities (43.5% versus 7.7%; P = 0.03) and anxiety scores (median, 16.5 versus 13.0; P = 0.035). A smaller subgroup (31%) had markedly abnormal BSGM, with biomarkers correlating with symptoms (nausea, pain, excessive fullness, early satiety, and bloating; all r > 0.35, P < 0.05). Patients with NVS share overlapping symptoms but comprise distinct underlying phenotypes as revealed by a BSGM device. These phenotypes correlate with symptoms, which should inform clinical management and therapeutic trial design.

Purpose of reviewThis review discusses the analgesic options available from randomized controlled trials and recent systematic reviews. The evidence from other settings is considered and the evidence specific to acute pancreatitis emphasized. This highlights the options that are best supported by evidence but also the options that warrant further clinical trials.Recent findingsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol can provide adequate pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis when compared with opioids. Epidural analgesia provides optimum pain relief in the first 24 h of onset of acute pancreatitis in addition to potential improvement in pancreatic perfusion. Several experimental analgesics and acupuncture have potential as opioid sparing strategies. Opioids are needed for patients with severe pain, to which adjuvant and experimental analgesics might be added.SummaryAmong the many options for pain management, the following principles should apply:1.tailor treatment to the individual patient (one size will not fit all);2.assess both pain intensity and pancreatitis severity when selecting analgesics;3.a step-down approach might be required achieve prompt pain relief (especially in patients with severe acute pancreatitis);4.use opioid sparing strategies whenever possible (especially in patients with mild acute pancreatitis); and5.patients should be enrolled in much needed clinical trials where possible.

Background: The lymphovenous junction (LVJ) of the thoracic duct (TD) is the principle outlet of the lymphatic system. Interest in this junction is growing as its role in lymphatic outflow obstruction is being realized, and as minimally invasive procedures for accessing the terminal TD become more common. Despite the growing clinical significance of the LVJ, its precise form and function remain unclear. The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature surrounding the structure and function of the LVJ and its associated lymphovenous valve (LVV). Methods and Results: A systematic review of the structure and function of the LVJ and LVV was undertaken using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Human and animal studies up to November 2019, with no language or past date restriction, were included. Forty-six relevant articles were reviewed. The LVJ shows marked anatomical variation. A valve is frequently absent at the LVJ, but when present it displays numerous distinct morphologies. These include bicuspid semilunar, ostial, and flap-like structure. Other factors, such as functional platelet plugs, or the tangential/intramural course of the terminal TD across the vein wall, may work to prevent blood from entering the lymphatic system. Conclusions: The form and function of the LVJ remain unclear. Dedicated studies of this area in vivo are required to elucidate how this part of the body functions in both health and disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Stress hyperglycemia is common in critical illness but it has not been clearly studied in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). This study aimed to investigate the specific blood glucose (BG) level that defines stress hyperglycemia and to determine the impact of stress hyperglycemia on clinical outcomes in AP patients. METHODS: AP patients admitted ≤ 48 h after abdominal pain onset were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by pre-existing diabetes and stress hyperglycemia was defined using stratified BG levels for non-diabetes and diabetes with clinical outcomes compared. RESULTS: There were 967 non-diabetic and 114 diabetic (10.5%) patients met the inclusion criteria and the clinical outcomes between these two groups were not significantly different. In non-diabetes, the cut-off BG level of ≥ 180 mg/dl was selected to define stress hyperglycemia with an 8.8-fold higher odds ratio for persistent organ failure (POF) (95% CI 5.4-14.3; P < 0.001). For diabetes, ≥ 300 mg/dl was selected with a 7.5-fold higher odds ratio for POF (95% CI 1.7-34.3; P = 0.009). In multivariable logistic regression, stress hyperglycemia was independently associated with POF, acute necrotic collection, major infection and mortality. The combination of BG and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score in predicting POF was better than SIRS or Glasgow score alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a cut-off BG level of ≥ 180 mg/dl and ≥ 300 mg/dl was optimal to define stress hyperglycemia for non-diabetic and diabetic AP patients, respectively. There was a significant relationship between stress hyperglycemia and adverse clinical outcomes.

Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of many diseases, but there is no accurate measurement of oxidative stress or antioxidants that has utility in the clinical setting. Cyclic Voltammetry is an electrochemical technique that has been widely used for analyzing redox status in industrial and research settings. It has also recently been applied to assess the antioxidant status of in vivo biological samples. This systematic review identified 38 studies that used cyclic voltammetry to determine the change in antioxidant status in humans and animals. It focusses on the methods for sample preparation, processing and storage, experimental setup and techniques used to identify the antioxidants responsible for the voltammetric peaks. The aim is to provide key information to those intending to use cyclic voltammetry to measure antioxidants in biological samples in a clinical setting.

Pancreatic surgery is performed in relatively few centres. There are validated quality benchmarks for pancreatic surgery, although it remains unclear how published benchmarks compare with each other. This study aimed to systematically review published literature to summarise metrics that define quality benchmarks for pancreatic surgery. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL was undertaken until June 2019. Articles that developed or validated published quality benchmarks for pancreatic surgery were included. Benchmarks were classified into three domains using the Donabedian framework, and their quality assessed using the AIRE Instrument. Nineteen studies included 55 quality metrics, of which 8 developed new metrics, and 11 studies validated previously published metrics. The methodology of metric development was either expert opinion-driven or data-driven. All metrics demonstrated moderate quality scores. There was partial agreement in some metrics (e.g. < 10 h total operative duration), but lack of consensus for most others (e.g. lymph node yield ≥ 10, ≥ 12, ≥ 15, ≥ 16). No metrics related to patient reported outcomes. Published quality benchmarks for pancreatic surgery predominantly arise from eight studies, with heterogeneity in how the metrics were developed. There was not consensus for all metrics. Metrics need to be reviewed as new data emerge, technologies develop and opinions change.

Background: Current approaches to predicting intervention needs and mortality have reached 65–85% accuracy, which falls below clinical decision-making requirements in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to accurately predict therapeutic intervention needs and mortality on admission, in AP patients, using machine learning (ML). Methods: Data were obtained from three databases of patients admitted with AP: one retrospective (Chengdu) and two prospective (Liverpool and Chengdu) databases. Intervention and mortality differences, as well as potential predictors, were investigated. Univariate analysis was conducted, followed by a random forest ML algorithm used in multivariate analysis, to identify predictors. The ML performance matrix was applied to evaluate the model’s performance. Results: Three datasets of 2846 patients included 25 potential clinical predictors in the univariate analysis. The top ten identified predictors were obtained by ML models, for predicting interventions and mortality, from the training dataset. The prediction of interventions includes death in non-intervention patients, validated with high accuracy (96%/98%), the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (0.90/0.98), and positive likelihood ratios (22.3/69.8), respectively. The post-test probabilities in the test set were 55.4% and 71.6%, respectively, which were considerably superior to existing prognostic scores. The ML model, for predicting mortality in intervention patients, performed better or equally with prognostic scores. Conclusions: ML, using admission clinical predictors, can accurately predict therapeutic interventions and mortality in patients with AP.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pain is the foremost complication to chronic pancreatitis (CP), but no validated questionnaires for assessment exist. The COMPAT questionnaire includes all relevant pain dimensions in CP, but a short form is needed to make it usable in clinical practice.METHODS: The full COMPAT questionnaire was completed by 91 patients and systematically reduced to 6 questions. Pain severity and analgesic use were merged, leaving 5 pain dimensions. The pain dimension ratings were normalized to a 0-100 scale, and the weighted total score was calculated, where 3 dimensions were weighted double. Reliability of the short form was tested in a test-retest study in 76 patients, and concurrent validity tested against the Brief Pain Inventory and Izbicki pain questionnaire. Convergent validity was verified using confirmatory factor analysis, and criterion validity tested against quality-of-life and hospitalization rates.RESULTS: The COMPAT-SF questionnaire consisted of the following pain dimensions: a) pain severity, b) pain pattern, c) factors provoking pain, d) widespread pain, and e) a qualitative pain-describing dimension. Quality of life correlated with the total score and all pain dimensions (P CONCLUSION: The COMPAT-SF questionnaire includes the most relevant aspects of pain in CP and is a feasible, reliable, and valid pain assessment instrument recommended to be used in future trials.