Search

Background Nivolumab is an anti PD1 immunotherapy drug approved for advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients who previously received at least one prior line of treatment. Older patients are often not represented in clinical trials and drugs with acceptable safety profiles are necessary. We aim to report the efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab in the real-world older subgroup of the Galician lung cancer group study. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 188 advanced NSCLC patients treated with at least one prior therapy. We collected data from patients who were ≥70 years old treated with Nivolumab in second or subsequent lines. Patient characteristics, treatment efficacy (overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate), and safety profile were reported. Results Thirty-eight patients aged ≥70 years were included in the subgroup analysis. The median age was 74.5 years, a high percentage of patients were males (95%), most had a Performance Status of 1 (79%) and only 13% were non-smokers. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (53%), and 18% of patients received 2 or more lines. The median Progression-Free Survival was 7.53 months (CI 4.3–17.3, p = 0.15) and the median Overall Survival was 14.85 months (CI 10.5–20.7, p = 0.44). The objective response rate was 42%. No new adverse events were reported in comparison to a global population. Conclusions The efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab in advanced NSCLC patients treated with at least one prior therapy and age ≥70 years old can be overlapped to a global population. Further prospective trials are needed to define and confirm these results.

Background Recently, immunotherapy has changed the standard of treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Outside clinical trials, data of real life is lacking. This is an observational study that represents the real world experience with nivolumab in pretreated NSCLC. Methods Eligibility criteria included, histologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIB and IV, evaluable disease and at least one prior therapy. Patients received nivolumab until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The main aim of the study was to report the efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC of our everyday clinical practice. The secondary aim was to perform subgroup analysis by clinical features. Results From August of 2015 to January of 2017, 188 patients were enrolled. The patients demographics were: median age 58 years, 144 male; 17 never smoker and 171 former/current smoker; 112 adenocarcinoma, 66 squamous-cell carcinoma and 10 not otherwise specified (NOS); 61 stage IIIB and 127 stage IV; 15 performance status (PS) 0, 154 PS 1 and 19 PS 2; 5 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and 1 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); 42 with central nervous system (CNS) metastases; and 71 received 2 or more prior therapy lines. Of the 188 patients enrolled, 25 (13.3%) were not evaluated, 3 (1.6%) had complete response (CR), 45 (23.9%) partial response (PR), 48 (25.5%) disease stabilization (DS) and 67 (35.6%) PD. The median of progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.83 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.9) and overall survival (OS) was 12.85 months (95% CI, 9.07-16.62). The subgroup analysis revealed statistical significance in OS for patients with CNS metastases 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.5-17.3) vs. 5.09 months (95% CI, 0.3-9.8) and also PS 0 [not reached (NR)] vs. PS 1 11.7 months vs. PS 2 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.3-4.4). The safety profile was in accordance with the literature data. Conclusions This study represents the real word experience with nivolumab and the results are consistent with previously reported in clinical trials. PS 2 and the presence of CNS metastases are associated with poor prognosis.

9076 Background: PD-L1 has emerged as a potential biomarker for predicting responses to immunotherapy and as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of first-line PD-(L)1 monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed to identify all eligible trials from inception until 1 November 2020, with no start date limit applied. Only phase III trials evaluating the efficacy of first-line (1L) PD-(L)1 monotherapy in patients with stage IIIB/stage IV NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included. Results: Six clinical trials (KEYNOTE-024, KEYNOTE-042, EMPOWER Lung-01, IMpower110, MYSTIC and CheckMate-026) with 2,111 patients were included. In head-to-head comparisons, immunotherapy showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS: HRpooled = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.90, p = 0.007), overall survival (OS: HRpooled = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78; p < 0.001) and overall response rate (ORR) (Risk ratio [RR]pooled = 1.354, 95% CI: 1.04-1.762, p = 0.024) compared to chemotherapy (CT). In the assessment of relative efficacy for PFS through indirect comparisons, pembrolizumab (results from KEYNOTE-024) ranked highest followed by cemiplimab and atezolizumab, with statistical significance determined across some of the drugs. In terms of OS, cemiplimab ranked highest followed by atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, although non-significant OS was determined across these drugs. Overall, 1L PD-(L)1 monotherapy improved OS in almost all subgroups, reaching statistical significance in men (HRpooled = 0.624, 95% CI: 0.51-0.72, p < 0.001), non-Asian patients (HRpooled = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, p < 0.001), all patients regardless of age ( < 65 years [HRpooled = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90, p = 0.005]; ≥65 years [HRpooled = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.77, p < 0.001]), ECOG PS status (ECOG PS = 0 [HRpooled = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.82, p < 0.001; ECOG PS = 1 [HRpooled = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82, p = 0.001) and histological tumour type (Squamous [HRpooled = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.001; Non-squamous [HRpooled = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.87, p = 0.003). In the case of smokers and NSCLC stage, only current/former smokers (HRpooled = 0.623, 95% CI: 0.47-0.83, p = 0.001) and patients with stage IV disease* (HRpooled = 0.687, 95% CI: 0.59-0.81, p < 0.001) benefited from single PD-(L)1 monotherapy over CT. Conclusions: PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy improves efficacy outcomes in the 1L setting of advanced NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression. Current/former smokers ≥65 years, with ECOG PS = 1 and squamous NSCLC benefited most from this therapy. *KEYNOTE-042 was the only study including patients with stage IIIB NSCLC.

e20579 Background: The current treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is conditioned by the presence of molecular and immunohistochemical biomarkers. In the absence of these, the therapeutic option is the use of chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic agents. The efficacy of non-target systemic treatments is not proven, beyond a second-line and the experiences in their use are limited to retrospective analyzes. We present the experience of the Grupo Gallego de Cáncer de Pulmón in patients with advanced NSCLC treated exclusively with three or more lines of chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC, treated with three or more lines of chemotherapy in standard regimen, with or without antiangiogenic agents, in Galicia´s hospitals, Spain. Results: We included 168 patients (134 male and 34 female) treated with three or more chemotherapy lines, with a median age at the time of receiving the first-line, of 60.84 years (41-83). Of these, 51 (30,35%) received a fourth-line and 18 (10,74%) a fifth-line of treatment. None received antitarget therapy or immunotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.1 months. The median OS after the third line was 6.1 months, with 73% of patients alive at three months and 44% six months after the start of that therapeutic line. We did not appreciate differences in OS between those who received three lines and those who received the largest number of subsequent treatments. Our multivariate analysis (age, gender, histology, performance status at initiation of each teatment-line, response to previous treatments) identified that the individuals who benefited the most were those under the age of 60 years, PS-ECOG 0-1 at diagnosis and those with a more durable response to the first-line. Conclusions: The third-line of chemotherapy can benefit those patients with advanced NSCLC, under 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis, with good performance status and with long-lasting responses to the first line of treatment. We did not see benefit in adding fourth or fifth-line of chemotherapy. All data will be presented in the 2019 ASCO annual meeting.

e20645 Background: The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) has been proposed as a new biomarker to select advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for anti-programmed cell death-1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy. In this study, we investigate the prognostic and predictive utility of the LIPI in a multicentric nivolumab monotherapy-based cohort. Methods: 153 patients with available baseline LIPI were included. Survival estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared with the log-rank test. The impact of the baseline LIPI on survival (PFS and OS), and DCR and ORR was assessed by Cox and logistic regression models respectively, adjusted for age, sex, ECOG-PS, smoking status, histology, TNM stage at diagnosis, presence of brain metastases and number of prior regimens. All p values were 2-sided, and those less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: 50.3% (n = 77) of the patients had a good (0 factors) LIPI, while 41.2% (n = 63) and 8.5% (n = 13) had intermediate (1 factor) and poor (2 factors) LIPI respectively. No significant differences were observed between the LIPI groups according to clinicopathologic characteristics. A high LIPI was significantly associated with poor OS in univariate (HR = 3.12, 95% CI 2.12 – 4.60; p < 0.0001) and multivariate (HR = 3.10, 95% CI 2.09 – 4.58; p < 0.0001) analyses. A high LIPI was associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.07 – 2.07; p = 0.02), but this correlation did not reach a statistical significance in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.98 – 1.92; p = 0.07). A higher LIPI was associated with a lower disease control rate in univariate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 – 0.85; p = 0.01) and multivariate (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 – 0.98; p = 0.04) analyses. Conclusions: This study confirms the utility of the LIPI in prognostication and disease control prediction in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab in the second line of therapy or beyond.

8509 Background: Patients with stage IIIA (N2 or T4N0) are potentially curable but median overall survival is only around 15 months and complete pathologic response with conventional chemotherapy (CT) is no more than 9%. Methods: A Phase II, single-arm, open-label multicenter study of resectable stage IIIA N2-NSCLC adult patients with CT plus IO as a neoadjuvant treatment: three cycles of Nivolumab (NV) 360mg IV Q3W + paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 6 IV Q3W followed by adjuvant NV treatment for 1 year. After complete neoadjuvant therapy, tumor assessment is performed prior to surgery. Surgery is performed in the 3rd or 4th week after day 21 of the third cycle of neoadjuvant treatment. The study aims to recruit 46 pts. The primary endpoint is Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 24 months. Efficacy is explored using objective pathologic response criteria. We present final data on all patients included in this study that underwent surgical assessment. Results: At the time of submission, 46 pts had been included and 41 had undergone surgery. CT-IO was well-tolerated and surgery was not delayed in any patient. None of the pts withdrew from the study preoperatively due to progression or toxicity. 41 surgeries had been performed and all tumors were deemed resectable, with R0 resection in all cases. 34 pts (83%) achieved major pathologic response (MPR) (CI 95% 71-95%), and 24 (71%) of them had a complete pathologic response (CPR) (CI 95% 54-87%). Downstaging was seen in 90% (CI 95% 81-100%) of cases. By RECIST, 29 pts (71%) (CI 95% 56-85%) had partial response and 3 (7%) (CI 95% 0-16%) complete response. Conclusions: This is the first multicentric study to CT-IO in the neoadjuvant setting in stage IIIA. Neoadjuvant CT-IO with nivolumab in resectable IIIA NSCLC yields a high complete pathologic response rate that has never been seen previously and unsuspected by RECIST criteria. Preliminary correlative analyses in blood samples are included in a separate abstract. EudraCT Number: 2016-003732-20. Clinical trial information: NCT 03081689.

e20654 Background: Treatment with tyrosine kinasa inhibitors has been a revolution for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR positive mutation, especially in patients with exon 19 deletions. Afatinib seems one of the best options of treatment. Methods: Retrospective study on patients from differents hospitals in Galicia (Spain) diagnosed of metastasic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR positive mutation who have received first line treatment with afatinib between July 2015 and September 2018 were included. The main objective was to compare our clinical experience concerning response rate, progression free survival and toxicity with published data. Results: 45 caucasians patients were included in our analysis (33 women, 12 men). Median age was 71.2 years (range 39-91 years) and 29 patients had never smoked. Exon 19 deletion was the most common mutation (41 patients, 91.1%). The objective overall response was 68.9% (95% CI: 82.4-55.3), complete responses were observed in 6 patients (13.3%) and partial responses were found in 25 patients (55.6%). Stable disease was observed in 8 patients (17.8%) and disease progression in 1 patient (2.2%), 5 patients have not been re-evaluated (11.1%). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 27 months (95% CI: 14.8-39.1) and overall survival was not reached. Common adverse events grade 3/4 were mucositis and skin toxicity in 11 patients (24.4%) and diarrhea in 6 patients (13.3%), respectively. The dose was reduced in 28 patients (62.2%) and treatment was discontinued in 8 patients (17.8%) owing to adverse events. Conclusions: Median PFS in our patients is 15 months longer than the information retrieved from differents studies with similar response rates and toxicity. This might be due to a majority of population with exon 19 deletion which, according to published data, seems to benefit more from afatinib than from other EGFR mutations.

e20067 Background: Platinum-based CChRT is recommended as the evidence-based approach for the management of patients (p) with locally advanced stage III NSCLC and a good performance status, although a clearly superior regimen has not been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of CChRT with Cisplatin (C) and intravenous and oral vinorelbine (V) and thoracic radiotherapy. Methods: 39 p with histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, stage IIIA (T4 or N2)/IIIB, PS 0-1 and adequate lung function (FEV1 > 1.1, V20 < 30%) were included in CChRT with: C 80 mg/m2 day 1 and intravenous V 25 mg/m2 day 1 and oral V 60 mg/m2 day 8 for three cycles, during conformal radical thoracic radiotherapy (66 Gys, 180 cGy/day). The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Median follow-up: 20,4 months. Results: The p characteristics were: mean age 69,8 years (44-75); male/female: 33/6; ECOG PS 0/1: 7/32; adeno/squamous/large cell carcinoma: 20/13/6; stage IIIA 19 p and stage IIIB 20 p. All p were evaluable for response and toxicity. RR: 3 CR, 27 PR (RR 77%; 95% CI: 64-90), 5 SD (12.8%) and 4 PD (10.2%). The median PFS was 12 months (95% CI: 7-17) and median OS was 36 months (95% CI: 14-58). The PFS at 1/3 years were 46%/22% and the OS at 1/3 years were 75%/47%. Main toxicities (NCI-CTC 4.0) per p in CChRT (109 cycles of chemotherapy, 2.9 per p; mean doses RT: 65,3 Gys) grade 1-2/3-4 (%) were: neutropenia 32.4/25.6; anemia 32.4/10.8; thrombocytopenia 13.5/2.7; nausea/vomiting 27/2.7; fatigue 28.2/0; esophagitis 43.5/5.4 and pneumonitis 17.9/0; hospitalizations were necesary in 13 p: the most important were febrile neutropenia (6 p) and grade 3 esophagitis (2 p). Conclusions: CChRT with Cisplatin and intravenous and oral Vinorelbine during thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option for inoperable locally advanced stage III NSCLC, showing good clinical efficacy and tolerability with excellent long-term survival.

e20612Background: Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody and it has demonstrated durable responses and tolerability in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This is an observationa...

e19017 Background: The standard treatment for elderly patients in advanced NS-NSCLC is not defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the combination of carbo...

Aim: We analyzed retrospectively data about treatment outcome with existing treatments in DTF. Methods: Descriptive analysis of data related to diagnosis and treatment from all DTF was collected in patients (p) between Sept. 1999 and Nov. 2013 in 26 hospitals of GEIS . Ethics committee approval was obtained. Results: 185 patients. Age: median 37 years (6-85) .63.2% female .Median time lapse from first symptom to diagnosis: 4 months(m). Location : trunk wall 81p (43.8%), extremities 50p (27%), retroperitoneum 10p (5.4%), Gastro-intestinal 16p (8.6%), Head/neck 6p( 3.2%), others 6p(3.2%), 2p (1.1%) missing . 20p (11%) presented a second neoplasia (throughout the whole process). Median tumor size: 8 cm(range 1-96). 3 p (1.6%) presented distant peritoneal disease. First treatment : No treatment 6p (2.7%), Surgery (S) alone 144 p ( 77.8%, 3p >1), S+radiotherapy (RT) 7p (3.7%), S+ chemotherapy (CT) 2 p (1.08%), S+hormonetherapy (HT) 3p (1.62%), S +HT+ Non steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)+Tirosin-kinasa inhibitor(TKI) 1p (0.54%), CT 5p (2.7%), RT 3p ( 1.6%),NSAID 5p (2.6%), HT 2p (1.08%), TKI 1p(0.54%), HT+NSAID 6p (2.7%). 128p (69.2%) became free of disease, in 49p (26.5%) residual disease remained . 61p (33%) progressed. Median Progression free survival (PFS) :109 m (95%CI 44.6-175.1).Multivariate analysis for PFS: extended/radical surgery(p=0.000) and tumor size Response to CT /other treatments CT treatment Other treatments (TKI, HT, NSAID) p % p % PR 12 30.7 4 7.4 SD 15 38.4 31 55.3 PD 3 7.6 10 17.8 NE 4 10.2 6 10.7 NA 5 12.8 5 8.9 Total 39 100 56 100 PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; NE: non evaluable; NA: non available data. Conclusions: Surgical quality and tumor size seems to play a relevant role in predicting PFS in DFT. Other sistemic treatments showed meaningful activity in progressive disease. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background: ICT with taxanes regimens has been demonstrate increase overall survival (OS) in the recent metaanalysis (Blanchard JCO 2013) in patients (pts) with LAHNC. However CRTP or RTCx hasnt be compared as consolidation treatment. This randomized phase III trial (TTCC-2007-01, NCT00716391) compared OS and not inferiority of RTCx respect to CRTP. Now, we report preliminary results of toxicity in both regimen. Methods: Eligible pts: unresectable tumors, measurable disease, adequate organ function, ECOG 0–1. Treatment: T 75 mg/m2 d1, P 75 mg/m2 d1, F 750 mg/m2 CI d 1–5 q 21 d + G-CSF & ciprofloxacin, by 3 cycles; then, they were randomized to: conventional radiotherapy (RT) up to 70 Gy + P 100 mg/m2 d 1–22-43 vs conventional RT up to 70 Gy + cetuximab 400/250 mg/m2 weekly until the completion of RT, and they were stratified by primary tumor site (TS). Surgery after RT (neck dissection) was allowed. Results: By July 2008, 516 pts over 531 were evaluable for toxicity; 89% male, 99,8% caucasian, median age: 57y (29–73), PS: 0 = 25.7%, 1 = 70.5%. Disease stage: III: 8,1% - IV: 90,5%. TS: oropharynx: 37.2%, hypopharynx: 20.7%, larynx: 14,3% and oral cavity: 12.8%. Median follow-up: 8,9 months, 197 deaths occurred. G3-4 toxicity: TPF neutropenia: 9,1%, febrile neutropenia (FN): 12,6%, non-hematological toxicity (NHT): 15,9%, toxic death: 2,13%. CRTP: anemia 1,4%, neutropenia 4,9%, FN 1,4%, NHT: 11,2%, mucosal and gastrointestinal toxicity were the most common, toxic death: 0,78%. RTCx: anemia 0,2%,neutropenia 0%, FN: 0,2%, NHT: 19,2%, cutaneous and mucosal toxicity were the most common disorders, toxic death: 0,78%. SAEs: CRTP 8,3%, RTCx: 4,5%. Conclusions: Interim data suggest that ICT is tolerable in ULAHNC. RTCx seems to have less haematological side effects than CRTP, and decreases the rate of SAEs. There's a trend of less gastrointestinal and renal toxicity with RTCx, and less dermatological toxicity and radiation-induced skin injury with CRTP. Currently ongoing to further evaluate efficacy and OS. Disclosure: R. Hitt, R. Mesia and J.J. Cruz Hernandez: This trial was funded by Sanofi Aventis and Merck. Consultant, advisory board and expert testimony compensated by Sanofi Aventis and Merck; J.J. Grau, J. Rubio, J. Martinez-Trufero, E. Del Barco Morillo, C. Garcia-Giron, S. Vazquez, B. Cirauqui, M. Pastor Borgonon, E. Galve Calvo, O. Juan-Vidal, R. Lopez, J. Martinez-Galan, R. Bastus and A. Berrocal: This trial was funded by Sanofi Aventis and Merck.All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Aim: Most GISTs have mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Patients with advanced GIST with KIT exon 9, with PDGFRA mutation or WT for KIT and PDGFRA have a worse progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients with KIT exon 11 mutated tumors. We evaluated expression of p-IGF-1R (Y1316) and MMP3 as predictors of PFS or overall survival (OS) Methods: Ninety-six advanced GIST patients included in GEIS-16 study with KIT and PDGFRA mutational information were examined for p-IGF-1R (Y1316) and MMP3 expression in a tissue micro-array. To study activation of the IGF-1R system, we have used an antibody (anti-pY1316) that specifically recognizes the phosphorylated (active) form of the IGF-1R. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues and intronic PCR primers were used to amplify exons 9,11,13 and 17 of KIT, 12 and 18 of PDGFRA. Bidirecctional sequencing with specific primers was performed on a ABI3100 sequencer using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 kit. Multivariate model was built using a stepwise automated variable selection approach with criterion to enter the variable in the model of p Results: MMP3 was overexpressed in 10% of cases and p-IGF-1R in only 2% of cases. 68% of patients had KIT mutations, 4% had PDGFRA mutations and 28% were WT for KIT and PDGFRA. At univariate analysis KIT exon 11/13 vs rest (WT/WT, KIT exon 9 mutations and PDGFRA mutations) had better PFS (p = 0.038; HR: 0.58; 95%CI (0.35-0.96). Less than 24 months disease free-interval (HR 24.2, 95% CI 10.5-55.8), poor performance status (PS) (HR 6.3, 95% CI 2.5-15.9), extension of disease; > 1 organ (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.03-3.4) and positive expression of p-IGF-1R or MMP3 (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.01-4,2) but not mutational analysis (HR 1.02; 95%CI 0.53-1.96) were the strongest prognostic factors for PFS in the multivariate analysis. For OS only PS, disease free-interval and number of metastatic sites remain significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that p-IGF-1R (Y1316) and MMP3 expression have major prognostic significance for PFS in advanced GIST treated with imatinib therapy. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

7549 Background: CChRT is recommended as the evidence-based approach for the management of patients (p) with locally advanced stage III NSCLC and a good performance status, although a clearly superior regimen has not been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of CChRT with bi-weekly docetaxel (D) and cisplatin (C) and thoracic radiotherapy. Methods: 50 p with histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, stage IIIAN2/IIIB (no pleural T4), PS 0-1 and adequate lung function (FEV1 > 1.1, V20 < 25%) were included: one cycle of D 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and C 40 mg/m2 days 1-2 followed at 21 days by CChRT with bi-weekly D 40 mg/m2 and C 40 mg/m2 for four courses, during conformal thoracic radiotherapy (66 Gys, 180 cGy/day). The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Median follow-up: 14,5 months. Results: The p characteristics were: mean age 59,1 years (34-75); male/female 44/6; squamous/adeno/large cell carcinoma: 52%/34%/14%; stage IIIAN2 14 p (28%) and stage IIIB 36 p (72%). All p were evaluable for response and toxicity. RR: 4 CR, 36 PR (RR 80%; 95% CI:69-91), 4 SD (8%) and 6 PD (12%). The median PFS was 13 months (95% CI:8-18) and median OS was 19 months (95% CI:14-24). The PFS and OS at 1/2 years were 52%/30% and 79%/40% respectively. A total of 50 cycles of D-C induction chemotherapy were given; main toxicities (NCI-CTC 3.0) per p Grade (g) 1-2/3-4 (%) were as follows: neutropenia 2/16; anemia 12/0; nausea/vomiting 28/2; diarrhea 22/4; there were two episodes of febrile neutropenia. Main toxicities per p in CChRT (D-C doses: 192, 3.8 per p; mean doses RT: 64,6 Gys) were g1-2/3 (%): neutropenia 28/6; anemia 60/0; esophagitis 52/4 and pneumonitis 34/0; there were four episodes of hospitalization: febrile neutropenia, 2 p and g3 esophagitis, 2 p. Conclusions: CChRT with bi-weekly docetaxel and cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option for inoperable locally advanced stage III NSCLC, showing good clinical efficacy and tolerability with acceptable long-term survival.

e17545 Background: CDDP+NVBO as induction and concomitant regimen with RT has shown good efficacy outcomes and safety profile (Krzakowski, J Thor Oncol. 2008). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of the combination of CDDP and NVBO given at full doses concomitantly with RT in LA-NSCLC. Methods: Between February 2010 and May 2011, 26 chemo-naive patients (p) with histologically confirmed stage IIIA/IIIB unresectable LA NSCLC were treated. Treatment consisted of 4 cycles (cy) of NVBO 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and CDDP 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus RT 66 Gy starting on day 1, cy 2. A standard Fleming two stage design is being used. The sample size is calculated with a power of 90% and a two-sided type 1 error allowance of 5%. Stage 1 included 25 pts, with subsequent expansion to a total of 45. Results: Patient’s characteristics were: Median age, 59 years (range 48-71); males, 92%; smokers, 60%; adenocarcinoma, 28% / squamous, 64%; stage IIIA, 54% / IIIB, 46%. 21 p completed the 4 cy treatment as per protocol. We analyzed 92 cy. Hematological toxicities (% cy): grade (g) 3/4 neutropenia, 42.3%; g3 anemia, 3.3%; g3 thrombocytopenia, 2.2%; febrile neutropenia, 1 p. Non-hematological toxicities (% cy): g3 oesophagitis, 6.5%; g4 diarrhea, 1.1%. 21 p were evaluable for response. 1 CR (4.8%), 17 PR (81%) and 1 SD (4.5%) were reported. ORR 85.8%. Survival analysis has not been performed due to short follow-up. Conclusions: The findings of this interim analysis confirm the previously reported outcomes of efficacy and safety with NVBO plus CDDP when administered concurrently with RT in stage IIIA/IIIB p. The trial has met the criteria for continuation into stage 2.

e18146 Background: Efficacy of oral erlotinib has been conclusively established in 2nd line setting (BR.21 and TRUST studies) and the outcomes are similar to those provided by other approved chemotherapeutical agents (TITAN study). Higher responses rates have been found in p with Asian ethnicity, adenocarcinoma, women and never smokers, where predictive EGFR mutations occur more frequently; even though erlotinib has a significant effect on survival in all subgroups of patients. This observational study evaluates the efficacy of 2nd line erlotinib in unselected p with nsNSCLC in 4 Galician institutions. Methods: Unselected p with advanced nsNSCLC were treated with 150 mg/day of erlotinib as 2nd line therapy until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. EGFR mutational status was retrospectively tested when feasible, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monitored during the treatment period. Results: Baseline characteristics of 45 p included at the time of this analysis: mean age of 61.7 yrs. (range: 38-83); 80% male; 73.3% adenocarcinoma; 71.1% stage IV; 7/69/24% PS ECOG 0/1/2; 29/33/38 % never/current/former smokers. EGFR activating mutation testing was performed in 24 p (53%) and 2 positive cases were found (8%), both with metastatic adenocarcinoma (stage IV). The median PFS was 3.3 (95% CI: 1.6-5.1) and the median OS 10 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.5). Among p without EGFR mutations, erlotinib conferred a median OS of 8.1 months (95% CI: 1.4-14.9). Out of 31 p evaluable, radiologic response was achieved in 7 p (22.6%), for an overall disease control rate of 45.2 %. No unexpected toxicities were reported: 60 % of p experienced cutaneous toxicity (6.6 % grade ¾), 22.2% asthenia (4.4% grade ¾) and 17.8% diarrhea (2.2% grade ¾). Only 3 p discontinued due to adverse events. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy and safety of 2nd line erlotinib in a clinical practice scenario and the outcomes in p with non-squamous NSCLC are equivalent to those reported with the chemotherapy for salvage therapy. Moreover, the absence of mutations does not preclude the benefit from the drug. Updated data of the study will be presented.

5040 Background: Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) chemotherapy followed by metronomic chemotherapy (low doses administered on a frequent schedule) acts on tumor vascular endothelial cells and enhances the antitumor effect of anti-angiogenic agents (Pietras et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007). This study investigated treatment of mRCC with Gem at MTD combined with metronomic Cap and the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Methods: Eligible patients had cytologically or histologically confirmed mRCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 and no previous targeted therapy or chemotherapy, and were unsuitable for or intolerant to immunotherapy. Treatment consisted of six 3-week cycles of Gem 1000 mg/m2 i.v. (days 1 and 8), oral Cap 500 mg/m2 b.i.d. (days 1 to 14) and oral sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d. (every day), followed by sorafenib monotherapy (at the discretion of the investigator). Study endpoints included median progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint), disease control rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and safety. Results: Forty patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of treatment (median age 63 yrs, male n = 24, ECOG 0/1 n = 18/22, 1–2/>2 metastatic sites n = 31/9). Median duration of treatment was 6 months. Among 36 evaluable patients, 17 (47%) had a partial response and 17 (47%) achieved stable disease. Median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI 7.6, 20.5). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue/asthenia (78%) hand-foot syndrome (75%) and mucositis (69%). Most AEs were grade1/2, no grade 4 toxicities occurred. One patient had grade 5 dyspnea; 6 patients discontinued treatment for AEs. Conclusions: PFS and objective responses in this study were greater than those observed in previous studies with Gem and Cap or sorafenib monotherapy in patients with mRCC, while AEs remained moderate in the majority of patients. These findings confirm the synergistic activity of the “chemo-switch” concept seen in preclinical models. The combination of sorafenib with MTD Gem and metronomic Cap warrants further investigation in mRCC. [Table: see text]

e18040 Background: NSCLC is primarily a disease of older people with a median age of approximately 70 years (y) at diagnosis. Platinum combination chemotherapy (CT) has shown to be more effective than single agents but it is associated with more toxicity. Erlotinib is an EGFR TK inhibitor with a favourable toxicity profile and its oral administration makes it suitable to treat elderly p. No much is known about its efficacy and toxicities in this subpopulation, often under-represented in clinical trials. This Galician study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib as 1st-line treatment (Tx) for elderly p with advanced nsNSCLC. Methods: Elderly p (≥70 years old) with stage IIIB/IV nsNSCLC were included in this prospective observational study. Erlotinib was orally administered at a dose of 150 mg daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. PFS (primary objective) and OS were measured from time of diagnosis. Results:A total of 31 p were enrolled. Baseline characteristics: Mean age 78 y (range 70-85); female 67.7%; adenocarcinoma (including BAC) 90.3%; never/current/former smokers (%): 54.8/16.1/22.6 (6.5% unknown), stage IV 84%; ECOG PS 0/1/2 (%): 6.4/45.2/48.4. The median PFS was 6.4 and the median OS was 9.9 months. Out of 26 evaluable p, 8 had PR and 8 SD, for an ORR of 30.8% and a DCR of 61.6%. The most common adverse event was skin rash, 38.7% (9.6% grade 3-4), diarrhoea, 25.8% (3.2% gr. 3-4) and asthenia, 19.3% (no gr 3-4 were reported). 5 p (16.1%) needed dose reduction and 3 p withdrew the Tx due to grade 3 diarrhoea, eye perforation and esofaghitis, respectively. EGFR mutational status was available for 10 p (32.2%); 4 p harboured activating mutations: 3 p achieved PR and 1 p SD. SLP of 31 (ongoing), 22.4 (ongoing), 13.6 and 9.8 months. Conclusions: These results in real-life settings confirm that erlotinib is an active and well tolerated agent as frontline Tx in elderly p (≥70) in nsNSCLC. Response rate is similar to that achieved with CT in younger people; benefit in PFS is modest, but median OS is acceptable, taking into account that half of the p had a PS of 2 EGFR mutation testing should be strongly encouraged among elderly p.