Search

Introduction Moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) increases plasma levels of factor VIII (FVIII) activity and, in China, is indicated for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recovery data of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in patients with hemophilia participating in two open-label studies, both conducted in China. Methods The authorization study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00868530) enrolled patients aged ≥6 years, previously treated with ≥1 exposure day of FVIII replacement therapy. The real-world study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02492984) enrolled patients of any age who were previously untreated or requiring surgical prophylaxis. In both studies, on-demand treatment was administered over 6 months. Key assessments included response to treatment, FVIII inhibitor development, and recovery. Results In the authorization study (N = 53; mean age, 23.2 years; severe hemophilia, 23%), response was excellent/good for 90% of infusions at 24 hours. Seven patients developed inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.77 (0.50) and 1.67 (0.45) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. In the real-world study (N = 85; mean age, 9.5 years; severe hemophilia, 58%), response was rated as excellent or good for most (87%) on-demand infusions and for all surgical prophylaxis patients (n = 14). Seven patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.71 (0.50) and 1.68 (0.31) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. No new safety signals were observed in either study. Conclusion On-demand treatment and surgical prophylaxis with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is safe and effective for both previously treated and previously untreated Chinese patients with hemophilia A.

Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept (ETN) manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing (SFHCM) process in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ----- Methods: In this global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study (NCT02378506), 187 adult patients with moderate to severe RA received ETN 50 mg once weekly for 24 weeks manufactured using the SFHCM process. Immunogenicity (presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs)) was assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Safety and efficacy were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. ----- Results: Eight (4.5%) patients tested positive for ADA, and there were no NAbs detected at any time throughout the study. Ninety (48.1%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), of which 27 (14.4%) reported injection-site reactions, and 43 (23.0%) reported infections. The majority of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and the drug was well tolerated. Throughout the duration of the study (week 4 to week 24), there was a progressive increase in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-defined responses (ACR20: 55.9%–82.0%, ACR50: 16.1%–57.8%, and ACR70: 3.2%–26.7%) from baseline and the proportion of patients achieving low disease activity and remission, with a corresponding decrease in measures of disease activity. ----- Conclusion: The immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of ETN manufactured using the SFHCM process were similar to the current approved ETN formulation. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02378506.

In a pivotal, multicenter, open-label study, 25 patients aged 12-54 years with moderately severe/severe hemophilia B received on-demand nonacog alfa (6 months; dose at investigator's discretion) followed by once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog alfa 100 IU/kg (12 months). During prophylaxis, patients had a median spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (sABR) of 1.0 and significant reductions in ABR (P < 0.0001). This post hoc analysis examined the time of onset of spontaneous bleeding events (sBEs) and spontaneous target joint bleeding events (sTJBEs). The postdosing day (D) of onset of sBEs observed during prophylaxis and steady-state FIX activity data (FIX:C) between 144 and 196 h postdose were collected at weeks 26 and 78. Twelve patients (48%) had no sBEs; the remaining 13 (52%) had the following onset of sBEs: less than 1 D (0%), 1 to less than 2D (5%), 2 to less than 3 D (22%), 3 to less than 4 D (9%), 4 to less than 5D (22%), 5 to less than 6D (23%), 6 to less than 7D (11%), and at least 7D (8%). Reductions in sBEs and sTJBEs during on-demand versus prophylaxis treatment were experienced by all 13 patients. Target joint sABR during prophylaxis was 0 for 5/13 patients. ABR reduction ranged from 66.1% (27.2 -> 9.2) to 97.8% (46.2 -> 1.0); sTJBE reductions ranged from 6.2% (2.1 -> 2.0) to 100% (from 40.1, 19.1, 3.9, 9.0, 6.1--0). During prophylaxis, 47% (8/17) of trough FIX activity samples were more than 2%. In sBE patients, ABR and number of TJBEs were reduced with once-weekly nonacog alfa. When sBEs occurred, they followed no apparent pattern for day of occurrence. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01335061., Pfizer Inc., Editorial support was provided by Teri O'Neill of Pelo-ton Advantage, Parsippany, New Jersey, an OPEN Health company, and was funded by Pfizer Inc.

WOS: 000442583600048, PubMed ID: 29582525, IntroductionThe pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) have been demonstrated in haemophilia A patients aged 6years. AimThese studies aimed to further describe moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) experience in paediatric patients (, PfizerPfizer, Pfizer

An open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, crossover study comparing the pharmacokinetics of factor VIII activity in plasma (FVIII:C) after administration of an albumin-free presentation of moroctocog alfa (test) and moroctocog alfa manufactured using the previous technique (reference) was conducted in 30 (25 evaluable) male subjects who had severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1 IU/dL). Blood samples were collected for 48 h after administration of each dose. FVIII C was assayed using a chromogenic substrate assay. The FVIII:C pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. The presentations would be bioequivalent if the 90% confidence limits of the ratio of the geometric mean values of AUCinf and recovery fell within the interval of 80-125%. The bioequivalence criteria were met. A total of 10 treatment-related adverse events were observed in a total of nine subjects. All were mild and none was determined to be related to administration of study medication.

A randomized, parallel-dose study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of etanercept in 61 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received doses from 10 mg once-weekly to 50 mg twice-weekly for 4 weeks. Empiric application of a maximal-effect (Emax) model to pooled steady-state concentrations (Css) and PD markers provided half-maximal-effect concentration estimates of 567, 573, 465, 87, and 159 ng/mL for change from baseline in number of swollen joints, number of painful joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukin-6, and matrix metalloproteinase-3, respectively. Css >∼2,000 ng/mL did not appear to offer additional benefit. It was concluded that the middle doses, 10 mg twice-weekly, 50 mg every 2 weeks, and 50 mg once-weekly, would provide Css in the target range of 500–2,000 ng/mL. The revised US Food and Drug Administration guideline for development of medicines for treatment of RA encourages a study design incorporating PK/PD assessment to inform later studies.

This study investigated the disposition of coagulation factor VIII activity in 754 patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A following the administration of moroctocog alfa, a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII. Data analyzed included patients aged 1 day to 73 years enrolled in 13 studies conducted over a period of 20 years in 25 countries. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with a baseline model described the pooled data well. Body size, age, inhibitors, race, and analytical assay were identified as significant predictors of factor VIII disposition. In addition, simulations of prophylactic dosing schedules in several pediatric cohorts showed large variability and suggest that younger patients would require higher weight-adjusted doses than adolescents to achieve target factor VIII trough activity when receiving every other day or twice weekly dosing.

Rivipansel is a pan-selectin inhibitor in phase 3 development for the treatment of vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease. This single-dose, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment (400 mg moxifloxacin open-label, 4 g rivipansel-blinded, and placebo-blinded) crossover study evaluated the effect of rivipansel on the QT/QTc interval in 48 healthy male African American subjects (age, 21-53 years; weight, 60-115 kg). Time-matched, placebo-adjusted change from baseline QT interval using Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) was determined using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. The highest upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for QTcF change was 3.22 milliseconds 3 hours postdose. Moxifloxacin showed the anticipated QTcF effect, indicating that the study had adequate sensitivity to detect changes in the QTcF interval. The study concluded that no QTcF effect was demonstrated with rivipansel compared with placebo, as the upper bound of the 2-sided 90%CI was less than 10 milliseconds at all times. Exposure-response modeling for rivipansel concentrations and change from baseline in QTcF data corroborated a lack of effect with rivipansel compared with placebo. Single doses of rivipansel 4 g by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes were well tolerated in this study.

Two studies evaluated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of rivipansel (NCT02813798, NCT02871570). A single intravenous 840-mg rivipansel dose was administered to subjects with renal impairment or normal renal function in study 1005 and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function in study 1006. Plasma (both studies) and urine (study 1005) samples were collected for 96 hours postdose. All subjects in studies 1005 (n = 28) and 1006 (n = 16) completed all study procedures. Rivipansel exposure (AUCinf ) was 47%, 124%, and 437% higher and total clearance 30%, 57%, and 82% lower in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, than in the normal renal function group. Overall rivipansel exposure was 20% lower and total clearance 31% higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal hepatic function group. Ten treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in studies 1005 and 1006; no event was considered treatment related. As expected, clearance of rivipansel decreased with increasing renal impairment. The difference observed between rivipansel pharmacokinetics in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function was not considered clinically significant. Single doses of rivipansel were well tolerated in subjects with either renal or hepatic impairment.

BACKGROUND: The need for antimicrobial therapies effective against multidrug resistant organisms for children remains unmet. Tigecycline shows antibacterial activity across a broad spectrum of bacteria and is approved for treating complicated skin and skin-structure infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections and, in the United States, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia for adult patients. No blinded, randomized phase 3 tigecycline clinical trials on neonates or children have been completed or planned. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of all the existing data sources, both on-label and off-label, for tigecycline use in children. METHODS: Data on tigecycline use in children were identified from published and unpublished sources including clinical trials, expanded access and compassionate use programs, databases of healthcare records and patient safety monitoring. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic simulations predicted that tigecycline 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose 50 mg) every 12 hours (q12h) in children 8-11 years and 50 mg q12h in children 12 to

Background: Nonacog alfa (recombinant factor IX [FIX]) is approved in China for the control and prevention of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia B. This was the first study to assess prophylaxis and on-demand therapy with recombinant FIX replacement in a real-world setting in China. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa in Chinese patients with hemophilia B. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02336178), patients received on-demand or prophylactic treatment with intravenous nonacog alfa for approximately 6 months or 50 exposure days, whichever occurred first. The primary safety outcome was medically important events (i.e., development of FIX inhibitors, allergic reactions, and thrombotic events). Key secondary efficacy outcomes included the annualized bleeding rate for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis, response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions per bleeding event, and the number of breakthrough bleeding events within 48 hours of prophylaxis. Results: Seventy male patients (mean [standard deviation] age 7.8 [7.2] years) were enrolled (on-demand, n = 37; prophylaxis, n = 57 [24 patients were included in both groups]). Thirty-eight (54%) patients had up to 50 FIX exposure days before the study. The only medically important event was a transient low-titer FIX inhibitor (incidence 1.4%, 95% confidence interval, 0–7.7). The mean annualized bleeding rate was 26.3 for on-demand treatment and 6.5 for prophylaxis. A mean (standard deviation) of 1.5 (1.7) nonacog alfa infusions were given per bleeding episode; 78.8% of episodes resolved with 1 infusion. Response was “excellent” or “good” for 88% of the on-demand infusions. Twenty-three bleeding events (n = 11 patients) occurred within 48 hours of 2032 prophylaxis doses (1.13%). Conclusion: In the real-world setting, nonacog alfa is safe and effective for on-demand treatment and for prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B in China.

Purpose Nonacog alfa, a recombinant factor IX (FIX) product, is used for FIX replacement in the treatment and prevention of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia B. This study aimed to provide supplemental pharmacokinetic (PK), efficacy, and safety data for nonacog alfa when administered as part of usual hemophilia care, including on-demand treatment, routine prophylaxis, and surgical prophylaxis. Methods Men with previously treated severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (FIX activity ≤2%) were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter study. An initial 72-hour PK assessment was performed wherein patients received a single dose of nonacog alfa (75 IU/kg) as an infusion over 10 minutes. A final 72-hour PK assessment was performed at the patient's last visit, after a minimum washout period of 4 days. Correlations between C max after the first dose and body weight and body mass index (BMI) were assessed post hoc using Spearman test after evaluating normality. Findings In total, 23 patients (age, 12–59 years; weight, 44–173 kg; and BMI, 16.3–45.1) with previous exposure to FIX products (median, 460 days; range, 150–2400 days) were enrolled; 21 were evaluable for efficacy. The median number of exposure days per efficacy-evaluable patient in this study was 48 (range, 31–103). The FIX activity profiles showed multiphasic disposition characteristics, with initial mean (SD) PK profiles as follows: C max , 61.4 (12.5) IU/dL; AUC ∞ , 1055 (227) IU·h/dL; t ½, 23.7 (5.6) hours; and recovery, 0.818 (0.167) IU/dL. Mean plasma FIX activity versus time profiles were essentially identical upon initial exposure and after repeated use (n = 17), and bioequivalence was confirmed. No apparent relationship was observed between C max and either body weight ( P > 0.1732) or BMI ( P > 0.1235). Implications The FIX activity profile after administration of nonacog alfa is predictable and is not altered after repeated exposure during usual hemophilia care. PK parameters are consistent with nonacog alfa use for FIX replacement in on-demand treatment, routine prophylaxis, and surgical prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B.

Limited data are available on optimal prophylaxis regimens of factor IX (FIX) replacements for patients with haemophilia B.This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog alfa compared with on-demand treatment in adolescent and adult patients.Males aged 12-65 years with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2%) were eligible for enrolment. Patients received on-demand treatment for 26 weeks, followed by once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Secondary end points included response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions used to treat bleeding events, and the incidence of less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE). FIX:C was measured on day 1 and at weeks 26 and 78.Mean (±SD) ABR was lower during prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment [3.6 (±4.6) vs. 32.9 (±17.4) events, respectively; P 0.0001]. The majority (88.4%) of bleeding events had excellent or good responses upon the first infusion; 82.1% of events responded to the first infusion. No incident of LETE occurred. No thrombotic events or FIX inhibitors were reported. Eight of 17 FIX:C approximately 1 week after dosing were2 IU dL(-1) (min-max of 2.13-10.39 IU dL(-1) ).Once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) was associated with lower ABR compared with on-demand treatment in adolescents and adults with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B. Once-weekly prophylaxis was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile as that reported during the on-demand treatment period. Residual FIX:C may be supportive of effectiveness.

Objectives\ud \ud In a separate document, we have provided specific guidance on performing individual pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using limited samples in persons with hemophilia with the goal to optimize prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates. This paper, intended for clinicians, aims to describe how to interpret and apply PK properties obtained in persons with hemophilia. \ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud The members of the Working Party on population PK (PopPK) of the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor VIII and IX and rare bleeding disorders, together with additional hemophilia and PK experts, completed a survey and ranking exercise whereby key areas of interest in the field were identified. The group had regular web conferences to refine the manuscript’s scope and structure, taking into account comments from the external feedback to the earlier document. \ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud Many clinical decisions in hemophilia are based on some form of explicit or implicit PK assessment. Individual patient PK profiles can be analyzed through traditional or PopPK methods, with the latter providing the advantage of fewer samples needing to be collected on any prophylaxis regimen, and without the need the for a washout period. The most useful presentation of PK results for clinical decision making are a curve of the factor activity level over time, the time to achieve a certain activity level, or related parameters like half‐life or exposure (AUC). Software platforms have been developed to deliver this information to clinicians at the point of care. Key characteristics of studies measuring average PK parameters were reviewed, outlining what makes a credible head‐to‐head comparison among different concentrates. Large data collections of PK and treatment outcomes currently ongoing will advance care in the future. \ud \ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud Traditionally used to compare different concentrates, PK can support tailoring of hemophilia treatment by individual profiling, which is greatly simplified by adopting a PopPK/Bayesian method and limited sampling protocol.

SummaryThis prospective, open-label, postauthorisation safety surveillance study assessed clinically significant inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products to reformulated moroctocog alfa (AF-CC). Males aged12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C) < 1 IU/dl), > 150 exposure days (EDs) to recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII products, and no detectable inhibitor at screening were enrolled. Primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development. Secondary end points included annualised bleeding rate (ABR), less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE), and FVIII recovery. Patients were assigned to one of two cohorts based on whether they were transitioning to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) from moroctocog alfa (cohort 1; n=146) or from another recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII product (cohort 2; n=62). Mean number of EDs on study was 94 (range, 1–139). Six positive FVIII inhibitor results, as determined by local laboratories, were reported in four patients; none were confirmed by a central laboratory, no inhibitor-related clinical manifestations were reported, and all anti-FVIII antibody assays were negative. Median ABRs were 23.4 and 3.4 in patients categorised at baseline as following on-demand and prophylactic regimens, respectively; 86.5 % of bleeding episodes resolved after one infusion. LETE incidence was 0.06 % and 0.19 % in the on-demand and prophylaxis settings, respectively. FVIII recovery remained constant throughout the study. No new safety concerns were identified. This study found no increased risk of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development in patients transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other FVIII replacement products to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC).

Bazedoxifene (BZA), a chemically distinct selective estrogen receptor modulator, has demonstrated efficacy and long-term safety in phase 3 placebo-controlled studies for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Here, we assessed the potential effects of age and renal function on BZA pharmacokinetics in healthy postmenopausal women (aged 55-84 years; CLcr, 32-109 mL/min). This was an open-label, single-dose, parallel, nonrandomized inpatient study conducted in healthy postmenopausal women and postmenopausal women with impaired renal function. Each subject received a single oral dose of BZA in a 20-mg tablet. Twenty-six subjects were enrolled: 8 in each of 3 age groups (55-64 years, 65-74 years, ≥75 years) and 2 (aged 71 and 75 years) with mild renal impairment; all subjects received treatment and completed the study. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics were apparent. Although the correlation was modest (R2 = 0.28), BZA CL/F decreased steadily with age, such that the oldest group (>75 years) had a mean CL/F 60% less than the youngest group (55-64 years). Over the observed range of CLcr, there was a weak positive correlation (R2 = 0.19) between BZA CL/F and CLcr.

Risk for thrombotic events with factor IX replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia B remains a concern for patients, those who treat them, and regulatory agencies, based on experience with early use of prothrombin complex concentrates. The current post hoc analysis assessed the incidence of thrombotic events and changes in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and D-dimer in 221 patients with haemophilia B who received nonacog alfa in clinical studies. Thrombotic event and coagulation marker data were collected from 8 interventional studies utilizing on-demand, prophylactic, and preventive regimens in patients with haemophilia B. Mean age was 25 years (min-max, 0-69), with 51 (23%) patients aged less than 12 years and 15 (7%) aged less than 2 years. None tested positive for inhibitors. Mean time on study was 60.9 ± 32 weeks and mean number of exposure days was 69.3 (min-max, 1-496). Sixty-nine (31%) patients regularly received infusions that were approximately 100 IU/kg as part of a routine prophylaxis regimen, and 29 (13%) patients underwent surgical procedures. No clinical thrombotic events were reported, and no patient experienced clinically significant changes in coagulation markers between baseline and end-of-study testing. These collective data support the low thrombotic risk associated with nonacog alfa in paediatric, adult, and surgical patients with haemophilia B receiving different treatment regimens, including doses of approximately 100 IU/kg. Although careful thrombotic clinical evaluation is important, regular coagulation marker monitoring does not appear to be warranted in patients with haemophilia B.

Reluctance to enroll pediatric subjects in clinical trials has left gaps in information about dosing, safety, and efficacy of medications. Pharmacotherapeutic information for pediatric patients may be available for only a small range of ages and may be deficient, as children respond differently as they grow and mature from prematurity to adolescence. Current regulations, however, require early planning for the participation of children in drug development, as pediatric plans must be submitted at the end of phase 1 (European Union) or the end of phase 2 (United States). These plans are extensive, outlining planned studies, subjects to be enrolled, dose and dosage form justification, planned observations, and statistical analysis as well as planned modeling, simulation, and extrapolation analyses. The extent to which efficacy information in adults can be extrapolated to children depends on how similar the disease is in adults and each of the 5 pediatric age groups. Extrapolation may not be possible for conditions that do not occur in adults, requiring a complete development plan in adults, or extrapolation may be complete because of similar pathology and response to treatment. Pharmacokinetic and safety information cannot be extrapolated and must be collected in children of all ages, unless a waiver is granted. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, optimal design, population pharmacokinetics, and scavenged samples are all examples of new methodologies being used to study pediatric therapeutics. Clinicaltrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials registry are good sources of results of pediatric trials, although sponsors are also working toward prompt publication of study results in peer-reviewed journals.

Biologicals are a rapidly expanding class of medications used in the treatment of many different conditions. This article reviews the common characteristics of this class and the requirements for safe and effective use in patients. Several vignettes are included to illustrate common challenges.

The development of medicines involves not only the translation of information collected in preclinical in vitro and in vivo experiments to clinical studies in healthy volunteers, also known as T1 translation, but additionally the optimization of the new medication within the environment of medical care, the translation from healthy volunteer to patient, also known as T2 translation. How do the pharmacokinetic parameters vary with different doses? What is the best dose? Can the new medication be combined with other therapies? This chapter begins with a discussion of the overall strategy and individual steps to determine a drug candidate’s pharmacology, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME), and drug-drug interactions in clinical studies, as well as subsequent evaluation of preclinical predictions. Integration of concentration-time data to develop population pharmacokinetic models and the use of biomarkers in clinical studies are discussed. Biomarkers can be particularly helpful in diseases where obvious clinical pathology may lag behind changes in laboratory values or other more easily measured surrogates. Case studies are also presented illustrating applications of translational research in the development of possible therapeutic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s disease.

Objective To assess the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with the TNF inhibitors etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADL), or infliximab (IFX), and determine the potential relationship with trough drug concentration, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods This multi-national, non-interventional, cross-sectional study (NCT01981473) enrolled adult patients with RA treated continuously for 6–24 months with ETN, ADL, or IFX. ADA and trough drug concentrations were measured by independent assays ≤2 days before the next scheduled dose. Efficacy measurements included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28), low disease activity (LDA), remission, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Targeted medical histories of injection site/infusion reactions, serum sickness, and thromboembolic events were collected. Results Baseline demographics of the 595 patients (ETN: n = 200; ADL: n = 199; IFX: n = 196) were similar across groups. The mean duration of treatment was 14.6, 13.5, and 13.1 months for ETN, ADL, and IFX, respectively. All ETN-treated patients tested negative for ADA, whereas 31.2% and 17.4% patients treated with ADL and IFX, respectively, tested positive. In ADL- or IFX-treated patients, those with ADA had significantly lower trough drug concentrations. There were negative correlations between trough drug levels and both CRP and ESR in ADL- and IFX-treated patients. DAS28-ESR LDA and remission rates were higher in patients without ADA. The rate of targeted medical events reported was low. Conclusion ADA were detected in ADL- and IFX-treated but not ETN-treated patients. Patients without ADA generally showed numerically better clinical outcomes than those with ADA. Trial registration This study was registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01981473).

UNLABELLED An open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, cross-over study comparing the pharmacokinetics of factor VIII activity in plasma ( FVIII C) after administration of a new presentation of moroctocog alfa containing 3,000 IU in a dual-chamber syringe and the combined contents of approved 1,000 and 2,000 IU vials was conducted in 16 male subjects who had moderately severe or severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2 IU/dL). Blood samples were collected for 72 hours after administration of the dose. FVIII C were assayed using a chromogenic substrate assay in a central laboratory. The FVIII C pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. The dual-chamber syringe would be bioequivalent to the combined contents of the vials if the 90% confidence limits of the ratio of the geometric mean values of AUCinf , and Cmax fell within the interval of 80-125%. The bioequivalence criteria were met. A total of seven treatment related adverse events were observed in a total of five subjects. All were mild and none was determined to be related to administration of study medication.

This open-label, nonrandomized study was conducted to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in 24 stable Chinese renal transplant patients receiving daily oral maintenance doses of sirolimus (1-4 mg). Repeated trough and serial whole blood sirolimus concentrations over a 24-hour dosing interval were collected and assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was employed to calculate sirolimus pharmacokinetic parameters. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotyping was performed. Cyclosporine (CsA) levels were determined for patients who took concomitant CsA. Mean (±SD) sirolimus maximum concentration (Cmax ), area under the concentration-time curve within a dosing interval of τ (AUCτ ), oral clearance (CL/F), and trough concentration (Ctrough ) at steady state were: 14.1 ± 13.4 ng/mL, 199 ± 210 ng · h/mL, 10.1 ± 4.4 L/h, and 5.9 ± 6.3 ng/mL, respectively. Median tmax (range) was 2.49 hours (1-12 hours). A strong correlation was observed between Ctrough and AUCτ . Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in patients with and without concomitant CsA were comparable. Allele frequency of CYP3A5*3 was 70.9% and a trend of higher oral clearance was observed in CYP3A5 expressers compared with non-expressers although the number of subjects in each genotype was small.

Results of therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus blood concentrations are assay and laboratory dependent. This study compared performance over time of the IMx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) as part of a proficiency testing scheme. Pooled samples from sirolimus-treated patients and whole-blood samples spiked with known quantities of sirolimus were assayed monthly between 2004 and 2012. When results of pooled patient samples were compared with LC/MS/MS, the MEIA assay showed an overall mean percent bias of -2.3% ± 11.2% that, although initially positive, became increasingly negative from 2007 through 2009. The CMIA, which replaced the MEIA assay, had a mean percent bias of 21.9% ± 12.3%, remaining stable from 2007 through 2012. Similarly, for spiked samples, the MEIA showed an increasingly negative bias over time vs. LC/MS/MS, whereas CMIA maintained a stable positive bias. Based on comparison of immunoassay measurements on individual patient samples, CMIA values were more than 25% higher than MEIA values. These results highlight the importance of continued proficiency testing and regular monitoring of sirolimus assay performance. Clinicians must be aware of the methodology used and adjust target levels accordingly to avoid potential effects on efficacy and toxicity.

Summary Few randomized studies have reported on the use of factor IX (FIX) for secondary prophylaxis in haemophilia B patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two secondary prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation FIX, nonacog alfa, compared with on-demand therapy. Male subjects aged 6–65 years with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2, n = 50) and ≥12 bleeding episodes (including ≥6 haemarthroses episodes) within 12 months of study participation were enrolled in this multicentre, randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial. The primary measure was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of two prophylactic regimens vs. on-demand therapy. In the intent-to-treat group, mean ABR values were 35.1, 2.6 and 4.6 for the first on-demand period, the 50 IU kg−1 twice-weekly period, and the 100 IU kg−1 once-weekly period respectively. Differences in ABR between the first on-demand period and both prophylaxis regimens were significant (P

The transformation of medical education, with the disappearance of sequential lectures in pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and therapeutics, has left gaps in skills needed for new physicians and other prescribers to safely incorporate medications into clinical practice. Brinkman et al. conducted a Delphi study of European Union (EU) medical school educators and practitioners to identify core competencies needed to prescribe medications. Their findings offer directions for learned societies, such as ASCPT, to enhance pharmacology education and practice.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in 76 healthy Japanese subjects were determined in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Subjects in an ascending single-dose study (n = 40) received 25-150 mg intravenously, whereas subjects in two multiple-dose studies received every 12-hour (q12h) dosing with 25 mg (n = 10) or 25, 50, or 100 then 50 mg (n = 30). Serial blood samples and urine were collected, drug concentrations determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated. Fecal samples were also collected in the second multiple-dose study. After 10 days of tigecycline 50 mg q12h, mean ± standard deviation pharmacokinetics in 8/10 subjects were: maximum concentration 1,118 ± 127 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve 0-12 hours 3,261 ± 937 ng h/mL, clearance 0.25 ± 0.05 L/h/kg, half-life 60.7 ± 23.4 hours, and volume of distribution 11.9 ± 2.3 L/kg. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting. Changes in total bilirubin were also observed. Enterococci in the intestinal microflora were reduced, whereas the number of Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides remained relatively constant. Several strains of Bacteroides spp. resistant to tigecycline treatment were found in fecal samples on days 30 and 31. The pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline was similar to non-Japanese subjects; tolerability and change in intestinal microflora were also similar.

Objectives To examine the incidence of pancreatitis among subjects enrolled in the tigecycline clinical trial programme, summarize cases and examine concomitant use of other pancreatitis-causing medications. Methods Subject data from Phase 3 and 4 comparative tigecycline studies were included in the analysis; investigator-reported adverse events of ‘pancreatitis’, ‘necrotizing pancreatitis’ or ‘pancreas disorder’ were reviewed. Data were summarized and cases were reported. No statistical comparisons were made. The incidence of overall pancreatitis with 95% CIs was calculated. The Wilson score method was used to calculate CIs. Results Nineteen subjects with investigator-determined pancreatitis were identified from the programme database, which included 3788 subjects treated with tigecycline and 3646 subjects treated with a comparator. There were 9 cases identified among the tigecycline-treated subjects [9 of 3788 (0.24%; 95% CI, 0.11–0.45)] and 10 cases among the comparator-treated subjects [10 of 3646 (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.13–0.50)]. The demographic characteristics of the subjects with pancreatitis were similar between treatment groups. The median duration of tigecycline therapy was 8.0 days compared with 11.0 days of comparator treatment. Concomitant or prior exposure to a Badalov class I medication was evident in the majority of subjects who developed pancreatitis. A numerically higher number of tigecycline-treated subjects were exposed to furosemide prior to the onset of pancreatitis than comparator-treated subjects. Conclusions Pancreatitis was uncommon in subjects treated with tigecycline, with an occurrence of

Thegoalofthethisstudywastore‐evaluatetigecyclineboneconcentrationsinsubjectsundergoingelectiveorthopedicsurgery,usingmultipledosesand a more robust bone assay than was used in a previous study. Each subject received three intravenous doses of tigecycline (one 100‐mg infusion followed

Sirolimus, metabolized primarily by intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4, is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. CYP3A4 inducers would be expected to decrease sirolimus exposure. This open-label, nonrandomized study investigated effects of CYP3A4 induction, by rifampin, on sirolimus pharmacokinetics. Healthy volunteers received sirolimus 20 mg on day 1. After washout period, multiple 600-mg rifampin doses were administered daily for 14 days. On day 9, one 20-mg sirolimus dose was administered after an overnight fast (≥10 hours). Whole blood samples for sirolimus collected for 144 hours after each dose were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters, assessed using noncompartmental methods, were compared using analysis of variance. Geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUCinf were 29% (90% CI: 26, 32%) and 18% (90% CI: 16, 21%), respectively, with rifampin co-administration versus sirolimus alone. Corresponding decreases in Cmax and AUC were 71% and 82%, respectively, which would likely cause trough concentrations to fall below the recommended therapeutic range. Mean CL/F increased approximately fivefold with rifampin versus sirolimus alone. Co-administering sirolimus and potent CYP3A inducers is not recommended. If co-administration is necessary, dose adjustment and concentration monitoring should be conducted.

BACKGROUND Despite a decreased incidence of acute rejection and early renal allograft loss due to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in transplant recipients, nephrotoxicity associated with long-term CNI use remains an important issue. This study evaluated whether a CNI-free regimen, including sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction, results in improved long-term renal function. METHODS This open-label, randomized, parallel group, comparative study in primary de novo renal transplant recipients was planned for 48 months but terminated early because of high acute rejection rates in the sirolimus arm. RESULTS Enrollment was stopped after ≈12 months, with 475 transplanted patients randomized (2:1) to sirolimus (n=314) or cyclosporine A (CsA) treatment (n=161). Mean length of follow-up after transplantation was 190 days; this article focuses on available data through 6 months. Mean±SD on-therapy Nankivell-calculated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different between the sirolimus (69.1±18.7 mL/min) and CsA (66.0±15.2 mL/min) treatment groups. Occurrence and length of delayed graft function was not significantly different between groups. Patients in the sirolimus group experienced numerically lower survival rates (96.9% vs. 99.4%; P=0.14), with nine deaths reported with sirolimus and one with CsA; higher rates of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (21.4% vs. 6.1%; P

Hemophilia A represents up to 80% of all hemophilia cases in China. In patients with this condition, bleeding can be prevented and controlled by administering clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Since their initial availability, recombinant FVIII products have undergone several iterations to enhance their safety. Moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) is among the third generation of recombinant FVIII products and received regulatory approval in China in August 2012. The present study characterizes the single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of FVIII activity (FVIII:C) after administration of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in male Chinese patients with hemophilia A.This multicenter, open-label, single-dose study enrolled 13 male Chinese patients diagnosed with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C1%) and a history of at least 150 exposure-days to any FVIII-containing product. Eligible patients received a single dose of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) 50 IU/kg IV within 10 minutes. Blood samples were collected within 2 hours before administration and through 72 hours after dosing.Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed based on FVIII:C and were analyzed by age groups: ages 6 to12 years (n = 3) and ≥12 years (n = 10). The mean plasma concentration-time profile for FVIII:C activity was consistently lower in patients aged 6 to12 years compared with those aged ≥12 years. Geometric AUCThis is the first report of the pharmacokinetic parameters of FVIII:C after moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in an all-Chinese population of males with hemophilia A. The pharmacokinetic profile in older patients was similar to that previously reported with recombinant FVIII products in studies with a predominantly white population; younger patients had reduced exposure to FVIII:C. The single doses of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) were well tolerated; 2 cases of transient, low-titer FVIII inhibitor development were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02461992.

SummaryA multicentre, single–dose study enrolled 12 previously treated patients with moderately severe to severe (factor IX [FIX] levels ≤2 IU/dl) haemophilia B to assess FIX pharmacokinetics after nonacog alfa administration and to evaluate the impact of length of sampling time on half-life (t½). After refraining from FIX replacement for four days, patients received 50 IU/kg as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 10 minutes. Blood samples were collected predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 24, 50, 72, and 96 h post dose. Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events and were subsequently summary tabulated. FIX activity was measured by a one-stage clotting assay with a lower limit of quantification of 0.010 IU/ml, and inhibitors to FIX were measured using the Bethesda assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and were descriptively summarised. Half-life estimates were calculated first using all available data, then excluding 96-h observations (truncated at 72 h) and, finally, excluding both 72– and 96-h observations (truncated at 50 h). No patient was positive for FIX inhibitors. No treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Prolonging the duration of the sample collection to 96 h resulted in a terminal t½ estimate of 39.6 ±7.4 h in the eight patients aged 18 years and older, which was longer than the estimates obtained using shorter periods of observation: 29.6 ± 5.5 h (truncated at 72 h) and 27.2 ± 7.0 h (truncated at 50 h). To accurately assess an adult patient’s t½, sampling should be continued for at least 96 h.

Although definitions of rare disease vary, most acknowledge that there are small numbers of affected patients compared with other conditions. Small numbers of patients, overlapping involvement of investigators as researchers and caregivers, as well as close relationships between researchers and manufacturers require a different pattern of drug development. Regulatory guidances for rare diseases are available, as well as ones for specific rare diseases. Maintaining drug supply for rare diseases also demands innovative approaches.

The antiparasitic agent moxidectin is under development for the treatment of onchocerciasis. As the first-in-human study of moxidectin used a liquid formulation but other trials used tablets, a study was performed to determine the relative bioavailability of the 2 formulations and to gain more information about the pharmacokinetics of moxidectin. Fifty-eight healthy male participants were randomized to receive open-label moxidectin (10 mg) as a tablet (n = 29) or liquid (n = 29) formulation. The mean ± SD pharmacokinetic parameters observed following administration of the tablet were peak concentration (Cmax) 67.1 ± 27.4 ng/mL, time to peak concentration (tmax) 3.2 ± 1.4 hours, area under the concentration time curve (AUC) 4403 ± 2360 ng·h/mL, apparent volume of distribution 3635 ± 1720 L, oral clearance 2.83 ± 1.25 L/h, and elimination half-life 1032 ± 502 hours. The Cmax and AUC observed following administration of the liquid formulation were 28.6% and 28.8% higher, respectively, and tmax 0.9 hours shorter compared with tablets. No serious adverse events (AEs) were observed. The most commonly reported AEs were headache, infection, diarrhea, asthenia, myalgia, and dizziness during the inpatient phase and flu syndrome, headache, and infection during the 6-month outpatient phase. There was no difference in reporting of these AEs between formulations.

Availability of a lower dose tablet would add to the dosing flexibility of currently available 1- and 2-mg sirolimus tablets for optimal concentrations and patient compliance. A randomized, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 30 fasting healthy volunteers (29 men, aged 31 ± 8 years, weight 79 ± 12 kg). Subjects were given 5 mg of sirolimus, either as doses of the 0.5-mg nonshellac-core prototype, 0.5-mg shellac-core prototype, or approved 1-mg tablet. Whole blood samples were collected at selected time points for 144 hours after dosing and analyzed using LC/MS/MS assay. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, followed by bioequivalence assessment. Twenty-four subjects completed all dosing periods, and no formulation-associated adverse events were reported. Ratios of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the concentration-time curve to the last measured concentration (AUCT ), and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC) for the nonshellac-core prototype compared with the 1-mg tablet were within the 80% to 125% range dictated by bioequivalence conventions. Similar results were observed when comparing the ratios of AUCT and AUC for the shellac-core prototype, while 90% confidence interval of the ratio of Cmax values was 105% to 129%. Within the context of clinical equivalence standards established by a phase 3 study comparing liquid to tablet formulations, it was concluded that both prototypes were clinically bioequivalent to the reference formulation.

As part of drug development, drug companies conduct experiments to gather data about the potential toxicity of medications in pregnant and lactating animals. Increasingly, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models are developed to simulate drug concentrations in pregnant and lactating women. As these women are not usually included in clinical trials, targeted postapproval safety monitoring, registries, or clinical studies may be performed to gather safety and efficacy information about drug use in these special populations.

Purpose The aim is to develop a pharmacokinetic model for factor IX activity (FIX) after BeneFIX (nonacog alfa, rFIX) administration and assess potential covariates using all available clinical data collected during development. Methods The data set for model development combined observations from eight studies. Postdose FIX observations were adjusted by subtracting predose FIX if these were above the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) and all BLQ observations were removed. A population pharmacokinetic model was then developed with 4936 observations from 201 patients. Two additional studies (385 observations from 72 patients) became available and were used to evaluate the model. Results A two-compartment model, parameterized for clearance (CL), volume of distribution of the central (V1) and peripheral (V2) compartments, and intercompartmental clearance (Q), with an effect of weight on all parameters was the final model. Weight was incorporated as a power function with exponent estimates close to conventional allometric scaling. Including interoccasion variability (IOV) on CL and V1 showed decreases in the objective function. Investigations of a full block omega matrix lead to the retention of a correlation between V2 and Q. Age was not a significant covariate with weight already included in the model. Observations in the studies used for evaluation were found to be higher than simulated values immediately after dosing, as well as a week after dosing. The differences may be due perhaps to differences in the patients enrolled in the evaluation studies (all were adults) as well as the sample collection time after dosing (longer after dosing in the evaluation studies). Conclusions FIX is appropriately modelled as a two-compartment model after rFIX administration. When weight is included, no additional effect of age is observed. Longer times of observation after dosing may be helpful in refining the model.

Sirolimus and tacrolimus are immunosuppressive compounds that have been used concomitantly in renal transplant patients. Both drugs are dosed orally and have common intestinal and hepatic metabolism and intestinal transport mechanisms. As such, there is a potential for pharmacokinetic drug interaction.A single-dose, open-label, four-period, four-treatment, randomized crossover study was conducted in 27 healthy fasting volunteers. Each subject received a 15-mg oral dose of sirolimus alone, a 10-mg oral dose of tacrolimus alone, sirolimus and tacrolimus administered simultaneously, and tacrolimus administered 4 h before sirolimus. Whole blood and plasma samples for sirolimus and tacrolimus testing were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using noncompartmental methods and were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA).The geometric mean ratio and 90 % confidence interval (CI) area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) for sirolimus administered simultaneously with tacrolimus versus sirolimus alone were 97 and 89-106, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus sirolimus alone, 107 and 98-117, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (%) and 90 % CI AUCinf for tacrolimus administered simultaneously with sirolimus versus tacrolimus alone were 92 and 82-102, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus tacrolimus alone, 94 and 84-105, respectively.The results of this study demonstrate a lack of any clinically important drug interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy subjects after single-dose administration. However, due to the complexity of anti-rejection immunosuppressive therapy dosing, we suggest that sirolimus and tacrolimus concentration monitoring be performed when changes in dosing are made for either drug regimen.

Pharmacokinetic and clinical data from tigecycline-treated patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) who were enrolled in a phase 3 clinical trial were integrated in order to evaluate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for efficacy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with clinical and microbiological responses, based on data from 61 evaluable HAP patients who received tigecycline intravenously as a 100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h for a minimum of 7 days and for whom there were adequate clinical, pharmacokinetic, and response data. The final multivariable logistic regression model for clinical response contained albumin and the ratio of the free-drug area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h ( f AUC 0–24 ) to the MIC ( f AUC 0–24 :MIC ratio). The odds of clinical success were 13.0 times higher for every 1-g/dl increase in albumin ( P < 0.001) and 8.42 times higher for patients with f AUC 0–24 :MIC ratios of ≥0.9 compared to patients with f AUC 0–24 :MIC ratios of P = 0.008). Average model-estimated probabilities of clinical success for the albumin/ f AUC 0–24 :MIC ratio combinations of P < 0.001) and 8.59 times higher for patients without VAP compared to those with VAP ( P = 0.003). Among the remaining variables evaluated, the MIC had the greatest statistical significance, an observation which was not surprising given the differences in MIC distributions between VAP and non-VAP patients (MIC 50 and MIC 90 values of 0.5 and 0.25 mg/liter versus 16 and 1 mg/liter for VAP versus non-VAP patients, respectively; P = 0.006). These findings demonstrated the impact of pharmacological and patient-specific factors on the clinical and microbiological responses.

Exposure-response analyses for efficacy and safety were performed for tigecycline-treated patients suffering from community-acquired pneumonia. Data were collected from two randomized, controlled clinical trials in which patients were administered a 100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg of tigecycline every 12 h. A categorical endpoint, success or failure, 7 to 23 days after the end of therapy (test of cure) and a continuous endpoint, time to fever resolution, were evaluated for exposure-response analyses for efficacy. Nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and changes in blood urea nitrogen concentration (BUN) and total bilirubin were evaluated for exposure-response analyses for safety. For efficacy, ratios of the free-drug area under the concentration-time curve at 24 h to the MIC of the pathogen ( f AUC 0-24 :MIC) of ≥12.8 were associated with a faster time to fever resolution; patients with lower drug exposures had a slower time to fever resolution ( P = 0.05). For safety, a multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that a tigecycline AUC above a threshold of 6.87 mg · hr/liter ( P = 0.004) and female sex were predictive of the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting ( P = 0.004). Although statistically significant, the linear relationship between tigecycline exposure and maximum change from baseline in total bilirubin is unlikely to be clinically significant.

The pathology that is associated with onchocerciasis is primarily caused by the accumulation of dead microfilariae in the skin and eyes; clinical manifestations include visual impairment, in some cases permanent blindness, and onchocercal skin dis- ease, which is associated with severe itching, dermatitis, and depigmentation. Moxidectin is a macrocyclic lactone drug derived from the actinomycete Streptomyces cyanogriseus spp. noncyanogenus that is currently being developed in collaboration with the World Health Organization for the treatment of onchocer- ciasis in humans. The drug was initially developed as a vet- erinary product for the treatment of canine heartworm and for the treatment of internal and external parasites in cat- tle, sheep, deer, and horses. 5 Studies have indicated that moxidectin may exert its antiparasitic action by binding to glutamate-gated chloride channels, leading to hyperpolariza- tion of muscle and nerves, and ultimately to paralysis and parasite death. 6, 7 Moxidectin also shows activity at the gamma- aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor complex, where it acts as an agonist and may stimulate the binding of the neurotrans- mitter GABA that leads to parasite death. 8 Abstract. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of moxidectin. Healthy male subjects were randomized to receive single oral 8 mg doses of moxidectin after an overnight fast or high- fat breakfast. In fasted subjects ( N = 27), mean (SD) parameters were C max : 58.9 (12.5) ng/mL; t max : 3.7 (1.5) h; area under concentration-time curve (AUC): 3,387 (1,328) ng/h/mL; Vl z /F: 2,829 (1,267) L; CL/F: 2.76 (1.28) L/h; and t ½ : 784 (347) h. Compared with fasted subjects, fed subjects ( N = 27) exhibited a 34% increase in C max , delay in t max to 5.3 (2.1) h, 44% increase in AUC, 40% decrease in Vl z /F, and a 35% decrease in CL/F. There was no significant change in t ½ . The changes are consistent with an increase in moxidectin bioavailability following administration with food. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, laboratory tests, or electrocardiograms.

Moxidectin, registered worldwide as a veterinary antiparasitic agent, is currently under development for humans for the treatment of onchocerciasis in collaboration with the World Health Organization. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of moxidectin in healthy lactating women, including the excretion into breast milk. Twelve women, ages 23 to 38 years, weighing 54 to 79 kg, all more than 5 months postpartum, were enrolled, following their plan to wean their infants and provision of informed consent. A single 8-mg, open-label dose was administered orally after consumption of a standard breakfast. Complete milk collection was done for approximately 28 days, and plasma samples were collected for 90 days. Moxidectin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection, with a validated range of 0.08 to 120 ng/ml. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods were used to find the following results: peak concentration in plasma ( C max ), 87 ± 25 ng/ml; time to C max ( t max ), 4.18 ± 1.59 h; terminal-phase elimination half-life ( t 1/2 ), 832 ± 321 h; total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 4,046 ± 1,796 ng·h/ml; apparent oral dose clearance (CL/ F ), 2.35 ± 1.07 l/h; ratio of CL/ F to the terminal-phase disposition rate constant, λ z (V λ z / F ), 2,526 ± 772 liters; percentage of maternal dose excreted in milk, 0.701 ± 0.299%; absolute amount excreted in milk, 0.056 ± 0.024 mg; relative infant dose, 8.73 ± 3.17% of maternal dose assuming complete absorption; clearance in milk (CL milk ), 0.016 ± 0.009 liter/h. Nine of 12 subjects reported adverse events, all of which were considered treatment emergent but not drug related and were mostly reported during the long outpatient period 8 to 90 days after dose administration. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache and nausea ( n = 4), oropharyngeal pain ( n = 2), rhinitis, viral pharyngitis, and viral upper respiratory tract infection ( n = 2).

BACKGROUND Long-term immunosuppression imposes increased malignancy risk in renal allograft recipients, significantly contributing to overall morbidity and mortality. This study examined malignancy rates in renal allograft recipients at 2 years after conversion to a sirolimus (SRL)-based, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen. METHODS This open-label, randomized, multicenter study (the CONVERT Trial) randomly assigned 830 patients to SRL conversion (n=555) or CNI continuation (n=275). Patients with history of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease or known/suspected malignancy within 5 years before screening were excluded. As part of standard safety measurements, subjects were monitored for any malignancy occurrence; both skin and nonskin malignancies were reported, even if the patient discontinued from the therapy. Malignancy rates were analyzed based on exposure time to study drugs (i.e., number of events per 100 person-years of follow-up). RESULTS At 2 years postconversion, the total number of malignancies per 100 person-years of exposure was significantly lower among SRL conversion patients compared with CNI continuation (2.1 vs. 6.0, P

Etanercept pharmacokinetics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriasis were assessed separately with distinct models using population pharmacokinetics methods of limited precision. The different model structures and associated significant covariates identified by these earlier methods made it difficult to compare etanercept pharmacokinetics among disease groups. This integrated analysis aimed to establish a framework to evaluate previously established population pharmacokinetic models of etanercept, and to identify consistent and important demographic and disease factors that affected etanercept pharmacokinetics in a diverse population of healthy subjects and patients with RA and AS. In this integrated analysis, cumulative rich and sparse etanercept concentration data from 53 healthy volunteers, 212 patients with RA, and 346 patients with AS were examined and compared using nonlinear mixed effect methodology implemented the in NONMEM VI software package. A more precise estimation method (FOCEi) was employed and compared with the first-order method in population pharmacokinetics model building and evaluation. The integrated analysis found that an optimal population pharmacokinetics model with a 2-compartment structure adequately characterized etanercept pharmacokinetics in all subject groups. Health status or disease type did not significantly affect etanercept pharmacokinetics. In adult patients with RA and AS, age and body weight do not significantly affect etanercept pharmacokinetics.

Background: Rivipansel is a pan-selectin inhibitor in phase 3 development for treatment of sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crises. Previous studies have shown almost complete elimination of unchanged drug in urine following an intravenous (IV) infusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of rivipansel. Methods: A single 840-mg dose of open-label rivipansel was administered IV over 20 minutes to 7 subjects with mild, 7 with moderate, and 7 with severe renal impairment, and to 7 healthy subjects with normal renal function. Classification of renal impairment groups was based on the Cockroft-Gault estimated glomerular filtration rate (CGeGFR): 60-89 mL/min (mild), 30-59 mL/min (moderate), and Results: All 28 subjects completed the study. A summary of PK parameters is presented in Table 1. Overall rivipansel exposure was greater in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, with values 1.4×, 2.3×, and 5.5× that of subjects with normal renal function, respectively. Renal clearance decreased with decreasing renal function. Total clearance was lower by 31%, 56%, and 82% in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, compared with the normal renal function group. Five treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 3 subjects in the mild renal impairment group, and 3 TEAEs were reported in 2 subjects in the severe renal impairment group. None of the TEAEs reported was considered to be treatment-related. Conclusions: Greater rivipansel exposure and decreased clearance were observed in subjects with renal impairment compared with subjects with normal renal function. A single 840-mg IV dose of rivipansel was well tolerated in all groups. Disclosures Tammara: Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Ryan:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Plotka:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Shafer:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Wei:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Readett:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Fang:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Korth-Bradley:Pfizer Inc.: Employment.

Moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII product for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. It has previously been studied in pediatric aged hemophilia patients, however direct comparisons between treatment regimens have not been evaluated. Importantly, as prophylaxis has been shown to be superior to on-demand treatment, comparisons between different prophylaxis regimens are needed. Reducing the frequency of infusions without sacrificing efficacy may reduce the burden of hemophilia management. This study was an open label, multicenter, randomized crossover study of two routine prophylaxis (RP) regimens of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) compared to on-demand (OD) therapy in 2 cohorts of children with hemophilia A. The primary objective was to demonstrate that prophylaxis reduces ABR relative to OD therapy. A secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of two different RP regimens. Additional objectives focused on FVIII recovery and safety. Study Design: The study was open to previously treated patients (≥20 exposure days (ED) to any FVIII replacement product) with moderately severe to severe hemophilia A ( Results: A total of 51 subjects were enrolled in the study: 9 subjects (age 2.4-5.9 yr; median 4.9 yr) in the OD group, 18 subjects (age 1.1-12.7 yr; median 4.7 yr) received LF followed by HF, and 24 subjects (age 1.2 to 9.6 yr; median 4.6 yr) received HF followed by LF. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ABR for the first cohort (n=9) during the OD segment was 47.0(32.2) and during the RP segment (HF) was 1.5(2.2). In those subjects from cohort 2 that completed both segments (n=38), the mean (standard deviation) ABR for HF was 2.2(4.1) and for LF was 3.3(5.3). Based on a prospectively defined equivalence limit of (-3, 3) bleeds per year, equivalence between these two regimens was demonstrated as the 90% CI for the difference, (0.03, 2.22) fell within this range. The mean (SD) recovery in 6 children aged 3.7 to 5.8 yrs was 1.44(0.61) IU/dL/IU/kg. Three subjects tested positive for FVIII inhibitors, however 2 were considered to be false positives for an overall rate of 2%. There were no new safety signals that emerged during this study. Conclusion: This study met its primary objective of demonstrating that RP reduces the ABR compared to OD. Notably, LF prophylaxis with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is as efficacious as a HF prophylaxis regimen. This has important implications as less frequent infusions can improve adherence and the quality of life for patients with hemophilia. Additionally, recovery was as expected in this pediatric population and no new safety signals emerged. Moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is safe and efficacious for routine prophylaxis in pediatric patients with hemophilia A and a low frequency (twice weekly) prophylaxis regimen is as efficacious as every other day prophylaxis. Disclosures Rupon: Pfizer: Employment. Korth-Bradley:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Smith:Pfizer: Employment. Rendo:Pfizer: Employment.

Patients with intra-abdominal infections differ with regard to the type of infection and the severity of illness. However, the impact of these factors, together with differences in drug exposure, on clinical response is not well understood. Using phase 2 and 3 data for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, the relative importance of tigecycline exposure, host factors, and disease factors, alone or in combination, for the probability of clinical response was examined. Patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections who received tigecycline intravenously as a 100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h for 5 to 14 days and who had adequate clinical, pharmacokinetic, and response data were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinical response. A final multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated six factors based on 123 patients to be predictive of clinical success: a weight of P = 0.026), the absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in baseline cultures ( P = 0.021), an APACHE II score of P = 0.029), non-Hispanic race ( P = 0.005), complicated appendicitis or cholecystitis ( P = 0.004), and a ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) of ≥3.1 ( P = 0.003). The average model-predicted probability of clinical success when one unfavorable factor was present was 0.940. This probability was lower (0.855) when the AUC/MIC ratio was