Search

Acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and problem-solving therapy are types of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) group that improve physical and mental health in chronic pain or cancer. However, dropout is high due to group demands alongside physical impairments. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a well-evidenced means of enhancing treatment adherence. Few studies have investigated MI as an adjunct to CBT in cancer or chronic pain, and none have established the minimum MI duration required for adherence improvement. This study evaluated minimal-duration MI to improve adherence in three CBT group types for cancer and chronic pain.In a cohort study of 99 cancer and chronic pain patients, 47 were given a 10- to 15-min structured MI telephone intervention (MI-call) after the first session. The remaining 52 received a CBT group without MI (no-MI).Odds of completing group CBTs were five times greater for patients in the MI-call cohort versus no-MI. Effects remained when controlling for age, gender, diagnosis, group type, and baseline quality of life. The MI-call cohort attended one extra session per patient compared to no-MI, controlling for age, gender, and diagnosis.A brief MI telephone intervention may improve adherence to group CBTs in cancer and chronic pain.A brief motivational interviewing (MI) telephone intervention may reduce dropout from group cognitive-behavioural therapies (CBTs) for cancer and chronic pain patients when administered after the first group session in routine care. Recipients of this intervention were five times more likely to complete a group CBT programme than those who did not receive it. Therefore, a minimal-dose MI intervention can have clinically important effects on dropout in group CBTs for patients with long-term conditions. It is unclear whether this intervention would also result in greater outcome improvements.

Objectives Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can improve symptoms of anxiety and depression, but also reduces the risk of future relapse after therapy completion. However, current CBT relapse prevention methods are resource‐intensive and can be limited in clinical practice. This paper investigates a personalized means of reducing relapse using smart‐messaging in two settings: research and routine care. Design Study 1 presents a cohort study comparing a cohort of smart‐messaging users versus non‐users. Study 2 presents time series follow‐up data from a case series of smart‐messaging users from clinical practice. Methods Fifteen of 56 CBT completers who participated in a trial for the treatment of health anxiety wrote advice they would want if in future they were doing well, experiencing early warning signs of relapse, or experiencing full relapse. Following CBT, participants received weekly text‐message requests to rate their well‐being. Dependent upon their response, participants received tailored advice they had written, appropriate to the well‐being level reported after recovery from health anxiety. Smart‐messaging was also trialled in a routine practice sample of 14 CBT completers with anxiety and depression. Results Across a 12‐month follow‐up, participants receiving smart‐messaging showed greater health improvements than those who did not. Well‐being scores showed stability between CBT completion and 6‐month follow‐up among routine care patients. Conclusions These findings suggest that a low‐intensity, personalized relapse prevention method can have a clinical benefit following CBT for common mental health problems. Practitioner points Post‐treatment outcomes may be improved using personalized smart‐messaging to prevent relapse following cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for health anxiety.In clinical practice, post‐treatment smart‐messaging can be well‐used by patients and may help maintain stable well‐being in the 6 months after CBT ends.This evidence supports the clinical utility of a brief tailored digital intervention, which can be integrated within routine clinical practice with minimal therapist input.Overall, longer‐term post‐CBT outcomes may be improved by integrating a smart‐messaging intervention at the end of therapy.

Objective \ud Depression and anxiety lead to reduced treatment adherence, poorer quality of life, and increased care costs amongst cancer patients. Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is an effective treatment, but dropout reduces potential benefits. Smart‐message reminders can prevent dropout and improve effectiveness. However, smart‐messaging is untested for MBCT in cancer. This study evaluates smart‐messaging to reduce dropout and improve effectiveness in MBCT for cancer patients with depression or anxiety.MethodsFifty‐one cancer patients attending MBCT in a psycho‐oncology service were offered a smart‐messaging intervention, which reminded them of prescribed between‐session activities. Thirty patients accepted smart‐messaging and 21 did not. Assessments of depression and anxiety were taken at baseline, session‐by‐session, and one‐month follow‐up. Logistic regression and multilevel modelling compared the groups on treatment completion and clinical effectiveness. Fifteen post‐treatment patient interviews explored smart‐messaging use.ResultsThe odds of programme completion were eight times greater for patients using smart‐messaging compared with non‐users, controlling for age, gender, baseline depression, and baseline anxiety (OR = 7.79, 95% CI 1.75 to 34.58, p = .007). Smart‐messaging users also reported greater improvement in depression over the programme (B = ‐2.33, SEB = .78, p = .004) when controlling for baseline severity, change over time, age, and number of sessions attended. There was no difference between groups in anxiety improvement (B = ‐1.46, SEB = .86, p = .097). In interviews, smart‐messaging was described as a motivating reminder and source of personal connection. ConclusionsSmart‐messaging may be an easily integrated telehealth intervention to improve MBCT for cancer patients.