Search

Purpose HER2 overexpression has a central role in breast cancer carcinogenesis and is associated with poor prognosis if untreated. Lately, identification of HER2-low breast cancer has been proposed to select patients for novel HER2-directed chemotherapy and includes cancers with immunohistochemistry 1 + or 2 + with negative FISH, encompassing approximately 55–60% of all breast carcinomas. In early-stage breast cancer, the prognostic significance of HER2 low-disease is less well understood, with a particular paucity of data evaluating the prevalence and implications of HER2-low status in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods We evaluated 666 stage I-III ILC tumors from a prospectively maintained institutional database, comparing clinicopathologic features and disease-free survival (DFS) using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results HER2-low status was common in this cohort of patients with ILC, but most clinicopathologic features did not differ between HER2-low and HER2-negative cases. However, when adjusting for tumor size, number of positive nodes, ER/PR status, and local therapy received, patients with HER2-low status had worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with HER2-negative tumors (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0–4.1, p = 0.05). Conclusion This difference in DFS supports the notion that HER2-low and HER2-negative early stage ILC may differ clinically, despite similar clinicopathologic features. Further investigation into the potential benefit of HER2 targeted therapy in HER2-low early-stage breast cancer, and specifically lobular cancer, is warranted to ensure optimal outcomes in this distinct tumor subtype.

Background: Treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer with selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) frequently results in the loss or reduction of ER expression. Whether these changes are due to on-target effects of SERDs degrading ER or arise as a mechanism of tumor resistance with associated changes in cellular phenotypes remains unknown. It is critical to distinguish between these possibilities to accurately assess treatment response and determine the most appropriate subsequent therapy. To this end, we created and conducted molecular analyses on patient-derived organoid cultures from post-treatment tissue in patients receiving neoadjuvant SERD therapy for early-stage ER+ breast cancer in the I-SPY2 Endocrine Optimization Protocol (EOP). Methods: The I-SPY2 EOP study is a prospective, randomized substudy within the I-SPY TRIAL testing the oral SERD amcenestrant alone or in combination with letrozole or abemaciclib in stage 2/3 ER+ Her2-negative breast cancer. Enrollment is ongoing, with patients receiving amcenestrant neoadjuvantly for 6 months until the day before surgery. Tumor tissue is collected at baseline, 3 weeks, and at surgery. Organoids were generated from post-treatment surgical samples. Organoid cultures were optimized based on established methods (Dekkers et al., Nature Protocols, 2021) to assess ER levels and activity. Pre- and post-treatment tissue samples were also assessed for ER, PR, Ki67, and GATA3, a luminal marker and transcription factor that is functionally linked with ER, via immunohistochemistry. Results: In 7 patients with both pre- and post-treatment tissue samples including fresh surgical samples for organoid generation, the ER in baseline tumor tissue was >=90% in all patients, PR ranged from 40-90%, and Ki67 ranged from 5-30%. In post-treatment surgical tissue from these cases, ER ranged from 0-30%, PR from 0-50%, Ki67 from < 1%-10%, and GATA3 was positive in 5 of 5 cases tested to-date. The creation of organoids from residual disease at surgery was attempted for these 7 patients, with organoids successfully propagated in 5 cases thus far. 3 of 5 organoid cultures were ready for analysis and in all cases strong ER and PR expression in organoids was observed after culture for > 1 month in the absence of amcenestrant. Detailed gene expression profiling (including Mammaprint/Blueprint) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to assess for intrinsic breast cancer subtype and ER activity in each sample and corresponding organoid culture are in progress and will be reported with the full dataset. Conclusion: Patient-derived organoid culturing of residual disease after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is feasible. Neoadjuvant treatment with a SERD can render ER and PR low or absent at the time of surgical resection, which does not necessarily imply the presence of endocrine therapy resistant disease. The use of organoids and additional IHC markers (GATA3) demonstrate that receptor negativity may be an indicator of the drug hitting its target, suggesting ER signaling is still intact. In general, patient-derived tumor organoid cultures modeling residual disease states can be a useful adjunct to existing methods used to monitor the effects of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and is being explored in the I-SPY EOP trial. Citation Format: Jennifer Rosenbluth, Christopher J. Schwartz, Tam Binh Bui, Shruti Warhadpande, Pravin Phadatare, Sigal Eini, Michael Bruck, Julissa Molina-Vega, Kami Pullakhandam, Nicole Schindler, Lamorna A. Brown Swigart, Christina Yau, Gillian Hirst, Rita Mukhtar, Karthik V. Giridhar, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Kevin Kalinsky, Cheryl A. Ewing, Jasmine M. Wong, Michael D. Alvarado, Laura Van’t Veer, Laura J. Esserman, Jo Chien. Characterization of residual disease after neoadjuvant selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) therapy using tumor organoids in the I-SPY Endocrine Optimization Protocol (EOP) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-01.

Pseudocirrhosis is a term used to describe changes in hepatic contour that mimic cirrhosis radiographically, but lack the classic pathologic features of cirrhosis. This radiographic finding is frequently found in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but the risk factors and clinical consequences are poorly understood.In this retrospective study, we identified patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis who were treated at a single center from 2002 to 2021. We used chart extraction and radiology review to determine demographic characteristics, treatment history, imaging features, and complications of pseudocirrhosis.120 patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis were identified with the following BC subtypes: hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative (n = 99, 82.5%), HR+/HER2+ (n = 14, 11.7%), HR- /HER2+ (n = 3, 2.5%), and triple negative (TNBC; n = 4, 3.3%). All patients had liver metastases and 82.5% (n = 99) had 15 liver lesions. Thirty-six patients (30%) presented with de novo metastatic disease. Median time from MBC diagnosis to pseudocirrhosis was 29.2 months. 50% of patients had stable or responding disease at the time of pseudocirrhosis diagnosis. Sequelae of pseudocirrhosis included radiographic ascites (n = 97, 80.8%), gastric/esophageal varices (n = 68, 56.7%), splenomegaly (n = 26, 21.7%), GI bleeding (n = 12, 10.0%), and hepatic encephalopathy (n = 11, 9.2%). Median survival was 7.9 months after pseudocirrhosis diagnosis. Radiographic ascites was associated with shorter survival compared to no radiographic ascites (42.8 vs. 76.2 months, p = 0.001).This is the largest case series of patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis. Nearly all patients had HR+ MBC and extensive liver metastases. Survival was short after pseudocirrhosis and prognosis worse with radiographic ascites.

ImportanceIt is estimated that up to 50% of patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) will develop brain metastases (BMs), which is associated with poor prognosis. Previous reports of the HER2CLIMB trial have demonstrated that tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine provides survival and intracranial benefits for patients with ERBB2-positive MBC and BMs.ObjectiveTo describe overall survival (OS) and intracranial outcomes from tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with ERBB2-positive MBC and BMs with an additional 15.6 months of follow-up.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsHER2CLIMB is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. The 612 patients, including those with active or stable BMs, had ERBB2-positive MBC previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine. The study was conducted from February 23, 2016, to May 3, 2019. Data from February 23, 2016, to February 8, 2021, were analyzed.InterventionsPatients were randomized 2:1 to receive tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) or placebo (orally twice daily), both in combination with trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously or subcutaneously every 3 weeks with an initial loading dose of 8 mg/kg) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle).Main Outcomes and MeasuresEvaluations in this exploratory subgroup analysis included OS and intracranial progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) in patients with BMs, confirmed intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) and duration of intracranial response (DOR-IC) in patients with measurable intracranial disease at baseline, and new brain lesion–free survival in all patients. Only OS was prespecified before the primary database lock.ResultsAt baseline, 291 of 612 patients (47.5%) had BMs. Median age was 52 years (range, 22-75 years), and 289 (99.3%) were women. At median follow-up of 29.6 months (range, 0.1-52.9 months), median OS was 9.1 months longer in the tucatinib-combination group (21.6 months; 95% CI, 18.1-28.5) vs the placebo-combination group (12.5 months; 95% CI, 11.2-16.9). The tucatinib-combination group showed greater clinical benefit in CNS-PFS and ORR-IC compared with the placebo-combination group. The DOR-IC was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.5-10.3 months) in the tucatinib-combination group and 3.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-10.3 months) in the placebo-combination group. Risk of developing new brain lesions as the site of first progression or death was reduced by 45.1% in the tucatinib-combination group vs the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis subgroup analysis found that tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine improved OS while reducing the risk of developing new brain lesions, further supporting the importance of this treatment option for patients with ERBB2-positive MBC, including those with BMs.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02614794

Background: Neratinib (NERLYNX®), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the extended adjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2+ breast cancer following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy and in combination with capecitabine for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Diarrhea is the most frequently reported on-target side effect associated with neratinib; in the ExteNET adjuvant trial, where no mandatory anti-diarrheal prophylaxis was used, 39.8% of patients reported grade 3 diarrhea and 16.8% of patients discontinued neratinib due to diarrhea. The CONTROL trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02400476) was designed to investigate pre-emptive antidiarrheal prophylaxis (loperamide alone or in combination with budesonide or colestipol) or neratinib dose escalation (DE) for the prevention of neratinib-associated diarrhea. Data for the loperamide, budesonide and colestipol cohorts have been reported previously [Barcenas et al. Ann Oncol 2020]. The final findings for the two DE regimen cohorts are reported here. Methods: CONTROL is an international, multi-cohort, open-label, phase 2 study. Patients ≥18 years of age with stage I-IIIc HER2+ breast cancer received oral neratinib (240 mg/day for 1 year) after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Patients were enrolled sequentially into separate cohorts investigating: 1) mandatory loperamide prophylaxis; 2) budesonide + loperamide; 3) colestipol + loperamide; 4) colestipol + loperamide PRN; 5) neratinib DE + loperamide PRN (two cohorts). DE1 schedule: neratinib 120 mg/day for week 1, 160 mg/day for week 2, then 240 mg/day from week 3 onwards to complete 12 months of treatment. DE2 schedule: neratinib 160 mg/day for weeks 1&2, 200 mg/day for weeks 3&4, then 240 mg/day from week 5 onwards up to 12 months. Both DE cohorts included loperamide PRN. Adverse events were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Primary endpoint: incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea. Results: A total of 563 patients were enrolled in CONTROL. All preventive strategies reduced the incidence of grade 3 diarrhea compared with that seen in ExteNET (historical control: 39.8%). Median cumulative duration of grade 3 diarrhea ranged from 2-3.5 days across the CONTROL study cohorts for the entire 12-month treatment period (compared with 5.0 days for ExteNET). The proportion of patients discontinuing neratinib because of diarrhea was decreased in all cohorts compared with ExteNET (16.8%), except for loperamide alone. Adoption of neratinib DE, particularly the 2-week DE schedule (DE1), most markedly reduced the incidence, severity, and duration of neratinib-associated diarrhea in CONTROL compared with ExteNET (see Table). Conclusions: Neratinib DE + loperamide PRN during the first 2 weeks of treatment (DE1 cohort) was associated with the lowest rates of grade 3 diarrhea (13.3%) and diarrhea-related discontinuations (3.3%) compared with all other anti-diarrheal strategies investigated in CONTROL. These final findings from the study show improved tolerability of neratinib with all diarrhea prophylaxis strategies and suggest that neratinib DE1 with loperamide PRN allows patients to stay on treatment longer and receive the full benefit of neratinib therapy. Table. Patient disposition and diarrhea characteristics: ExteNET vs CONTROL DE cohortsExteNET(n=1408)CONTROL DE1 (n=60)CONTROL DE2 (n=62)Patients completing 1 year of neratinib treatment, %617874Median duration of treatment, months (range)11.6 (2.5–11.9)12.0 (0.2–12.4)11.9 (0.3–14.5)Diarrhea, %Grade 339.813.327.4Grade 4 Citation Format: Arlene Chan, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Gavin Marx, Adam Brufsky, Jo Chien, Michael Thirlwell, Maureen Trudeau, Ron Bose, José A García-Sáenz, Daniel Egle, Barbara Pistilli, Johanna Wassermann, Kerry A Cheong, Christian F Singer, Daniel Hunt, Navid Foruzan, Leanne McCulloch, Carlos H Barcenas. Final findings from the CONTROL trial of diarrheal prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation on neratinib-associated diarrhea and tolerability in patients with HER2+ early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-02.

Background: There is no clinical equipoise on the best upfront management of patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) that is high-risk by clinicopathologic criteria, and low-risk based on molecular profiling. These patients are unlikely to respond to chemotherapy. However, these patients still have risk, often risk of late recurrence, despite standard adjuvant endocrine therapy. Novel endocrine-based strategies that are more effective and tolerable than current standard therapies are needed for this population. Next-generation orally-bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degraders (oSERDs) with improved pharmacokinetic (PK) properties are promising potential therapies for HR+ BC. The oSERD amcenestrant has demonstrated a favorable safety profile and encouraging efficacy in a phase I/II dose escalation and expansion trial for heavily pre-treated patients with HR+ metastatic BC and is an attractive agent for assessment in the neoadjuvant BC setting. The neoadjuvant setting offers a unique opportunity to study novel agents and to assess early biological endpoints. However, one of the challenges in studying endocrine-based strategies in the neoadjuvant setting is the lack of a robust surrogate endpoint to reliably predict response and benefit. The I-SPY2 Endocrine Optimization Protocol (EOP) is a pilot sub-study within the main I-SPY2 TRIAL that will test amcenestrant alone or in combination with abemaciclib or letrozole. EOP will test the feasibility of using the I-SPY2 platform to test novel endocrine-based strategies in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with clinical high-risk, molecular low-risk, HR+/HER2- tumors, and will generate a rich database of imaging, molecular, and pathologic correlative endpoints that may potentially inform the improved assessment of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Trial Design/Eligibility/Accrual: The I-SPY2 EOP is a prospective, randomized, open-label trial specifically for patients with HR+/HER2-negative MammaPrint (MP) low-risk tumors that are at least 2.5 cm in size. Eligible patients are identified during the screening process for the parent I-SPY2 trial. The planned total accrual for the EOP is 120 patients. Patients are randomized 1:1:1 to one of 3 oral treatment arms: 1) amcenestrant 200 mg daily; 2) amcenestrant 200 mg daily + abemaciclib 150 mg bid; 3) amcenestrant 200 mg daily + letrozole 2.5 mg daily. Patients are treated for 6 months prior to surgery. Premenopausal women must receive concomitant monthly ovarian suppression. Serial breast MRIs, breast biopsies, blood, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) are being collected, and patients will be followed for 10 years for recurrence and survival. Serial dedicated breast PET (dbPET) scans and PKs will be assessed in a subset of patients. Objectives/Statistics: The primary objective of the EOP is to investigate the feasibility of enrolling and treating molecularly-selected patients with early stage HR+/HER2- MP low-risk BC in a randomized neoadjuvant trial using an oral-SERD backbone. Treatment will be determined to be feasible if ≥75% of enrolled patients complete ≥75% of assigned study therapy. Secondary objectives include the safety, tolerability, PROs, and PKs related to amcenestrant +/- abemacilcib and letrozole, as well as the assessment of imaging, pathologic, and molecular correlative endpoints as potential biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Status: This study opened in May 2021. Accrual is ongoing. Citation Format: A. Jo Chien, Kevin M Kalinsky, Julissa Molina-Vega, Rita Mukhtar, Karthik Giridhar, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Amrita Basu, Smita M Asare, Paul Henderson, Gillian Hirst, Ruixiao Lu, Ella Jones, Nola Hylton, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Laura J van 't Veer, Douglas Yee, Ingrid Mayer, Laura J Esserman. I-SPY2 endocrine optimization protocol (EOP): A pilot neoadjuvant endocrine therapy study with amcenestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemacicilib or letrozole in molecularly selected HR+/HER2- clinical stage 2/3 breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-10-02.

Background: The CK12 expression signature consists of genes CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL8, CCL18, CCL19, CCL21, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13 and was previously shown to associate with the presence of T and B cell rich tertiary lymphoid structures in melanoma and other cancers, and with better patient survival independent of tumor staging and treatment. I-SPY 2 is a biomarker-rich, phase II neoadjuvant platform trial for high risk early stage breast cancer. Here we leverage the I-SPY 2 biomarker program to test the hypothesis that this signature associates with sensitivity to neoadjuvant immunotherapies and potentially other classes cancer therapeutics in breast cancer. Methods: Data from 1130 patients across 12 arms of I-SPY2 (control (ctr): 210; veliparib/carboplatin (VC): 71; neratinib (N): 114; MK2206: 93; ganitumab: 106; ganetespib: 93; AMG386: 134; TDM1/pertuzumab(P): 52; H/P: 44; pembrolizumab (pembro): 69; durvalumab/olaparib (durva/olap): 71; pembro/SD101: 72) were available for analysis. Pre-treatment FF (n=987) or FFPE (n=143) biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. Signature scores were calculated as the average expression level across the 12 genes, after z-score normalization. We used logistic modeling to assess association with pCR in each arm in a model adjusting for HR and HER2 (likelihood ratio test, p Citation Format: Hatem Soliman, Denise Wolf, Jo Chien, Christina Yau, Michael Campbell, Mark Magbanua, Ruixiao Lu, Nicholas O'Grady, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Gillian Hirst, Beverly Parker, Laura Sit, Smita Asare, Doug Yee, Angie DeMichele, Rita Nanda, Lajos Pusztai, Don Berry, Laura Esserman, Laura Van't Veer. Chemokine12 (CK12) tertiary lymphoid gene expression signature as a predictor of response in 3 immunotherapy arms of the neoadjuvant ISPY 2 TRIAL - pembrolizumab with and without SD101, and durvalumab combined with olaparib - and in 9 other arms of the trial including platinum-based and dual-anti-HER2 therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-07.

HER2-targeted therapy dramatically improves outcomes in early breast cancer. Here we report the results of two HER2-targeted combinations in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 phase 2 adaptive platform trial for early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence: ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (T-DM1/P) and paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP). Eligible women have >2.5 cm clinical stage II/III HER2+ breast cancer, adaptively randomized to T-DM1/P, THP, or a common control arm of paclitaxel/trastuzumab (TH), followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, then surgery. Both T-DM1/P and THP arms ‘graduate’ in all subtypes: predicted pCR rates are 63%, 72% and 33% for T-DM1/P (n = 52), THP (n = 45) and TH (n = 31) respectively. Toxicity burden is similar between arms. Degree of HER2 pathway signaling and phosphorylation in pretreatment biopsy specimens are associated with response to both T-DM1/P and THP and can further identify highly responsive HER2+ tumors to HER2-directed therapy. This may help identify patients who can safely de-escalate cytotoxic chemotherapy without compromising excellent outcome., HER2-targeted therapy improves patient’s outcome in early breast cancer. Here, the authors present the efficacy and biomarker analysis of two HER2-targeted combinations (ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab and paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab) in the context of the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 phase 2 adaptive platform trial for early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence.

Background: Recent guidelines regarding estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor testing from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists defined a new reporting category of ER-low positive breast cancer for tumors with 1-10% ER expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The clinical implications of ER-low positivity are incompletely understood, especially in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common type of breast cancer. Given the rarity of low-ER positivity in ILC, we evaluated tumor features and outcomes associated with a spectrum of ER/PR positivity in a monoinstitutional ILC cohort. Methods: We analyzed cases of stage I-III ILC with available IHC reports. Based on prior published categories in ILC, we classified ER as low, medium, or high as defined by ER staining of 10–69%, 70–89%, and ≥90% respectively. PR negative, low, and high tumors were defined by 0%, < 20%, or ≥20% staining respectively. We used chi-squared tests, t-tests, and Cox proportional hazards models in Stata 16.1 to evaluate associations between ER/PR categories including clinicopathologic variables and event-free survival (EFS). Results: Of 744 cases, 24 (3.2%) were ER negative and 10 (1.3%) were ER-low positive as defined by 1-10% positive staining. 713 remaining cases had ER positivity ≥ 10% and comprised the cohort categories of ER low, medium, and high for this study (11.2%, 15.0%, and 73.8% respectively). In 751 cases with PR data, 122 (16.2%) were PR negative, 145 (19.4%) were PR low and 483 (64.3%) were PR high. ER high status was significantly associated with older age (mean 56.7, 56.7, and 60.6 years in ER low, medium, and high respectively, p=0.0005). ER low was associated with PR negative and low status (42.3% were PR neg/low and ER low, versus 37.4% with ER medium and 29.9% in ER high, p=0.045), and more likely to have overexpression of HER2 (9.7%, 9.0%, and 2.9% ER low, medium, high, respectively, p=0.002). ER low tumors were more likely to be grade 1 than ER medium or high (41.8%, 29.8% and 24.5% respectively, p=0.025), and have positive surgical margins (39.4%, 35.9% and 23.9% respectively, p=0.002). ER status was not associated with Ki67, stage, body mass index (BMI), lymphovascular invasion, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), pleomorphic histology, local therapy, or chemotherapy use. In contrast, PR high was significantly associated with younger age (57.6 versus 63.5 years in PR low, p< 0.0001). PR low was associated with HER2 overexpression (8.6% versus 3.2% in PR high, p=0.002). PR low cases were more likely to present at higher stages (15.8% stage III versus 10.1% stage III in PR high, p=0.032), to be pleomorphic (16.8% versus 8.2%, p< 0.001), and to receive chemotherapy (30.8% versus 23.1%, p=0.022) but were less likely to have associated LCIS (64.0 versus 74.2%, p=0.004). PR status was not associated with Ki67, BMI, lymphovascular invasion, local therapy, or surgical margins. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, stage, grade, pleomorphic histology, and chemotherapy use, ER category was not associated with EFS but both PR negative and PR low status each had significantly worse EFS compared to PR ≥20% (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.7, p< 0.001 for PR negative, and HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.5, p=0.015 for PR low). The estimated cumulative 5-year EFS for patients with ER low, medium, and high tumors was 87.1%, 93.4%, and 90.1% respectively. The estimated cumulative 5-year EFS for patients with PR negative, low, and high tumors was 78.9%, 90.2%, and 92.7% respectively. Conclusions: Using ILC-specific categories for ER expression, we found associations between ER category and clinicopathologic variables but not with EFS. In contrast, PR negative and low status was associated with worse EFS. These findings highlight the importance of exploring the spectrum of ER/PR activity within ILC, a classically strongly hormone receptor-positive tumor type, using more quantitative methods. Citation Format: Elle Clelland, Harriet T. Rothschild, Anne Patterson, Julissa Molina-Vega, Mandeep Kaur, Mary Kathryn Abel, W. Fraser Symmans, Jo Chien, Christopher J. Schwartz, Rita Mukhtar. Quantifying estrogen and progesterone receptor status in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: associated factors and outcomes in an institutional series [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-16.

Immunotherapy has resulted in unprecedented gains in long-term outcomes for many cancer types and has revolutionized the treatment landscape of solid tumor oncology. Checkpoint inhibition in combination with chemotherapy has proven to be effective for the treatment of a subset of advanced triple-negative breast cancer in the first-line setting. This initial success is likely just the tip of the iceberg as there is much that remains unknown about how to best harness the immune system as a therapeutic strategy in all breast cancer subtypes. Therefore, numerous ongoing studies are currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in breast cancer. In this review, we will discuss emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for breast cancer treatment including the following: (1) Intratumoral therapies, (2) Anti-tumor vaccines, (3) B-specific T-cell engagers, and (4) Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and (5) Emerging systemic immunotherapy strategies. For each topic, we will review the existing preclinical and clinical literature, discuss ongoing clinical trials, and highlight future directions in the field.

BACKGROUND We proposed that a test for sensitivity to the adjuvant endocrine therapy component of treatment for patients with stage II-III breast cancer (SET2,3) should measure transcription related to estrogen and progesterone receptors (SETER/PR index) adjusted for a baseline prognostic index (BPI) combining clinical tumor and nodal stage with molecular subtype by RNA4 (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinically high-risk, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer received neoadjuvant taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy, surgery with measurement of residual cancer burden (RCB), and then adjuvant endocrine therapy. SET2,3 was measured from pre-treatment tumor biopsies, evaluated first in an MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) cohort (n = 307, 11 years' follow-up, U133A microarrays), cut point was determined, and then independent, blinded evaluation was carried out in the I-SPY2 trial (n = 268, high-risk MammaPrint result, 3.8 years' follow-up, Agilent-44K microarrays, NCI Clinical Trials ID: NCT01042379). Primary outcome measure was distant relapse-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression models tested prognostic independence of SET2,3 relative to RCB and other molecular prognostic signatures, and whether other prognostic signatures could substitute for SETER/PR or RNA4 components of SET2,3. RESULTS SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to RCB in the MDACC cohort: SET2,3 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, P = 0.004] and RCB (HR 1.77, P < 0.001); and the I-SPY2 trial: SET2,3 (HR 0.27, P = 0.031) and RCB (HR 1.68, P = 0.008). SET2,3 provided similar prognostic information irrespective of whether RCB-II or RCB-III after chemotherapy, and in both luminal subtypes. Conversely, RCB was most strongly prognostic in cancers with low SET2,3 status (MDACC P < 0.001, I-SPY2 P < 0.001). Other molecular signatures were not independently prognostic; they could effectively substitute for RNA4 subtype within the BPI component of SET2,3, but they could not effectively substitute for SETER/PR index. CONCLUSIONS SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to chemotherapy response (RCB) and baseline prognostic score or subtype. Approximately 40% of patients with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- disease had high SET2,3 and could be considered for clinical trials of neoadjuvant endocrine-based treatment.

Purpose of Review Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is increasingly recognized as a distinct subtype of breast cancer with unique management challenges. We reviewed currently available clinical trials for patients with ILC. Recent Findings We describe the rationale for and study design of clinical trials for patients with both early stage and metastatic ILC. Molecular alterations specific to or enriched in ILC may serve as treatment targets. Summary ILC has specific features that may be treatment targets. Clinical trials for ILC are available and being developed.

Background: Neratinib (NERLYNX®), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used for the extended adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy and for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in the 3rd-line setting. Diarrhea, particularly in the first 1-2 months, is the main tolerability concern with neratinib and is common in the absence of proactive management. In the ExteNET trial, where no mandatory prophylaxis was used, the rate of grade 3 diarrhea was 40%, 34% of patients experienced at least 1 dose hold, and 17% of patients discontinued due to diarrhea. The CONTROL trial previously showed that pre-emptive antidiarrheal prophylaxis (loperamide alone or in combination with budesonide or colestipol) or dose escalation (DE) reduced the rate, severity, and duration of neratinib-associated grade ≥3 diarrhea compared with ExteNET. Currently, antidiarrheal prophylaxis is initiated with the first dose of neratinib and used during the first 2 cycles of treatment (US PI). Updated findings from two DE cohorts in CONTROL are reported. Methods: CONTROL is an international, multi-cohort, open-label, phase 2 study. Patients ≥18 years with stage I-IIIc HER2+ breast cancer were treated with neratinib (240 mg/day for 1 year) after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Patients were enrolled sequentially into separate cohorts including 2 dose-escalation cohorts: DE1 (neratinib 120 mg/day on days 1-7, 160 mg/day on days 8-14, then 240 mg/day to day 365) + loperamide as needed (PRN); and DE2 (neratinib 160 mg/day on days 1-14, 200 mg/day on days 15-28, then 240 mg/day to day 365) + loperamide PRN. Adverse events were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Primary endpoint: incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea. Data cut-off: May 1, 2020. Results: Complete data for DE1 (60 patients) and interim data for the ongoing DE2 (60 patients) are presented. All patients in DE1 were off study and 40 (66.7%) of patients remained on treatment in the ongoing DE2. The median treatment duration for DE1 was 12.0 months (IQR 11.1-12.0) and for DE2 was 3.7 months (IQR 1.6-9.1). Overall, 48% and 57% of DE1 and DE2 patients, respectively, had prior pertuzumab; 0% and 3%, respectively, had prior T-DM1. The majority of patients in both DE1 and DE2 dose-escalated to 240 mg on planned schedule. The incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea was 13.3% in DE1 and 20.0% in DE2. The median cumulative duration of grade ≥3 diarrhea over the entire 12-month treatment period was 3 days (range 1-6 days) for DE1 and 2 days (range 1-7 days) for DE2. In both DE1 and DE2, 7 patients (11.7%) had at least one dose hold while on study (none during escalation phase in DE1 and 4 during escalation phase in DE2). In both DE1 and DE2, 2 (3.3%) patients discontinued neratinib because of diarrhea (1 during escalation phase in each cohort). Updated data for the DE2 cohort will be presented. Conclusions: Adoption of neratinib DE reduced the incidence, severity, and duration of neratinib-associated diarrhea in CONTROL compared with ExteNET. DE1 was associated with low rates of dose holds and diarrhea-related discontinuations compared with all previously mandated prophylaxis strategies investigated in CONTROL and with ExteNET. Together these results show improved tolerability of neratinib with DE and suggest that DE combined with loperamide PRN may allow patients to stay on neratinib for the recommended period of time. Neratinib dose escalation scheme 1 (n=60)Neratinib dose escalation scheme 2 (n=60)On neratinib treatment, %066.7Median duration of treatment, months12.03.7Diarrhea, %Grade 140.041.7Grade 245.033.3Grade 313.320.0Grade 400Discontinuation rate due to diarrhea, %3.33.3At least one dose hold due to diarrhea, %11.711.7 Citation Format: Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Arlene Chan, Gavin Marx, Adam Brufsky, A Jo Chien, Michael Thirlwell, Maureen Trudeau, Ron Bose, José A García-Sáenz, Daniel Egle, Daniel Hunt, Utpal Khambholja, Leanne McCulloch, Naisargee Shah, Debu Tripathy, Carlos H Barcenas, the CONTROL Investigators. Bringing diarrhea under CONTROL: Dose escalation reduces neratinib-associated diarrhea and improves tolerability in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-20.

Background: CTCs are detectable in approximately 50% of pts with metastatic breast cancer, and elevated CTC levels are an independent negative prognostic factor. CTCs have been shown to play a valuable role in predicting outcomes in pts with ABC treated with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. This phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit (CB) of pazopanib, a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) in pts with ABC resistant to NSAIs. As an exploratory analysis, we hypothesized that CTC levels might be correlated with response to pazopanib plus endocrine therapy. Methods: Eligibility included postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) ABC and progressive disease after at least one month of NSAIs. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg/day plus either letrozole or anastrozole. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate at 12 weeks (CBR12, wks). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), safety, and the impact of pazopanib and NSAI on CTCs. A CBR of 20% was considered a clinically meaningful comparison to the expected CBR of Results: 32 pts were enrolled; 28 are evaluable for study endpoints. The median age was 58 years (range: 41-77). Pts were heavily pre-treated, with a median of 2 prior hormone therapies (range 1-6) and 1 prior chemotherapy (range 0-8). 8 pts (28.6%) stopped treatment due to adverse events, and 6 pts progressed before wk 12. CBR12 was 46.4% (12 SD, 1 PR), and CBR24 was 25% (5 SD, 2 PR). Safety has been presented (ASCO 2020). Median PFS was 20 wks, and median PFS for pts with CBR12 was 24 wks. Five (22%) of 23 pts with CTC data were CTC-positive (5 CTC/7.5 mL). There was no significant association between CBR12 and CTC status at baseline, or between CBR12 and change in CTC status (baseline to 4 wks after initiation of treatment). 7 pts had non-CBR12 and CTC data; 4 pts (n=4/7; 57%) were CTC positive at either baseline, week 4 or both. 11 pts had CBR12 and CTC data; all patients were CTC negative at baseline and remained negative at 4 wks. 7 pts had PFS >6 months (24, 32, 36, 36, 48, 184 and 274 wks), and 6 had CTC data: all were CTC-negative at baseline and 4 wks, then remained negative at 12 wks. Based on baseline values only, CTC-positive pts had a shorter median PFS compared to CTC-negative pts, but the difference was not statistically significant (11 wks vs 14 wks, p=0.18). Persistently CTC negative patients had significantly longer PFS compared to patients who were CTC positive at any time during study treatment (36 wks vs 11 wks, p=0.01). Conclusions: The addition of pazopanib to NSAIs resulted in a CBR12 of 46.4%, and a CBR24 of 25% in pts with heavily pre-treated ABC resistant to NSAIs. These results support clinical efficacy of antiangiogenic TKI in HR+ ABC and suggest benefit in hormone resistant disease. Consistently negative CTCs correlated with response and response duration. PFS was significantly longer in patients who were consistently CTC negative, further defining the prognostic role of CTCs in HR+ ABC. (NCT01466972) Citation Format: Ozge Gumusay, Mark Jesus M. Magbanua, Melanie C. Majure, Travis Deal, Jonathan R. Renslo, Chiara A. Wabl, Michelle E. Melisko, A. Jo Chien, Andrei Goga, Mark M. Moasser, John W. Park, Jimmy Hwang, Hope S. Rugo. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration in a phase II trial of pazopanib in addition to endocrine therapy in patients with hormone resistant advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-19.

Background: Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow detected after treatment may represent occult residual disease. We enumerated DTCs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients (pts) diagnosed with high-risk early stage breast cancer and examined the relationship of these cells with response and survival. Methods: I-SPY SURMOUNT is a sub-study of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL (NCT01042379). Pts enrolled on I-SPY 2, who signed consent for this sub-study, had bone marrow aspirates (BMA) collected after NACT at the time of surgery. DTCs were isolated and enumerated from BMA using immunomagnetic enrichment/flow cytometry (IE/FC). DTCs were defined as EPCAM-positive and CD45-negative nucleated cells. Samples were considered positive using a predetermined threshold of >4 DTCs per mL (Magbanua et al, unpublished data). Pathologic response was assessed using the residual cancer burden (RCB) method at local sites, and pts underwent standard adjuvant therapy if indicated and follow up for recurrence events and death. Relationship of DTCs with clinicopathologic variables was examined using Chi-squared test. Group means were compared using t tests. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom had successful DTC assessment. The median DTC per mL was 4 (interquartile range 1.2-11.6). 24/51 (47%) were DTC-positive. Clinical characteristics by DTC status are shown in the table. DTC-positive pts were significantly younger (p=0.02) and had larger pretreatment tumors (longest diameter by magnetic resonance imaging) compared to DTC-negative pts (p=0.032). DTCs were not associated with receptor subtype. Thirty pts (41%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). DTCs were not associated with pCR (p= 0.166); however, DTC-positive patients were significantly more likely to have residual cancer (RCB-II/III) after NACT compared to DTC-negative patients (OR 3.3, p=0.037). Median follow up of this cohort was 2.8 years (range: 0.9-4.8). Interim survival analysis showed that DTCs were not significantly correlated with EFS (p=0.6) or DRFS (p=0.41). Conclusions: Detection of DTCs at surgery after NACT is significantly more common in young patients, those with larger tumors, and those with residual disease at surgery. While these associations suggest higher risk for later recurrence, larger studies and longer follow up are necessary to determine if DTCs add prognostic value over pathologic evaluation alone for pts receiving NACT. Citation Format: Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Laura van 't Veer, Amy Clark, A. Jo Chien, Judy Boughey, Heather Han, Anne Wallace, Heather Beckwith, Minetta Liu, Christina Yau, E. Paul Wileyto, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Jane Perlmutter, Lauren Bayne, Shannon Deluca, Stephanie Yee, Erica Carpenter, Laura Esserman, John Park, Lewis Chodosh, Angela DeMichele. Outcomes associated with disseminated tumor cells at surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk early stage breast cancer: The I-SPY SURMOUNT study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-07.

Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within molecular subtypes defined by receptor status and MammaPrint (MP) risk to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/Tis ypN0). SGN-LIV1A is an investigational antibody drug conjugate consisting of an antibody to LIV1A, a zinc transporter highly prevalent in breast cancer, and a highly potent microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin E. Retrospective IHC analysis of LIV1A expression levels amongst tumor samples from 100 previous ISPY-2 patients showed 88% of breast tumor samples with moderate to high expression of LIV1A (Yau, C. et al SABCS 2018).Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. Only HER2 negative (HER2-) patients were eligible for this treatment, hormone-receptor positive (HR+) patients had to have MP high molecular profile. Treatment included SGN-LIV1A 2.5 mg/kg (max dose 250 mg) every 3 weeks x 4, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 2-3 weeks x 4. The control arm was weekly paclitaxel x 12 followed by AC every 2-3 weeks x 4. All patients undergo serial MR imaging where response at 3 & 12 weeks combined with accumulating pCR data are used to estimate, and continuously update, predicted pCR rate for the trial arm. Analysis set was modified intention to treat with patients who switched to non-protocol therapy counted as non-pCR and not as their pCR status at time of surgery. The goal is to identify/graduate regimens with ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (i.e. demonstrating superiority to control) in a future 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial with a pCR endpoint within signatures defined by HR & HER2 status & MP result. This investigational arm was eligible for graduation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+HER2- and HR-HER2-. Regimens may also leave the trial for futility (< 10% probability of success), maximum sample size accrual (10% < probability of success Results: Sixty patients were randomized and evaluable to SGN-LIV1A. The study arm was stopped due to reaching the predetermined time limit for patient accrual of 2 yrs. Final estimated pCR rates are below. The estimated pCR rates were similar between the SGN-LIV1A and control arms for any tumor subtype. Preliminary safety events for SGN-LIV1A include increased rates of transaminitis and hyperglycemia and reduced rates of peripheral neuropathy compared to control. One patient was removed from the analysis as she was determined to have angiosarcoma of the breast. Notably, this patient had a dramatic early response and subsequent pCR to SGN-LIV1A treatment. Conclusion: The value of I-SPY 2 is to give insight about the performance of an investigational agent’s likelihood of achieving pCR. SGN-LIV1A delivered every 3 weeks was comparable to paclitaxel for the primary endpoint of pCR in I-SPY2 and may have a similar side effect profile, however, with less peripheral neuropathy. Clinical trials evaluating weekly dosing of SGN-LIV1A are ongoing. A trial of SGN-LIV1A in the treatment of angiosarcoma is under consideration at this time. Final Estimated pCR Rates and Predictive ProbabilitiesEstimated pCR rate(95% prob interval)SignatureSGN-LIV1AControlProbability SGNLIV1A Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Success in Phase 3HER2-0.16 (0.08-0.24) N= 600.20 (0.16-0.25) N= 3270.180.02HR-/HER2-0.25 (0.12-0.37) N=360.28 (0.21-0.35) N=1460.310.06HR+/HER2-0.09 (0-0.18) N=240.14 (0.09-0.19) N=1810.150.03 Citation Format: Heather Beckwith, Richard Schwab, Christina Yau, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Shi Wei, A. Jo Chien, Kathy S Albain, Kevin Kalinsky, Anne Wallace, Anthony Elias, Douglas Yee, Amy S Clark, Judy C Boughey, Heather Han, Rita Nanda, Claudine Isaacs, Zahi Mitri, Julie E Lang, Alexandra Thomas, Tara Sanft, Angela DeMichele, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, Nola M Hylton, W. Fraser Symmans, Michelle E Melisko, Laura J van't Veer, I-SPY 2 Consortium, Amy Wilson, Smita M Asare, Ashish Sanil, Donald A Berry, Laura J Esserman. Evaluation of SGN-LIV1a followed by AC in high-risk HER2 negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-10.

Author(s): Magbanua, MJM; Swigart, LB; Wu, H-T; Hirst, GL; Yau, C; Wolf, DM; Tin, A; Salari, R; Shchegrova, S; Pawar, H; Delson, AL; DeMichele, A; Liu, MC; Chien, AJ; Tripathy, D; Asare, S; Lin, C-HJ; Billings, P; Aleshin, A; Sethi, H; Louie, M; Zimmermann, B; Esserman, LJ; van 't Veer, LJ | Abstract: BackgroundPathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is strongly associated with favorable outcome. We examined the utility of serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing for predicting pCR and risk of metastatic recurrence.Patients and methodsCell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 291 plasma samples of 84 high-risk early breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL with standard NAC alone or combined with MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor) treatment. Blood was collected at pretreatment (T0), 3 weeks after initiation of paclitaxel (T1), between paclitaxel and anthracycline regimens (T2), or prior to surgery (T3). A personalized ctDNA test was designed to detect up to 16 patient-specific mutations (from whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor) in cfDNA by ultra-deep sequencing. The median follow-up time for survival analysis was 4.8 years.ResultsAt T0, 61 of 84 (73%) patients were ctDNA positive, which decreased over time (T1: 35%; T2: 14%; and T3: 9%). Patients who remained ctDNA positive at T1 were significantly more likely to have residual disease after NAC (83% non-pCR) compared with those who cleared ctDNA (52% non-pCR; odds ratio 4.33, Pn= 0.012). After NAC, all patients who achieved pCR were ctDNA negative (nn= 17, 100%). For those who did not achieve pCR (nn= 43), ctDNA-positive patients (14%) had a significantly increased risk of metastatic recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 10.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-46.6]; interestingly, patients who did not achieve pCR but were ctDNA negative (86%) had excellent outcome, similar to those who achieved pCR (HR 1.4; 95% CI 0.15-13.5).ConclusionsLack of ctDNA clearance was a significant predictor of poor response and metastatic recurrence, while clearance was associated with improved survival even in patients who did not achieve pCR. Personalized monitoring of ctDNA during NAC of high-risk early breast cancer may aid in real-time assessment of treatment response and help fine-tune pCR as a surrogate endpoint of survival.

Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2, and MammaPrint (MP) status to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). Cemiplimab is an anti-PD-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of NSCLC and cutaneous basal and squamous cell CA. Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) binds MHC class II leading to inhibition of T-cell proliferation and activation and is often co-expressed with PD-1. REGN3767 is a fully humanized mAb that binds to LAG-3 and blocks inhibitory T-cell signaling. Concurrent blockade of LAG-3 with an anti-PD-1 may enhance efficacy of an anti-PD-1. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. Only HER2 negative (HER2-) patients were eligible for this treatment; HR positive (HR+) patients had to be MP high risk. Treatment included Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly x 12 and Cemiplimab 350 mg and REGN3767 1600 mg both given q3weeks x 4, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 2 weeks x 4. The control arm was weekly paclitaxel x 12 followed by AC every 2-3 weeks x 4. Cemiplimab/REGN3767 was eligible to graduate in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR-HER2-, and HR+HER2-. The statistical methods for evaluating I-SPY 2 agents has been previously described. To adapt to changing standard of care, we constructed “dynamic controls” comprising ‘best’ alternative therapies using I-SPY 2 and external data and estimated the probability of Cemiplimab/REGN3767 being superior to the dynamic control. Response predictive subtypes (Immune+ vs Immune-) were assessed using pre-treatment gene expression data and the ImPrint signature. Results: 73 HER2- patients (40 HR+ and 33 HR-) received Cemiplimab/REGN3767 treatment. The control group included [357 patients with HER2- tumors (201 HR+ and 156 HR-) enrolled since March 2010. Cemiplimab/REGN3767 graduated in both HR-/HER2- and HR+/HER2- groups; estimated pCR rates (as of June 2022) are summarized in the table. Safety events of note for Cemiplimab/REGN3767 include hypothyroidism 30.8%, adrenal insufficiency (AI) 19.2%, hyperthyroidism 14.1%, pneumonitis 1.3%, and hepatitis 3.8%. All were G1/2 except for 6 (7.7%) G3 AI and 3 (3.8%) G3 colitis. Rash occurred in 62.8%, 9% G3 and 2 pts (2.6%) had pulmonary embolism. X% of adrenal insufficiency cases required replacement therapy. 40 patients (11 HR+ and 29 HR-) in Cemiplimab/REGN3767 were predicted Immune+; 32 (29 HR+ and 3 HR-) were predicted Immune-. In the HR+ group pCR was achieved in 10/11 (91%) patients with Immune+ subtype compared with 8/29 (28%) with Immune- subtype. Additional biomarker analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The I-SPY 2 study aims to assess the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a phase 3 neoadjuvant trial. Dual immune blockade with a LAG-3 inhibitor and anti-PD1 therapy resulted in a high predicted pCR rate both in HR-/HER2- (60%) and HR+/HER2- (37%) disease. The novel Imprint signature identified a group of HR+ patients most likely to benefit from this active regimen. Table 1: Estimated pCR rates Citation Format: Claudine Isaacs, Rita Nanda, Jo Chien, Meghna S. Trivedi, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Christos Vaklavas, Judy C. Boughey, Amy Sanford, Anne Wallace, Amy S. Clark, Alexandra Thomas, Kathy S. Albain, Laura C. Kennedy, Tara B. Sanft, Kevin Kalinsky, Hyo S. Han, Nicole Williams, Mili Arora, Anthony Elias, Carla Falkson, Smita Asare, Ruixiao Lu, Maria Pitsouni, Amy Wilson, Jane Perlmutter, Hope Rugo, Richard Schwab, W. Fraser Symmans, Nola M. Hylton, Laura Van’t Veer, Douglas Yee, Angela DeMichele, Donald Berry, Laura J. Esserman, I-SPY Investigators. Evaluation of anti-PD-1 Cemiplimab plus anti-LAG-3 REGN3767 in early-stage, high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-03.

Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2, and MammaPrint (MP) status to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). Cemiplimab (Cemi) is a PD-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of NSCLC, cutaneous basal, and squamous cell cancer. Here, we report current efficacy rates of Cemi in combination with paclitaxel followed by AC. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. Only HER2 negative (HER2-) patients were eligible for this treatment; HR positive (HR+) patients had to be MP high risk. Treatment included paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly x 12 and Cemi 350 mg IV given q3weeks x 4, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 2 weeks x 4. The control arm was weekly paclitaxel x 12 followed by AC every 2-3 weeks x 4. All patients undergo serial MRI imaging; and imaging response (at 3 weeks, 12 weeks and prior to surgery) were used along with accumulating pCR data to continuously update and estimate pCR rates for trial arms. Analysis was modified intent to treat. Patients who switched to non-protocol therapy count as non-pCR. The goal is to identify (graduate) regimens with ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (i.e. demonstrating superiority to control) in a future 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial with a pCR endpoint within responsive signatures. Cemi was eligible to graduate in 3 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR-HER2-, and HR+HER2-. To adapt to changing standard of care, we constructed “dynamic controls” comprising ‘best’ alternative therapies using I-SPY 2 and external data and estimated the probability of Cemi being superior to the dynamic control. Results: 60 HER2- patients (28 HR+ and 32 HR-) received Cemi arm treatment. The control group included 357 patients with HER2- tumors (201 HR+ and 156 HR-) enrolled since March 2010. Cemi graduated in HR-/HER2- signature. Estimated pCR rates (as of June 2022) are summarized in the table. Immune-related endocrine disorders include: hypothyroid (14.5%), adrenal insufficiency (10%), hyperthyroid (4.8%),) and thyroiditis (3.2%). Only one grade 3 adrenal insufficiency was observed. All immune related AE’s were manageable. Additional biomarker analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Response predictive subtypes (Immune+ vs Immune-) and additional predictive biomarkers were assessed. Associations with pCR will be presented at SABCS. Conclusion: The I-SPY 2 study aims to assess the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a phase 3 neoadjuvant trial. Anti-PD-1 therapy with Cemi resulted in a higher predicted pCR rate in HR-/HER2- 55 rate% disease compared to control at 29%. Immune-mediated AE’s were observed. This data is consistent with previously published data using check point inhibitors in early-stage HR-/HER2- breast cancer. Estimated pCR rates Citation Format: Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca A. Shatsky, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Judy C. Boughey, Kathy S. Albain, Hyo S. Han, Rita Nanda, Claudine Isaacs, Kevin Kalinsky, Zahi Mitri, Amy S. Clark, Christos Vaklavas, Alexandra Thomas, Meghna S. Trivedi, Janice Lu, Smita Asare, Ruixiao Lu, Maria Pitsouni, Amy Wilson, Jane Perlmutter, Hope Rugo, Richard Schwab, W. Fraser Symmans, Nola M. Hylton, Laura Van ’t Veer, Douglas Yee, Angela DeMichele, Donald Berry, Laura J. Esserman, I-SPY Investigators. PD11-01 Evaluation of the PD-1 Inhibitor Cemiplimab in early-stage, high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-01.

Background: Metastatic staging imaging is not recommended for asymptomatic patients with stage I–II breast cancer. Greater distant metastatic disease risk may warrant baseline imaging in patients with stage II–III with high-risk biologic subtypes. NCCN Guidelines recommend considering CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT CAP) and bone scan in appropriate patients. CT CAP and bone scan are considered standard of care (SoC), although PET/CT is a patient-centered alternative. Methods: Data were available for 799 high-risk patients with clinical stage II–III disease who initiated screening for the I-SPY2 trial at 4 institutions. A total of 564 complete records were reviewed to compare PET/CT versus SoC. Costs were determined from the payer perspective using the national 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and representative reimbursements to the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured cost of using PET/CT per percent of patients who avoided a false-positive (FP). Results: The de novo metastatic disease rate was 4.6%. Imaging varied across the 4 institutions (PP=.0009). Mean time between incidental finding on baseline imaging to FP determination was 10.8 days. Mean time from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation was 44.3 days with SoC versus 37.5 days with PET/CT (P=.0001). Mean cost per patient was $1,132 (SoC) versus $1,477 (PET/CT) using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, with an ICER of $31. Using representative reimbursements to UCSF, mean cost per patient was $1,236 (SoC) versus $1,073 (PET/CT) for Medicare, and $3,083 (SoC) versus $1,656 (PET/CT) for a private payer, with ICERs of −$15 and −$130, respectively. Conclusions: Considerable variation exists in metastatic staging practices. PET/CT reduced FP risk by half and decreased workup of incidental findings, allowing for earlier treatment start. PET/CT may be cost-effective, and at one institution was shown to be cost-saving. Better alignment is needed between hospital pricing strategies and payer coverage policies to deliver high-value care.

Purpose: To evaluate whether patients with ILC are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with IDC when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1-3 positive nodes and RS ≤ 25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology.Methods: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, stage I-III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1-3 positive nodes and RS £ 25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy.Results: 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared to IDC. Among patients with 1-3 positive nodes and RS ≤ 25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 with 1-3 positive nodes and RS ≤ 25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC.Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials.

PURPOSE In the HER2CLIMB study, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer with brain metastases (BMs) showed statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with tucatinib. We describe exploratory analyses of intracranial efficacy and survival in participants with BMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. All patients underwent baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging; those with BMs were classified as active or stable. Efficacy analyses were performed by applying RECIST 1.1 criteria to CNS target lesions by investigator assessment. CNS-PFS (intracranial progression or death) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in all patients with BMs. Confirmed intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) was evaluated in patients with measurable intracranial disease. RESULTS There were 291 patients with BMs: 198 (48%) in the tucatinib arm and 93 (46%) in the control arm. The risk of intracranial progression or death was reduced by 68% in the tucatinib arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.48; P < .0001). Median CNS-PFS was 9.9 months in the tucatinib arm versus 4.2 months in the control arm. Risk of death was reduced by 42% in the tucatinib arm (OS HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.85; P = .005). Median OS was 18.1 versus 12.0 months. ORR-IC was higher in the tucatinib arm (47.3%; 95% CI, 33.7% to 61.2%) versus the control arm (20.0%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 43.7%; P = .03). CONCLUSION In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with BMs, the addition of tucatinib to trastuzumab and capecitabine doubled ORR-IC, reduced risk of intracranial progression or death by two thirds, and reduced risk of death by nearly half. To our knowledge, this is the first regimen to demonstrate improved antitumor activity against BMs in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in a randomized, controlled trial.

Background. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a risk factor for the subsequent development of invasive breast cancer. Features of DCIS that are associated with a high risk of a subsequent event include large size (> 5 cm), high grade, comedo necrosis, palpable mass, hormone receptor negativity, and HER2 positivity. We have previously shown that immune infiltrates in DCIS are positively associated with these high-risk features, suggesting that manipulating the immune microenvironment in high risk DCIS could potentially alter disease progression. Objectives. The objectives of this study were: 1). to define dose limiting toxicities, tolerability, and feasibility of intralesional injection of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab) into DCIS; and 2). to determine response rate as measured by an increase in total T cells or CD8+ T cells from baseline to post treatment. Methods. Study participants received 2 intralesional injections of pembrolizumab, 3 weeks apart, with surgery approximately 3 weeks after the 2nd dose. Multiplex immunofluorescence analyses were used to compare immune cell populations in pre-treatment biopsies to post-treatment surgical specimens. Tissue samples were stained with two 6-plex immune panels using Opal immunofluorescence reagents (Perkin Elmer) on a fully automated Ventana Discovery platform, imaged with a Vectra 3 system and analyzed with inForm software (Perkin Elmer). Results. The intralesional injections were well tolerated and there were no systemic toxicities observed. Multiplex immunofluorescence analyses demonstrated significant increases in total T cells, as well as cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, following therapy. We also observed a significant positive correlation between the change (pre- vs. post-therapy) in Ki67+ T cells (proliferating T cells) with the increase in total T cells, suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibition removed the “brakes” from the T cells, allowing them to proliferate. Changes in macrophage, B cell, and Treg numbers pre- vs. post-therapy were not significant. Despite an increase in T cell infiltrates, there were no measurable indicators of an anti-tumor response: no reduction in lesion size by MRI, no reduction in proliferation of DCIS cells (Ki67 staining), and no increase in cell death (cleaved caspase 3 staining). Spatial analyses indicated that in most cases the T cell expansion (both total T cells and CD8+ T cells) occurred predominantly in the stroma, not among the DCIS cells in the ducts. Conclusions. We met the objectives of our study: 1). we demonstrated the safety and feasibility of intralesional injection of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab) in high risk DCIS; and 2). we demonstrated that local immunotherapy resulted in the local proliferation/expansion of T cells. However we did not observe any change in the size of the lesions by MRI. In addition, there was no evidence for T cell killing at the cellular level, suggesting that even though there was an expansion of T cells, there are other factors at play such as immune exclusion or possibly immunosuppression of their killing ability. These results suggest that combination of pembrolizumab with another agent(s) will be needed to achieve a more complete response. Citation Format: Michael Campbell, Jasmine Wong, Emma McCune, Harriet Rothschild, Tristan Loveday, Jennifer Bolen, Cliff Hoyt, Scott VandenBerg, Jo Chien, Laura Esserman. Modulation of the immune microenvironment in high risk DCIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-11.

Background: Neratinib (NERLYNX®), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used for the extended adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Diarrhea is the main tolerability concern with neratinib and is common in the absence of proactive management. The CONTROL study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02400476) is investigating the effectiveness of rationally structured antidiarrheal prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation in the prevention of neratinib-associated diarrhea. CONTROL includes antidiarrheal prophylactic regimens with loperamide either alone or in combination with budesonide (locally acting corticosteroid) or colestipol (bile acid sequestrant), as well as two different neratinib dose-escalation schedules. Updated findings from CONTROL are reported. Methods: CONTROL is an international, multi-cohort, open-label, phase II study. Patients ≥18 years of age with stage I-IIIc HER2+ breast cancer were treated with oral neratinib (240 mg/day for 1 year) after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Patients were enrolled sequentially into separate cohorts investigating: 1) mandatory loperamide prophylaxis; 2) budesonide + loperamide prophylaxis; 3) colestipol + loperamide prophylaxis; 4) colestipol + loperamide prn; 5) neratinib dose escalation + loperamide prn (two cohorts). Adverse events were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Primary endpoint: incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea. Data cut-off: 17 June 2019. Results: A total of 514 patients have been enrolled. At the cut-off date, study treatment had been completed by 100% of patients in all cohorts except for the two neratinib dose-escalation cohorts (the colestipol + loperamide prn cohort had just 1 patient continuing treatment as of the cut-off date). All preventive strategies reduced the incidence of grade 3 diarrhea (Table) compared with that seen in ExteNET (historical control: 39.9%). Median cumulative duration of grade 3 diarrhea across the study cohorts ranged from 2-5 days for the entire 12-month treatment period. The proportion of patients discontinuing neratinib because of diarrhea was decreased in all cohorts compared with ExteNET (16.8%), except for Cohort 1. The majority of adverse events (including diarrhea) leading to treatment discontinuation occurred early while on treatment, primarily during the first or second cycle. Table. Characteristics of treatment-emergent diarrheaLoperamide (n=137)Budesonide + loperamide (n=64)Colestipol + loperamide (n=136)Colestipol + loperamide prn (n=104)Neratinib dose escalation scheme 1 (n=60)Neratinib dose escalation scheme 2 (n=13)On neratinib treatment, %0001.0a85.084.6Diarrhea, %Grade 124.125.027.930.841.723.1Grade 224.832.834.632.738.346.2Grade 330.728.120.631.715.07.7Grade 4000000Median cumulative duration, days (range)Grade ≥25.0 (1-400)6.0 (1-117)4.0 (1-371)8.0 (1-375)5.0 (1-28)2.0 (1-6)Grade 33.0 (1-93)2.5 (1-6)3.5 (1-22)3.0 (1-55)2.0 (1-5)5.0 (5-5)Discontinuation (due to a diarrhea TEAE), %20.410.94.47.73.30Hospitalization (due to a diarrhea TEAE), %1.500000aAs of the data cut-off, the final patient in the colestipol + loperamide prn cohort had completed 1 year of neratinib treatment but had not yet had the final study visit. Conclusions: The addition of budesonide or colestipol to loperamide prophylaxis given for 1-2 cycles reduces the incidence, severity and duration of neratinib-associated diarrhea. These strategies reduce the rate of neratinib discontinuation due to diarrhea, allowing patients to receive the benefits of 1 year of extended adjuvant neratinib therapy. Early findings with escalating the dose of neratinib over the first 2-4 weeks of treatment are promising. Updated data for the two neratinib dose-escalation cohorts will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Arlene Chan, Sara A Hurvitz, Gavin Marx, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Cynthia Farrell, Daniel Hunt, Leanne McCulloch, A Jo Chien, Debu Tripathy, Carlos H Barcenas, the CONTROL Investigators. Effect of prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation on neratinib-associated diarrhea and tolerability in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: Phase II CONTROL trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-03.

Background: Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has been shown on the patient level to predict excellent long-term event-free survival outcomes. Residual cancer burden (RCB) quantifies the extent of residual disease for patients who did not achieve pCR. A high proportion of metastatic events to the central nervous system (CNS), a known chemotherapy sanctuary site, was previously observed among the small number of relapses in patients achieving a pCR (Symmans et al 2017), raising the possibility that these CNS events may be independent of response in the breast. I-SPY2 is an adaptively randomized, phase II, platform trial that evaluates new drugs and combinations in the neoadjuvant setting for women with high-risk primary breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated the type and sites of recurrences by RCB classes in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Methods: I-SPY 2 patients enrolled prior to 11/2016 across 9 experimental and control arms, with available RCB and event-free survival (EFS) data were included in this analysis. The median follow-up is 3.8 years. We summarized the EFS event type, further sub-dividing the distant recurrence events by their site of relapse (CNS-only, CNS and other sites, Non-CNS). We estimated the overall and site-specific distant recurrence incidence in each RCB class at 3 years using a competing risk (Fine-Gray) model. In addition, we assessed the association between RCB and distant recurrence free survival including all distant recurrences (DRFS), as well as excluding the CNS-only recurrences (non-CNS DRFS) using a Cox model. Our statistics do not adjust for multiplicities beyond variables evaluated in this study. Results: Among 938 subjects, there were 180 EFS events, including 28 (16%) local recurrences (without distant recurrence and/or death) and 152 DRFS events. Among the DRFS events, 25 patients died without a distant recurrence. 127 experienced distant recurrences, including 22 (17.3%) with CNS-only, 16 (12.6%) with CNS and other sites, 87 (68.5%) with non-CNS distant recurrence; 2 (1.6%) patients had missing recurrence site information. Incidence of CNS-only recurrences are low and are similar across RCB classes (pCR/RCB-0 (n=338): 1%, RCB-I (n=129): 3%, RCB-II (n=328): 2%, RCB-III (n=143): 2% at 3 years). In contrast, the incidence of non-CNS recurrences increase with increasing RCB (RCB-0: 2%, RCB-I: 4%, RCB-II: 11%, RCB-III: 19% at 3 years). DRFS of RCB-I patients do not significantly differ from those achieving a pCR/RCB-0 (DRFS at 3 years: 92% vs. 95%, hazard ratio: 1.77 (0.87-3.63)); the small numerical difference is further reduced when the CNS-only recurrences are excluded (non-CNS DRFS at 3 years: 95% vs. 96%, hazard ratio: 1.48 (0.61-3.58)). CNS recurrences among DRFS events are proportionally higher within the pCR (5/16 (31%)) and RCB-I (5/12 (42%)) than in the RCB-II (8/57 (14%)) and RCB-III (4/42 (9%)) groups largely because of the relative low frequency of non-CNS recurrence events. Conclusions: In our high-risk I-SPY 2 cohort, CNS-only recurrences are uncommon but appear similar across RCB groups, independent of response, suggesting that the CNS is a treatment sanctuary site. In contrast, non-CNS recurrence rates increase as RCB increases. These findings, if confirmed, support the use of RCB to identify patients with excellent outcomes beyond those achieving a pCR; and suggest that inclusion of CNS only recurrences as an outcome event may impact the association between neoadjuvant therapy response and long-term outcome. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Angela DeMichele, W. Fraser Symmans, Lajos Pusztai, Douglas Yee, Amy S. Clark, Christos Hatzis, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Jodi Carter, Yunn-Yi Chen, Kimberly Cole, Laila Khazai, Molly Klein, Dina Kokh, Gregor Krings, Sunati Sahoo, Kathy S. Albain, A. Jo Chien, Kirsten K. Edmiston, Anthony D. Elias, Erin D. Ellis, David M. Euhus, Heather S. Han, Claudine Isaacs, Qamar J. Khan, Julie E. Lang, Janice Lu, Jane L. Meisel, Zaha Mitri, Rita Nanda, Donald W. Northfelt, Tara Sanft, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca K. Viscusi, Anne M. Wallace, Rachel Yung, Nola M. Hylton, Judy C. Boughey, Michelle E. Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S. Rugo, Richard Schwab, Laura J. van' t Veer, Donald A. Berry, Laura J. Esserman. Site of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy: Clues to biology and impact on endpoints [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-02.

Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. The goal is to identify (graduate) regimens with ≥ 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (i.e., demonstrating superiority to control) in a future 300-patient phase 3 1:1 randomized neoadjuvant trial with pCR endpoint within signatures defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2, and MammaPrint (MP) status. Regimens may leave the trial for futility (< 10% probability of success), maximum sample size accrual (with probability of success ≥ 10% and < 85%), or safety concerns as recommended by the independent DSMB. For HER2+ patients, the I-SPY2 control arm was 12 weekly cycles of paclitaxel+trastuzumab (TH, control) followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) q2-3 weeks x4 and surgery. Patritumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits HER3. In this experimental arm for HER2+ patients, patritumab was given q3w x 4 cycles (18mg/kg loading dose followed by 9mg/kg/dose) concurrent with paclitaxel and trastuzumab q1w x 12 weeks (PTH, treatment), followed by AC q2-3w. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+ tumors were ineligible. MRI scans (baseline, 3 weeks after start of therapy, prior to AC, and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to predict pCR for individual patients. Analysis was intention to treat. Patients who switched to non-protocol therapy count as non-pCR. Patients on treatment arm therapy at the time of arm closure are non-evaluable. Graduation potential was in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: all HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and HR+/HER2+. Results: The PTH regimen was stopped at the recommendation of the Safety Working Group and DSMB based on a safety event (bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, Gr 3) observed in one patient. At the time of arm closure, N=31 patients had received PTH treatment; 4 patients receiving PTH were changed to non-protocol therapy and removed from the analysis. The final estimated pCR report will consider 27 PTH and 31 TH as evaluable patients. Accrual was insufficient to assess graduation, however, there appears to be good signal in the HER2+HR- but not HER2+HR+ signatures. I-SPY 2 TRIAL Est. pCR at time of arm closureSignaturesPTH (Treatment)N= 31TH (Control)N = 31All (HER2+)0.40 (0.22 - 0.59), n=310.23 (0.09 - 0.37), n=31HR-/HER2+0.64 (0.36 - 0.91), n=110.30 (0.12 - 0.47), n=12HR+/HER2+0.28 (0.08 - 0.48), n=200.20 (0.06 - 0.34), n=19 HR+/HER2+0.28 (0.08 - 0.48), n=200.20 (0.06 - 0.34), n=19The patient who developed Gr3 sensorineural hearing loss 6 days after the 2nd patritumab (and 4th paclitaxel/trastuzumab) treatment, did not recover her hearing after patritumab was stopped, and also reported Gr3 vulvovaginal pain, vulvitis, and vaginal inflammation. Other gynecological symptoms in the PTH arm include: 1 pt with Gr1 vaginal hemorrhage, and 1 pt with Gr2 dyspareunia. There was a higher frequency of Gr3 hypokalaemia (12.5% vs. 3.2%). One pt in the PTH arm reported Gr3 small intestinal obstruction which resolved with conservative management. Conclusion: The I-SPY 2 study aims to assess the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a phase 3 neoadjuvant trial; PTH was stopped due to safety concerns, although there was activity in the HER2+ HR- signature. This is the first report of Gr3 hearing loss associated with patritumab/paclitaxel/trastuzumab, and thus attribution is uncertain. Citation Format: Teresa L Helsten, Shelly S Lo, Christina Yau, Kevin Kalinsky, Anthony D Elias, Anne M Wallace, A. Jo Chien, Janice Lu, Julie E Lang, Kathy S Albain, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Amy S Clark, Judy C Boughey, Erin D Ellis, Douglas Yee, Angela DeMichele, Claudine Isaacs, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, Richard Schwab, Nola M. Hylton, W. Fraser Symmans, Michelle E Melisko, Laura J van't Veer, Amy Wilson, Ruby Singhrao, Smita M Asare, Ashish Sanil, Donald A Berry, Laura J Esserman. Evaluation of patritumab/paclitaxel/trastuzumab over standard paclitaxel/trastuzumab in early stage, high-risk HER2 positive breast cancer: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-02.

Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, response-adaptive randomization phase 2 trial to evaluate novel agents when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer - weekly paclitaxel + investigational treatment x 12 wks followed by doxorubicin & cyclophosphamide(AC) q3 wks x 4 vs. weekly paclitaxel/AC (control). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). The goal for all investigational arms is to identify/graduate regimens with ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (i.e. demonstrating superiority to control) in a future 300-patient phase 3 1:1 randomized neoadjuvant trial with a pCR endpoint within signatures defined by hormone-receptor (HR) & HER2 status & MammaPrint (MP). Findings from the graduated, previously reported Pembro4 arm (Nanda et al, ASCO 2017) supported investigation of de-escalating therapy, and determining if pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) alone q3 wks x 4 after weekly paclitaxel x 12 wks + pembrolizumab q3 wks x 4 was sufficient to sustain response without AC. Methods: Women with tumors ≥2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+ were ineligible. MRI scans (at baseline, 3 wks, 12 wks, and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to predict pCR for individual patients (pts). Pts who receive non-protocol therapy (e.g., carboplatin or AC for the Pembro8-noAC arm) count as non-pCR. Pembro8-noAC was open to HER2- pts for evaluation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+/HER2-, and HR-/HER2-. Regimens exit the trial for futility ( Results: Pembro8-noAC was randomized to 73 pts, 3 of whom progressed while receiving pembrolizumab alone on study. Randomization to this arm continued after the first report because the rate of progression during AC over the course of the trial was estimated to be 6.5% based on serial MRI studies. However, notification of the third case prompted the study team to ask the DSMB for the summary response for this arm. Although it did not meet formal stopping rules for either graduation or futility, Pembro8-noAC was not near the target threshold pCR rates of 60% for HR-/HER2- and 30% for HR+/HER2+. As a result of this information, combined with the on-treatment progressions, assignment to Pembro8-noAC was discontinued. Treatment with pembrolizumab alone was no longer allowed due to the potential concern for progression, and investigators were given the option to administer AC with pembrolizumab or proceed with definitive surgery following the 12 weeks of paclitaxel + pembrolizumab. 34 pts had surgery results at the time the study was closed. Of the remaining 39 pts, 34 pts have on-therapy MRI assessments. Estimated pCR rates were based on all pts with information at the time (see table). Immune-related adverse events included grade 3 colitis (n=2), grade 3 pneumonitis (n=1), grade 3 transaminitis (n=1), grade 3 hypothyroidism (n=1), and grade 1-2 adrenal insufficiency (n=5). Conclusion: Although Pembro8-noAC is performing at least as well as standard paclitaxel/AC, the likelihood is very low that the regimen would be successful in a phase 3 trial. Pembrolizumab alone following 12 weeks of paclitaxel + pembrolizumab was not sufficient to sustain a response. This was quickly assessed with a small number of patients. Estimated pCR rateSignature(95% prob interval)Pembro8-noACControlHER2-0.210.2(0.09-0.32)(0.15-0.25)HR-/HER2-0.270.27(0.09-0.45)(0.19-0.35)HR+/HER2-0.150.15(0.01-0.29)(0.09-0.20) Citation Format: Minetta C. Liu, Patricia A Robinson, Christina Yau, Anne M Wallace, A. Jo Chien, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rita Nanda, Douglas Yee, Kathy S Albain, Judy C Boughey, Heather S Han, Anthony D Elias, Kevin Kalinsky, Amy S Clark, Kathleen Kemmer, Claudine Isaacs, Julie E Lang, Janice Lu, Tara Sanft, Angela DeMichele, Nola M Hylton, Michelle E Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, Richard Schwab, W. Fraser Symmans, Laura J van't Veer, Patricia K Haugen, Amy Wilson, Ruby Singhrao, Smita Asare, Ashish Sanil, Donald A Berry, Laura J Esserman. Evaluation of a novel agent plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in early stage, high-risk HER2 negative breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-02.