ISI Document Delivery No.: 841NR Times Cited: 2 Cited Reference Count: 40 Cited References: BENHAMOU S, 1994, ANIM BEHAV, V47, P1423, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1994.1189 Benhamou S, 2003, ANIM BEHAV, V65, P729, DOI 10.1006/anbe.2003.2092 Benhamou S, 2003, BEHAV PROCESS, V61, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00168-7 Benhamou S., 2010, ENCY BEHAV NEUROCIEN, V2, P497, DOI [10.10161B978-0-08-045396-5.00106-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-045396-5.00106-8] Benhamou S, 1996, ANIM BEHAV, V52, P201, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1996.0165 Benhamou S, 2003, J THEOR BIOL, V225, P235, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00242-X BENHAMOU S, 1992, ANIM BEHAV, V43, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80097-1 Benhamou S, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P518, DOI 10.1890/05-0495 Benhamou S, 2004, J THEOR BIOL, V229, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.016 Bingman VP, 2005, ETHOL ECOL EVOL, V17, P295 Bonadonna F, 2005, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V272, P489, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2984 Bourjea Jerome, 2007, Endangered Species Research, V3, P273, DOI 10.3354/esr00053 Bowen Brian W., 1996, P190 Codling EA, 2008, J R SOC INTERFACE, V5, P813, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 Flemming JEM, 2006, ENVIRONMETRICS, V17, P351, DOI 10.1002/env.774 Girard C, 2006, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V322, P281, DOI 10.3354/meps322281 Hays GC, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P1636, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01531.x Hays GC, 2001, J EXP BIOL, V204, P4093 Hays GC, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, pS5, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0022 Johnsen S, 2008, PHYS TODAY, V61, P29, DOI 10.1063/1.2897947 KENDALL DG, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V36, P365 Lohmann KJ, 2008, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V356, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.12.017 Lohmann KJ, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P19096, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0801859105 Luschi P, 2007, CURR BIOL, V17, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.062 Luschi P, 2001, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V50, P528, DOI 10.1007/s002650100396 Mancho AM, 2006, COMPUT FLUIDS, V35, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.003 Maus S, 2007, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V8, DOI 10.1029/2007GC001643 MEYLAN AB, 1990, SCIENCE, V248, P724, DOI 10.1126/science.2333522 NORMAN JA, 1994, MOL ECOL, V3, P363, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00076.x Papi F, 2000, J EXP BIOL, V203, P3435 Rio MH, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JC006505 Sudre J, 2008, OCEAN DYNAM, V58, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10236-008-0134-9 Thebault E, 2010, SPACE SCI REV, V155, P95, DOI 10.1007/s11214-010-9667-6 Thomas UN., 2008, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V177, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1029/177GM04, 10.1029/177GM04] Turiel A, 1998, PHYS REV LETT, V80, P1098, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1098 Turiel A, 2008, J PHYS A-MATH THEOR, V41, DOI 10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015501 Wallraff HG, 2004, ANIM BEHAV, V67, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.007 Wiltschko R, 2006, BIOESSAYS, V28, P157, DOI 10.1002/bies.20363 Wyneken J., 2001, NMFSSEFSC470 NOAA Yahia H, 2010, PATTERN RECOGN, V43, P3591, DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.04.011 Benhamou, Simon Sudre, Joel Bourjea, Jerome Ciccione, Stephane De Santis, Angelo Luschi, Paolo Agence nationale de la Recherche [ANR-07-BLAN-0220-01] The work was funded by Agence nationale de la Recherche http://www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr/, Programme ESTVOI (ANR-07-BLAN-0220-01). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 2 PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE SAN FRANCISCO PLOS ONE; Background: Laboratory and field experiments have provided evidence that sea turtles use geomagnetic cues to navigate in the open sea. For instance, green turtles (Chelonia mydas) displaced 100 km away from their nesting site were impaired in returning home when carrying a strong magnet glued on the head. However, the actual role of geomagnetic cues remains unclear, since magnetically treated green turtles can perform large scale (> 2000 km) post-nesting migrations no differently from controls. Methodology/Principal Findings: In the present homing experiment, 24 green turtles were displaced 200 km away from their nesting site on an oceanic island, and tracked, for the first time in this type of experiment, with Global Positioning System (GPS), which is able to provide much more frequent and accurate locations than previously used tracking methods. Eight turtles were magnetically treated for 24-48 h on the nesting beach prior to displacement, and another eight turtles had a magnet glued on the head at the release site. The last eight turtles were used as controls. Detailed analyses of water masses-related (i.e., current-corrected) homing paths showed that magnetically treated turtles were able to navigate toward their nesting site as efficiently as controls, but those carrying magnets were significantly impaired once they arrived within 50 km of home. Conclusions/Significance: While green turtles do not seem to need geomagnetic cues to navigate far from the goal, these cues become necessary when turtles get closer to home. As the very last part of the homing trip (within a few kilometers of home) likely depends on non-magnetic cues, our results suggest that magnetic cues play a key role in sea turtle navigation at an intermediate scale by bridging the gap between large and small scale navigational processes, which both appear to depend on non-magnetic cues.