Search

Obtaining consent to care requires the radiation oncologist to provide loyal information and to ensure that the patient understands it. Proof of such an approach rests with the practitioner. The French Society for Radiation Oncology (SFRO) does not recommend the signature of a consent form by the patient but recommends that the radiation oncologist be able to provide all the elements demonstrating the reality of a complete information circuit., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a valuable option to control cerebral metastases. However, the risk (adverse radiation effect (ARE))-benefit (local control (LC)) ratio switches when the target is too large., Objective: In order to balance this ratio, two fractions staged GKRS protocol was conducted for "large" cerebral metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome (LC, ARE)., Methods: A total of 39 large cerebral metastases in 35 patients were treated. The initial mean tumor volume was 14.6 cc [6.1; 35.8]. The prescription margin dose was 12 Gy on the 50% isodose line, with 2 weeks between them. A majority of primary cancer were from lung (43%), melanoma (20%) or breast (17%) origin. The mean age was 63 years old (31-89). Mean Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) was 2., Results: At the second fraction, mean tumor volume was 10.3 cc [1.9-27.4]. The mean percentage of volume variation for decreasing lesions was 29%. At last follow-up, mean tumor volume was 7.4 cc [0-25.2]; 34 lesions decreased volume (mean 35%). A decreased volume of more than 45% after first stage GKRS was able to predict a long-term local response to staged GKRS treatment. Local control rate at 6 months and 1 year was 87.3% and 75% respectively. The rate of ARE was 7.7%. No predictive factor of local control or ARE was found in a univariate analysis., Conclusion: The new 2-fractions-dose-staged GKRS concept seems to be a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for large cerebral metastases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery., Patients and Methods: From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm 3 ., Results: The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm 3 was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05)., Conclusion: A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Head & Neck Paragangliomas have been historically relying on surgery mostly, with worsened quality of life and major sequelae. Conventional external radiation therapy seems to offer an equivalent control rate with a low toxicity profile. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficiency of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Head & Neck paragangliomas., Methods: This is a retrospective monocentric study conducted in a referral center, including all patients treated with IMRT, whether as an exclusive or post-operative treatment for a tympanic and jugular, carotid, or vagal paraganglioma. Data collection was performed through the manuscript and computerized medical files, including consultation, operative, imaging, pathological analyses, delineation, and treatment planning reports. Success was defined as the complete or partial regression or stabilization without progression, or relapse in accordance with the RECIST criteria. Acute toxicities and long-term sequelae were assessed., Results: Our cohort included 39 patients included between 2011 and 2021: 18 patients treated for a TJ PG (45.9%), 11 patients for a carotid PG (28.4%), and 9 for a vagal PG (23.1%). Twenty-nine patients had IMRT as an exclusive treatment (74.4%), whereas 10 patients had a post-operative complementary treatment (25.6%). Median follow-up in our cohort was 2318 days (average = 2200 days, 237-5690, sd = 1281.9). Among 39 patients, 37 were successfully controlled with IMRT (94.8%), and the toxicity profile was low without any major toxicity., Conclusion: IMRT seems an ideal treatment, whether exclusive or post-operative for Head & Neck paragangliomas., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:607-614, 2023., (© 2022 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

The purpose of the first two editions of the guidelines for external radiotherapy procedures, published in 2007 and 2016 respectively, was to issue recommendations aimed at optimising, harmonising and standardising practices. The purpose of this third edition, which includes brachytherapy, is identical while also taking into account recent technological improvements (intensity modulation radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and three-dimension brachytherapy) along with findings from literature. Part one describes the daily use of general principles (quality, security, image-guided radiation therapy); part two describes each treatment step for the main types of cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The French society of oncological radiotherapy (Société française de radiothérapie oncologique, SFRO) was created in 1990. On the occasion of its thirtieth annual congress, in October 2019, a session was devoted to it, with the objective of exposing its functioning, its actions and its productions during these three decades during which radiotherapy and oncology have undergone unprecedented transformations. We propose in this article to outline the content of this session., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other., Methods: We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies)., Findings: 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRT P ) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRT P (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (IC TaxPF -LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and IC TaxPF followed by CLRT (80%)., Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or IC TaxPF -CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer., Fundings: French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CP reports a grant from Fondation ARC during the conduct of the study. J-PP reports grants from Ligue National Contre le Cancer, during the conduct of the study. AA reports grants from Ligue Contre le Cancer and Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique en Cancérologie–Institut National du Cancer, during the conduct of the study; grants from F Hoffmann-La Roche, and from the French Radiation and Oncology Group for Head and Neck (GORTEC), outside the submitted work. EEV and QTL report personal fees AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biolumina, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Merck, Regeneron, Novartis for EEV, and Grail for QTL outside the submitted work. J-WL reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study. JJCH reports other payment from Sanofi Aventis during the conduct of the study; payment for an advisory role and conferences from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Novartis, and Roche Pharma outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results., Materials and Methods: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint., Results: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p&#95;trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p&#95;trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005)., Conclusion: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Intracranial radiotherapy has been improved, primarily because of the development of stereotactic approaches. While intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy is mainly indicated for treatment of benign or malignant tumors, this procedure is also effective in the management of other neurological pathologies; it is delivered using GammaKnife® and linear accelerators. Thus, brain arteriovenous malformations in patients who are likely to experience permanent neurological sequelae can be managed by single session intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy, or radiosurgery, in specific situations, with an advantageous benefit/risk ratio. Radiosurgery can be recommended for patients with disabling symptoms, which are poorly controlled by medication, such as trigeminal neuralgia, and tremors, whether they are essential or secondary to Parkinson's disease. This literature review aims at defining the place of intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of patients suffering from non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies. It is clear that the multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced teams from Neurosurgery, Neurology, Neuroradiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics is needed for the procedures using high precision radiotherapy techniques, which deliver high doses to locations near functional brain areas., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective dosimetric study was to assess the dose distribution regarding the brain areas implied in cognitive functions using two approaches: volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-seven patients were treated using a dual-arc VMAT approach for supratentorial glioblastoma between 2016 and 2018. The total dose of 60Gy in 30 daily fractions was administered to the planning target volume (PTV). The brain structures that play an important role in cognitive physiology, such as the hippocampi, corpus callosum, cerebellum, subventricular zones (SVZ), were delineated. For each patient, a new treatment plan in HT was determined by a second medical physicist in a blindly fashion according to the same dose constraints and priorities. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test., Results: Conformity indexes remained similar with both techniques. The mean values were 0.96 (0.19-1.00) for VMAT and 0.98 (range, 0.84-1.00) for HT, respectively (P=0.73). Significant D 50% reductions were observed with VMAT compared to HT: 14.6Gy (3.8-28.0) versus 17.4Gy (12.1-25.0) for the normal brain (P=0.014); 32.5Gy (10.3-60.0) versus 35.6Gy (17.1-58.0) for the corpus callosum (P=0.038); 8.1Gy (0.4-34.0) versus 12.8Gy (0.8-27.0) for the cerebellum (P<0.001), respectively., Conclusion: The VMAT approach seemed to improve the sparing of the key brain areas implied in cognitive functions without jeopardizing PTV coverage., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of chemotherapy added to a surgical locoregional treatment (LRT) for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)., Materials and Methods: We studied the sub-group of trials with surgical LRT included in the meta-analysis on chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC). Data from published and unpublished randomized trials comparing the addition of chemotherapy to LRT in HNSCC patients were sought using electronic database searching for the period 1965-2000, hand searching and by contacting experts in the field. Trials with less than 60 patients, or preoperative radiotherapy or where the type of LRT could not be individually determined were excluded. All individual patient data were checked for internal consistency, compared with published reports, and validated with trialists. Data were pooled using a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane test and I 2 statistic., Results: Twenty-four trials were eligible (5000 patients). Chemotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.92 [95%CI: 0.85-0.99] p = 0.02). There was a significant interaction between treatment effect and timing of chemotherapy (p = 0.08 at pre-specified threshold of 0.10) with a greater effect for concomitant chemotherapy (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.92). The benefit of chemotherapy was greater in women (HR women  = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.50-0.80) compared to men (HR men  = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.89-1.04; p for interaction = 0.001)., Conclusions: This analysis confirmed the benefit of concomitant chemotherapy added to surgical LRT. The role of induction therapy as yet to be determined as it did not improve OS. Women may benefit more than men from chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety of a large consecutive series of 362 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era., Patients and Methods: From 2005 to 2015, 362 consecutive patients with brain metastases from RCC were treated using SRS in 1 fraction: 226 metastases (61 patients) using Gamma-Knife at a median of 18 Gy (50% isodose line); 136 metastases (63 patients) using linear accelerator at a median of 16 Gy (70% isodose line). The median patient age was 58 years. At the first SRS, 37 patients (31%) received a systemic treatment. Among systemic therapies, TKIs were the most common (65%)., Results: The local control rates were 94% and 92% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a minimal dose >17 Gy and concomitant TKI treatment were associated with higher rates of local control. The overall survival rates at 12 and 36 months were 52% and 29%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor survival included age ≥65 years, lower score index for SRS, concomitant lung metastases, time between RCC diagnosis and first systemic metastasis ≤4 months, occurrence during treatment with a systemic therapy, no history of neurosurgery, and persistence or occurrence of neurological symptoms at 3 months after SRS. Seventeen patients had Grade III/IV adverse effects of whom 3 patients presented a symptomatic radionecrosis., Conclusion: SRS is highly effective in patients with brain metastases from RCC. Its association with TKIs does not suggest higher risk of neurologic toxicity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Meningiomas account for 30-35% of intracranial tumors. Grade I meningiomas are most common and carry the best prognosis. Grade II and III meningiomas are more aggressive and the outcomes after surgical resection alone remain unsatisfactory. The main objective of this retrospective, single-center study was to assess our results of treatment of grade II-III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy (HT). We retrospectively reviewed patients with histologically proven (WHO 2007) grade II-III meningioma irradiated with HT. Patients were treated one session a day, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 59.4 Gy and 68.4 Gy delivered in 33 and 38 fractions of 1.8 Gy each to the LR PTV and HR PTV, with or without simultaneous integrated boost. From May 2011 to January 2015, 19 patients (15 with grade II and 4 with grade III meningiomas) were treated. Median follow-up for patients with Grade II or Grade III meningiomas, was 29.2 months (range, 10.7-52.4) and 21.3 months (range, 2.4-51.3), respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 89.2%, 83.6% and 56.3% respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 94.7%, 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. No patient had neurological toxicity greater than grade 2 in the acute period. During follow-up, only one patient had neurological toxicity greater than or equal to grade 3. The management of grade II to III meningiomas using HT with doses exceeding 60 Gy is associated with good local control and acceptable survival results., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Life expectancy of patients treated for brain tumors has lengthened due to the therapeutic improvements. Cognitive impairment has been described following brain radiotherapy, but the mechanisms leading to this adverse event remain mostly unknown. Technical evolutions aim at enhancing the therapeutic ratio. Sparing of the healthy tissues has been improved using various approaches; however, few dose constraints have been established regarding brain structures associated with cognitive functions. The aims of this literature review are to report the main brain areas involved in cognitive adverse effects induced by radiotherapy as described in literature, to better understand brain radiosensitivity and to describe potential future improvements., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Information on the role of radiotherapy in anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody-treated melanoma patients is limited. We report on a prospective cohort of advanced melanoma patients treated simultaneously with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy between 01/01/15 and 30/06/16. Tumor evaluations (RECIST 1.1) were performed every 3 months on radiated and non-radiated lesions. Twenty-five advanced melanoma patients (64% AJCC stage IV M1c, 64% on second-line treatment or more, 60% with elevated LDH serum levels) were included. Radiotherapy was performed early (median: 24 days) after the first anti-PD-1 dose in 15 patients with rapidly progressing symptomatic lesion(s) or later (median: 5.4 months) in 10 patients with progressive disease (PD) despite PD-1 blockade. Radiotherapy was limited to one organ in 24 patients and consisted mainly of hypo-fractioned radiotherapy (median dose 26 Gy in 3-5 fractions, 17 patients) or brain radiosurgery (5 patients). Median follow-up after first anti-PD-1 dose was 16.9 m (range 2.7-27.4), with 44% of patients alive at last follow-up. For radiated lesions, rates of complete (CR), partial (PR) responses, stable disease (SD) or PD were 24%, 12%, 24%, and 32%, respectively. For non-radiated lesions, rates of CR, PR, SD, and PD were 20%, 19%, 12%, and 40%, respectively. Responses achieved after radiotherapy for radiated and non-radiated areas were correlated (Pearson correlation r : 0.89, P <0.0001) suggesting an abscopal effect. Five patients with CR remained disease-free after discontinuation of anti-PD-1 for a median of 9.5 months. No unusual adverse event was recorded. Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy may enhance efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy in difficult-to-treat patients. Controlled studies are needed.

Brain metastases natural history from one primary tumor type might be accelerated or favored by using certain systemic chemotherapy. A great deal was described in mice and suggested in human with antiangiogenic drugs, but little is known about the metastatic progression generated by the perverse effect of anticancer drugs. A total of 413 patients who underwent treatment for brain metastasis (2013-2016) were included. The identification of all previous anticancer drugs received by patients from primary tumor diagnosis to brain metastases diagnosis was collated. The median value for the time of first appearance of brain metastasis in all patients was 13.1 months (SD 1.77). The values of brain metastasis-free survival (bMFS) for each primary cancer were: 50.9 months (SD 8.8) for breast, 28.5 months (SD 11.4) for digestive, 27.7 months (SD 18.3) for melanoma, 12.3 months (SD 8.3) for kidney, 1.5 months (SD 0.1) for lung and 26.9 months (SD 18.3) for others (p < 0.009). Through Cox multivariate proportional hazard model, we identified that the only independent factors associated with short bMFS were: lung primary tumor [odd ratio (OR) 0.234, CI 95% 0.16-0.42; p < 0.0001] and mitotic spindle inhibitor (taxanes) chemotherapy [OR 0.609, CI 95% 0.50-0.93; p < 0.001]. Contrariwise, breast primary tumor [odd ratio (OR) 2.372, CI 95% 1.29-4.3; p < 0.005] was an independent factor that proved a significantly longer bMFS. We suggest that anticancer drugs, especially taxane and its derivatives, could promote brain metastases, decreasing free survival. Mechanisms are discussed but still need to be determined.

Background: Little information is currently available concerning young medical students desire to pursue a career in oncology, or their career expectations., Methods: This project is a cross-sectional epidemiological study. A voluntary and anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all young oncologists studying in France between the 2nd of October 2013 and the 23rd of February 2014., Results: The overall response rate was 75.6%. A total of 505 young oncologists completed the questionnaire. The main determining factors in the decision to practice oncology were the cross-sectional nature of the field (70.8%), the depth and variety of human relations (56.3%) and the multi-disciplinary field of work (50.2%). Most residents would like to complete a rotation outside of their assigned region (59.2%) or abroad (70.2%) in order to acquire additional expertise (67.7%). In addition, most interns would like to undertake a fellowship involving care, teaching and research in order to hone their skills (85.7%) and forge a career in public hospitals (46.4%). Career prospects mainly involve salaried positions in public hospitals. Many young oncologists are concerned about their professional future, due to the shortage of openings (40.8%), the workload (52.8%) and the lack of work-life balance (33.4%)., Conclusions: This investigation provides a comprehensive profile of the reasons young oncologists chose to pursue a career in oncology, and their career prospects.

Actuality was dense in 2017 for oncology and hematology. The editorial board of the Bulletin du Cancer proposes a selection of key data distinguishing four trends: precision medicine, immunotherapy, focus on early stages and global management of metastatic disease. A summary of results which have been published or presented in congresses is proposed and the impact on daily practices is discussed., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Little is known about the natural history of cancer and its evolution to metastasis. Paget was the first to postulate the important role played by microenvironment in metastasis progression. Since, the concept of his "seed and soil" theory has been supported and confirmed. Understanding the chronology and natural course that underlie metastasis is mandatory to deepen this concept and to progress in the development of novel therapeutic strategies. A total of 413 patients who underwent treatment for brain metastasis (2013-2016) were included. The identification of previous and newly diagnosed metastasis was made during the clinical and imaging follow-up. We identified 910 metastases in our series. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival estimates were 80% (SD 2), 59.1% (3), and 36% (4), respectively. The median time for first metastasis, referred as metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 15.2 months (SD 1.47). MFS were determined for each metastasis location and were as follows: 7.2 months (SD 8.0) for bone, adrenal 8.4 months (SD 9.4) for adrenal, 13.2 months (SD 1.7) for brain, 14.6 months (SD 5.4) for liver, 25.7 months (SD 11.7) for pleura, 27.7 months (SD 15.9) for peritoneum, 29.8 months (SD 7.2) for spine, 30.2 months (SD 5.2) for lungs, and 54.2 months (SD 12.4) for skin (p < 0.009 log rank). We identified a metastatic timeline process for breast cancer (p < 0.0001 log rank (Mantel-Cox)) and furthermore according to breast subtype cancer (p < 0.0001). We suggest that in addition to Paget's theory, a timeline and a natural history of metastasis exist in patients with cancer. We suppose that some, but not all, primary cancers follow chronological and scheduled metastatic processes to invade organs.

Purpose: Dynamic conformal radiotherapy with helical TomoTherapy ® (HT) offers a more quantitative paradigm for total body irradiation. Treatment planning, delivery, dose verification of the first French experiences of total body irradiation using helical TomoTherapy ® are presented., Materials and Methods: Patients planned for total body irradiation at our institution from February 2012 to May 2013 were reported. Total body irradiation consisted in a single fraction of 2Gy. Planning target volume was divided in two due to the limited translation length of the table. Delivery quality assurance was performed with cylindrical phantom, ionization chamber and films. Thermoluminescent dosimeters and radiochromic films were used for in vivo dosimetry and junction region heterogeneity assessment., Results: Six patients were included. One finally did not receive the treatment but dosimetric data were analyzed. Planned V 95% was covered by D 95% and V 2% did not exceed D 107% for five of the six patients. The mean relative difference between measured and calculated absolute dose of the Delivery quality assurance was always less than 2.5% (mean value±SD: 1%±0.67%). Gamma index (3%; 3mm) was less than 1 for at least 93% of the points (value±SD: 97.4±1.6% and 96.6±2.5% for upper and lower part of treatment respectively). Difference between in vivo measured and calculated dose was above 5% for only two out of 15 points (maximum: 10.2%, mean: 0.73±4.6%). Junction region heterogeneity was in average 5.8±1%. The total treatment session of total body irradiation lasted 120min, with a mean beam on time of 17.2±0.6 and 11.2±1.6min for upper and lower part of the body respectively., Conclusion: Total body irradiation using helical TomoTherapy ® guaranteed high dose homogeneity throughout the body and dose verification was achievable, showing small difference between planned and delivered doses., (Copyright © 2017 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations., (Copyright © 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVE Grade II meningiomas, which currently account for 25% of all meningiomas, are subject to multiple recurrences throughout the course of the disease and represent a challenge for the neurosurgeon. Radiosurgery is increasingly performed for the treatment of Grade II meningiomas and is quite efficient in controlling relapses locally at the site of the lesion, but it cannot prevent margin relapses. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the technical parameters involved in producing marginal relapses and to optimize loco-marginal control to improve therapeutic strategy. METHODS Eighteen patients presenting 58 lesions were treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2010 and 2015 in Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière. The median patient age was 68 years (25%-75% interval: 61-72 years), and the sex ratio (M/F) was 13:5. The median delay between surgery and first GKRS was 3 years. Patients were classified as having Grade II meningioma using World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 criteria. The tumor growth rate was computed by comparing 2 volumetric measurements before treatment. After GKRS, iterative MRI, performed every 6 months, detected a relapse if tumor volume increased by more than 20%. Patterns of relapse were defined as being local, marginal, or distal. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between criterion and potential risk factors was tested by the log-rank test and univariable Cox model. RESULTS The median follow-up was 36 months (range 8-57 months). During this period, 3 patients presented with a local relapse, 5 patients with a marginal relapse, and 7 patients with a distal relapse. Crude local control was 84.5%. The local control actuarial rate was 89% at 1 year and 71% at 3 years. The marginal control actuarial rate was 81% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years. The distal control actuarial rate was 100% at 1 year, 81% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years. Median distal control was 38 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 71% at 1 year, 36% at 2 years, and 23% at 3 years. Median PFS was 18 months. Lesions treated with a minimum radiation dose of ≤ 12 Gy had significantly more local relapses than those treated with a dose > 12 Gy (p = 0.04) in univariate analysis. Marginal control was significantly influenced by tumor growth rate, with a lower growth rate being highly associated with improved marginal control (p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a relationship between dose and marginal control, but it was not significant (p = 0.09). PFS was significantly associated with delay between first surgery and GKRS (p = 0.03). The authors noticed few complications with no sequelae. CONCLUSIONS In order to optimize loco-marginal control, radiosurgical treatment should require a minimum dose of > 12 Gy and an extended target volume along the dural insertion. Ideally, these parameters should correspond to the aggressiveness of the lesion, based on genetic features of the tumor.

To assess efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) in patients over 80 years old with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Between June 2009 and September 2015, patients in this population with a recommendation for radiation therapy from a multidisciplinary tumor board, and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60 as assessed by a radiation oncologist, who received HRT (40 Gy/15 fractions) ± concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 21 patients fulfilled the criteria for eligibility. Median KPS was 80 (60-90). After a median follow-up of 5.8 months (IQR 3.7-13.1 months), median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (95 % CI 4.5-19.1) and the 1-year and 2-year OS were 39.5 % (95 % CI 21.9-71.2 %) and 6.6 % (95 % CI 1.0- 43.3 %), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.9-7.7 months), 1-year and 2-year PFS were 15.2 % (95 % CI 4.4-52.4) and 0 %, respectively. Overall, 16 (76.2 %) patients presented a recurrence. Overall seven patients (33.3 %) needed to be hospitalized during treatment. On univariate analysis, hospitalization was the only variable that correlated with less favourable outcome in terms of both OS (12.2 months versus 3.8 months, p < 0.010) and PFS (5.8 months versus 3.4 months, p = 0.002). Our study suggests that HRT is feasible with acceptable tolerance among "very elderly" patients affected by GBM. Patients 80 and older should be considered for management based on RT.

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. Treating these tumours is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk, infiltrating nature, and radioresistance. Clinical prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance status, tumour location, and treatments such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have long been recognized in the management of patients with gliomas. Molecular biomarkers are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. These practice guidelines aim at helping in choosing the best treatment, in particular radiation therapy., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)