Search

Mariko Jitsumori,1,* Shinya Matsuzaki,1,* Masayuki Endo,1 Takeya Hara,1 Takuji Tomimatsu,1 Satoko Matsuzaki,2 Tatsuya Miyake,1 Tsuyoshi Takiuchi,1 Aiko Kakigano,1 Kazuya Mimura,1 Eiji Kobayashi,1 Yutaka Ueda,1 Tadashi Kimura1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Shinya Matsuzaki; Aiko KakiganoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, JapanTel +81-6-6879-3355Fax +81-6-6879-3359Email zacky@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jp; ai-kaki@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jpBackground: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is used to treat severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). According to a few studies, UAE for PPH was associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in subsequent pregnancies. These previous studies, however, lacked controls, and to the best of our knowledge, no systematic literature reviews have been conducted thus far. We report the results of our retrospective case–control study of pregnancies after UAE at a single center and include a literature review to evaluate the risk of PAS in pregnancies after UAE.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from deliveries at our hospital between January 2012 and October 2017. We divided the delivery data into cases with previous UAEs performed for PPH (the post-UAE group) and those without UAEs (the non-UAE group, which included women without previous PPH). We defined PAS as cases in which hysterectomy was performed and pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).Results: We used data from 3155 patients in this study, of whom 16 patients had undergone UAE (post-UAE group) and 3139 had not (non-UAE group). We found no differences between the groups in terms of frequency of preterm births (12.5% versus 14.2%, respectively; OR, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.218 to 3.414; P = 0.84) or FGR (6.2% versus 10.0%, respectively; OR, 0.602; 95% CI, 0.104 to 3.584; P = 0.61). However, cases of PAS were significantly more common in the post-UAE group (37.5%) than in the non-UAE group (1.2%; OR, 50.303; 95% CI, 17.38 to 145.592; P < 0.01).Conclusion: Our results suggest that previous UAE is a significant risk factor for PAS.Keywords: placenta accreta, placenta accreta spectrum, uterine artery embolization, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric outcomes

Additional file 3: Table S3 Comparison of uterine preservation rate among different suture sizes in uterine atony cases

A 67-year-old uniparous woman had undergone surgery for acute perforated gastric ulcer 10 years prior to the current presentation. Although abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed at that point had revealed a mature cystic teratoma measuring 6 cm in diameter in the right ovary, it was left untreated. She visited the department of surgery at our hospital with chief complaints of appetite loss, nausea, and vomiting that had persisted for the prior two weeks. She was admitted with a diagnosis of ileus attributed to an abdominal incisional hernia. CT performed on admission revealed a tumor measuring 21 cm in diameter with mural nodules in the right ovary. Thus, surgery was performed under suspicion of malignant transformation of the previously detected ovarian mature cystic teratoma. While neither lymphadenopathy nor distant metastasis was detected by imaging studies, bilateral adnexectomy and repair of the abdominal incisional hernia were performed. Cytology of ascites was negative. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma arising from teratoma, and the postoperative clinical diagnosis was stage IA ovarian cancer. It was assumed that the mature cystic teratoma which had been detected in the right ovary 10 years earlier had undergone malignant transformation.