Search

Recently, animal welfare has been attracting worldwide attention, and implementation of 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) is prioritized in every way possible in the drug development. Microsampling, in which small amounts of blood are collected, is attracting attention in this context. ICH S3A Q&A focused on microsampling was published in November 2017 to help accelerate the application of microsampling for toxicokinetic assessment. The increased sensitivity of drug measurement apparatuses such as mass spectrometers has made it possible to measure drug concentrations with small amounts of blood samples. In this review, we summarized the reports on toxicological influence of microsampling in rodents (rats and mice) with or without drug administration or recovery period after blood collection and influences that may arise from differences in the blood sampling site or blood sampling volume. We also summarized some perspectives on further implementation of microsampling in toxicology studies. The use of microsampling in regulatory toxicology studies has gradually increased, although at a lower rate than in discovery studies. Since more animals are used in GLP toxicology studies than in discovery studies, the effect of reducing the number of animals by microsampling is expected to be greater in the toxicology studies. This report aims to promote the application of microsampling to nonclinical studies, as it is beneficial for improving animal welfare and can contribute to the 3Rs. Microsampling is a technique for collecting small amounts of blood from animals and is expected to contribute to the 3Rs. In this review, we summarized the reports on toxicological influence of microsampling in rodents (rats and mice) with or without drug administration or recovery period after blood collection and influences that may arise from differences in the blood sampling site or blood sampling volume. We also summarized some perspectives on further implementation of microsampling in regulatory toxicology studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Ethyl (6 R)-6-[ N-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)sulfamoyl]cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate (TAK-242) was metabolized to cyclohexene and phenyl ring moieties in non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies and it was suggested that the cyclohexene ring moiety of TAK-242 is tightly bound to endogenous macromolecules. After incubation of TAK-242 and glutathione (GSH) in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C, TAK-242 reacted with GSH to produce a glutathione conjugate of the cyclohexene ring moiety of TAK-242, which had been observed as a metabolite (M-SG) in non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Formation of M-SG was time dependent with a first order reaction and M-I, a metabolite from the phenyl ring moiety of TAK-242, was also produced in parallel. The formation of M-SG was accelerated with increasing pH, therefore it was indicated that TAK-242 reacted with GSH by a nucleophilic substitution reaction. Because glutathione transferase (GST) enhanced M-SG formation in vitro, it is expected that the conjugation of TAK-242 with GSH is also facilitated by GST in vivo in addition to a spontaneous chemical reaction. When radio-labeled TAK-242 ([cyclohexene ring-U-14 C]TAK-242) was incubated with rat serum albumin (RSA) or human serum albumin (HSA) in vitro, the radioactive material was covalently bound to RSA and HSA, and M-I was generated simultaneously in the reaction mixture. The chemical structure of the TAK-242 adduct covalently bound to HSA was characterized by the accurate mass spectra that cyclohexene ring moiety of TAK-242 was covalently bound to the lysine residue in HSA. The adduct was also detected in the plasma of rats and humans after single i.v. dosing of TAK-242 ( in vivo). Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pharmacokinetics of TAK-272 (SCO-272), an orally active renin inhibitor, was investigated in rats with subcutaneously injected turpentine oil, which was an inflammation animal model. Following intravenous administration of TAK-272 to the turpentine-treated rats, the systemic clearance and volume of distribution decreased with the elevated plasma α 1 -acid glycoprotein (AGP) levels. The elevated plasma AGP levels were negatively correlated with the plasma unbound fraction of TAK-272 in the rats. Although the AUCs of total TAK-272 in the turpentine-treated rats were higher than those in the control rats after intravenous and oral administration, those of unbound TAK-272, which seem to directly contribute to the pharmacological effect and safety, were nearly equal between the turpentine-treated and control rats in the respective dose routes. TAK-272 has been shown to primarily bind to AGP in the human plasma. These results strongly suggested that the pharmacokinetic of TAK-272 in humans would also be affected by the variation in the plasma AGP levels and should be discussed with not only the total concentrations but also the unbound concentrations in the clinical trial for patients with elevated plasma AGP levels.