Search

The field of radiation oncology (RO) has experienced large fluctuations in the number of applicants to residency programs. It is essential to understand the modifiable factors which influence entry. The objective of this project is to identify factors (i.e., "enablers") that motivate prospective medical students to apply to RO. A survey was developed to characterize RO enablers and barriers as perceived by current RO residents. An existing conceptual framework of why medical students choose primary care was used as the foundation of the survey and was modified for relevance towards RO. The final mixed-methods survey was administered to Canadian RO residents (2015-2019 match years) via Program Directors and the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists resident member database. Medical students are most likely to select a career in RO during or after a clerkship experience. Extrinsic factors strongly motivating interest in RO were (% rating as very important or extremely important on a 5-point scale) as follows: positive feedback from radiation oncologists (86%) and RO residents (66%), clinical rotations in RO (84%) and mentorship (77%). Intrinsic factors include perceived fulfillment (95.2%), commitment to patient care (85.3%), and intellectual challenge (67.7%). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of mentorship, the "hand-heart" connection, career variability/flexibility, career satisfaction/lifestyle, and personal connections with cancer/cancer care in motivating students to pursue RO. Increased preclinical exposure such as mentorship may encourage students to seek clerkship opportunities in RO. These findings inform strategies to recruit medical students to a career in RO., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Background and Purpose: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer delivers radiation in proximity to the shoulder and torso, and radiation exposure may contribute to long-term upper extremity and postural morbidity. To date, no studies have assessed the differential dosimetric impact of proton versus photon radiation on shoulder and torso anatomy. This study examined clinically relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) structures and assessed the dose delivered with each modality., Patients/material and Methods: Ten MSK structures were contoured on IMPT (intensity-modulated proton therapy) and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans for 30 patients receiving RNI. Relevant dose metrics were compared for each of the structures. Intensity-modulated proton therapy dose was calculated using the relative biological effective value of 1.1. Hypo-fractionated plans were scaled to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) using an alpha/beta ratio of four. Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests compared doses. Select three-dimensional and optimised VMAT plans were also informally compared., Results and Interpretation: Each of the 10 structures received a statistically significantly lower dose with the use of IMPT compared with VMAT. Differences were greatest for posterior structures, including the trapezius, latissimus dorsi and glenohumeral joint. Mean absolute differences were as great as 23 Gy (supraspinatus D5cc) and up to 30-fold dose reductions were observed (deltoid D50cc). An average 3.7-fold relative dose reduction existed across all structures. Measures of low/intermediate dose (V15Gy and D50cc) showed the largest differences. Intensity-modulated proton therapy results in statistically lower radiation exposure to relevant shoulder and torso anatomy compared to photon radiation for patients requiring RNI. Prospective study is needed to correlate functional outcomes with radiation dose.

Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used in the ongoing RadComp pragmatic randomized clinical trial (PRCT)., Methods and Materials: The deidentified and blinded data set included 774 English-speaking female participants who completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment. Eleven PRO measures were evaluated, including the Trial Outcome Index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes, the BREAST-Q, and selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. PROs were measured at 3 timepoints: baseline, completion of radiation therapy (RT), and 6 months post-RT. Ten variables were used as validity anchors. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated between PROs and convergent validity indicators. Mean PRO differences between clinically distinct categories were compared with analysis of variance methods (known-groups validity). PRO change scores were mapped to change in other variables (sensitivity to change)., Results: Most correlations between PROs and validity indicators were large (≥0.5). Mean score for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes was higher (better) for those with a lumpectomy compared with those with a mastectomy (P < .001). Mean scores for the FACT-B Trial Outcome Index and for PROMIS Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were better for those with good baseline performance status compared with those with poorer baseline performance status (P < .05). At completion of RT and post-RT, mean scores for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes and BREAST-Q Radiation were significantly different (P < .001) across categories for all Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -Treatment Satisfaction - General items. There were medium-sized correlations between change scores for FACT-B Trial Outcome Index, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and change scores in the Visual Analog Scale., Conclusions: For patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving radiation in the RadComp PRCT, our findings demonstrate high reliability and validity for important PRO measures, supporting their psychometric strength and usefulness to reflect the effect of RT on health-related quality of life., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Axillary recurrence following lumpectomy with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is rare, possibly due to routine use of whole breast radiation. In this study, we characterized the rate of any axillary recurrence among mastectomy patients with a negative SLNB and no adjuvant radiation therapy., Methods: We identified women who underwent mastectomy with SLNB for early-stage breast cancer (1999-2005) and included patients with pathologically negative nodes and no axillary dissection or adjuvant radiation. The primary outcome was ipsilateral axillary recurrence., Results: A total of 234 women, median age 50 years, underwent 242 mastectomies. Histology showed 112 (46%) invasive cancers, 16 (7%) ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) with microinvasion, and 114 (47%) pure DCIS. Cancers were predominantly estrogen receptor positive (59%) and moderate (41%) or high grade (32%). A mean of 2 final sentinel nodes were excised (range 1-6) and 21 patients (9%) had isolated tumor cells on SLNB pathology. At 16 years median follow up (range 1-22 years), 3 patients (1.2%) developed an isolated axillary failure, and 1 had concurrent axillary and chest wall recurrences (total axillary recurrence rate 1.7%). Three of four axillary recurrences occurred in patients with moderate or high-grade estrogen receptor-positive DCIS without invasion on mastectomy histology. Median time to axillary recurrence was 70.5 months (range 29-132 months)., Conclusions: Axillary recurrence is rare after a negative SLNB, even in the absence of adjuvant radiation. This supports the safety of forgoing additional surgery or radiation to the axilla in the early-stage breast cancer and a negative SLNB., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the expansion of proton radiation therapy centers across the United States and a gradually expanding body of academic evidence supporting its use, more patients are receiving-and asking about-proton therapy than ever before. Here, we outline, for nonradiation oncologists, the theoretical benefits of proton therapy, the clinical evidence to date, the controversies affecting utilization, and the numerous randomized trials currently in progress. We also discuss the challenges of researching and delivering proton therapy, including the cost of constructing and maintaining centers, barriers with insurance approval, clinical situations in which proton therapy may be approached with caution, and the issue of equitable access for all patients. The purpose of this review is to assist practicing oncologists in understanding the evolving role of proton therapy and to help nonradiation oncologists guide patients regarding this technology.

Purpose: Sarcopenia, an age-related decline in muscle mass and physical function, is associated with increased toxicity and worse outcomes in women with breast cancer (BC). Sarcopenia may contribute to toxicity-related early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine  therapy (aET) in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC but remains poorly characterized., Methods and Materials: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included consecutive women with stage 0-II HR+ BC who received breast conserving therapy (lumpectomy and radiation therapy) and aET from 2011 to 2017 with a 5-year follow-up. Skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm 2 /m 2 ) was analyzed using a deep learning model on routine cross-sectional radiation simulation imaging; sarcopenia was dichotomized according to previously validated reports. The primary endpoint was toxicity-related aET discontinuation; logistic regression analysis evaluated associations between SMI/sarcopenia and aET discontinuation. Cox regression analysis evaluated associations with time to aET toxicity, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), and disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: A total of 305 women (median follow-up, 89 months) were included with a median age of 67 years and early-stage BC (12% stage 0, 65% stage I). A total of 60 (20%) women experienced toxicity-related aET discontinuation. Sarcopenia was associated with toxicity-related early discontinuation of aET (odds ratio, 2.18; P = .036) and shorter time to aET toxicity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; P = .031). SMI or sarcopenia were not independently associated with IBTR or DFS; toxicity-related aET discontinuation was associated with worse IBTR (HR, 9.47; P = .002) and worse DFS (HR, 4.53; P = .001)., Conclusions: Among women with early-stage HR+ BC who receive adjuvant radiation therapy and hormone therapy, sarcopenia is associated with toxicity-related early discontinuation of aET. Further studies should validate these findings in women who did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy. These high-risk patients may be candidates for aggressive symptom management and/or alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Greenspace in schools might enhance students' academic performance. However, the literature-dominated by ecological studies at the school level in countries from the Northern Hemisphere-presents mixed evidence of a beneficial association. We evaluated the association between school greenness and student-level academic performance in Santiago, Chile, a capital city of the Global South. This cross-sectional study included 281,695 fourth-grade students attending 1,498 public, charter, and private schools in Santiago city between 2014 and 2018. Student-level academic performance was assessed using standardized test scores and indicators of attainment of learning standards in mathematics and reading. School greenness was estimated using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models were fit to evaluate associations, adjusting for individual- and school-level sociodemographic factors. Analyses were stratified by school type. In fully adjusted models, a 0.1 increase in school greenness was associated with higher test scores in mathematics (36.9 points, 95% CI: 2.49; 4.88) and in reading (1.84 points, 95% CI: 0.73; 2.95); as well as with higher odds of attaining learning standards in mathematics (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.12; 1.28) and reading (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02; 1.13). Stratified analysis showed differences by school type, with associations of greater magnitude and strength for students attending public schools. No significant associations were detected for students in private schools. Higher school greenness was associated with improved individual-level academic outcomes among elementary-aged students in a capital city in South America. Our results highlight the potential of greenness in the school environment to moderate educational and environmental inequalities in urban areas., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study., (© 2023 The Authors. GeoHealth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.)

Background/objective: Implant-based breast reconstruction is a common plastic surgery procedure with well-documented clinical outcomes. Despite this, the natural history and timing of key complication endpoints are not well described. The goal of this study is to determine when patients are most likely to experience specific adverse events after implant-based reconstruction., Methods: Retrospective consecutive series of patients who received mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction over a 6-year period were included. Complications and unfavorable outcomes including hematoma, seroma, wound infection, skin flap necrosis, capsular contracture, implant rippling, and implant loss were identified. A time-to-event analysis was performed and Cox regression models identified patient and treatment characteristics associated with each outcome., Results: Of 1473 patients and 2434 total reconstructed breasts, 785 complications/unfavorable outcomes were identified. The 12-month cumulative incidence of hematoma was 1.4%, seroma: 4.3%, infection: 3.2%, skin flap necrosis: 3.9%, capsular contracture: 5.7%, implant rippling: 7.1%, and implant loss: 3.9%. In the analysis, 332/785 (42.3%) complications occurred within 60 days of surgery; 94% of hematomas, 85% of skin necrosis events, and 75% of seromas occurred during this period. Half of all infections and implant losses also occurred within 60 days. Of the remaining complications, 94% of capsular contractures and 93% of implant rippling occurred >60 days from surgery., Conclusions: Complications following mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction exhibit a discrete temporal distribution. These data represent the first comprehensive study of the timing of adverse events following implant-based reconstruction. These findings are immediately useful to guide postoperative care, follow-up, and clinical trial design., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents globally. A prospective cohort of residents completed surveys before and after the live virtual webinar sessions (pre- and post-surveys, respectively). Live sessions were structured as complex gray-zone cases across various core disease sites. Resident demographics and responses were summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions. Nine ROVER sessions were held from October 2020 to June 2021. A total of 1487 registered residents completed the pre-survey, of which 786 attended the live case discussion and 223 completed post-surveys. A total of 479 unique radiation oncology residents (of which 95, n = 19.8%, were international attendees) from 147 institutions (national, n = 81, 55.1%; international, n = 66, 44.9%) participated in the sessions. There was similar participation across post-graduate year (PGY) 2 through 5 (range n = 86 to n = 105). Of the 122 unique resident post-surveys, nearly all reported learning through the virtual structure as "very easy" or "easy" (97.5%, n = 119). A majority rated the ROVER 2.0 educational sessions to be "valuable or "very valuable" (99.2%, n = 121), and the panelists-attendee interaction as "appropriate" (97.5%, n = 119). Virtual live didactics aimed at radiation oncology residents are feasible. These results suggest that the adoption of the ROVER 2.0 curricula may help improve radiation oncology resident education., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Disproportionate sex, racial, and ethnic diversity remains in the radiation oncology physician workforce despite widespread awareness and longitudinal efforts to improve representation. In this collaborative review, we define the rationale and components of holistic review and how it can be best used to provide a comprehensive evaluation of applicants to residency programs in radiation oncology. We initially discuss the current state of diversity in the field of radiation oncology and highlight the components of the residency selection process that may serve to perpetuate existing biases. Subsequently, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and Association of American Medical Colleges holistic review framework is reviewed in detail to demonstrate the balanced assessment of potential applicants. The implementation of holistic review in medical school and residency selection to date is examined to underscore the potential value of holistic review in the radiation oncology residency selection process. Finally, recommendations for the practical implementation of holistic review in radiation oncology trainee selection are outlined., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study sought to report the degree to which postgraduate trainees in radiation oncology perceive their education has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional online survey was administered from June to July 2020 to trainee members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) (n = 203). Thirty-four trainees responded with a 17% response rate. Just under half of participants indicated that COVID-19 had a negative/very negative impact on training (n = 15; 46%). The majority agreed/strongly agreed that they feared family/loved ones would contract COVID-19 (n = 29, 88%), felt socially isolated from friends and family because of COVID-19 (n = 23, 70%), and had difficulty concentrating on tasks because of concerns about COVID-19 (n = 17, 52%). Changes that had a negative/very negative impact on learning included limitations to travel and networking (n = 31; 91%) and limited patient contact (n = 19; 58%). Virtual follow-ups (n = 25: 76%) and in-patient care activities (n = 12; 36%) increased. Electives were cancelled in province (n = 10; 30%), out-of-province (n = 16; 49%), and internationally (n = 15; 46%). Teaching from staff was moderately reduced to completely suppressed (n = 23, 70%) and teaching to medical students was moderately reduced to completely suppressed (n = 27, 82%). Significant changes to radiation oncology training were wrought by the pandemic, and roughly half of trainees perceive that these changes had a negative impact on training. Innovations in training delivery are needed to adapt to these new changes., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

The decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned federal protections for abortion rights, making way for states to enact abortion bans with or without exceptions for the health or life of the pregnant patient. Patient care across many areas of medicine including oncology continues to be affected. Although the change in the legal landscape is widely felt, the core ethical considerations for physicians do not change because of restrictions on the practice of medicine. ASCO offers this guidance to assist US oncologists and institutions who must balance limitations with established ethical duties. This paper articulates principles for cancer care and pregnancy, offers a framework for ethical reflection and action for oncologists who care for pregnant patients, and makes recommendations for individual and institutional action to support evidence-based, patient-centered care in the United States where abortion is illegal or access is limited.

Proton therapy is a promising therapeutic modality with unique physical properties that allow for abrupt dose fall-off distal to the target of interest, thereby sparing nearby organs at risk. A number of studies have identified the utility of proton radiation in mitigating treatment related sequelae for patients with locally advanced breast cancers. Thus, in the following review, we highlight clinical and technical considerations for proton radiotherapy delivery in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an uncommon aggressive malignancy that is associated with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, the relationships between the clinical and pathological features of MpBC, treatment approach, and clinical outcomes remain underexplored. In the following review article, we synthesize the existing data on the clinical, pathological and genomic features, management, and outcomes of MpBC. We also identify potential targets for future clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest We declare no competing interests. B: CT chest with contrast (axial, left; coronal, right) of a second patient also depicts a large well-defined mass involving the pleura and minor fissure, with morphology similar to metastatic sarcomatous nodules., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Conventional photon radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer is associated with a reduction in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and an increase in troponin, N-terminal pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and incident heart failure. The cardiac radiation exposure with proton-RT is much reduced and thus may be associated with less cardiotoxicity. The objective was to test the effect of proton-RT on GLS, troponin, and NT-proBNP., Methods and Materials: We conducted a prospective, observational, single-center study of 70 women being treated with proton-RT for breast cancer. Serial measurements of GLS, high-sensitivity troponin I, and NT-proBNP were performed at prespecified intervals (before proton-RT, 4 weeks after completion of proton-RT, and again at 2 months after proton-RT)., Results: The mean age of the patients was 46 ± 11 years, and the mean body mass index was 25.6 ± 5.2 kg/m 2 ; 32% of patients had hypertension, and the mean radiation doses to the heart and the left ventricle (LV) were 0.44 Gy and 0.12 Gy, respectively. There was no change in left ventricular ejection fraction (65 ± 5 vs 66 ± 5 vs 64 ± 4%; P = .15), global GLS (-21.7 ± 2.7 vs -22.7 ± 2.3 vs -22.8 ± 2.1%; P = .24), or segmental GLS from before to after proton-RT. Similarly, there was no change in either high-sensitivity troponin or NT-proBNP with proton-RT. However, in a post hoc subset analysis, women with hypertension had a greater decrease in GLS after proton-RT compared with women without hypertension (-21.3 ± 3.5 vs -24.0 ± 2.4%; P = .006)., Conclusions: Proton-RT did not affect LV function and was not associated with an increase in biomarkers. These data support the potential cardiac benefits of proton-RT compared with conventional RT., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with either 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) planning or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) receive permanent tattoos to assist with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of surface imaging, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo-based setups to those without reference to tattoos., Methods and Materials: Forty-eight patients receiving RNI at our institution from July 2019 to December 2020 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Twenty-four patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface and x-ray imaging. A subsequent 24 patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by x-ray imaging without reference to tattoos. Patient cohorts were balanced by treatment technique and use of deep inspiration breath hold. Treatment (including setup and delivery) time and x-ray-based shifts after surface imaging were recorded., Results: Among patients in the tattoo group receiving 3DCRT RNI, the average treatment time per fraction was 21.35 versus 19.75 minutes in the 3DCRT RNI no-tattoo cohort (P = .03). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the tattoo cohort were 5.6 versus 4.4 mm in the no-tattoo cohort. The average treatment time per fraction for the tattoo VMAT RNI cohort was 23.16 versus 20.82 minutes in the no-tattoo VMAT RNI cohort (P = .08). Mean 3D vector shifts for the patients in the tattoo VMAT cohort were 5.5 versus 7.1 mm in the no-tattoo VMAT cohort. Breath hold technique and body mass index did not affect accuracy in a consistent or clinically relevant way., Conclusions: Using a combination of surface and x-ray imaging, without reference to tattoos, provides excellent accuracy in alignment and setup verification among patients receiving RNI for breast cancer, regardless of treatment technique and with reduced treatment time. Skin-based tattoos are no longer warranted for patients receiving supine RNI., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We provide a novel method to assess the heat mitigation impacts of greenspace though studying the mechanisms of ecosystems responsible for benefits and connecting them to heat exposure metrics. We demonstrate how the ecosystem services framework can be integrated into current practices of environmental health research using supply/demand state-of-the-art methods of ecological modeling of urban greenspace. We compared the supply of cooling ecosystem services in Boston measured through an indicator of high resolution evapotranspiration modeling, with the demand for benefits from cooling measured as a heat exposure risk score based on exposure, hazard and population characteristics. The resulting evapotranspiration indicator follows a pattern similar to conventional greenspace indicators based on vegetation abundance, except in warmer areas such as those with higher levels of impervious surface. We identified demand-supply mismatch areas across the city of Boston, some coinciding with affordable housing complexes and long term care facilities. This novel ES-framework provides cross-disciplinary methods to prioritize urban areas where greenspace interventions can have the most impact based on heat-related demand., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Koen Tieskens reports a relationship with World Bank that includes: consulting or advisory., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Treatment goals for patients with metastatic cancer include prolongation and maintenance of quality of life. Patients and oncologists have questioned the current paradigm of initial dose selection for systemic therapy; however, data on oncologists' dose selection strategies and beliefs are lacking., Methods: We conducted an electronic international survey of medical oncologists who treat patients with breast and/or gastrointestinal cancers. Survey questions addressed experiences with, and attitudes toward, dose reduction at initiation (DRI) of a new systemic therapy for patients with metastatic cancer., Results: Among 3,099 eligible oncologists, 367 responded (response rate 12%). Most (52%) reported using DRI at least 10% of the time to minimize toxicities. Gastrointestinal specialists were more likely to report DRI ≥ 10% of the time (72% v 50% of generalists and 51% of breast specialists, P < .005). Of those who dose reduced ≥ 10% of the time, 89% reported discussing potential tradeoffs between efficacy and toxicity with patients. Overall, 65% agreed it is acceptable to lower starting doses to reduce side effects even if it compromises efficacy; younger clinicians were more likely to agree ( P < .005). There was strong support (89%) for future trials to determine optimal effective, rather than maximum tolerated, dose., Conclusion: Oncology practice varies with regard to discussion and individualized selection of starting doses in the metastatic setting. This study demonstrates a need for consideration of shared decision making regarding initial dose selection and strong support among oncologists for clinical studies to define optimal dosing and best practices for individualizing care., Competing Interests: Rachel B. JimenezEmployment: BiogenStock and Other Ownership Interests: BiogenResearch Funding: Focal Therapeutics R. Donald HarveyConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex, GlaxoSmithKlineResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, Calithera Biosciences, Pfizer, AbbVie, Genmab, Nektar, Rgenix, Xencor, Meryx Pharmaceuticals, Abbisko, Actuate Therapeutics, Alkermes, Amgen, Bayer, Fujifilm, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, InhibRx, Merck, Mersana, Puma Biotechnology, RAPT Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Sutro Biopharma, Takeda Vicki A. MorrisonConsulting or Advisory Role: MerckSpeakers’ Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgenePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Up-to-Date author (Pathogenesis of infection in CLL pts, prevention of infection in CLL pts) Teri PollastroEmployment: Sengine Precision Oncology, Resolution BioscienceConsulting or Advisory: PfizerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer David WaterhouseConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AZTherapies, AbbVie, Amgen, McGivney Global Advisors, Janssen Oncology, Seattle Genetics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Exelixis, Eisai, EMD Serono, Merck, Pfizer, Mirati Therapeutics, Sanofi/Regeneron, Fresenius Kabi, Lilly, Sanofi, Astellas PharmaSpeakers’ Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Merck, AstraZeneca, Amgen, EMD SeronoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb Colin WeekesHonoraria: Celgene, Lilly, BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Merrimack, IpsenResearch Funding: Celgene, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Novartis, Actuate Therapeutics Grant R. WilliamsHonoraria: Cardinal Health Jeffrey PeppercornThis author is the Editor-in-Chief designate of JCO Oncology Practice. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Employment: GlaxoSmithKlineStock and Other Ownership Interests: GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: Athenex, Abbott LaboratoriesResearch Funding: Outcomes4MeNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

With improvement in mastectomy skin flap viability and increasing recognition of animation deformity following sub-pectoral implant placement, there has been a transition toward pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. While studies have explored the cost effectiveness of implant-based breast reconstruction, few investigations have evaluated cost with respect to pre-pectoral versus sub-pectoral breast reconstruction. A retrospective review of 548 patients who underwent mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction was performed from 2017 to 2020. The demographic and surgical characteristics of the pre-pectoral and sub-pectoral cohorts were well matched, except for reconstructive staging, as patients who underwent pre-pectoral reconstruction were more likely to undergo single-stage instead of two-stage reconstruction. Comparison of institutional cost ratios by reconstructive technique revealed that the sub-pectoral approach was more costly (1.70 ± 0.44 vs 1.58 ± 0.31, p < 0.01). However, further stratification by laterality and reconstructive staging failed to demonstrate difference in cost by reconstructive technique. These results were confirmed by multivariable linear regression, which did not reveal reconstructive technique to be an independent variable for cost. This study suggests that pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is a cost-effective alternative to sub-pectoral breast reconstruction and may confer cost benefit, as it is more strongly associated with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) is an international collaborative network of radiation oncology (RO) professionals with the goal of improving RO education. This report summarizes the first two ROECSG annual symposia including an overview of presentations and analysis of participant feedback. One-day symposia were held in June 2018 and May 2019. Programs included oral and poster presentations, RO education leadership perspectives, and keynote addresses. Post-symposia surveys were collected. Research presentations were recorded and made available online. The 2018 symposium was had 36 attendees from 25 institutions in three countries. The 2019 symposium had 76 individuals from 41 institutions in five countries. Attendees represented diverse backgrounds including attending physicians (46%), residents (13%), medical students (14%), physicists (2%), nurses (1%), and program coordinators (1%). Fifty-five oral presentations were given with 53 released online. Ninety percent of attendees rated the symposium as improving their knowledge of RO educational scholarship, 98% felt the symposium provided the opportunity to receive feedback on RO education scholarship, and 99% felt that the symposium fostered the development of collaborative RO education projects. ROECSG was rated higher than professional organizations in fostering educational scholarship (p<0.001). All attendees felt that the symposium produced new RO education scholarship ideas and provided unique networking opportunities. The first two ROECSG symposia drew a diverse population of attendees and provided unique opportunities for presentation of RO education scholarship. Future ROECSG symposia will be designed to enhance opportunities to present RO education scholarship and to facilitate networking., (© 2021. American Association for Cancer Education.)

Purpose: Children may be exposed to numerous in-home environmental exposures (IHEE) that trigger asthma exacerbations. Spatially linking social and environmental exposures to electronic health records (EHR) can aid exposure assessment, epidemiology, and clinical treatment, but EHR data on exposures are missing for many children with asthma. To address the issue, we predicted presence of indoor asthma trigger allergens, and estimated effects of their key geospatial predictors., Methods: Our study samples were comprised of children with asthma who provided self-reported IHEE data in EHR at a safety-net hospital in New England during 2004-2015. We used an ensemble machine learning algorithm and 86 multilevel features (e.g., individual, housing, neighborhood) to predict presence of cockroaches, rodents (mice or rats), mold, and bedroom carpeting/rugs in homes. We reduced dimensionality via elastic net regression and estimated effects by the G-computation causal inference method., Results: Our models reasonably predicted presence of cockroaches (area under receiver operating curves [AUC] = 0.65), rodents (AUC = 0.64), and bedroom carpeting/rugs (AUC = 0.64), but not mold (AUC = 0.54). In models adjusted for confounders, higher average household sizes in census tracts were associated with more reports of pests (cockroaches and rodents). Tax-exempt parcels were associated with more reports of cockroaches in homes. Living in a White-segregated neighborhood was linked with lower reported rodent presence, and mixed residential/commercial housing and newer buildings were associated with more reports of bedroom carpeting/rugs in bedrooms., Conclusions: We innovatively applied a machine learning and causal inference mixture methodology to detail IHEE among children with asthma using EHR and geospatial data, which could have wide applicability and utility., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Technical advances in radiation oncology may allow for greater reduction in the late toxicities associated with breast radiotherapy. In this review, we explore emerging technologies that show specific promise for the identification and reduction of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity namely, proton therapy and cardiac autosegmentation. First, we will examine the historical risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in breast cancer, including trends in cardiac radiation exposure over time. Then, we will highlight the rationale for proton therapy, including the early dosimetric and clinical studies available to-date, to underscore proton therapy's unique potential for limiting cardiac radiation exposure and preserving cardiac function among patients with breast cancer, with consideration of modern cardiac dose constraints. Finally, we will focus on the development of cardiac contouring atlases and substructure auto-segmentation methods in order to demonstrate opportunities for integration of auto-segmentation into dosimetric planning and outcome prediction., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of all breast cancers. The treatment paradigm for the majority of patients with DCIS consists of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT), with adjuvant endocrine therapy offered for hormone-receptor positive disease. RT after BCS reduces the risk of in-breast recurrence, decreasing subsequent in-situ and invasive cancers by ≥50%, with 10-year breast-cancer specific survival outcomes approaching 98%. As local control rates are high, treatment efforts have focused on selective de-escalation of care. Traditionally, clinicians have used clinical-pathologic features (ie, grade, age, size, margin width) to guide selection of low-risk DCIS patients in whom postoperative RT may be omitted. More recently, genomic molecular assays including the Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score and DCISionRT have been developed to provide individualized assessment of predicting RT benefit after BCS. These molecular assays have the potential for personalized risk assessment, particularly when used in combination with existing clinical-pathologic features for risk assessment. This article reviews the current status and existing published literature on DCIS molecular-risk assessment tools and their potential for guiding postoperative RT recommendations in the BCT setting. In addition, current trials studying omission of definitive surgery for low-risk DCIS are discussed., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is a measure of greenness widely used in environmental health research. High spatial resolution NDVI has become increasingly available; however, the implications of its use in exposure assessment are not well understood., Objective: To quantify the impact of NDVI spatial resolution on greenness exposure misclassification., Methods: Greenness exposure was assessed for 31,328 children in the Greater Boston Area in 2016 using NDVI from MODIS (250 m 2 ), Landsat 8 (30 m 2 ), Sentinel-2 (10 m 2 ), and the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP, 1 m 2 ). We compared continuous and categorical greenness estimates for multiple buffer sizes under a reliability assessment framework. Exposure misclassification was evaluated using NAIP data as reference., Results: Greenness estimates were greater for coarser resolution NDVI, but exposure distributions were similar. Continuous estimates showed poor agreement and high consistency, while agreement in categorical estimates ranged from poor to strong. Exposure misclassification was higher with greater differences in resolution, smaller buffers, and greater number of exposure quantiles. The proportion of participants changing greenness quantiles was higher for MODIS (11-60%), followed by Landsat 8 (6-44%), and Sentinel-2 (5-33%)., Significance: Greenness exposure assessment is sensitive to spatial resolution of NDVI, aggregation area, and number of exposure quantiles. Greenness exposure decisions should ponder relevant pathways for specific health outcomes and operational considerations., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.

Background: Audio recordings of oncology clinic discussions can help patients retain and understand information about their disease and treatment decisions. Access to this tool relies on acceptance of recordings by oncologists. This is the first study to evaluate experience and attitudes of oncologists toward patients recording clinic visits., Methods: Medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists from 5 US cancer centers and community affiliates were surveyed to evaluate clinicians' experience, beliefs, and practices regarding patient-initiated recordings., Results: Among 360 oncologists (69% response rate), virtually all (93%) have experienced patients seeking to record visits. Although 75% are comfortable with recording, 25% are uncomfortable and 56% report concerns ranging from less thorough discussions to legal liability. Most (85%) always agree when patients ask to record, but 15% never or selectively allow recording. Although 51% believe recording is positive for the patient-physician relationship, a sizable minority report that it can lead to less detailed conversations (28%) or avoidance of difficult topics, including prognosis (33%). Views did not vary based on subspecialty, practice setting, or geographic region, but older age and years in practice were associated with more positive views of recording. The majority of clinicians (72%) desire institutional policies to govern guidelines about recordings., Conclusions: Most oncologists are comfortable with patient requests to record visits, but a sizable minority remain uncomfortable, and access to recording varies solely on physician preference. This difference in care delivery may benefit from institutional policies that promote access while addressing legitimate physician concerns over privacy and appropriate use of recordings., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

With 5-year survival rates after breast cancer therapy exceeding 90%, comprehensive follow-up care is a vital component of the treatment plan for patients who have completed active therapy. Although radiation oncologists are generally comfortable with management of the locoregional toxicities of breast cancer radiation therapy, many may be less familiar with the toxicities and available interventions associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and antihormone therapy. For radiation oncologists to provide the greatest value to their patients and play a meaningful role in patients with breast cancer follow-up care, multisystem assessment and management, beyond the breast/chest and axilla, is key. This guide is intended as an educational and practical tool to assist any oncology caregiver with a thorough multisystem assessment and management of the most common survivorship issues for the treated breast cancer patient. Hyperlinks to published data supporting or summarizing the intervention are provided for further reading in the online version, along with sample "Follow-Up Note and After Visit Summary" templates., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) recently released new contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction (IBR). As compared to prior ESTRO guidelines, the new guidelines primarily redefined the chest wall (CW) target to exclude the breast prosthesis. In this study, we assessed the impact of these changes on treatment planning and dosimetric outcomes using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) therapy., Methods: We performed a treatment planning study of 10 women with left-sided breast cancer who underwent PMRT after IBR. All target structures were delineated first using standard (ESTRO) breast contouring guidelines and then separately using the new (ESTRO-ACROP) guidelines. Standard organs-at-risk (OARs) and cardiac substructures were contoured. Four sets of plans were generated: (1) VMAT using standard ESTRO contours, (2) VMAT using new ESTRO-ACROP contours, (3) PBS using standard contours, and (4) PBS using new contours., Results: VMAT plans using the new ESTRO-ACROP guidelines resulted in modest sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (mean dose: 6.99 Gy standard ESTRO vs. 6.08 Gy new ESTRO-ACROP, p  = 0.010) and ipsilateral lung (V 20 : 21.66% vs 19.45%, p  = 0.017), but similar exposure to the heart (mean dose: 4.6 Gy vs. 4.3 Gy, p  = 0.513), with a trend toward higher contralateral lung (V 5 : 31.0% vs 35.3%, p  = 0.331) and CW doses (V 5 : 31.9% vs 35.4%, p  = 0.599). PBS plans using the new guidelines resulted in further sparing of the heart (mean dose: 1.05 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.54 Gy(RBE), p  < 0.001), nearly all cardiac substructures (LAD mean dose: 2.01 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.66 Gy(RBE), p  < 0.001), and ipsilateral lung (V 20 : 16.22% vs 6.02%, p  < 0.001)., Conclusions: PMRT after IBR using the new ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines with both VMAT and PBS therapy is associated with significant changes in exposure to several cardiopulmonary structures.

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Recent years have seen improvements in breast cancer survival and a greater appreciation of potential long-term morbidity associated with the dose and volume of irradiated organs. Proton therapy reduces the dose to nontarget structures while optimizing target coverage. However, there remain additional financial costs associated with proton therapy, despite reductions over time, and studies have yet to demonstrate that protons improve upon the treatment outcomes achieved with photon radiation therapy. There remains considerable heterogeneity in proton patient selection and techniques, and the rapid technological advances in the field have the potential to affect evidence evaluation, given the long latency period for breast cancer radiation therapy recurrence and late effects. In this consensus statement, we assess the data available to the radiation oncology community of proton therapy for breast cancer, provide expert consensus recommendations on indications and technique, and highlight ongoing trials' cost-effectiveness analyses and key areas for future research., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is used for pediatric craniopharyngioma in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage settings. Proton RT may be useful owing to tumor proximity to eloquent anatomy. We report clinical outcomes for a large cohort treated with proton therapy., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients (≤21 years) treated with surgery and proton therapy for craniopharyngioma between August 2002 and October 2018. Clinical characteristics, treatment course, and outcomes were recorded. Acute toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Late toxicity was assessed using neuroendocrine, neuro-ophthalmologic, and neuropsychological testing., Results: Among 77 patients, median age at diagnosis was 8.6 years (range, 1.3-20); median age at radiation was 9.6 years (range, 2.3-20.5). Most common presenting symptoms were headache (58%), visual impairment (55%), and endocrinopathy (40%). Patients underwent a median of 2 surgical interventions (range, 1-7) before protons. At initial surgery, 18% had gross total resection, 60% had subtotal resection, and 22% had biopsy/cyst decompression. Median RT dose was 52.2 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness). Common acute toxicities were headache (29%), fatigue (35%), and nausea/vomiting (12%). Only 4% developed any acute grade 3 toxicity. Nine patients experienced cyst growth requiring replanning or surgical decompression. At a median of 4.8 years from RT (range, 0.8-15.6), there were 6 local failures and 3 deaths, 2 related to disease progression. Effect of tumor and treatment contributed to late toxicity including Moyamoya syndrome (13%), visual impairment (40%), and endocrine deficiency requiring hormone replacement (94%). Subclinical decline in functional independence and adaptive skills in everyday life was detected at follow-up., Conclusions: Surgery and proton therapy results in excellent disease control for pediatric craniopharyngioma. Severe acute toxicity is rare. Late toxicities from tumor, surgery, and radiation remain prevalent. Endocrine and ophthalmology follow-up is necessary, and neuropsychological testing may identify patients at risk for treatment-related cognitive and adaptive functioning changes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fewer than 1% of all breast cancers occur in men. As a result, a distinct lack of data exists regarding the management and outcomes in this cohort., Methods: Any male patient with pathologically confirmed breast cancer diagnosed between August 2000 and October 2017 at either Massachusetts General Hospital or Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and their affiliate satellite locations were included. Primary chart review was used to assess clinical and pathologic characteristics. Patient and treatment variables were reported via descriptive statistics. Local-regional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: 100 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 112 months (range 1-220 months). Approximately 1/3 of patients experienced at least a 3-month delay to presentation. 83 patients ultimately underwent mastectomy as definitive surgical treatment. 46 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, and 37 patients received chemotherapy. Of 82 hormone receptor-positive patients with invasive cancer, 94% (n = 77) received endocrine therapy. Of the fifty-eight patients who underwent genetic testing, 15 (26%) tested positive. The 5-year OS, BCSS, DFS, and LRF rates were 91.5%, 96.2%, 86%, and 4.8%, respectively. Delay to presentation was not associated with worse survival., Conclusions: Male breast cancer remains a rare diagnosis. Despite this, the majority of patients in this study received standard of care therapy and experienced excellent oncologic outcomes. Penetration for genetic testing improved over time.

Purpose: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) hosted its annual international symposium using a virtual format in May 2020. This report details the experience of hosting a virtual meeting and presents attendee feedback on the platform., Methods and Materials: The ROECSG symposium was hosted virtually on May 15, 2020. A postsymposium survey was distributed electronically to assess attendee demographics, participation, and experience. Attendee preference and experience were queried using 3-point and 5-point Likert-type scales, respectively. Symplur LLC was used to generate analytics for the conference hashtag (#ROECSG)., Results: The survey was distributed to all 286 registrants, with a response rate of 67% (191 responses). Seventeen nonattendee responses were omitted from this analysis, for a total of 174 included respondents. Eighty-two attendees (47%) were present for the entire symposium. A preference for a virtual symposium was expressed by 78 respondents (45%), whereas 44 (25%) had no preference and 52 (30%) preferred an in-person meeting. A total of 150 respondents (86%) rated the symposium as "extremely" well organized. Respondents who had not attended a prior in-person ROECSG symposium were more likely to prefer the virtual format (P = .03). Seventy-eight respondents (45%) reported a preference for the virtual platform for reviewing scholarly work, and 103 (59%) reported a preference for an in-person platform for networking. On the day of the symposium, #ROECSG had 408 tweets and 432,504 impressions., Conclusions: The 2020 ROECSG symposium was well received and can serve as a framework for future virtual meetings. Although the virtual setting may facilitate sharing research, networking aspects are more limited. Effort is needed to develop hybrid virtual and in-person meetings that meet the needs of participants in both settings. Social media is a significant avenue for dissemination and discussion of information and may be valuable in the virtual setting., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To highlight the current evidence and the limitations in data to support a personalized approach in breast oncology radiation therapy management and define steps needed for clinical implementation., Methods and Materials: A critical review of the current literature on the use of genomics in breast radiation therapy was undertaken by a group of breast radiation oncologists to discuss current data, future directions, and challenges., Results: A summary of the existing data, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions is provided. The authors note many groups have developed radiation-specific genomic assays, which demonstrate promise in prediction of local control and benefit from radiation therapy; however, prospective validation of their utility is needed. Limitations continue to exist in our understanding of tumor biology and how it can be integrated into clinical practice., Conclusions: Given the relative ubiquity of breast radiation therapy, the variety of dose and fractionation approaches, and the current data to support a personalized approach, it is our belief that the delivery of breast radiation therapy is uniquely poised for a genomically personalized radiation therapy approach. Prospective clinical trials implementing genomic signatures are needed at this time to advance the field., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

The multi-attribute method (MAM) based on liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry is emerging as a powerful tool to directly monitor multiple product quality attributes simultaneously. To better implement MAM, either for product characterization or for quality control (QC), there is a need for a robust, universal, and high-throughput workflow that can be broadly adopted in different laboratories with minimal barriers to implementation. Manual preparation of samples for MAM, however, is labor intensive and produces nontrivial variations across analysts and laboratories. We describe the development of a fully automated peptide mapping procedure with a high-throughput robotic liquid handling system to improve sample handling capacity and outcome reproducibility while saving analyst hands-on time. Our procedure features the automation of a "microdialysis" step, an efficient desalting approach prior to proteolytic digestion that optimizes digestion completeness and consistency each time. The workflow is completely hands-free and requires the analyst only to pre-normalize the sample concentrations and to load buffers and reagents at their designated positions on the robotic deck. The robotic liquid handler performs all the subsequent preparation steps and stores the digested samples on a chiller unit to await retrieval for further analysis. We also demonstrate that the manual and automated procedures are comparable with regard to protein sequence coverage, digestion completeness and consistency, and quantification of posttranslational modifications. Notably, in contrast to a previously reported automated sample preparation protocol that relied on customized accessories, all components in our automation procedure are commercial products that are readily available. In addition, we also present the high-throughput data analysis workflow by using Protein Metrics. The automation procedure can be applied cross-functionally in the biopharmaceutical industry and, given its practicality and reproducibility, can pave the way for MAM implementation in QC laboratories., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Innovation in health care delivery is needed to improve care for cancer survivors. We report our experience with adapting screening questions from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline to evaluate the needs of breast cancer survivors., Materials and Methods: We adapted the NCCN-recommended screening questions into a plain language, self-administered 1-page intake questionnaire. The tool was administered to a convenience sample of female breast cancer survivors at follow-up oncology and primary care visits. Domains included symptoms, lifestyle concerns, and financial issues. Frequency of concerns was assessed as "never," "rarely," "sometimes," "very frequently," and "always." We evaluated feasibility and utility of administration and the prevalence and frequency of patient-reported concerns., Results: The questionnaire was highly acceptable to patients and enhanced visits for clinicians. Clinicians reported that it led to discussion of issues that may not otherwise be addressed in the visit and did not find it burdensome. The most commonly endorsed patient concerns were desire to improve fitness or nutrition, worry about cancer recurrence, and insomnia. A majority also reported feeling anxiety and aches or pains in joints or extremities. Several issues known to be underreported in clinic visits were frequently endorsed, included sexual dissatisfaction and memory impairments. Clinicians suggested incorporating the tool into the electronic health record to increase utility and awareness., Conclusion: Screening for individual needs among breast cancer survivors is feasible, efficient, and may identify prevalent issues that otherwise can be missed in routine survivorship care., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected medical student clerkships and education around the country. A virtual medical student clerkship was created to integrate didactic education with disease specific lectures for medical students, contouring, and hands on learning with telehealth. Twelve medical students in their 3rd and 4th year were enrolled in this 2 week elective from April 27, 2020 to June 5, 2020. There was significant improvement of overall knowledge about the field of radiation oncology from pre elective to post elective (P < .001). Feedback included enjoying direct exposure to contouring, telehealth, and time with residents. Overall this 2 week rotation was successful in integrating radiation oncology virtually for medical students. This is now being expanded to multiple institutions as an educational resource and future rotations for medical students., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Purpose: The predictive benefit of breast cancer molecular subtypes for systemic therapy approaches has been well established; yet, there is a paucity of data regarding their use as a predictor of radiation therapy fractionation sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether rates of local recurrence (LR) for patients treated with hypofractionated (HF) radiation therapy, in comparison to conventional fractionation, differ across breast cancer molecular subtypes in a large, prospectively collected cohort treated with modern systemic therapy., Methods and Materials: Patients who received a diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer between 2005 and 2009 were identified. Molecular subtype was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification system (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER2+, triple negative [TN]). Multivariable Cox regression modeling was used to identify predictors of LR. LR-free-survival (LRFS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test., Results: A total of 5868 cases were identified with a median follow-up of 10.8 years. Patients with luminal-A subtype composed 45% of the cohort (n = 2628), compared with 30% luminal-B (n = 1734), 15% HER2+ (n = 903), and 10% TN (n = 603). A total of 76% (n = 4429) of patients were treated with HF. The 10-year LRFS was 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.6-97.6) for the whole cohort. The 10-year LRFS based on molecular subtypes was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.6-98.7) luminal-A, 96.6% (95% CI, 95.5-97.4) luminal-B, 97.0% (95% CI, 95.5-98.0) HER2+, and 93.5% (95% CI, 91.1-95.3) TN (P < .001). There was no difference in the 10-year LRFS between patients treated with HF versus conventional fractionation among those with luminal-A (98.2% vs 98.4%; P = .42), luminal-B (96.6% vs 96.8%; P = .90), HER2+ (97.5% vs 95.8%; P = .12), or TN (93.9% vs 92.2%; P = .47). There was no significant interaction between subtype and fractionation regimen., Conclusions: These data support the routine use of hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens across all breast cancer subtypes., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)