Search

Objective:Akathisia is among the most unpleasant side effects related to antipsychotic drug (AP) use, and possible associations between akathisia and agitation, depression and suicidal behaviour, respectively, have been described in previous literature. New generation antipsychotics are however regarded less prone to induce this particular adverse effect compared to older drugs, but evidence is incomplete and in need of confirmation from clinically relevant samples and settings. We, therefore, aim to investigate akathisia at hospital discharge for patients consecutively admitted with acute-phase psychosis and treated with atypical antipsychotics according to guideline-concordant clinical practice.Methods:This exploratory study is part of a naturalistic randomised controlled study in patients admitted with acute phase psychosis (N = 109). We report cross-sectional data at discharge/first follow-up after acute psychiatric hospital admission for patients with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders.Results:There were statistically significant positive associations between akathisia and the following; suicidality in men (Beta 0.306, p = 0.048), but not in women; agitation in those previously unexposed to antipsychotics (Beta 0.288, p = 0.047) and depression in those exposed to antipsychotics before hospital admittance (Beta 0.375, p = 0.031).Conclusion:Main findings were that akathisia is still a prevalent side effect in a clinically relevant sample of patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Our results suggest that akathisia is significantly associated with depression, suicidality and agitation in different subgroups of patients receiving APs. Akathisia can be detrimental and the relations between akathisia and depression, suicidality and agitation should be investigated further in prospective, hypothesis-testing studies with larger samples.

Background: Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder with periods of remission and relapse. As discontinuation of antipsychotic medication is the most important reason for relapse, long-term maintenance treatment is key. Whether intramuscular long-acting (depot) antipsychotics are more efficacious than oral medication in preventing medication discontinuation is still unresolved. We aimed to compare time to all-cause discontinuation in patients randomly allocated to long-acting injectable (LAI) versus oral medication. Methods: EULAST was a pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial conducted at 50 general hospitals and psychiatric specialty clinics in 15 European countries and Israel. Patients aged 18 years and older, with DSM-IV schizophrenia (as confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5 plus) and having experienced their first psychotic episode from 6 months to 7 years before screening, were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) using block randomisation to LAI paliperidone, LAI aripiprazole, or the respective oral formulations of these antipsychotics. Randomisation was stratified by country and duration of illness (6 months up to 3 years vs 4 to 7 years). Patients were followed up for up to 19 months. The primary endpoint was discontinuation, regardless of the reason, during 19 months of treatment. We used survival analysis to assess the time until all-cause discontinuation in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group, and per protocol analyses were also done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02146547, and is complete. Findings: Between Feb 24, 2015, and Dec 15, 2018, 533 individuals were recruited and assessed for eligibility. The ITT population included 511 participants, with 171 (33%) women and 340 (67%) men, and a mean age of 30·5 (SD 9·6) years. 410 (80%) of 511 participants were White, 35 (7%) were Black, 20 (4%) were Asian, and 46 (9%) were other ethnicity. In the combined oral antipsychotics treatment group of 247 patients, 72 (29%) patients completed the study and 175 (71%) met all-cause discontinuation criteria. In the combined LAI treatment arm of 264 patients, 95 (36%) completed the study and 169 (64%) met the all-cause discontinuation criteria. Cox regression analyses showed that treatment discontinuation for any cause did not differ between the two combined treatment groups (hazard ration [HR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·94–1·43, p=0·18). No significant difference was found in the time to all-cause discontinuation between the combined oral and combined LAI treatment groups (log rank test χ 2=1·87 [df 1]; p=0·17). During the study, 121 psychiatric hospitalisations occurred in 103 patients, and one patient from each of the LAI groups died; the death of the patient assigned to paliperidone was assessed to be unrelated to the medication, but the cause of other patient's death was not shared with the study team. 86 (25%) of 350 participants with available data met akathisia criteria and 70 (20%) met parkinsonism criteria at some point during the study. Interpretation: We found no substantial advantage for LAI antipsychotic treatment over oral treatment regarding time to discontinuation in patients with early-phase schizophrenia, indicating that there is no reason to prescribe LAIs instead of oral antipsychotics if the goal is to prevent discontinuation of antipsychotic medication in daily clinical practice. Funding: Lundbeck and Otsuka.

Summary Background Amisulpride, aripiprazole, and olanzapine are first-line atypical antipsychotics that have not previously been compared head-to-head in a pragmatic trial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these agents in a controlled trial. Methods This pragmatic, rater-blind, randomised controlled trial was done in three academic centres of psychiatry in Norway, and one in Austria. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (F20–29), and had symptoms of active psychosis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive oral amisulpride, aripiprazole, or olanzapine. Treatment allocation was open to patients and staff, and starting dose, treatment changes, and adjustments were left to the discretion of the treating physician. Computer-generated randomisation lists for each study centre were prepared by independent statisticians. Patients were followed up for 52 weeks after random assignment, during which assessments were done 8 times by researchers masked to treatment. The primary outcome was reduction of the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at 52 weeks, and primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01446328. Findings Between Oct 20, 2011, and Dec 30, 2016, we assessed 359 patients for eligibility. 215 patients were excluded (107 did not meet inclusion criteria, 82 declined to participate, 26 other reasons). 144 patients (mean baseline PANSS total estimated score 78·4 [SD 1·4]) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive amisulpride (44 patients), aripiprazole (48 patients) or olanzapine (52 patients). After 52 weeks, the patients allocated to amisulpride had a PANSS total score reduction of 32·7 points (SD 3·1) compared with 21·9 points reduction with aripiprazole (SD 3·9, p=0·027) and 23·3 points with olanzapine (2·9, p=0·025). We observed weight gain and increases of serum lipids and prolactin in all groups. 26 serious adverse events (SAEs) among 20 patients were registered (four [9%] of 44 patients allocated to amisulpride, ten [21%] of 48 patients allocated to aripiprazole, and six [12%] of 52 patients allocated to olanzapine), with no statistically significant differences between the study drugs. 17 (65%) of the 26 SAEs occurred during the use of the study drug, with readmission or protracted hospital admission accounting for 13 SAEs. One death by suicide, one unspecified death, and one life-threatening accident occurred during follow-up, after cessation of treatment. Interpretation Amisulpride was more efficacious than aripiprazole or olanzapine for reducing the PANSS total scores in adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Side-effect differences among the groups were generally small. This study supports the notion that clinically relevant efficacy differences exist between antipsychotic drugs. Future research should aim to compare first-line antipsychotics directly in pragmatic clinical trials that reflect everyday clinical practice. Funding The Research Council of Norway, the Western Norway Regional Health Trust, and participating hospitals and universities.

Introduction: Psychosis is a multifaceted clinical phenomenon in which the various symptoms may show a differential response to treatment. Important information may be lost when heterogeneous sympt...

Background Antipsychotic associated akathisia is a highly relevant clinical phenomenon. The common side effect can be stigmatizing, cause subjective distress and depression, lead to medication noncompliance and be potentially disabling for patients with psychosis. Associations between akathisia and both suicide, depression and agitation has been suggested in research literature, but inconsistently. This study investigates the level of akathisia at hospital discharge/first follow-up for consecutively admitted patients with acute phase psychosis, comparing four atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) regarding the presence of akathisia, and explores possible associations between akathisia and both suicidality, depression and agitation. Methods This study is a sub-study of the Bergen Psychosis Project (BPP), a pragmatic, rater-blind, randomized trial comparing head-to-head ziprasidone, olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine. The present study reports cross-sectional data at discharge/first follow-up after acute admission to hospital for patients with psychosis. Patients were assessed with The Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We applied the validated PANSS Excited Component (PANSS-EC) factor to assess agitation. The PANSS-EC consists of the five PANSS items: P4 Excitement, P7 Hostility, G4 Tension, G8 Uncooperativeness and G14 Poor impulse control. To assess depression in general and suicidality specifically we used the validated Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS).Furthermore the Clinical Global Impression – Severity Scale (CGI-S), and the patient-administered version of the UKU Side Effect Self-Rating Scale (UKU SERS Pat). Results A total of 109 patients were included of which 35 (32.1 %) were females, mean age was 34.0 (12.4). The mean total PANSS score was 54.9 (14.4), the mean CGI-S was 3.7 (1.1) and the mean total CDSS score was 3.9 (4.0). Our preliminary results show that a total of 58 (53.3%) patients had used antipsychotics before entering the study. Some level of akathisia was reported by ¼ of the patients, meaning a score of 1 or more on the UKU SERS Pat. There was a statistically significant difference between ziprasidone and olanzapine, with higher akathisia level in the ziprasidone group. Furthermore, there were statistically significant correlations between akathisia and suicidality and between akathisia and depression. We found no significant correlation between akathisia and the PANSS-EC factor or between akathisia and the PANSS general item G14 Poor impulse control. Statistical details will be presented on the poster. Discussion Our study shows that akathisia is a prevalent side effect in a clinically relevant sample of patients with acute phase psychosis treated with atypical antipsychotics. The prevalence of antipsychotic associated akathisia ranges widely across studies due to, among others, methodological heterogeneities and varieties in measurement tools. In our study, akathisia was significantly associated with both depression and suicidality. The finding of a significant correlation between akathisia and suicidality supports a previous finding that even a mild to moderate experience of akathisia in first episode patients had an increase in the likelihood to be suicidal. We found no relationship with agitation in our study. As akathisia may go unrecognized in clinical practice and may contribute to medication noncompliance, systematic assessment for symptoms of akathisia is warranted. Conclusion Akathisia is still a prevalent phenomenon in a substantial proportion of patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Special attention is called for regarding the association towards suicidality.

Tiden like etter utskrivelse fra psykiatrisk dognenhet innebaererforhoyet selvmordsrisiko. Nasjonale retningslinjer for selvmordsforebyggingi psykisk helsevern anbefaler at nar selvmordsrisiko harvaert en problemstilling under oppholdet eller tidligere skal pasienterselvmordsrisikovurderes og det er en fordel med timeavtale hosoppfolgende instans. Hensikten med denne studien var a kartleggedokumentert etterlevelse av disse anbefalingene og identifisering avprediktorer for manglende timeavtale.En journalstudie i Divisjon psykisk helsevern, Haukeland Universitetssykehus,ble gjennomfort for a vurdere i hvilken grad dokumentasjonspraksisi epikriser og overforingsnotat samsvarte medretningslinjeanbefalingene. Opplysninger om selvmordsrisikovurderingog timeavtale ble kartlagt sammen med kjonn, alder, tidligereselvmordsforsok, andre risikofaktorer og mulige beskyttende faktorerfor selvmord, hoveddiagnoser, henvisnings- og mottaksformalitet.Analyser var deskriptiv statistikk og Generalized Estimating Equation.Selvmordsrisikovurdering var dokumentert i nesten alle epikriser/overforingsnotat. Begrunnelser for selvmordsrisikovurderingene vari liten grad dokumentert. Lavere sannsynlighet for dokumentasjon avtimeavtale var knyttet til utskrivelser med rus som hoveddiagnose,schizofrenidiagnose for kvinner, samt a bli henvist til tvangsinnleggelsemen mottatt til frivillig sykehusopphold for kvinner.Dokumentasjonspraksis vedrorende selvmordsrisikovurdering vargod, men vurderingene inneholdt i liten grad utdypende beskrivelserslik retningslinjen anbefaler. Gode beskrivelser gir oppfolgendeinstans viktig informasjon for videre pasientbehandling. Bedret dokumentasjonspraksis kan bidra til okt kontinuitet i helsetjenestetilbudetfor pasientene.