1. Effects of polyethylene glycol 2 L alone or with ascorbic acid compared with polyethylene glycol 4 L alone for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Author
-
Jie-Li Huang, Hang Zhou, Xu Tian, Bing-Rong Liu, Lan-Ying He, Xi Liu, Wei-Qing Chen, and Bang-Lun Liu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Network Meta-Analysis ,Colonoscopy ,Cathartic ,Polyethylene glycol ,Ascorbic Acid ,Polyethylene Glycols ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Informed consent ,medicine ,Protocol ,Humans ,Medical physics ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Protocol (science) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cathartics ,General Medicine ,Ascorbic acid ,Surgery ,meta-analysis ,Regimen ,chemistry ,Evidence Based Practice ,Meta-analysis ,polyethylene glycol ,bowel preparation ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Systematic Reviews as Topic - Abstract
IntroductionColonoscopy has been regarded as a standard method of detecting and removing gastrointestinal lesions early, while adequate bowel preparation is the prerequisite of determining the diagnostic accuracy and treatment safety of this process. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based bowel preparation regimens remain the first recommendation, but the optimal option is still uncertain. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is to determine the optimal PEG based bowel preparation regimen before colonoscopy.Methods and analysisWe will assign two investigators to independently search all potential citations, screen records, abstract essential information and appraise the risk of bias accordingly. Then, random effects pairwise and network meta-analyses of RCTs comparing PEG 2 L alone or with ascorbic acid with PEG 4 L alone will be performed using RevMan 5.3 (Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2013), Stata 14 (StataCorp, Texas, USA) and WinBUGS 1.4 (Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary’s, London, UK) from January 2000 to April 2017. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve will also be calculated in order to rank the regimens.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval and patient written informed consent will not be required because all of the analyses in the present study will be performed based on data from published studies. We will submit our systematic review and network meta-analysis to a peer reviewed scientific journal for publication.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO: CRD42017068957.
- Published
- 2017