1. The difference and clinical application of modified thoracolumbar fracture classification scoring system in guiding clinical treatment
- Author
-
Lu Wenjie, Zhang Jiaming, and Jiang Weiyu
- Subjects
Thoracolumbar fracture ,Severity ,Grading assessment ,Clinical application ,Orthopedic surgery ,RD701-811 ,Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,RC925-935 - Abstract
Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the modified thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score system in guiding clinical treatment. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 120 patients with thoracolumbar fractures who were admitted to the Department of Spinal Surgery at Ningbo Sixth Hospital between December 2019 and June 2021. The study population consisted of 68 males and 52 females, with an average age of 36.7 ± 5.7 years. The severity of the fractures was assessed based on comprehensive scores incorporating fracture morphology, neurological function, posterior ligament complex integrity, and disc injury status. The evaluation was performed using the total score T, which guided the formulation of the clinical treatment strategy. Furthermore, the study compared the treatment options, imaging data, and clinical efficacy between two classification systems. Results The analysis of 120 patients revealed no statistically significant difference in the total score or treatment method between the TLICS system and the modified TLICS system. However, the operation rate for the modified TLICS system (73.3%) was slightly lower compared to the TLICS system (79.2%). All patients were followed up for a mean duration of 19.2 ± 4.6 months, ranging from 11 to 27 months. At the last follow-up, the visual analogue scale score was 1.94 ± 0.52, and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 28.8 ± 4.5, indicating a significant improvement compared to the scores obtained prior to treatment. The neurological status exhibited varying degrees of improvement. Notably, the anterior vertebral height ratio was 87.10 ± 7.17%, the sagittal index was 90.35 ± 7.72%, and the Cobb angle was 3.05 ± 0.97 degrees at the last follow-up. All these measurements demonstrated statistically significant differences compared to the values observed prior to treatment (P
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF