Search

Aim: We conducted a multicentre, randomized phase 3 trial in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin (HSK7653), a novel long‐acting dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor, in patients with drug‐naïve type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods: Patients with inadequately controlled T2D were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg or placebo, taken orally once every 2 weeks for a 24‐week double‐blind period. Eligible patients then received cofrogliptin 25 mg in a 28‐week open‐label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Results: In total, 475 patients (median age: 54.0 years) were randomized and received at least one dose of cofrogliptin 10 mg (n = 158), cofrogliptin 25 mg (n = 158) or placebo (n = 159); 401 patients entered the open‐label extension. At week 24, the least‐squares (LS) mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in HbA1c versus placebo was −0.63% (−0.81, −0.46) with cofrogliptin 10 mg and −0.59% (−0.77, −0.42) with cofrogliptin 25 mg (both p < 0.0001). The LS mean (standard error) change in HbA1c from baseline was maintained at the end of the study in patients given open‐label cofrogliptin 25 mg for an additional 28 weeks: cofrogliptin 10 mg: −0.86% (0.07); cofrogliptin 25 mg: −0.74% (0.07); placebo: −0.89% (0.07). Over the entire study, common adverse events were hyperuricaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, increased lipase, upper respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infection. Hypoglycaemic events did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusions: Cofrogliptin provided glycaemic control over 52 weeks and was generally well tolerated in patients with T2D. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT04556851 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04556851). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of basal insulin glargine 100 units/ml (Gla) + 2‐3 oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) with twice‐daily premixed insulin aspart 70/30 (Asp30) + metformin (MET) after short‐term intensive insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes in China. Materials and Methods: This open‐label trial enrolled insulin‐naïve adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 7.5%‐11.0% (58‐97 mmol/mol) despite treatment with 2‐3 OADs. All participants stopped previous OADs except MET, then received short‐term intensive insulin therapy during the run‐in period, when those with a fasting plasma glucose of less than 7.0 mmol/L and 2‐hour postprandial glucose of less than 10.0 mmol/L were randomized to Gla + MET + a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor or twice‐daily Asp30 + MET. If HbA1c was more than 7.0% (>53 mmol/mol) at week 12, participants in the Gla group were added repaglinide or acarbose, at the physician's discretion, and participants in the Asp30 group continued to titrate insulin dose. The change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was assessed in the per protocol (PP) population (primary endpoint). Results: There were 384 enrollees (192 each to Gla and Asp30); 367 were included in the PP analysis. The threshold for non‐inferiority of Gla + OADs versus Asp30 + MET was met, with a least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c of –1.72% and –1.70% (–42.2 and –42.1 mmol/mol), respectively (estimated difference –0.01%; 95% CI –0.20%, 0.17% [–0.1 mmol/mol; 95% CI –2.2, 1.9]). Achievement of HbA1c less than 7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was comparable between the groups (60% vs. 57%). The proportion of participants with any (24% vs. 38%; P =.003), symptomatic (19% vs. 31%; P =.007) or confirmed hypoglycaemia (18% vs. 33%; P <.001) was lower in the Gla + OADs group. Conclusions: Compared with Asp30 + MET, Gla + 2‐3 OADs showed similar efficacy but a lower hypoglycaemia risk in Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes who had undergone short‐term intensive insulin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]