Search

Objectives The effect of marital status on the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been strictly studied. Therefore, the present study focused on exploring whether marital status was related to ICC prognosis. Methods This study chose cases from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during the 2004–2015 period. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between married and unmarried groups. Results We enrolled 4550 eligible cases, among them, 2760 were married (60.66%). Married subjects had more younger age (P P P P = 0.003] as well as OS (HR: 0.903; 95%CI: 0.845–0.965; P = 0.003). Upon subgroup analysis, married cases had prolonged CSS as well as OS to unmarried cases of almost every subgroup, especially for patients who have not received surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Conclusion This study identified marital status as the factor independently predicted ICC prognosis. The dismal prognostic outcome of unmarried cases may attribute to inadequate treatments, socioeconomic and psychosocial factors.

To construct and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). The potentially eligible cases were obtained against the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Log-rank test and Cox analysis were conducted to identify the independent prognostic factors for predicting OS. The identified prognostic factors were later integrated for the construction of an OS prediction nomogram. Altogether 2904 eligible cases were identified, and the median survival time was 18 (range: 0–155) months. As suggested by multivariate analysis, age, primary site, grade, tumor size, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, lymph node dissection and chemotherapy were identified as the independent factors for predicting OS. Afterwards, the above variables were incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index indicated better discriminatory ability of the nomogram than AJCC 8th TNM staging and SEER summary stage systems (both P

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of age on colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and identify the prognosis factors of patients aged ≥ 65 years.Methods: Patients were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We ensured that all characteristics were well balanced through adopting the propensity score matching (PSM) method. In addition, the prognostic factors were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazardous model.Results: Altogether 3305 cases were enrolled, including 1564 in elderly group (aged ³65 years). As a result, more patients were female, unmarried, white, earlier AJCC stage, tumor size ≤5cm, grade III/IV and located in cecum–transverse colon in the elderly group; whereas significant fewer patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy. After 1:1 PSM analysis, each group contained 1032 cases. As discovered by Kaplan-Meier analysis, the elderly group was associated with remarkably dismal survival compared with the younger group after PSM analysis (P=0.0091).Moreover, grade, primary site, AJCC stage, tumor size, surgery and chemotherapy were identified as the independent prognostic factors for the elderly patients.Conclusion: The prognosis of colorectal SRCC aged ≥ 65 years was worse than the younger patients. We may need strengthen the chemotherapy of the eldly colorectal SRCC.

The prognostic role of marital status on colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has not been studied. In this study, the correlation of marital status with prognosis of colorectal SRCC was analyzed. Eligible subjects were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset from 2004 to 2015, followed by comparison of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between married and unmarried group. 3152 patients were identified including 1777 married patients (56.38%). Married populations tended to be more patients aged P < 0.05).Moreover, 5-year CSS (30.04% vs. 28.19%, P = 0.0013) and OS rates (26.68% vs. 22.94%, P P = 0.016) and OS (HR: 0.898; 95%CI: 0.827–0.975; P = 0.011).In addition, CSS as well as OS were superior in married populations than unmarried ones in most subgroups. Marital status was an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with colorectal SRCC. Additionally, married patients obtained better survival advantages.

// Ling Cao 1, * , Yong-Jing Yang 1, * , Jian-Dong Diao 2 , Xu-He Zhang 1 , Yan-Ling Liu 1 , Bo-Yu Wang 1 , Zhi-Wen Li 3 and Shi-Xin Liu 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Jilin Province, Changchun 130012, People’s Republic of China 2 Department of Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital Affiliated Jilin University, Changchun 130012, People’s Republic of China 3 Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, People’s Republic of China * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Shi-Xin Liu, email: liushixin1964@sina.com Zhi-Wen Li, email: prince00111@hotmail.com Keywords: zoledronic acid, bone metastasis, dose interval, skeletal-related events, meta-analysis Received: April 21, 2017 Accepted: July 18, 2017 Published: August 03, 2017 ABSTRACT Zoledronic acid is used to treat patients with bone metastasis, but the optimal dosing interval remains controversial. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of a 12-week interval of zoledronic acid with the standard 4-week interval. Three randomized controlled trials comprising 2650 patients were analyzed. Using a random-effects model, pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. No differences in the occurrence of skeletal-related events (SREs: RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.86–1.12; P = 0.80) or grade 3/4 adverse events (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.69–1.20; P = 0.52) were observed between the 12-week and 4-week groups. The 12-week group tended to have lower incidences of osteonecrosis of the jaw [13 (0.98%) vs. 23 (1.73%)] and kidney dysfunction [21 (1.68%) vs. 31 (2.45%)] than the 4-week group, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.30–1.12; P = 0.11); (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.39–1.15, P = 0.15). These data show that zoledronic acid administered at 12-week intervals instead of 4-week intervals does not increase the risk of SREs, and may reduce the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw and kidney dysfunction. This suggests the 12-week interval with zoledronic acid may be an acceptable treatment option.

In the present study, we examined the factors affecting survival of women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and constructed and validated a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) in these patients. The cohort was selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2013. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed. A nomogram was developed based on significant prognostic indicators of OS. The discriminatory and predictive capacities of the nomogram were assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C‐index) and calibration plots. A total of 1651 eligible patients were identified, with a median survival time of 31 months (range 0‐131 months), and the 3‐ and 5‐year OS rates were 52.8% and 39.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that race (P, The present study aimed to examine the factors affecting survival of female patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), as well as to construct and validate a nomogram to predict overall survival in IBC.