Search

Assessing the cost of vaccine preventable diseases (VPD) surveillance is becoming more important in the context of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) funding transition, since GPEI support to polio surveillance helped the incremental building of VPD surveillance systems in many countries, including low income countries such as Nepal. However, there is limited knowledge on the cost of conducting VPD surveillance, especially the national cost for surveillance of multiple vaccine-preventable diseases. The current study sought to calculate the economic and financial costs of Nepal’s comprehensive VPD surveillance systems from July 2016 to July 2017. At thecentral level, all surveillance units were included in the sample. At sub-national level, a purposive sampling strategy was used to select a representative sample from locations involved in conducting surveillance. The sub-national sample costs were extrapolated to the nationwide VPD surveillance system. Nepal’s total annual economic cost of VPD surveillance was USD 4.81 million or USD 0.18 per capita, while the total financial cost was USD 4.38 million or USD 0.16 per capita. Government expenditures accounted for 56% of the total economic cost, and World Health Organization accounting for 44%. The biggest cost driver was personnel accounting for 51% of the total economic cost. WHO supported trained surveillance personnel through donor funding, mainly from Global Polio Eradication Initiative. As a polio transition priority country, Nepal will need to make strategic choices to fully self-finance or seek full donor support or a mixed-financing model as polio program funding diminishes.

In 2020, National Immunization Programme (NIP) of Nepal implemented a measles outbreak response immunization (ORI) campaign, which was additional to an ongoing preventive measles-rubella SIA campaign. Both campaigns were implemented during ongoing COVID-19 transmission. By April, 220 measles cases and two deaths were confirmed from eight districts of Nepal. The NIP triangulated information from surveillance (measles and COVID-19), measles immunization performance and immunity profile, programme capacities and community engagement and applied a logical decision-making framework to the collated data to inform 'Go/No-Go' decisions for ORI interventions. This was reviewed by the National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC) for endorsement. Outbreak response with non-selective immunization (ORI), vitamin-A administration and case management were implemented in affected municipalities of four districts, while in the remaining districts outbreak response without ORI were undertaken. The structure and iterative application of this logical framework has been described. ORI was implemented without interrupting the ongoing measles-rubella vaccination campaign which had targeted children from 9 to 59 months of age. The age group for ORI was same as SIA in one sub-district area, while for the other three sub-district areas it was from 6 months to 15 years of age. More than 32,000 persons (97% coverage) were vaccinated in ORI response. Overall measles incidence decreased by 98% after ORI. The daily incidence rate of measles was 94 times higher (95% confidence interval: 36.11 - 347.62) before the ORI compared to two weeks after ORI until year end. Close attention to surveillance and other data to inform actions and seamless collaboration between NIP and core immunization partners (WHO, UNICEF), with guidance from NIAC were key elements in successful implementation. This was an example of feasible application of the global framework for implementation of a mass vaccination campaign during COVID-19 through application of a simple decision-making logical framework.

Summary box RI emerged as one the most disrupted health services in early-2020 to mid-2020,1 a global systems shock associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2020, an estimated 80 million children were thought to be affected by interrupted vaccination services and campaigns,2 and over 60% of 105 countries reported at least partial RI disruptions to WHO.1 If left unaddressed, these disruptions are poised to halt or even reverse decades of global progress achieved in vaccine delivery and child health.3 4 Yet with great challenges can come great opportunity: knowledge and …

Highlights • Sixteen AEFI cases (21%) with symptom or sign of bleeding were reported in 2016–2018. • Six (38%) had intra-cranial haemorrhage; 14 (88%) had bleeding from injection site. • Only one case (6%) had confirmed history of receiving vitamin K at birth. • Three (19%) were classified as late onset VKDB; 11 (69%) as suspected late onset VKDB. • Nine cases (56%) resulted in death; among cases with VKDB diagnosis, eight (57%) died., Background Surveillance for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) is important to monitor vaccine safety and should lead to appropriate responses to improve health and immunization program. Bleeding following vaccination is not recognized as an important AEFI. Without policy of vitamin K (VK) prophylaxis at birth, vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB) could be an important cause of bleeding in young infants and may manifest as AEFI. Methods We retrospectively analysed all serious AEFI cases that presented with external or internal bleeding reported to Nepal’s AEFI surveillance system during 2016–2018. The cases were classified as VKDB, suspected VKDB or non-VKDB. Results During the period, 16 serious AEFI with symptom or sign of bleeding were reported representing 21.3% of all serious AEFI reported. Cases were between 40 and 94 days of age. The National AEFI Investigation Committee classified all cases as coincidental. Fourteen cases (87.5%) had bleeding from injection site. Median time from vaccination to injection site bleeding was 4.3 h (interquartile range: 2.1–11.6 h). Six cases (37.5%) had intra-cranial haemorrhage. Only one case had confirmed history of receiving VK at birth. Ten cases (62.5%) received appropriate treatment (VK injection; blood transfusion if needed). Based on limited laboratory investigations available, three cases (18.75%) could be classified as late onset VKDB and 11 cases (68.75%) as suspected late onset VKDB. Conclusion VKDB should be suspected in young infants presenting with bleeding including following vaccination, and prompt treatment should be initiated. Bleeding following vaccination should be recognized as an important AEFI as even a small amount of blood loss in young infants can be catastrophic. We posit that this series is a small subset of VKDB cases in Nepal detected through AEFI surveillance system. In countries without policy of VK prophylaxis at birth including Nepal, the policy should be introduced.