Search

The article discusses research which investigated the occurrence of prosthetic infections following the administration of tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Topics explored include the common adverse drug reactions (ADR) associated with tocilizumab, the C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels observed during tocilizumab use, and the risk of periprosthetic joint infections in patients with chronic inflammatory disease history.

The antipsychotic drug clozapine is associated with weight gain. The proposed mechanisms include blocking of serotonin (5‐HT2a/2c), dopamine (D2) and histamine (H1) receptors. Clozapine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) to norclozapine, a metabolite with more 5‐HT2c‐receptor and less H1 blocking capacity. We hypothesized that norclozapine serum levels correlate with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and other parameters of the metabolic syndrome. We performed a retrospective cross‐sectional study in 39 patients (female n = 8 (20.5%), smokers n = 18 (46.2%), average age 45.8 ± 9.9 years) of a clozapine outpatient clinic in the Netherlands between 1 January 2017 and 1 July 2020. Norclozapine concentrations correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.354, P =.03) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (r = 0.34, P =.03). In smokers (smoking induces CYP1A2), norclozapine concentrations correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.723, P =.001), HbA1c (r = 0.49, P =.04) and BMI (r = 0.63, P =.004). Elucidating the relationship between norclozapine and adverse effects of clozapine use offers perspectives for interventions and treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently requires chronic immunosuppressive treatment and active involvement from patients during treatment decision making. Information about the risk of developing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to IBD therapies is required in this process. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the ADRs reported in IBD patients from real-world data, using the Dutch nationwide IBDREAM registry, and compare the occurrence and cumulative incidences with the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of the associated drugs. Methods: In this retrospective multicentre study, ADRs related to IBD medication were assessed. Only reports associated with the use of drugs used for the maintenance treatment of IBD were included. All ADRs were verified by healthcare professionals and coded by trained pharmacovigilance assessors. Results: In total, 3080 ADRs were reported in 1179 patients. Twenty-three new drug–ADR associations related to the use of azathioprine, mercaptopurine, infliximab, oral mesalamine and thioguanine were reported in the IBDREAM registry that were not mentioned in the corresponding SmPCs. The most frequently reported new association was pyrexia for azathioprine (3.1%) and mercaptopurine (4.9%). In addition, there were seven ADRs with a higher cumulative incidence in IBDREAM compared with the SmPC, and included, among others, arthralgia during mercaptopurine use (2.5%), and diarrhoea (1.4%), alopecia (1.2%) and infections (1.6%) during azathioprine use. Conclusions: Based on real-world data, ADR reporting demonstrated new ADRs and higher incidences of ADRs to IBD therapies. This information will contribute to drug safety by updating the SmPCs, allowing better risk assessment and communication towards patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To assess the agreement between patient‐reported and health care provider‐reported medical information in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: This multicentre, prospective, event monitoring study enrolled adult Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with a biological in four medical centers in the Netherlands. At two‐monthly intervals, patients completed questionnaires on biological use, combination therapy and indication. The patient‐reported information was compared with their electronic health records (EHRs) and analysed for percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa. A reference population from a prospective IBD registry was used to assess the representativeness of the study population. Results: In total, 182 patients (female 50.5%, mean age 42.2 years, CD 76.9%) were included in the analysis. At baseline, 51.0% of the patients were prescribed an immunomodulator (43.9% thiopurines, 7.1% methotrexate), and patients were prescribed biologicals as follows: 59.3% infliximab, 30.2% adalimumab, 9.3% vedolizumab, and 1.1% ustekinumab. Agreement on patient‐reported indication and biological use was almost perfect (κ = 0.878 and κ = 1.000, respectively); substantial for combination therapy (κ = 0.672). Gender, age, type of IBD, biological use and combination therapy were comparable with the reference population. Conclusion: Systematic patient‐reporting by questionnaires was reliable in retrieving indication and treatment specific information from IBD patients. These results indicate that the use of patient‐reporting outcomes in daily IBD practice can ensure reliable information collection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The antidepressant nortriptyline is metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to the less active and more cardiotoxic drug metabolite, 10‐hydroxynortriptyline. High serum levels of this metabolite (>200 μg/L) may lead to withdrawal of nortriptyline therapy. Adding CYP2D6 inhibitors reduce the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 (phenoconversion) and so decrease the forming of hydroxynortriptyline. In this study, 5 mg paroxetine is administered to patients with high hydroxynortriptyline concentrations (>200 μg/L). The shift in number of patients to therapeutic nortriptyline (50–150 μg/L) and safe hydroxynortriptyline (<200 μg/L) concentrations, and the degree of phenoconversion, expressed as the change in ratio nortriptyline/hydroxynortriptyline concentrations before and after paroxetine addition, are prospectively observed and described. After paroxetine addition, 12 patients (80%) had therapeutic nortriptyline and safe hydroxynortriptyline concentrations. Hydroxynortriptyline concentrations decreased in all patients. The average nortriptyline/hydroxynortriptyline concentrations ratio increased from 0.32 to 0.59. This study shows that 5 mg paroxetine addition is able to lower high hydroxynortriptyline serum levels to safe ranges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Assessment of the quality of patient-reported medical information in the Dutch Biologic Monitor and evaluation of the representativeness of the sampled participants. Methods Consecutive adult patients using a biologic DMARD (bDMARD) for an immune-mediated inflammatory disease were included in eight Dutch centres. For this substudy, data of 550 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were used. Patient-reported bDMARD prescription, indication and combination therapy were verified for patients that permitted access to their electronic health record using percentage agreement and/or Cohen's kappa (n = 483). Conservative post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed to account for missing data. Population representativeness was tested for the entire substudy population by comparing age, gender and prescribed bDMARD to the centres' reference populations using Mann–Whitney U -test, χ2 goodness-of-fit or Fisher's exact test with Monte Carlo simulation (n = 550). Results The correct bDMARD was reported by 95.8% of the participants. Agreement between patients and electronic health record was almost perfect for indications (κ = 0.832) and substantial for combination therapies (κ = 0.725). Agreement on combination therapies remained substantial after post hoc sensitivity analysis (κ = 0.640). Gender distribution (P > 0.05) and bDMARD use (P > 0.05) were similar to the reference populations. Median age was different (58.0 vs 56.0 years, P = 0.04), but considered clinically irrelevant. Conclusion The Dutch Biologic Monitor seems to be a valid tool to obtain patient-reported medical information. Reported medical information generally corresponded to the electronic health records and the participants represented their reference populations regarding age, gender and prescribed bDMARD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this report we describe a 53-year-old woman with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, treated with pemetrexed and cisplatin combination therapy, followed by pemetrexed monotherapy. The patient developed severe muscle spasms at least twice, shortly after administration of pemetrexed monotherapy. A possible explanation for this observation is that in combination with cisplatin therapy, the patient was hyperhydrated before administration to promote renal excretion and reduce toxicity. Pemetrexed is also renally excreted, which supports the finding that toxicity did not occur when the patient was hyperhydrated. After discontinuation of pemetrexed the symptoms did not reoccur. All aspects of this case point to a possible relationship between pemetrexed and an adverse drug reaction (ADR). We conclude that muscle spasms are a rare, but possibly dose-related ADR of pemetrexed-based therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]