Search

Introduction Cardiovascular risk seems not to be greater in patients with white coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH) than in patients with sustained blood pressure (BP) control. Therefore, its detection is important to avoid overtreatment. The COVID-19 pandemic determined a massive migration of hypertension consultations from the face-to-face modality to teleconsultations, and it is unknown whether WUCH exists in this context. Aim We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of WUCH through home BP monitoring (HBPM) in treated hypertensive patients evaluated by teleconsultation. Methods We included treated hypertensive patients that owned a digital BP monitor. During teleconsultation, patients were asked to perform two BP measurements and then a 7-day HBPM, using the same device. Patients were classified as having WUCH if BP was ≥ 140 and/or 90 mmHg in teleconsultation and

Hypertension is the main cause of death worldwide and the approach that the Family Physician makes of hypertensive patients, given his or her key role as a gateway to the health system, is a crucial determinant in their evolution. On the other hand, Complexity theory contributes to the understanding on how systems grow, adapt and evolve. The hypertensive patient, given his character of biological and social being, can be understood and approached as a complex system. Understanding the characteristics of these systems contributes to considering the patient from another perspective, more satisfactory both for himself and for the professional who assists him. This review analyzes the characteristics of the complex system «hypertensive patient» and the tools that allow us to account for and interact with this complexity. An approach from multiple perspectives, migrating from the classic reductionist models to others that take into account the dynamic interrelationships that are at stake, would be a useful strategy for the Family Physician in the challenge of achieving adequate control of blood pressure in his or her patients.

Objective Resistant hypertension carries a poor prognosis and current guidelines recommend the exclusion of the white-coat phenomenon for proper diagnosis. However, guidelines do not focus on patients treated with at least three drugs whose blood pressure (BP) is controlled at the office but elevated out of it. We aimed at determining whether this masked uncontrolled apparent resistant hypertension (MUCRH) detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has prognostic value for fatal and nonfatal events in these hypertensive patients. Methods Hypertensive patients treated with at least three drugs who performed a baseline HBPM between 2008 and 2015 were followed to register the occurrence of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and fatal and nonfatal cardiac and cerebrovascular events. MUCRH was defined as office blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg and home BP at least 135 and/or 85 mmHg. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted to determine the independent prognostic value of MUCRH for the events of interest. Results We included 470 patients, 35.5% male, mean age 71.9 years, and treated with 3.3 antihypertensive drugs on average. Among study population, 15.5% had MUCRH (33.3% when considering only patients with adequate BP control at the office). Median follow-up was 6.7 years. In multivariable models, MUCRH was an independent predictor for cardiovascular mortality and cerebrovascular events: hazard ratio 4.9 (95% CI 1.2-19.9, P = 0.03) and 5.1 (95% CI 1.5-16.9, P = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion MUCRH is not rare and is independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The systematic monitoring of intensively treated individuals through HBPM would be useful for the detection of patients at increased risk of events.

The prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has been investigated in several studies in the general population, demonstrating its independent association with cardiovascular events. However, in the case of treated hypertensive subjects, evidence is controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of HBPM in this population. Medicated hypertensive patients who performed a 4-day HBPM (Omron® HEM-705CP-II) between 2008 and 2015 were followed up for a median of 5.9 years, registering the occurrence of a composite primary outcome of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. Cox regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value of HBPM, considering 4-day measurements, discarding the first day, and analyzing morning, afternoon and evening periods separately. We included 1582 patients in the analysis (33.4% men, median age 70.8 years, on an average of 2.1 antihypertensive drugs). During follow-up, 273 events occurred. HBPM was significantly associated with cardiovascular events in all five scenarios in the unadjusted models. When adjusting for office BP and other cardiovascular risk factors, the association remained marginally significant for the 4-day period, discarding first-day measurements HBPM (HR 1.04 [95% CI 1-1.1] and 1.04 [95% CI 1-1.1], respectively) and statistically significant for all separate periods of measurement: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.01-1.72); 1.33 (95% CI 1.02-1.72); and 1.30 (95% CI 1.01-1.67), for morning, afternoon and evening, respectively. When analyzing separately fatal and non-fatal events, statistical significance was held for the former only. In conclusion, HBPM is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in hypertensives under treatment.

What is known and Objective Controversy has arisen in the scientific community on whether the use of renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in the context of COVID‐19 would be beneficial or harmful. A meta‐analysis of eligible studies comparing the occurrence of severe and fatal COVID‐19 in infected hypertensive patients who were under treatment with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) vs no treatment or other antihypertensives was conducted. Methods PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, medRxiv and bioRxiv were searched for relevant studies. Fixed‐effects models or random‐effects models were used depending on the heterogeneity between estimates. Results and discussion A total of eighteen studies with 17 311 patients were included. The use of RAS inhibitors was associated with a significant 16% decreased risk of the composite outcome (death, admission to intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation requirement or progression to severe or critical pneumonia): RR: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73‐0.95), P = .007, I2 = 65%. What is new and conclusion The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the use of ACEI/ARB does not worsen the prognosis of COVID‐19, and could even be protective in hypertensive subjects. Hypertensive patients should continue these drugs even if they become infected with SARS‐CoV‐2., Controversy exists on whether RAS inhibitors are beneficial or harmful in COVID‐19. In this meta‐analysis, the use of RAS inhibitors was not associated with a worse COVID‐19 prognosis and was even protective in hypertensive patients. Patients should continue these drugs during their COVID‐19 illness.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Pulsatile blood pressure (BP) confers cardiovascular risk. Whether associations of cardiovascular end points are tighter for central systolic BP (cSBP) than peripheral systolic BP (pSBP) or central pulse pressure (cPP) than peripheral pulse pressure (pPP) is uncertain. Among 5608 participants (54.1% women; mean age, 54.2 years) enrolled in nine studies, median follow-up was 4.1 years. cSBP and cPP, estimated tonometrically from the radial waveform, averaged 123.7 and 42.5 mm Hg, and pSBP and pPP 134.1 and 53.9 mm Hg. The primary composite cardiovascular end point occurred in 255 participants (4.5%). Across fourths of the cPP distribution, rates increased exponentially (4.1, 5.0, 7.3, and 22.0 per 1000 person-years) with comparable estimates for cSBP, pSBP, and pPP. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios, expressing the risk per 1-SD increment in BP, were 1.50 (95% CI, 1.33–1.70) for cSBP, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.19–1.54) for cPP, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.33–1.67) for pSBP, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.19–1.51) for pPP (P

Resumen Introduccion La ciencia argentina ha jugado un papel importante en el estudio de la presion arterial. Sin embargo, esta produccion cientifica no ha sido caracterizada. Nos propusimos: 1) analizar la contribucion de las publicaciones cientificas indizadas en MEDLINE de autores con filiacion argentina en el campo de la presion arterial e hipertension arterial en los ultimos 50 anos, y 2) determinar las caracteristicas de las revistas cientificas en las cuales se publicaron. Metodos Se analizaron cuantitativa y cualitativamente 831 publicaciones indizadas en MEDLINE (periodo 1966-2017) de autores de Argentina. Resultados El numero de publicaciones se incrementaron 5,4 veces en los ultimos 20 anos. El 80% de las publicaciones fueron manuscritos originales y el 15% revisiones. El 65% de las publicaciones abordaron la investigacion clinica y el 33% la investigacion basica. El promedio de autores por trabajo fue de 6 (89% como primer autor), el 74% pertenecian a instituciones publicas. Las investigaciones se publicaron en revistas editadas en EE. UU. (36%), Reino Unido (27%), Holanda (12%), Espana (6%) y Argentina (4%). El 18% de las publicaciones fue en revistas con factor impacto > 3,88 (primer cuartil). Solo el 5% accedieron a revistas con factor ≥ 10. El indice SJR promedio fue 1,66. Conclusiones La produccion cientifica Argentina en MEDLINE en el campo de la presion arterial e hipertension arterial presento un crecimiento constante. La gran mayoria son investigaciones originales, dirigidas por investigadores con filiacion en instituciones publicas. Mayormente se accede a revistas extranjeras con aceptables indices de calidad.

OBJECTIVE To address to what extent central hemodynamic measurements, improve risk stratification, and determine outcome-based diagnostic thresholds, we constructed the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (IDCARS), allowing a participant-level meta-analysis. The purpose of this article was to describe the characteristics of IDCARS participants and to highlight research perspectives. METHODS Longitudinal or cross-sectional cohort studies with central blood pressure measured with the SphygmoCor devices and software were included. RESULTS The database included 10,930 subjects (54.8% women; median age 46.0 years) from 13 studies in Europe, Africa, Asia, and South America. The prevalence of office hypertension was 4,446 (40.1%), of which 2,713 (61.0%) were treated, and of diabetes mellitus was 629 (5.8%). The peripheral and central systolic/diastolic blood pressure averaged 129.5/78.7 mm Hg and 118.2/79.7 mm Hg, respectively. Mean aortic pulse wave velocity was 7.3 m per seconds. Among 6,871 participants enrolled in 9 longitudinal studies, the median follow-up was 4.2 years (5th–95th percentile interval, 1.3–12.2 years). During 38,957 person-years of follow-up, 339 participants experienced a composite cardiovascular event and 212 died, 67 of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS IDCARS will provide a unique opportunity to investigate hypotheses on central hemodynamic measurements that could not reliably be studied in individual studies. The results of these analyses might inform guidelines and be of help to clinicians involved in the management of patients with suspected or established hypertension., Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Participant-level meta-analyses assessed the age-specific relevance of office blood pressure to cardiovascular complications, but this information is lacking for out-of-office blood pressure. At baseline, daytime ambulatory (n=12 624) or home (n=5297) blood pressure were measured in 17 921 participants (51.3% women; mean age, 54.2 years) from 17 population cohorts. Subsequently, mortality and cardiovascular events were recorded. Using multivariable Cox regression, floating absolute risk was computed across 4 age bands (≤60, 61-70, 71-80, and >80 years). Over 236 491 person-years, 3855 people died and 2942 cardiovascular events occurred. From levels as low as 110/65 mm Hg, risk log-linearly increased with higher out-of-office systolic/diastolic blood pressure. From the youngest to the oldest age group, rates expressed per 1000 person-years increased (P

Worldwide, hypertension control rate is far from ideal. Some studies suggest that patients treated by specialists have a greater chance to achieve control. The authors aimed to determine the BP control rate among treated hypertensive patients under specialist care in Argentina, to characterize patients regarding their cardiovascular risk profile and antihypertensive drug use, and to assess the variables independently associated with adequate BP control. The authors included adult hypertensive patients under stable treatment, managed in 10 specialist centers across Argentina. Office BP was measured thrice with a validated oscillometric device. Adequate BP control was defined as an average of the three readings

Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is an entity described in treated hypertensive subjects, where office blood pressure (BP) is well controlled and out‐of‐office BP is elevated. It has been related to a higher cardiovascular risk. However, the reproducibility of MUCH has been scarcely studied. In this study, we aimed to determine the reproducibility of MUCH detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Two sets of measurements were performed in hypertensive adults under stable treatment with a 1‐week interval. Each set of measurements included three office BP readings and a 4‐day HBPM with duplicate readings in the morning, afternoon, and evening (the same validated oscillometric device was employed in both settings). We determined the percentage of agreement regarding the presence of MUCH in the two sets of measurements and quantified such agreement through the Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), its 95% confidence interval, and P value. We included 105 patients (median age 58.6 [IQR 45.6‐67.2] years old, 53.4% men). MUCH prevalence on at least one occasion was 22.3% (95% CI: 15.2‐31.5). The reproducibility of MUCH was scant: κ = 0.19 (95% CI: 0.0002‐0.38), P = 0.02, due to the poor reproducibility of the office BP component of MUCH in comparison with the home BP component: κ = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.03‐0.39), P = 0.01 vs κ = 0.48 (95% CI 0.29‐0.67), P

Information regarding predictors of a worse COVID-19 prognosis in the South American population is scarce. We aimed to determine whether the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is associated with a worse clinical course of COVID-19, and to evaluate what clinical variables are associated with COVID severity in our population. We included adult subjects with rtPCR-confirmed COVID-19. The use of renin system inhibitors was defined according to its registration in the electronic medical record or the hospital pharmacy registry during the previous three months. Our endpoint was a composite of death or mechanical ventilation requirement. Patients were followed up until discharge or death. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of the composite endpoint. In all, we included 4930 COVID+ patients, the median age was 52 years, and 48.1% were male. The endpoint occurred in 488 patients (9.9%). In adjusted analysis, neither angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors nor angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with the outcome. Independent predictors of mortality and/or mechanical ventilation requirement were age, male sex, a history of diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease, smoking and dementia. To conclude, renin system inhibitors seem to be unrelated to COVID-19 severity, whereas prognosis is independently associated with age, male sex and comorbidities.

Introduction Although multiple home blood pressure variability (HBPV) indices have been proposed, the superiority of one over another is not clear in treated hypertensives. Aim We evaluated the correlation between different indices of HBPV and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in this population and determined predictors of greater HBPV. Methods We included adult treated hypertensives who performed an HBP monitoring (duplicate sitting BP readings in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 4 days, Omron HEM-705CP-II), laboratory measurements, transthoracic echocardiogram and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. We selected HBPV indices from three different calculation approaches: coefficient of variation (CoV), difference between maximum and minimum BP (MMD), and morning BP increase (MI), and evaluated their correlation with left ventricular mass index, relative wall thickness (RWT), ejection fraction, arterial stiffness and estimated glomerular filtration rate through a correlation matrix. For those variability indices significantly associated with HMOD, we constructed multiple linear regression models to determine independent predictors of HBPV. Results We included 204 patients, mean age 67.2 (± 13.8) years, 64% female. CoV and MMD for systolic BP showed the greatest correlation with HMOD. Factors independently associated both with CoV and MMD were: older age (b = 0.07; 95% CI 0.04–0.07; p < 0.001 and b = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2–0.5; p < 0.001, respectively), history of stroke (b = 3.6; 95% CI 0.9–6.4; p = 0.01 and b = 25.7; 95% CI 10.1–41.2; p = 0.001, respectively), and body mass index [b = − 0.1; 95% CI − 0.2 to (− 0.02); p = 0.01 and b = − 0.5; 95% CI − 0.9 to (− 0.1); p = 0.01, respectively]. Conclusion CoV and MMD showed the greatest association with HMOD in treated hypertensives. Older age, history of stroke and lower body mass index were easy-to-detect predictors.

Resumen La asociación entre patología cardiovascular y mala evolución de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 resulta llamativa. Estudios publicados en diferentes países muestran que la hipertensión, la diabetes, la enfermedad cerebrovascular y la cardiopatía isquémica son marcadamente más frecuentes en los pacientes que requieren cuidados críticos o fallecen por COVID-19. Un posible nexo causal sería el daño y la disfunción miocárdica producidos por el SARS-CoV-2, evidenciado en los frecuentes hallazgos de elevación de la troponina y anormalidades electrocardiográficas. Por otra parte, existen hipótesis a favor y en contra de un posible efecto deletéreo de los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora y los bloqueantes del receptor de angiotensina 2 en esta patología, no habiendo actualmente evidencia sólida que respalde contundentemente una u otra, resultando impostergable la necesidad de estudios que diluciden este interrogante. Los pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular deberían evitar especialmente la exposición al SARS-CoV-2, no automedicarse y consultar rápidamente ante la aparición de síntomas.

Background: controversy has arisen in the scientific community on whether the use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in the context of COVID-19 would be of benefit or harmful. A meta-analysis of eligible studies comparing the occurrence of severe and fatal COVID-19 in infected patients who were under treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) vs no treatment or other antihypertensives was conducted. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, MedRxiv and BioRxiv were searched for relevant studies. Fixed-effect models or random-effect models were used depending on the heterogeneity between estimates. Results: a total of fifteen studies with 21,614 patients were included. The use of RAS inhibitors was associated with a non-significant 20% decreased risk of the composite outcome (death, admission to intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation requirement or progression to severe or critical pneumonia): RR 0.81 (95%CI: 0.63-1.04), p=0.10, I2=82%. In a subgroup analysis that included hypertensive subjects only, ACEI/ARB were associated with a 27% significant decrease in the risk of the composite outcome (RR 0.73 (95%CI: 0.56-0.96), p=0.02, I2=65%). Conclusion: the results of this pooled analysis suggest that the use of ACEI/ARB does not worsen the prognosis, and could even be protective in hypertensive subjects. Patients should continue these drugs during their COVID-19 illness.

Older hypertensive adults under treatment are especially susceptible to hypotensive episodes, which entail an elevated risk. However, data on this subject are very scarce. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of office and home hypotension in older (≥ 65 years) treated hypertensive adults. Blood pressure (BP) was measured at the office and at home, using a validated oscillometric device. Office and home hypotension were defined as systolic BP (SBP)

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the aortic piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure (cSBP) with the SphygmoCor. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A total of 85 participants from both sexes, aged 18-80 years, were stratified into three age groups ( 60 years), with an equal number of healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients. We performed three cSBP measurements with each device, in an alternate manner, using the Bland-Altman method to determine the level of agreement. The standard of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation for brachial blood pressure evaluation was used for the comparison. RESULTS The mean cSBPs were 109.3±12.05 and 109.0±12.2 mmHg with the SphygmoCor and the Aortic device, respectively, showing a strong correlation (r=0.98, P

Introduction: Publication rates vary significantly among different scientific meetings, with many abstracts never being published as peer-reviewed articles. This issue has never been investigated in the Hypertension field in Argentina. Our purpose was to determine the proportion of abstracts presented at the Argentinian Congress of Hypertension meetings that were published as full articles in peer-reviewed indexed journals, the time lag to publication and the factors associated with successful publication. Methods: we conducted a PubMed search to identify peer-reviewed publications of abstracts presented at the Argentinian Congress of Hypertension meetings between 2006 and 2015, assessing publication rate along with the time lag to publication. We also extracted information about several abstract characteristics and, for those that got published, we recorded the date of publication and journal name with its impact factor and H index. Predictors of publication were analyzed using a multivariable model. Results: a total of 619 abstracts were presented between 2006 and 2015. The rate of conversion to full-text peer-reviewed articles by June 2017 was 28.1% (95%CI 24.7–31.8%), with a median time to publication of 15.7 months (IQR 8–30.9). On multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of publication were basic science category (OR 5 [95%CI 2.3–10.8], p < 0.001), oral presentation (OR 2.8 [95%CI 1.6–4.9], p < 0.001) and being an award winner for the presentation (OR 3 [95%CI 1.3–6.8], p = 0.01). Conclusion: conversion rate to full peer-reviewed articles of abstracts presented at the Argentinian Congress of Hypertension meetings is far from ideal, with potential areas where efforts should be concentrated to improve dissemination of knowledge. Introducción: El porcentaje de resúmenes que se presentan en reuniones científicas y llegan a publicarse como manuscritos completos en revistas indexadas revisadas por pares es bajo. Este problema no ha sido investigado en el área de la hipertensión en Argentina. Nos propusimos determinar la proporción de resúmenes presentados en los congresos argentinos de hipertensión que llegan a publicarse en revistas indexadas, como artículos completos revisados por pares, el tiempo transcurrido hasta la publicación y los factores asociados a la misma. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en PubMed para identificar las publicaciones en revistas con revisión por pares de los resúmenes presentados en los congresos argentinos de hipertensión entre los anos ˜ 2006 y 2015, determinando el porcentaje de resúmenes que llegaron a publicarse y el tiempo transcurrido hasta la publicación. Registramos fecha de publicación y revista, con su factor de impacto e índice H. Construimos un modelo multivariable de regresión logística para determinar los factores independientemente asociados a la publicación. Resultados: Entre 2006 y 2015 se presentaron 619 resúmenes. La tasa de conversión de resúmenes en artículos revisados por pares a junio de 2017, fue del 28,1% (IC 95%: 24,7-31,8%) con una mediana de tiempo hasta la publicación de 15,7 meses (RIC: 8-30,9). Los factores predictivos independientes de la publicación fueron: categoría ciencia básica (OR: 5 [IC 95%: 2,3-10,8]; p < 0,001), presentación oral (OR: 2,8 [IC 95%: 1,6-4,9]; p < 0,001), y haber obtenido un premio al mejor trabajo (OR: 3 [IC 95%: 1,3-6,8]; p = 0,01). Conclusión: La tasa de conversión de resúmenes en artículos revisados por pares presentados en los congresos argentinos de hipertensión a publicaciones en revistas indexadas dista de ser ideal, habiéndose identificado áreas donde la concentración de esfuerzos podría mejorar la difusión del conocimiento. Fil: Barochiner, J.. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina Fil: Martínez, R.. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina Fil: Choi, Marcelo Roberto. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Espeche, W.. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina Fil: Micali, R.G.. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina Fil: Tomat, A.. Sociedad Argentina de Hipertensión Arterial; Argentina

Arterial stiffness, assessed through pulse wave velocity (PWV), independently predicts cardiovascular outcomes. In untreated persons, white-coat hypertension (WCH) has been related to arterial stiffness, but data in treated patients with WCH are scarce. The authors aimed to determine a possible association between WCH and arterial stiffness in this population. Adult treated hypertensive patients underwent home blood pressure monitoring and PWV assessment. Variables associated with PWV in univariable analyses were entered into a multivariable linear regression model. The study included 121 patients, 33.9% men, median age 67.9 (interquartile range 18.4) years, 5.8% with diabetes, and 3.3% with a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. In multivariable analysis, WCH in treated hypertensive patients remained a determinant of PWV: β=1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.1-2.1 [P=.037]; adjusted R2 0.49). In conclusion, WCH is independently associated with arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive patients. Whether this high-risk association is offset by antihypertensive treatment should be further investigated.

Background An alerting reaction is a physician-induced phenomenon which produces a transient blood pressure rise in the office. Objective To determine its relationship with target organ damage in treated hypertensives. Method We used three different indexes for calculating alerting reaction depending on the first, second or third office blood pressure measurement. We correlated these indexes with glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular mass index and pulse wave velocity. Thereafter, for multivariate analysis, we selected the index which better correlated with each target organ damage subtype. Results We included 174 adults, mean age 67(±13.7) years. 75% of the patients had some degree of blood pressure fall between measurements 1-3. In multivariate linear regression models, after adjusting for classic risk factors, two out of the three systolic alerting reaction indexes showed an independent association with target organ damage. After further adjusting for office blood pressure and white coat effect (calculated with standardized home blood pressure monitoring), left ventricular mass index maintained a statistically significant association. Conclusion A higher alerting reaction in the office seems to be related to increased target organ damage in treated hypertensives and should not be considered an innocent phenomenon.

To generate outcome-driven thresholds for home blood pressure (BP) in the elderly, we analyzed 375 octogenarians (60.3% women; 83.0 years [mean]) enrolled in the International Database on home BP in relation to cardiovascular outcome. Over 5.5 years (median), 155 participants died, 76 from cardiovascular causes, whereas 104, 55, 36, and 51 experienced a cardiovascular, cardiac, coronary, or cerebrovascular event, respectively. In 202 untreated participants, home diastolic in the lowest fifth of the distribution (≤65.1 mm Hg) compared with the multivariable-adjusted average risk was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (hazard ratios [HRs], ≥1.96; P ≤0.022), whereas the HR for cardiovascular mortality in the top fifth (≥82.0 mm Hg) was 0.37 ( P =0.034). Among 173 participants treated for hypertension, the HR for total mortality in the lowest fifth of systolic home BP (P =0.020). In further analyses of home BP as continuous variable (per 1-SD increment), higher diastolic BP predicted lower cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and cardiac and coronary risk (HR≤0.65; P ≤0.039) in untreated participants. In those treated, cardiovascular morbidity was curvilinearly associated with systolic home BP with nadir at 148.6 mm Hg and with a 1.45 HR ( P =0.046) for a 1-SD decrease below this threshold. In conclusion, in untreated octogenarians, systolic home BP ≥152.4 and diastolic BP ≤65.1 mm Hg entails increased cardiovascular risk, whereas diastolic home BP ≥82 mm Hg minimizes risk. In those treated, systolic home BP

Exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation (EOV) is a poorly understood phenomenon related to high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to determine whether hypertensive patients with EOV have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, assessed through impedance cardiography. METHODS In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between -20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between -10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV. RESULTS We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01-1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo. CONCLUSION Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an increasingly recognized disorder that is associated with functional impairment, quality-of-life deterioration, increased risk of cardiovascular ischemic events, and increased risk of total and cardiovascular mortality. Although earlier studies suggested that PAD was more common in men, recent reports based on more sensitive tests have shown that the prevalence of PAD in women is at least the same as in men, if not higher. PAD tends to present itself asymptomatically or with atypical symptoms more frequently in women than in men, and is associated with comorbidities or situations particularly or exclusively found in the female sex, such as osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, the use of oral contraceptives, and a history of complications during pregnancy. Fat-distribution patterns and differential vascular characteristics in women may influence the interpretation of diagnostic methods, whereas sex-related vulnerability to drugs typically used in subjects with PAD, differences in risk-factor distribution among sexes, and distinct responses to revascularization procedures in men and women must be taken into account for proper disease management. All these issues pose important challenges associated with PAD in women. Of note, this group has classically been underrepresented in research studies. As a consequence, several sex-related challenges regarding diagnosis and management issues should be acknowledged, and research gaps should be addressed in order to successfully deal with this major health issue., Video abstract

Background. The morning home blood pressure (BP) rise is a significant asymptomatic target organ damage predictor in hypertensives. Our aim was to evaluate determinants of home-based morning-evening difference (MEdiff) in Argentine patients.Methods. Treated hypertensive patients aged≥18 years participated in a cross-sectional study, after performing home morning and evening BP measurement. MEdiff was morning minus evening home average results. Variables identified as relevant predictors were entered into a multivariable linear regression analysis model.Results. Three hundred sixty-seven medicated hypertensives were included. Mean age was 66.2 (14.5), BMI 28.1 (4.5), total cholesterol 4.89 (1.0) mmol/L, 65.9% women, 11.7% smokers, and 10.6% diabetics. Mean MEdiff was 1.1 (12.5) mmHg systolic and 2.3 (6.1) mmHg diastolic, respectively. Mean self-recorded BP was 131.5 (14.1) mmHg systolic and 73.8 (7.6) mmHg diastolic, respectively. Mean morning and evening home BPs were 133.1 (16.5) versus 132 (15.7) systolic and 75.8 (8.4) versus 73.5 (8.2) diastolic, respectively. Significant beta-coefficient values were found in systolic MEdiff for age and smoking and in diastolic MEdiff for age, smoking, total cholesterol, and calcium-channel blockers.Conclusions. In a cohort of Argentine medicated patients, older age, smoking, total cholesterol, and use of calcium channel blockers were independent determinants of home-based MEdiff.

The absence of an outcome-driven reference frame for self-measured pulse pressure (PP) limits its clinical applicability. In an attempt to derive an operational threshold for self-measured PP, we analyzed 6470 participants (mean age 59.3 years; 56.9% women; 22.5% on antihypertensive treatment) from 5 general population cohorts included in the International Database on HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. During 8.3 years of follow-up (median), 294 cardiovascular deaths, 393 strokes and 336 cardiac events occurred. In 3285 younger subjects (

Postprandial hypotension (PPH) is a frequently under-recognized entity associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of PPH detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is unknown. To determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of PPH in hypertensive patients assessed through HBPM. Hypertensive patients of 18 years or older underwent home blood pressure (BP) measurements (duplicate measurements for 4 days: in the morning, 1 h before and 1 h after their usual lunch, and in the evening; OMRON 705 CP). PPH was defined as a meal-induced systolic BP decrease of ≥20 mm Hg. Variables identified as relevant predictors of PPH were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. In total, 230 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 73.6 (interquartile range 16.9) years, and 65.2% were female. The prevalence of PPH (at least one episode) was 27.4%. Four variables were independently associated with PPH: age of 80 years or older (odds ratio (OR) 3.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-8.82), body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.81-0.96), office systolic BP (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05) and a history of cerebrovascular disease (OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.03-10.53). PPH after a typical meal is a frequent phenomenon that can be detected through HBPM. Easily measurable parameters in the office such as older age, higher systolic BP, lower BMI and a history of cerebrovascular disease may help to detect patients at risk of PPH who would benefit from HBPM.

Arterial hypertension and transplantation are closely linked, and its association may promote impaired graft and overall survival. Since the introduction of calcineurin inhibitors, it is observed in 50–80% of transplanted patients. However, many pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in its genesis. In this review, we intend to provide an updated overview of these mechanisms, dealing with the causes common to all kinds of transplantation and emphasizing special cases with distinct features, and to give a perspective on the pharmacological approach, in order to help clinicians in the management of this frequent complication.

Masked hypertension (MH) entails an increased cardiovascular risk. Therefore, it is important to identify those individuals who would benefit the most from out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement. We sought to determine the prevalence and identify predictors of MH among adult hypertensive patients under treatment.Treated hypertensive patients aged ≥ 18 years underwent office (duplicate sitting and standing BP in 1 visit) and home BP measurements (duplicate measurements for 4 days in the morning, afternoon, and evening; at least 16 measurements) and completed a questionnaire regarding risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease. MH was defined as normal office BP (140/90mm Hg) with elevated home BP (≥135/85mm Hg, average of all readings discarding first day measurements). Patients with a systolic BP rise upon standing ≥5mm Hg were considered to have orthostatic hypertension (OHT). Variables indentified as relevant predictors of MH were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis model.Three hundred and four patients were included (mean age = 66.7 ±13.8; 67.4% women). The prevalence of MH in the whole population was 12.4% and was 20.9% among patients with office-controlled hypertension. Factors independently associated with MH were age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.14), high-normal office systolic BP (OR = 5.61, 95% CI = 1.39-22.57), history of peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR = 8.83, 95% CI = 1.5-51.84), moderate alcohol consumption (OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01-0.73), and OHT (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.27 to 10.51).Easily measurable parameters such as age, office systolic BP, history of PAD, and OHT may help to detect a population at risk of MH that would benefit from home BP monitoring.

Volume expansion 1,2 is frequent among hypertensives.3 Impedance Cardiography (ICG) measures hemodynamic disturbances,3,4 and apparently estimates volume excess 5 through the thoracic fluid content (TFC), an inverse of thoracic impedance(Z0). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.