Radosław Juszczak, Benjamin Wolf, Annika Nordbo, Giuseppe Benanti, Stephanie K. Jones, Mohamed Helmy, Roland Klefoth, Raquel Lobo-do-Vale, Jukka Pumpanen, Terhi Rasilo, Ana Paula Rosa, Hermanni Aaltonen, Sara Vicca, Michael Giebels, Peter Schreiber, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Mari Pihlatie, Jatta Sheehy, Janne Korhonen, Dominique Serça, Department of Physics, Department of Forest Sciences, Ecosystem processes (INAR Forest Sciences), Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles, Forest Ecology and Management, Department of Physics [Helsinki], Falculty of Science [Helsinki], University of Helsinki-University of Helsinki, Division of Biomass & Ecosystem Science, University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (KU), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Faculty of Forestry [Vancouver] (UBC Faculty of Forestry), University of British Columbia (UBC), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Department of Forest Sciences [Helsinki], Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry [Helsinki], School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin [Dublin] (UCD), Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Leibniz Association, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California [Davis] (UC Davis), University of California-University of California, Scottish Agricultural College, University of Edinburgh, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Meteorology Department, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Agronomy Institute, Technical University of Lisbon, Centre for Environmental Biology, Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), University of Hamburg, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Universität Greifswald - University of Greifswald, Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerpa, Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung - Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU), and Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
International audience; The static chamber method (non-flow-through-non-steady-state chambers) is the most common method to measure fluxes of methane (CH4) from soils. Laboratory comparisons to quantify errors resulting from chamber design, operation and flux calculation methods are rare. We tested fifteen chambers against four flux levels (FL) ranging from 200 to 2300 μg CH4 m−2 h−1. The measurements were conducted on a calibration tank using three quartz sand types with soil porosities of 53% (dry fine sand, S1), 47% (dry coarse sand, S2), and 33% (wetted fine sand, S3). The chambers tested ranged from 0.06 to 1.8 m in height, and 0.02 to 0.195 m3 in volume, 7 of them were equipped with a fan, and 1 with a vent-tube. We applied linear and exponential flux calculation methods to the chamber data and compared these chamber fluxes to the reference fluxes from the calibration tank. The chambers underestimated the reference fluxes by on average 33% by the linear flux calculation method (Rlin), whereas the chamber fluxes calculated by the exponential flux calculation method (Rexp) did not significantly differ from the reference fluxes (p < 0.05). The flux under- or overestimations were chamber specific and independent of flux level. Increasing chamber height, area and volume significantly reduced the flux underestimation (p < 0.05). Also, the use of non-linear flux calculation method significantly improved the flux estimation; however, simultaneously the uncertainty in the fluxes was increased. We provide correction factors, which can be used to correct the under- or overestimation of the fluxes by the chambers in the experiment.