Search

Teesha Downton,1,2 Fiona Zhou,1,2 Davendra Segara,1 Rinath Jeselsohn,3,* Elgene Lim1,2,* 1Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent’s Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Elgene Lim, Tel +61 2 9355 5600, Fax +61 2 9355 5602, Email e.lim@garvan.org.auAbstract: Several endocrine therapies are currently available for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, but the clinical benefit of these agents is limited by endocrine therapy drug resistance. A common mechanism of endocrine therapy resistance is ESR1 mutations. The first-generation selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) fulvestrant has activity against ESR1 mutant tumors but requires intramuscular injection and has poor bioavailability that precludes optimal drug dosing. This led to the development of second-generation SERDs which are potent and have improved oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics. Several of these oral SERDs are now in phase III trials in both the early and advanced ER positive breast cancer settings. This review summarizes the background of oral SERD development, the current status and future perspectives.Keywords: selective estrogen receptor degraders, breast cancer, estrogen receptor

The molecular underpinnings of HER2-low and HER2-0 (IHC 0) breast tumors remain poorly defined. Using genomic findings from 1039 patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer undergoing next-generation sequencing from 7/2013-12/2020, we compare results between HER2-low (n = 487, 47%) and HER2-0 tumors (n = 552, 53%). A significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles (median copy count: 2.05) are observed among HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-0 (median copy count: 1.79; P = 2.36e-6), with HER2-0 tumors harboring a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions (31.1% vs. 14.5%). No other genomic alteration reaches significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and no significant differences in tumor mutational burden are observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors (median: 7.26 mutations/megabase vs. 7.60 mutations/megabase, p = 0.24). Here, we show that the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors does not differ significantly, apart from a higher ERBB2 copy count among HER2-low tumors, and a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions in HER2-0 tumors. HER2-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, for which the molecular landscape remains incompletely understood. Here, the authors use genomic data from 1039 patients to unveil and compare the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advancements in molecular biology have unveiled multiple breast cancer promoting pathways and potential therapeutic targets. Large randomized clinical trials remain the ultimate means of validating therapeutic efficacy, but they require large cohorts of patients and are lengthy and costly. An alternative approach is to conduct a window of opportunity study in which patients are exposed to a drug pre-surgically during the interval between the core needle biopsy (CNB) and the definitive surgery (excisional biopsy (EB)). These are non- therapeutic studies and the end point is not clinical or pathological response but rather evaluation of molecular changes in the tumor specimens that can predict response. However, since the end points of the non-therapeutic studies are biologic, it is critical to first define any biologic changes that occur in the absence of treatment. In this study, we compared the molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors at the time of the diagnostic biopsy versus the definitive surgery in the absence of any intervention. Methods: The study was conducted with DFCI/HCC IRB approval and patient consent. Post- menopausal women with a breast lesion suspected to be cancerous were eligible for this study. We obtained a tissue specimen at the time of a CNB and if determined to be consistent with invasive carcinoma a second specimen was obtained at the time of the EB. We used the Nanostring Ncounter system to study the expression level of 148 transcripts. Since we expected that most of the tumors will be hormone receptor positive (HR+), the library included; genes that have been shown to be prognostic in HR+ tumors (Oncotype DX®, PAM50), estrogen receptor (ER) modulators, ER responsive genes and inflammatory genes. The Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used to evaluate for changes in gene expression levels between the paired samples. Results: 25 patients were enrolled in this study and paired tumor tissue samples were obtained from all patients. 21 of the paired samples were successfully analyzed by the nanostring system. 86% of the patients are HR+/Her2-. We found that the gene expression levels of 14 out of the 148 genes (9%) did change between the CNB and EB without any intervention (p < 0.05). 8 of these 14 genes can be classified as inflammatory genes that also have known functions in tumor progression. The expression of these 8 genes was upregulated between the biopsies and include; CD68, ADM, CD14, IL6, VEGFA, CD52, CD44 and SNAI1. These changes may be due to an inflammatory response to the CNB. Ki67 expression did not change significantly between biopsies. Conclusions: In this study we found significant gene expression variations between CNBs and EBs in 9% of the genes tested, without any therapeutic intervention. Our findings suggest that when conducting a "Window of Opportunity" clinical study to evaluate for biomarkers of response or resistance, changes in expression of inflammatory genes cannot be attributed to treatment and a control arm should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent breast cancers often develop resistance to standard-of-care therapies. Identifying targetable factors contributing to cancer recurrence remains the rate-limiting step in improving long-term outcomes. In this study, we identify tumor cell-derived osteopontin as an autocrine and paracrine driver of tumor recurrence. Osteopontin promotes tumor cell proliferation, recruits macrophages, and synergizes with IL-4 to further polarize them into a pro-tumorigenic state. Macrophage depletion and osteopontin inhibition decrease recurrent tumor growth. Furthermore, targeting osteopontin in primary tumor-bearing female mice prevents metastasis, permits T cell infiltration and activation, and improves anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response. Clinically, osteopontin expression is higher in recurrent metastatic tumors versus female patient-matched primary breast tumors. Osteopontin positively correlates with macrophage infiltration, increases with higher tumor grade, and its elevated pathway activity is associated with poor prognosis and long-term recurrence. Our findings suggest clinical implications and an alternative therapeutic strategy based on osteopontin's multiaxial role in breast cancer progression and recurrence., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Context and Objective: The genetic profile of prolactinomas remains poorly understood. Our objective is to identify somatic genetic alterations associated with prolactinomas and to report the identification of an activating ESR1 mutation (ESR1Y537S) in an aggressive prolactinoma., Setting: Brigham and Women's Hospital., Design: Massively parallel-sequencing panel (OncoPanel) was performed in a cohort of patients with prolactinomas to identify mutations and copy number variation (CNV)., Results: Twenty subjects (mean age 38.6 years; 12 women and 8 men) were included in this study. A somatic ESR1Y537S mutation was identified in an aggressive prolactinoma in a post-menopausal woman. No SF3B1 or other somatic mutations were identified. The median number of CNV events identified in our samples was 46; the prolactinoma with ESR1Y537S had the highest number with 233 events. In breast cancer, ESR1Y537S has been shown to activate estrogen receptor alpha independent of ligand binding. In patients with resistant breast cancer and ESR1Y537S, elacestrant, a second-line ER degrader, improves progression-free survival. Therefore, given the lack of response to multimodality therapies, elacestrant was initiated in this patient after the third cycle of radiotherapy. Elacestrant, along with radiotherapy, controlled tumor growth and significantly reduced prolactin levels., Conclusion: Molecular profiling allowed the identification of ESR1Y537S, in an aggressive prolactinoma. ESR1Y537S was not detected early in the course of the disease and is likely conferring tumor aggressiveness. This finding emphasizes the significance of estrogen receptor signaling in prolactinomas. It also allowed the use of targeted therapy with successful control of disease progression., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. See the journal About page for additional terms.)

The ESR1 ligand binding domain activating mutations are the most prevalent genetic mechanism of acquired endocrine resistance in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. These mutations confer endocrine resistance that remains estrogen receptor (ER) dependent. We hypothesized that in the presence of the ER mutations, continued ER blockade with endocrine therapies that target mutant ER is essential for tumor suppression even with chemotherapy treatment. Here, we conducted comprehensive pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo experiments testing the efficacy of adding fulvestrant to fluorouracil (5FU) and the 5FU pro-drug, capecitabine, in models of wild-type (WT) and mutant ER. Our findings revealed that while this combination had an additive effect in the presence of WT-ER, in the presence of the Y537S ER mutation there was synergy. Notably, these effects were not seen with the combination of 5FU and selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as tamoxifen, or in the absence of intact P53. Likewise, in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) harboring a Y537S ER mutation the addition of fulvestrant to capecitabine potentiated tumor suppression. Moreover, multiplex immunofluorescence revealed that this effect was due to decreased cell proliferation in all cells expressing ER and was not dependent on the degree of ER expression. Taken together, these results support the clinical investigation of the combination of ER antagonists with capecitabine in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who have experienced progression on endocrine therapy and targeted therapies, particularly in the presence of an ESR1 activating mutation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is a clinical challenge in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) is a candidate target in endocrine-resistant ER+ breast cancer models and selective CDK7 inhibitors (CDK7i) are in clinical development for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms responsible for the activity of CDK7i in ER+ breast cancer remain elusive. Herein, we sought to unravel these mechanisms., Experimental Design: We conducted multi-omic analyses in ER+ breast cancer models in vitro and in vivo, including models with different genetic backgrounds. We also performed genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens to identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in CDK4/6i-resistant models., Results: We found that the on-target antitumor effects of CDK7 inhibition in ER+ breast cancer are in part p53 dependent, and involve cell cycle inhibition and suppression of c-Myc. Moreover, CDK7 inhibition exhibited cytotoxic effects, distinctive from the cytostatic nature of ET and CDK4/6i. CDK7 inhibition resulted in suppression of ER phosphorylation at S118; however, long-term CDK7 inhibition resulted in increased ER signaling, supporting the combination of ET with a CDK7i. Finally, genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens identified CDK7 and MYC signaling as putative vulnerabilities in CDK4/6i resistance, and CDK7 inhibition effectively inhibited CDK4/6i-resistant models., Conclusions: Taken together, these findings support the clinical investigation of selective CDK7 inhibition combined with ET to overcome treatment resistance in ER+ breast cancer. In addition, our study highlights the potential of increased c-Myc activity and intact p53 as predictors of sensitivity to CDK7i-based treatments., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Annual breast cancer (BCa) deaths have declined since its apex in 1989 concomitant with widespread adoption of hormone therapies that target estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), the prominent nuclear receptor expressed in ∼80% of BCa. However, up to ∼50% of patients who are ER+ with high-risk disease experience post endocrine therapy relapse and metastasis to distant organs. The vast majority of BCa mortality occurs in this setting, highlighting the inadequacy of current therapies. Genomic abnormalities to ESR1, the gene encoding ERα, emerge under prolonged selective pressure to enable endocrine therapy resistance. These genetic lesions include focal gene amplifications, hotspot missense mutations in the ligand binding domain, truncations, fusions, and complex interactions with other nuclear receptors. Tumor cells utilize aberrant ERα activity to proliferate, spread, and evade therapy in BCa as well as other cancers. Cutting edge studies on ERα structural and transcriptional relationships are being harnessed to produce new therapies that have shown benefits in patients with ESR1 hotspot mutations. In this review we discuss the history of ERα, current research unlocking unknown aspects of ERα signaling including the structural basis for receptor antagonism, and future directions of ESR1 investigation. In addition, we discuss the development of endocrine therapies from their inception to present day and survey new avenues of drug development to improve pharmaceutical profiles, targeting, and efficacy., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is not considered immunogenic and, to date, has been proven resistant to immunotherapy. Endocrine therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for ER+ breast cancers. However, constitutively activating mutations in the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene can emerge during treatment, rendering tumors resistant to endocrine therapy. Although these mutations represent a pathway of resistance, they also represent a potential source of neoepitopes that can be targeted by immunotherapy. In this study, we investigated ESR1 mutations as novel targets for breast cancer immunotherapy. Using machine learning algorithms, we identified ESR1-derived peptides predicted to form stable complexes with HLA-A*0201. We then validated the binding affinity and stability of the top predicted peptides through in vitro binding and dissociation assays and showed that these peptides bind HLA-A*0201 with high affinity and stability. Using tetramer assays, we confirmed the presence and expansion potential of antigen-specific CTLs from healthy female donors. Finally, using in vitro cytotoxicity assays, we showed the lysis of peptide-pulsed targets and breast cancer cells expressing common ESR1 mutations by expanded antigen-specific CTLs. Ultimately, we identified five peptides derived from the three most common ESR1 mutations (D538G, Y537S, and E380Q) and their associated wild-type peptides, which were the most immunogenic. Overall, these data confirm the immunogenicity of epitopes derived from ESR1 and highlight the potential of these peptides to be targeted by novel immunotherapy strategies., Significance: Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mutations have emerged as a key factor in endocrine therapy resistance. We identified and validated five novel, immunogenic ESR1-derived peptides that could be targeted through vaccine-based immunotherapy., (© 2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors such as palbociclib are approved for the treatment of metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapies and significantly improve outcomes in patients with this disease. However, given the large number of possible pairwise drug combinations and administration schedules, it remains unclear which clinical strategy would lead to best survival. Here, we developed a computational, cell cycle-explicit model to characterize the pharmacodynamic response to palbociclib-fulvestrant combination therapy. This pharmacodynamic model was parameterized, in a Bayesian statistical inference approach, using in vitro data from cells with wild-type estrogen receptor (WT-ER) and cells expressing the activating missense ER mutation, Y537S, which confers resistance to fulvestrant. We then incorporated pharmacokinetic models derived from clinical data into our computational modeling platform. To systematically compare dose administration schedules, we performed in silico clinical trials based on integrating our pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic models as well as considering clinical toxicity constraints. We found that continuous dosing of palbociclib is more effective for lowering overall tumor burden than the standard, pulsed-dose palbociclib treatment. Importantly, our mathematical modeling and statistical analysis platform provides a rational method for comparing treatment strategies in search of optimal combination dosing strategies of other cell-cycle inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer., Significance: We created a computational modeling platform to predict the effects of fulvestrant/palbocilib treatment on WT-ER and Y537S-mutant breast cancer cells, and found that continuous treatment schedules are more effective than the standard, pulsed-dose palbociclib treatment schedule., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Inhibitors for the KAT6 family of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) have been actively pursued due to the oncogenic roles of KAT6A in human cancer. CTx-648 is a novel KAT6A/B inhibitor with excellent pharmacokinetic properties and in vivo efficacy that represents a promising new treatment strategy for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare competing financial interests: K.P. serves on the scientific advisory board of Novartis, Vividion Therapeutics, Ideya Biosciences, and Scorpion Therapeutics; holds equity options in Scorpion Therapeutics and Ideya Biosciences; and receives sponsored research funding through Dana-Farber from Novartis. R.J. received research funding (institutional) from Pfizer and Lilly and is a consultant for Carrick Therapeutics and GE Health., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapies have yet to demonstrate significant efficacy in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Given that endocrine therapy (ET) is the primary approach for treating HR+ breast cancer, we investigated the effects of ET on the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in HR+ breast cancer. Spatial proteomics of primary HR+ breast cancer samples obtained at baseline and after ET from patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant clinical trial (NCT02764541) indicated that ET upregulated β2-microglobulin and influenced the TME in a manner that promotes enhanced immunogenicity. To gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms, the intrinsic effects of ET on cancer cells were explored, which revealed that ET plays a crucial role in facilitating the chromatin binding of RelA, a key component of the NF-κB complex. Consequently, heightened NF-κB signaling enhanced the response to interferon-gamma, leading to the upregulation of β2-microglobulin and other antigen presentation-related genes. Further, modulation of NF-κB signaling using a SMAC mimetic in conjunction with ET augmented T-cell migration and enhanced MHC-I-specific T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Remarkably, the combination of ET and SMAC mimetics, which also blocks prosurvival effects of NF-κB signaling through the degradation of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, elicited tumor regression through cell autonomous mechanisms, providing additional support for their combined use in HR+ breast cancer., Significance: Adding SMAC mimetics to endocrine therapy enhances tumor regression in a cell autonomous manner while increasing tumor immunogenicity, indicating that this combination could be an effective treatment for HR+ patients with breast cancer., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Aberrant activation of the forkhead protein FOXA1 is observed in advanced hormone-related cancers. However, the key mediators of high FOXA1 signaling remain elusive. We demonstrate that ectopic high FOXA1 (H-FOXA1) expression promotes estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) metastasis in a xenograft mouse model. Mechanistically, H-FOXA1 reprograms ER-chromatin binding to elicit a core gene signature (CGS) enriched in ER+ endocrine-resistant (EndoR) cells. We identify Secretome14, a CGS subset encoding ER-dependent cancer secretory proteins, as a strong predictor for poor outcomes of ER+ BC. It is elevated in ER+ metastases vs. primary tumors, irrespective of ESR1 mutations. Genomic ER binding near Secretome14 genes is also increased in mutant ER-expressing or mitogen-treated ER+ BC cells and in ER+ metastatic vs. primary tumors, suggesting a convergent pathway including high growth factor receptor signaling in activating pro-metastatic secretome genes. Our findings uncover H-FOXA1-induced ER reprogramming that drives EndoR and metastasis partly via an H-FOXA1/ER-dependent secretome., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests C.K.O. is a consultant/advisory board member for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnologies, and Tolmar and on the Data Monitoring Committee for Eli Lilly. R.S. has received research support (to institute) from Puma Biotechnology, Gilead Sciences, and AstraZeneca; is a consultant/advisor of MacroGenics; holds patents, royalties, and other intellectual property from Wolters Kluwer/UpToDate; and has a patent pending (via institution; NRF Ref. BAYM.P0312US.P1-1001123973 “A multiparameter classifier to predict response to HER2-targeted therapy without chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer”) with no revenue received. N.W. is a consultant/advisor for Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, a member of the scientific advisory board and stockholder for Relay Therapeutics, and a member of the scientific advisory board and stockholder for Flare Therapeutics. He has previously received research support from Novartis and Puma Biotechnology, consulted with Novartis, and consulted with Foundation Medicine. R.J. has received research funding from Pfizer. M.F.R. has received research support from Pfizer and consults with Genentech, Novartis, Daiichi, AstraZeneca, Seagen, and MacroGenics. M.G. is a consultant/advisor for Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Samuraciclib is a selective oral CDK7-inhibitor. A multi-modular, open-label Phase I study to evaluate safety and tolerability of samuraciclib in patients with advanced malignancies was designed (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03363893). Here we report results from dose escalation and 2 expansion cohorts: Module 1A dose escalation with paired biopsy cohort in advanced solid tumor patients, Module 1B-1 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) monotherapy expansion, and Module 2A fulvestrant combination in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients post-CDK4/6-inhibitor. Core study primary endpoints are safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints are pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and anti-tumor activity. Common adverse events are low grade nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Maximum tolerated dose is 360 mg once daily. PK demonstrates dose proportionality (120 mg-480 mg), a half-life of approximately 75 hours, and no fulvestrant interaction. In dose escalation, one partial response (PR) is identified with disease control rate of 53% (19/36) and reduction of phosphorylated RNA polymerase II, a substrate of CDK7, in circulating lymphocytes and tumor tissue. In TNBC expansion, one PR (duration 337 days) and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR) of 20.0% (4/20) is achieved. In combination with fulvestrant, 3 patients achieve PR with CBR 36.0% (9/25); in patients without detectable TP53-mutation CBR is 47.4% (9/19). In this study, samuraciclib exhibits tolerable safety and PK is supportive of once-daily oral administration. Clinical activity in TNBC and HR+/HER2-breast cancer post-CDK4/6-inhibitor settings warrants further evaluation., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone of management in hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer (BC). Indeed, targeting the estrogen receptor (ER) signaling at different levels is a successful strategy, since BC largely relies on the ER signaling as a driver of tumorigenesis and progression. In metastatic BC, progression of disease typically occurs due to either ligand-independent ER signaling, which favors tumor proliferation and survival in the absence of hormonal stimuli, or an ER-independent signaling, which exploits alternative transcription pathways. For instance, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations induce constitutive ER activity, in turn upregulating ER-dependent gene transcription and causing resistance to estrogen depleting therapies. The largest unmet need lies after progression on ET + cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, where fulvestrant alone provides an average 2-3-month PFS. In this context, novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) and other next-generation ETs are being investigated, both as single agents and in combination with targeted therapies. Elacestrant, the next generation ET in most advanced clinical development and the first to be FDA approved, demonstrated improved outcomes compared to standard ETs in ET pre-treated HR+/HER2- metastatic BC in the phase 3 EMERALD clinical trial. Additionally, other agents are showing promising results in both preclinical and early phase clinical settings. In this review, emerging data related to oral SERDs and other novel ETs in managing HR+/HER2- BC are presented. Major challenges and future perspectives related to the optimal sequence of therapeutic options and the molecular landscape of endocrine resistance are also provided., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CCo, has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. CDA is a consultant and/or advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. GB is a consultant and/or advisory board member for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, EISAI, Eli Lilly, Genomic Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Neopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. LM reports speaker/consultant honoraria by Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly. Research Grant from Novartis and Pfizer. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. MG reports honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Amgen, and Eisai. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. EH reports institutional research funding from OncoMed, Genentech/Roche, Zymeworks, Rgenix, ArQule, Clovis, Silverback Therapeutics, Millenium, Acerta Pharma, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Torque, Black Diamond, Karyopharm, Infnity Pharmaceuticals, Curis, Syndax, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Immunomedics, FujiFilm, Taiho, Deciphera, Fochon, Molecular Templates, Onconova Therapeutics, Hutchinson MediPharma, MedImmune, SeaGen, Puma Biotechnology, Compugen, TapImmune, Lilly, Pfzer, H3 Biomedicine, Takeda, Merus, Regeneron, Arvinas, StemCentRx, Verastem, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, CytomX, InventisBio, Lycera, Mersana, Radius Health, AbbVie, Nucana, Leap Therapeutics, Zenith Epigenetics, Harpoon, Orinove, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Macrogenics, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, Syros, Sutro, G1 Therapeutics, Merck, PharmaMar, Olema, Polyphor, Immunogen, Plexxicon, Amgen, Akesobio Australia, and Shattuck Labs; consultancy/advisory roles with Genentech/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Dantari, Eli Lilly, Merck, Puma, Silverback Therapeutics, CytomX, Pfzer, Mersana, Black Diamond, H3 Biomedicine, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Arvinas, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, and Seattle Genetics. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. RJ receives research funding from Pfizer and Lilly and is a consultant for Carrick Therapeutics and Luminex. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. KJ reports fees for consulting or advisory role for Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Jounce Therapeutics, Synthon, Intellisphere, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, AbbVie, Lilly, BluePrint Medicines, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Biotheranostics, SunPharma Pvt Ltd, Taiho Oncology, Sanofi. Research Funding from Novartis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Debiopharm Group (Inst), ADC Therapeutics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novita Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Zymeworks (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), VelosBio/Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Travel, Accommodations, travel expenses from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Jounce Therapeutics, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Intellisphere. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. GC reports personal fees for consulting, advisory role and speakers’ bureau from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Samsung and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Ellipses Pharma and fees for travel and accommodations from Roche/Genentech and Pfizer. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. CCr reports personal fees for consulting, advisory role and speakers’ bureau from Lilly, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Seagen, Gilead and Pfizer. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)