Search

Background/Objective: Central venous pressure (CVP) serves as a surrogate for right atrial pressure, and thus could potentially predict a wider range of heart failure conditions. The purpose of this work is to assess CVP, through an implantable sensor incorporated with a novel anchor design, in the inferior and superior vena cava of an animal model. Methods: Two animals (Dorset sheep) were implanted with sensors at 3 different locations: inferior vena cava (IVC), superior vena cava (SVC), and pulmonary artery (PA). Two sensors with distinct anchor designs considering anatomical requirements were used. A standard PA sensor (trade name Cordella) was deployed in the PA and SVC, whereas a sensor with a modified cylindrical anchor with various struts was designed to reside in the IVC. Each implant was calibrated against a Millar catheter reference sensor. The ability of the central venous sensors to detect changes in pressure was evaluated by modifying the fluid volume of the animal. Results: The sensors implanted in both sheep were successful, which provided an opportunity to understand the relationship between PA and CVP via simultaneous readings. The mapping and implantation in the IVC took less than 15 minutes. Multiple readings were taken at each implant location using a hand-held reader device under various conditions. CVP recorded in the IVC (6.49 mm Hg) and SVC (6.14 mm Hg) were nearly the same. PA pressure (13–14 mm Hg) measured was higher than CVP, as expected. The SVC waveforms showed clear beats and respiration. Respiration could be seen in the IVC waveforms, but not all beats were easily distinguishable. Both SVC and IVC readings showed increases in pressure (3.7 and 2.7 mm Hg for SVC and IVC, respectively) after fluid overload was induced via extra saline administration. Conclusion: In this work, the feasibility of measuring CVP noninvasively was demonstrated. The established ability of wireless PA pressure sensors to enable prevention of decompensation events weeks ahead can now be explored using central venous versions of such sensors.

Background/Objective: In recent years, treatment of heart failure patients has proved to benefit from implantation of pressure sensors in the pulmonary artery (PA). While longitudinal measurement of PA pressure profoundly improves a clinician’s ability to manage HF, the full potential of central venous pressure as a clinical tool has yet to be unlocked. Central venous pressure serves as a surrogate for the right atrial pressure, and thus could potentially predict a wider range of heart failure conditions. However, it is unclear if current sensor anchoring methods, designed for the PA, are suitable to hold pressure sensors safely in the inferior vena cava. The purpose of this study was to design an anchoring system for accurate apposition in inferior vena cava and evaluate whether it is a potential site for central venous pressure measurement. Materials and Methods: A location inferior to the renal veins was selected as an optimal site based on a CT scan analysis. Three anchor designs, a 10-strut anchor, and 5-struts with and without loops, were tested on a custom-made silicone bench model of Vena Cava targeting the infra-renal vena cava. The model was connected to a pulsatile pump system and a heated water bath that constituted an in-vitro simulation unit. Delivery of the inferior vena cava implant was accomplished using a preloaded introducer and a dilator as a push rod to deploy the device at the target area. The anchors were subjected to manual compression tests to evaluate their stability against dislodgement. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis was completed to characterize blood flow in the anchor’s environment using pressure-based transient solver. Any potential recirculation zones or disturbances in the blood flow caused by the struts were identified. Results: We demonstrated successful anchorage and deployment of the 10-strut anchor in the Vena Cava bench model. The 10-strut anchor remained stable during several compression attempts as compared with the other two 5-strut anchor designs. The 10-strut design provided the maximum number of contact points with the vessel in a circular layout and was less susceptible to movement or dislodgement during compression tests. Furthermore, the CFD simulation provided haemodynamic analysis of the optimum 10-strut anchor design. Conclusions: This study successfully demonstrated the design and deployment of an inferior vena cava anchoring system in a bench test model. The 10-strut anchor is an optimal design as compared with the two other 5-strut designs; however, substantial in-vivo experiments are required to validate the safety and accuracy of such implants. The CFD simulation enabled better understanding of the haemodynamic parameters and any disturbances in the blood flow due to the presence of the anchor. The ability to place a sensor technology in the vena cava could provide a simple and minimally invasive approach for heart failure patients.