The involvement of morphine-like alkaloids in alcoholism has been extensively studied ever since the formation of dopamine-derived alkaloids, SAL (1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dihydroxy-isoquinolines) and tetrahydropapaveroline (THP), was observed in vitro after rat brain homogenate was treated with ethanol or acetaldehyde (Davis and Walsh, 1970; Yamanaka et al., 1970). Subsequent identification of increased in vivo production of SAL in parkinsonian patients on L-DOPA treatment after ethanol ingestion (Sandler et al., 1973) further prompted studies of SAL as a potential biomarker for alcoholism. SAL is formed from dopamine (DA) either by nonenzymatic Pictet-Spengler condensation with acetaldehyde, a metabolite of ethanol, yielding racemic (R/S)-SAL, or with pyruvic acid followed by enzymatic decarboxylation and reduction, producing (R)-SAL. It has been also reported that enantio-selective (R)-SAL can be synthesized from DA and acetaldehyde by (R)-SAL synthase in human brain (Naoi et al., 1996). (R/S)-SAL is present in urine, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid and postmortem brains of both alcoholics and nonalcoholics (Haber et al., 1996; Sjoquist et al., 1982). The SAL is also contained in alcoholic beverages and variety of foods such as cheese, banana, beef, and milk (Duncan et al., 1984; Riggin et al., 1976). Attempts to correlate the SAL levels in biological fluids and brain tissues to ethanol intake or to alcohol addiction behavior have been reported even though the results are controversial. Acute ethanol ingestion by nonalcoholics showed unchanged, decreased, or increased SAL levels in human biological fluids (Adachi et al., 1986; Haber et al., 1996; Sjoquist et al., 1985). A role of SAL in alcohol addiction has been suggested, as SAL infusion into rat brain ventricles promoted alcohol consumption or self-administration (Duncan and Deitrich, 1980; Melchior and Myers, 1977; Rodd et al., 2003). The SAL concentrations in plasma and urine were shown to be elevated in chronic alcoholics in comparison to nonalcoholics (Collins et al., 1979; Faraj et al., 1989; Sjoquist et al., 1981), supporting SAL as a potential clinical marker for alcohol addiction. However, others reported that SAL levels in urine (Feest et al., 1991; Musshoff et al., 1997) or in the postmortem brains (Musshoff et al., 2005; Sjoquist et al., 1983) were not different between alcoholics and controls. These controversial results prompted further studies to evaluate possible stereoselective contributions of SAL to alcoholism. Advances in analytical methods for the enantiomeric determination of SAL isomers have proved changes in R/S ratio in the brain regions of alcohol-preferring (P) rats after ethanol consumption (Haber et al., 1999; Rojkovicova et al., 2008). However, enantiomeric distribution of SAL isomers was neither changed in human urine and plasma by acute alcohol ingestion (Haber et al., 1996) nor different in postmortem brains between alcoholics and controls (Musshoff et al., 2005). The variability in the reported levels of SAL in healthy subjects and conflicting results on the influence of ethanol on SAL levels and enantiomeric distribution might be partly due to analytical problems and experimental variables including dietary conditions and genetic factors. In this study, we examined the effect of SAL-containing foods, ethanol or genetic predisposition to high alcohol drinking on the levels of SAL enantiomers and DA in humans and rats using a newly developed method (Lee et al., 2007).